Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-R-28Resolution No', 900 FO~, "= ~P) Comprehensive Fiscal Plan and Annexation Time Line- 2005 II· I I . . II Whereas, the collective membership, both Democrat and Republican, of the Jeffersonville City Council share a common goal. The collective common goal is to take those actions necessary to ensure that the taxpayers and citizens of Jeffersonville are best served by government. Whereas, the Jeffersonville City Council believes that the mayor and all other elected officials share in that same goal. Whereas, at this time the Council has raised the issue of whether or not annexation of properties contiguous might serve this common goal. Whereas, in order to determine whether annexation is fiscally sound and in the best interest of both the existing citizens and the potential new citizens it is necessary that an economical, professional, non-partisan, fair and balanced comprehensive fiscal plan be prepared. Annexation without such a plan would not serve the best interest of the taxpayers or citizens. Whereas, public discourse has been raised implying that the motives' for annexation are political in nature and tone. Whereas, the councils' interest in annexation .is not politically motivated. However, it is important for the maintenance of the integrity of the process to .ensure Page. 1 of 4 the public that mechanisms are in place to assure that any actions taken by the' Council ,. · are timely, orderly and with just cause. Whereas, the council recognizes that annexation will effect not only those annexed but the existing taxpaying residents of the city.' The council believes that any decision regarding annexation should weigh greatest in favor of the existing taxpayers and citizens of Jeffersonviile. The decision to annex should only be undertaken if there .... is clear and. convincing evidence that the existing taxpayers will benefit from this decision. Be It Resolved That' o The Council requests the Mayor of Jeffersonville contract with and employ e cost effective, professional, non-partisan financial consultant with documented experience in the preparation of an annexation fiscal plan in the State of Indiana which have withstood successfully the challenge of remonstrance or other legal challenges in Indiana within thirty (30) days of passage of this resolution. 2. The Council believes that it is prudent to forgo any actions upon annexation until the completion and adoption of the comprehensive plan; provided the plan is completed within 18 months of passage of this resolution. 3. The Council believes the issue of annexation should be studied concurrently' with the comprehensive plan update in order to complement the completion of both tasks. Page 2 of 4 4'. The Council agrees in consideration of the Mayor contracting and employing a financial consultant to prepare an annexation fiscal plan that itWill not introduce nor consider an annexation ordinance until ihe completion and adoption of the comprehensive plan or before March 1, 2007, whichever occurs first. 5. The Council further agrees that it will not attempt to amend and/or modify this resolution unless the Mayor concurs. So Resolved this . \ ~~'~ day of August, 2005. Ron Grooms, President Con Perkins, Member Ke~ Fetz, Memb. er ~ ~,Barbara Wilso~n,. ~-~Member. Phil 'MCCauley' Mer~er Ea ZastawnY, M~ber t~d by: Peggy Wii~ Jeffem~~~lerk Treasurer Ack ~ -' (,~age.~ of 4