Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJune 16, 2025 Council Minutes COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA June 16, 2025 Regular Meeting Minutes The Common Council of the City of Jeffersonville, Indiana met for the Regular Meeting on June 16, 2025. Council President Stoner, along with City Clerk Gill called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.The meeting was open to the public in person as well as live streamed via the City Website using Zoom. INVOCATION: Council Vice President Burns led the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: The roll call was conducted by City Clerk Lisa Gill and present in Council Chambers were Council President Stoner, Council Vice President Burns, Councilperson Semones, Councilperson White, Councilperson Webb, Councilperson Snelling, Councilperson Anderson, and Councilperson Hawkins. 8 Council Members were present in Council Chambers while Councilperson Reed attended via zoom. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Councilperson Semones made a motion to Approve the Minutes for Regular Meeting on June 2,2025, seconded by Council Vice President Burns; City Clerk Lisa Gill conducted a roll call vote, Councilperson White-Aye Council Vice President Burns-Aye Councilperson Semones-Aye Councilperson Anderson-Aye Council President Stoner-Aye Councilperson Reed-Aye Councilperson Webb- Aye Councilperson Hawkins-Aye Councilperson Snelling-Aye Motion passed, 9-0. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Council Vice President Burns made a motion to approve the Agenda, seconded by Councilperson Semones; City Clerk Lisa Gill conducted a roll call vote- Councilperson White-Aye Council Vice President Burns-Aye Councilperson Semones-Aye Councilperson Anderson- Aye Council President Stoner-Aye Councilperson Reed-Aye Councilperson Webb-Aye Councilperson Hawkins-Aye Councilperson Snelling-Aye 4 Motion passed 9-0. I CLAIMS TO APPROVE: Civil City$ 1,032,118.80 Council Vice President Burns made a motion to approve the Civil City Claims, seconded by Councilperson Snelling; City Clerk Lisa Gill conducted a roll call vote- Councilperson White-Aye Council Vice President Burns-Aye Councilperson Semones-Aye Councilperson Anderson-Aye Council President Stoner-Aye Councilperson Reed-Aye Councilperson Webb-Aye Councilperson Hawkins-Aye Councilperson Snelling-Aye Motion passed 9-0. Parks$ 128,987.92 Councilperson Anderson made a motion to approve the Parks Claims, seconded by Councilperson Semones; City Clerk Lisa Gill conducted a roll call vote- Councilperson White-Aye Council Vice President Burns-Aye Councilperson Semones-Aye Councilperson Anderson-Aye Council President Stoner-Aye Councilperson Reed-Aye Councilperson Webb-Aye Councilperson Hawkins-Aye Councilperson Snelling-Aye Motion passed, 9-0. REPORT OF THE CLERK: None. REPORT OF THE YOUTH ADVISOR: Still in the process of selecting a new Youth Advisor. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Heather Metcalf 2025-OR-26 Ordinance (PUBLIC HEARING)of Additional Appropriation Heather Metcalf stated- "As presented in the previous meeting, this is for three different things. The First one is for the River Stage for professional services.They've received a donation from the UEZ for a night market.The second one is for vehicle maintenance. This is due to the hail damage, this is the check that we've received from Travelers for our Insurance. This would be able to be re-appropriated so that they can pay the vendor for some vehicles. The third one is appropriating cash that's already in the Fund for the local law enforcement continuing Ed Fund. These are all new monies that were recently received." Heather stated she had no changes from the last meeting. Council President Stoner opens a public hearing for anyone for or against the Ordinance. There are no speakers or comments, public hearing closed. Motion to approve on the Second and Third Reading by Council Vice President Burns, Seconded by Councilperson Semones; City Clerk Lisa Gill conducted a roll call vote- Councilperson White-Aye Council Vice President Burns-Aye Councilperson Semones-Aye Councilperson Anderson-Aye Council President Stoner-Aye Councilperson Reed-Aye Councilperson Webb-Aye Councilperson Hawkins-Aye Councilperson Snelling-Aye Motion passed, 9-0. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Public Comment: None. 2. Kim Calabro 2025-OR-27 Ordinance Amending 2024-OR-58 and Fixing the Salaries of Appointed Officers and Employees for All Departments of City Christine Geiser, HR manager, greeted the council members stating she was representing Human Resource Director Kim Calabro, who was unable to attend due to bereavement, with a proposal to amend 2024-OR-58. This amendment would fix salaries of appointed officers and employees for all the departments of the City of Jeffersonville.The amendment request aims to align and adjust positions and corresponding salaries for certain civilian positions based on department organizational needs (see attachment for proposed changes). They affect the Parks and Recreation, Vehicle Maintenance and Wastewater departments. She refers again to the attachment for a quick summary that shows • Parks and Recreation department is looking at consolidating the duties of two open green space crew leader positions, the crew leader mowing, which was noted to already be vacant and the crew leader landscaping, into a single crew leader position. As a result of eliminating the crew leader landscaping position, the department proposes adding one additional green space general labor position. The vacant crew leader position parks and facility maintenance that is on the salary ordinance will be eliminated with the manager of park maintenance absorbing those responsibilities.This change would allow for the addition of an additional general labor position for the parks facility division. This will ultimately add two general labor positions at a lesser budgeted salary rate than two existing crew leader positions. (refer to attachment on page 3) • Vehicle maintenance is looking at absorbing the duties of the currently unfilled auto body repair shop position into the existing diesel mechanic roles. In addition to the current diesel mechanics position, it will be reclassified as diesel mechanics heavy duty to better reflect their responsibilities. Although these reclassifications result in a higher pay grade, the cost is offset by limiting the auto body repair position. ( refer to attachment on page 5) • Wastewater is eliminating the collection system sewer line locator position in order to add a collection systems operation and maintenance tech position. They're also removing the lab tech position to more appropriately defined departmental needs, resulting in the addition of a laboratory and plant operator technician position. The Sanitary Sewer Board presented and approved these proposed changes at their May 23rd, 2025 meeting. ( refer to attachment on page 6) Christine Geiser stated "So in essence, these modifications are necessary to maintain a competitive or recruitment efforts, support fair and equitable pay adjustments related to the transition of titles and reclassifications and ensure that we're able to attract and retain positions for these critical functions. These proposed adjustments, as I mentioned, have been reviewed with the department's directors in collaboration with the controller and fall within the budgeted parameter. Any proposed changes that are on this revision will be absorbed through vacancy savings, reallocation, or other relevant budget adjustments. So in conclusion I respectfully recommend approval of the ordinance amendment as presented, and I do request that it be approved in all three readings tonight, if possible, per the request of our department directors, that will support the timely hiring and replacement of their open positions within their departments." Christine Geiser ended with opening the floor for questions for herself or the directors of the specific departments. Council President Stoner asked to hear from the directors, which Christine Geiser offered for Paul Northern, Director of Parks and recreation to step to the podium and speak. Which Paul begin with stating that "with five Mondays in the month of June it was going to push us out another week before we can hire if we ask for it to be voted on in two different meetings, so that's why I'm asking for a vote on all three readings so we can expedite the process and get someone hired as soon as possible. The green space and maintenance are both shorthanded and we'd love to get these people in as soon as possible." He ended by opening the floor back up to questions from the council. Council President Stoner asked "which two positions were going to be assumed by the parks maintenance director or the parks maintenance manager?" Paul answered by stating that it "was just one in green space and one in maintenance and the one in the maintenance position was a crew leader, so we will still have a manager and a skilled labor position. In the green space division we had two separate crew leaders, we had a mowing and landscape crew leader. Which one of them resigned and we're eliminating that job and turning it into a general labor and the one crew leader that is left will absorb the duties." Council President Stoner- "And you're getting two general labors? Paul- "Absolutely" Council President Stoner- "That's good' Paul- "At a lesser rate obviously" At this time Councilperson White spoke up with a question- "Did the mayor withdraw his executive order on no hiring?" which City Clerk Lisa Gill responded to councilperson White's question followed by Paul explaining more. City Clerk Lisa Gill- "No" Paul- "No, this is to replace an existing employee, we were told that if it was a new employee that was on a freeze, but any job to replace an existing employee is approved." Which in turn Councilperson White confirmed he understood and Council President Stoner continued with more questions. Council President Stoner- "And you said that these were passed by the board of Public Works?" Which Paul confirmed and Christine backing this. Paul- "Yes" I Christine- "Yes" Council Vice President Burns spoke up with a question- "I just have one question for Lynn" which in turn Lynn, Director of Wastewater stepped to the podium to be addressed. Council Vice President Burns- "The locator collection system, sewer lines being eliminated, will the technicians do that then?" Lynn- "The technicians are doing that as we speak, that way the supervisor could delegate to any one of those lab positions and the can do all the work." Council Vice President Burns- "Okay that's what I assumed but I was just curious" Council President Stoner thanked Paul and addressed Mike who is the director of vehicle maintenance leading him to step to the podium. Council President Stoner- "Mike how does that deleting the mechanic auto body repair and adding a diesel mechanic, how does that affect you?" Mike- "Currently we four positions that are identified as a job description of a diesel mechanic but two of those four, it's not true as far as their skillset as far as what they do on their day-to-day operation, so that's why we feel that we should change that position and reflect the jobs that they entail, which is heavy duty mechanic, and that going from a pay grade three to a pay grade five, and then of course that being absorbed and not replacing the position of the auto body/diesel mechanic that we had. Councilperson Hawkins- "so with that auto body part of that were we just unable to keep that filled?" Mike- "So the person that was in that position switched over to the vacant diesel mechanic position to get out of auto body altogether so we were able to absorb that a little internally." Once all questions were asked, the council showed favor in suspending the rules. Council Vice President Burns made a motion to suspend the rules to allow all three readings that night, seconded by Councilperson Semones; City Clerk Lisa Gill conducted a roll call vote- Councilperson White-Aye Council Vice President Burns-Aye Councilperson Semones-Aye Councilperson Anderson-Aye Council President Stoner-Aye Councilperson Reed-Aye Councilperson Webb-Aye Councilperson Hawkins-Aye Councilperson Snelling-Aye Motion passed, 9-0. Councilperson Semones made a motion to pass 2025-OR-27 on the first, second and third readings, Seconded by Council Vice President Burns; City Clerk Lisa Gill conducted a roll call vote- Councilperson White-Aye Council Vice President Burns-Aye Councilperson Semones-Aye Councilperson Anderson-Aye Council President Stoner-Aye Councilperson Reed-Aye Councilperson Webb-Aye Councilperson Hawkins-Aye Councilperson Snelling-Aye Motion passed, 9-0. 3. Chief Kavanaugh/Les Merkley 2025-R-08 Resolution Approving the MOU Between GCCS Corporation and Jeffersonville for School Resource Officers Assistant Chief McVoy greeted the council stating that he was standing in for Chief Kavanaugh, who was delayed due to an unexpected visit by US Representative Houchin to the police station. He introduced the MOU with Greater Clark County Schools (GCCS) to place an additional School Resource Officer(SRO) at forthcoming Pike Elementary School. GCCS will pay the officer's full annual salary of $66,000, bringing the total annual agreement to approximately$225,294.40, distributed quarterly in the amount of$56,323.60. The City will cover insurance and related expenses. An SRO vehicle is already available. This addition increases the authorized sworn officer count from 92 to 93, requiring salary ordinance adjustments if approved. Council Discussion—Equity & Funding Concerns • Mrs. Reed and other members stressed the importance of equitable SRO placement across Jeffersonville schools. o Noted that older schools like Utica, Riverside, and North Haven (each with over 500 students) currently lack coverage, whereas new schools get priority. o Confirmed ongoing negotiations to possibly share an SRO between Utica and Riverside, though North Haven remained unaddressed. • Funding queries revealed GCCS currently pays$39,000 per quarter for four SROs; with this addition, the cost rises to $56,000 per quarter for five SROs. • Members raised concerns about the City's budget constraints (citing a $21.75 million deficit) and asked for a renegotiation of funding terms, suggesting GCCS pay full costs for additional officers. • Assistant Chief offered support for a council-led committee to engage GCCS directly. Formation of Review Committee • Council President Stoner asked Ms. Reed and Mr. Webb to lead a committee to confer with GCCS and the Police Department on equitable placement and financial terms. Council Interest Levels • Members agreed that every Jeffersonville school should have an SRO, emphasizing safety (active shooter, medical emergencies, disciplinary issues, unruly visitors). • Estimates: o Full SRO staffing would require 8-9 officers—one per elementary school, plus possibly two at Jeffersonville High School (for C.O.R.T. and Porter programs). o Estimated costs for three additional officers could total nearly$1 million annually. Financial Strategy& Negotiations • Council members proposed presenting GCCS with a "best offer" and anticipating negotiations to reach a fair cost-sharing agreement. • Emphasis was placed on balancing student safety with fiscal responsibility and equitable treatment across all schools. Councilperson Semones made a motion to pass 2025-R-08, seconded by Councilperson Webb; Clerk City Clerk Lisa Gill conducted a roll call vote- Councilperson White-Aye Council Vice President Burns- No Councilperson Semones-Aye Councilperson Anderson- No Council President Stoner- No Councilperson Reed- No Councilperson Webb- No Councilperson Hawkins-Abstain Councilperson Snelling- Aye Motion failed 3-5-1, Councilmember Hawkins abstained from the vote due to a potential conflict of interest involving their employment. 4. Assistant Chief McVoy/Heather Metcalf 2025-OR-28 Ordinance of Additional Appropriation Assistant Chief of Police Scott McVoy presented Ordinance 2025-OR-28, requesting an additional appropriation of$80,000 to the vehicle maintenance line of the Police Department budget to carry them through the remainder of the fiscal year. He explained that based on current expenditures, the department's vehicle maintenance fund is expected to be exhausted by late June or mid-July. He noted this trend has worsened in recent years, with additional appropriation requests occurring earlier each year due to the rising costs of labor and parts, coupled with the department managing the largest fleet in the city. Police vehicles are used heavily—many around the clock—and common wear and tear items like tires and mechanical equipment break down more frequently during extreme seasons. The Assistant Chief further emphasized: • The department has operated with the same base maintenance budget for several years, despite increasing costs. • Unexpected but common expenses like catalytic converters and transmissions can cost thousands per vehicle. • The requested $80,000 should cover anticipated repairs through the end of the year, with any unused funds reverting to the general fund. A council member asked for clarification on the billing process, specifically whether this was the situation where Vehicle Maintenance completes work and then invoices the Police Department.The Assistant Chief clarified: • Vehicle Maintenance arranges the work and is invoiced by the vendors directly. • The funds are transferred from the vehicle maintenance budget to the Police Department so they can handle payments to vendors, rather than Vehicle Maintenance paying them directly. Following discussion, Councilperson Snelling made a motion to approve Ordinance 2025-OR-28 on the first reading. The motion was seconded by Councilperson Simons; City Clerk Lisa Gill conducted a roll call vote- Councilperson White-Aye Council Vice President Burns-Aye Councilperson Semones-Aye Councilperson Anderson-Aye Council President Stoner-Aye Councilperson Reed-Aye Councilperson Webb-Aye Councilperson Hawkins-Aye Councilperson Snelling-Aye Motion passed, 9-0. 5. Larry Wilder 2025-OR-29 Ordinance Rescinding Ordinances 2025-OR-12 and 2025-OR-13 Regarding Fire Territory Attorney Larry Wilder addressed the council concerning Ordinances 2025-OR-12 and 2025-OR-13, which relate to the establishment of a fire protection territory. At the request of President Stoner, Wilder reviewed the relevant statutes, the inter-local agreement, and applicable legal frameworks to determine whether there is a path for the council to rescind these ordinances. Mr. Wilder explained that his role was strictly legal analysis without advocacy for any party. He methodically examined whether a fire protection territory currently exists, finding that: • No fire protection territory currently exists. • There is no joint executive board or board of directors for such a territory. • The Department of Local Government Finance has not reviewed or approved a tax rate for the territory. • The Utica Fire Protection District still exists independently, retains its equipment, and collects tax revenues. • No budget has been approved to fund a fire territory. Based on these findings, Mr. Wilder concluded that since no territory exists, there is no territory from which to withdraw, and therefore, the council can legally vote to rescind the ordinances without acting improperly. He also noted that if the legal advice was incorrect, potential damages or liabilities would be minimal or nonexistent. He affirmed that rescinding the ordinances would be a legitimate legal action. Council President Stoner thanked him and opened the floor to questions from the council. A question was raised regarding whether there are any damages caused by the ordinance, with the response clarifying that no damages currently exist. It was explained that fire service is still being provided by the township board that collects taxes and maintains equipment, and this would continue even if the ordinance was rescinded or resent.Therefore, there is no irreparable harm to the fire service provision. The ordinance under discussion rescinds the fire territory ordinance, which created the taxing district and equipment replacement fund, but there is currently no money in that fund, and no property or title has been transferred to the fire territory. The inter-local agreement with Jefferson Fire 1 4 Department to provide fire services until the end of the year remains in effect regardless of the ordinance status. It was noted that if the ordinance is rescinded, it does not affect the ongoing fire service agreement or the statutory timetable for withdrawal, which runs through March 31 of the following year. Legal considerations around potential injunctions were discussed, with emphasis on the requirement for irreparable harm to be shown, which was not evident in this case.The council was reminded that if any party chooses to sue, the matter would be resolved by the courts. A council member acknowledged the efforts of various individuals who supported the fire territory and emphasized that the issue should not be taken personally.The member expressed support for the fire territory as a plan to stabilize EMS services in Jeffersonville.The initial plan was intended to bolster and expand fire coverage in the East end, including renovating the Crestview station as previously discussed by Ms. Reed. There was uncertainty whether the state would intervene to significantly change the plan; initially, it was deemed unlikely by Mr. Wilder. The current plan under consideration is notably different from the original plan that was supported and voted on. Deputy Chief Sharp described it as a "shell of the original plan." Concerns were expressed about division and disagreement stemming from this situation. Despite the noble intentions of Mr. White and the team to address a critical issue, professionals involved in the process have indicated that the current plan is not feasible and may be unaffordable operationally. A legal basis to rescind the plan was presented by Mr. Wilder, and a call was made to vote to rescind rather than proceed with the plan as it stands. Some council members expressed frustration at continued delays and emphasized the growing needs of the eastern part of the city due to population growth and new schools. The risk of tragedy occurring due to inaction was highlighted, with a warning against being responsible for failing to address the issue. Councilperson White provided an overview regarding the statutory creation and operation of fire territories under Indiana Code 36-8-19-13. It was emphasized that fire territories are strictly governed by state statute, not by opinion, and that all council members were provided with the relevant legal documentation for reference. The process for withdrawal from a fire territory was outlined, noting that such action can only occur between January 1 and April 1 of any given year through the adoption of an ordinance. The council member then presented updated financial estimates from Baker Tilly, including proposed property tax rates and levies. Two scenarios were discussed: • Generating approximately$17,037,300 at the 40-cent tax cap rate with no equipment replacement fund. • Allocating funds between the operating and equipment replacement funds while maintaining the same overall cap, resulting in $15.6 million for operations and $1.4 million for equipment replacement. A draft of the 2026 budget was reviewed and prepared in collaboration with Fire Department leadership, projecting $17,008,156 to fund nine new firefighter positions at the Utica Station—staying within the estimated revenue limits. Councilperson White stated that unnecessary expenditures were removed from the budget and further reductions are possible. It was clarified that the budget excludes ambulance service operations. The council member emphasized the longstanding need for additional fire resources in the eastern part of the city, which this proposal addresses. They noted that funding operations solely through tax dollars ensures sustainability, unlike uncertain support from entities like River Ridge, which has historically declined to cover operational expenses. This proposal would: • Establish an additional company in the eastern area. • Free up approximately $4 million in the city's general fund. • Prepare the city for anticipated increases in Local Income Tax(LIT) revenue in 2027. Councilperson White expressed confidence that if future budgets reveal insufficient revenue, the council can vote to dissolve the territory next year, restoring levies to normal in 2027. The Department of Local Government Finance (DLGF) will only modify, not reject, the city's budget unless statutory procedures were not properly followed, which, according to the council member, they were. Councilperson White concluded by recommending the ordinance to withdraw from the fire territory be voted down. He suggested gathering further information if necessary but reaffirmed the fire territory was properly established under state law. Council President Stoner asked Mr. Wilder for his legal assessment of what Councilperson White had just presented and discussed. Mr. Wilder expressed his belief that the ordinance establishing the Fire Territory remains on solid legal ground, noting that he crafted it based on the council's direction. However, some council members expressed being conflicted, pointing out that the situation has evolved significantly due to Senate Bill 1, leaving them uncertain about how to proceed. Several members stated that what is currently being proposed does not reflect the original plan they agreed to, and frustration was voiced over the extensive time, money, and resources spent on outside consultants like Baker Tilly, without seeing a direct benefit to the city. The budget itself raised significant concerns. Deputy Chief Sharp and Anne Langley were involved in creating the proposed financial plan, but neither formally endorsed it, avoiding conflict with their positions under the mayor's administration. The renovation of the Utica fire station will be covered by the Fire Protection District, not city funds, while the new River Ridge station is not included in this budget, as previous versions only allowed for staffing, not construction. Financial projections revealed a likely shortfall, with the most recent estimate showing $18.7 million in revenue compared to the $20.7 million needed for full operation with both the Utica and River Ridge stations. Despite these concerns, some council members recognized the significant efforts of the Fire Department, particularly Deputy Chief Sharp, in developing this plan. They highlighted that the intention behind the territory was to stabilize EMS services and improve fire protection coverage in the East End. Others argued that although the numbers have changed, the territory still offers a net benefit to public safety and provides relief to the city's general fund, especially given the fiscal constraints imposed by SB1. The legal discussion clarified that the council's previous approval of 2025-OR-12 and the signed inter-local agreement effectively created the Fire Territory, though full implementation is ongoing. Questions were raised about what would happen if the territory were dissolved after formation. Legal counsel confirmed that state statutes outline the process for dissolution and asset division, providing a legal pathway if the city chooses to withdraw. Looking ahead, the hiring of nine firefighters is projected to occur over a three-to-five-year period, contingent upon the final budget figures certified by the Department of Local Government Finance I (DLGF). The council stressed that no binding commitments should be made until those certified numbers are received, which likely will not occur until early 2025. Several members expressed that if the revenue proves insufficient, they would support dissolving the territory at the earliest opportunity.There was broad recognition of the legal commitments already made, along with the potential benefits to public safety, but concerns about financial feasibility, transparency, and the evolving nature of the plan continue to cause hesitation. Joe Jarles, Utica Township Fire Protection District President, was invited to the podium to speak and give more clarification on the outline from Baker Tilly and how the break-up would look. Mr.Jarles explained that Baker Tilly provided financial estimates regarding the potential dissolution of the Fire Territory. If the city and Utica withdraw from the territory, roughly$18.7 million would be divided between the two, with Jeffersonville receiving approximately$17.8 million and Utica receiving around $889,000. These figures are based on statutory dissolution guidelines. However, concerns remain about the accuracy of the financial projections, particularly in light of Senate Bill 1, which has created uncertainty around future revenue. Baker Tilly reportedly acknowledged that the $18.7 million estimate might not be reliable, suggesting they were essentially making conservative guesses due to the unknown impact of SB1. During discussions, a council member questioned whether forming the territory, collecting funds, and later dissolving it would mean only Jeffersonville and Utica get money returned, even though the funds originate from a broader pool. No clear answer was provided, but the legal language indicates the funds are pro-rated between Jeffersonville and Utica upon dissolution. In addition to the $18.7 million, forming the territory would also free up money in the city's general fund, estimated to be between $3.5 and $4 million, compared to previous projections of$4.8 million before SB1. It was also noted that by 2027, the city expects to receive $2 million more in local income tax revenue. Despite these financial possibilities, uncertainty persists, and both council members and financial advisors remain cautious about long-term projections and the implications of the territory's creation or dissolution. The council continued discussions regarding the projected budget impact of forming and later potentially dissolving the fire territory. Baker Tilly had raised concerns about the financial assumptions, particularly regarding the estimated $4 to $4.8 million that could be "freed up" for the general fund if the fire territory were created. Heather clarified that the $4 million estimate may be overstated, largely due to circuit breaker impacts, which have increased significantly, reducing the revenue that can actually be recovered. It was also noted that some expenses, such as insurance costs, originally thought to be removed from the general fund and absorbed by the fire territory, would still need to be paid regardless of how the funds were shifted. The discussion revealed confusion about whether health insurance was properly accounted for in Baker Tilly's calculations, with debate over whether insurance was included in the original fire territory rate projection. Heather Metcalf, Director of Finance, explained that based on her understanding, health insurance for fire personnel was included in the original fire territory plan, but not in the new budget proposal, which instead keeps those costs within the HR department and general fund. Council members raised concerns that the general fund, already strained and facing reductions from Senate Bill 1, would be further impacted if those health insurance expenses stayed there.There was also acknowledgment of lingering uncertainty surrounding the true financial benefit of forming the fire territory and whether the general fund would genuinely see relief or if much of the savings would be 4 offset by other required expenses. Council members and staff agreed the situation remains complex, with conflicting estimates and variables still unresolved. The council continued discussions on the fire territory, the financial impacts of Senate Bill 1, and concerns regarding tax increases for residents. One council member explained their reluctance to support the fire territory now that Senate Bill 1 changed the financial outlook, expressing they could not support raising taxes for their district if the benefits no longer applied directly to them. They emphasized that the original fire territory proposal promised new stations and better EMS service, but Senate Bill 1 and shifting budget projections altered those assurances. Council President Stoner reminded members that opportunities had been provided to consult directly with Baker Tilly for clarification. He also pointed out that even the fire administration had requested reconsideration of the fire territory plan. Council President Stoner made a motion to suspend the rules to allow all three readings that night, seconded by Councilperson Anderson; City Clerk Lisa Gill conducted a roll call vote- Councilperson White- No Council Vice President Burns- No Councilperson Semones- No Councilperson Anderson-Aye Council President Stoner-Aye Councilperson Reed-Aye Councilperson Webb-Aye Councilperson Hawkins- No Councilperson Snelling- No Motion failed 4-5 The council then discussed procedural requirements to potentially schedule a special meeting, noting that either the council president, mayor, or majority of council members could call such a meeting with at least 48 hours' notice. Attendance quorum and majority vote rules were reviewed, including the option for remote attendance via Zoom. Council President Stoner made a motion to pass 2025-OR-29 on the first and second reading, Seconded by Councilperson Webb; City Clerk Lisa Gill conducted a roll call vote- Councilperson White- No Council Vice President Burns- No Councilperson Semones- No Councilperson Anderson-Aye Council President Stoner-Aye Councilperson Reed-Aye Councilperson Webb- Aye Councilperson Hawkins-Aye Councilperson Snelling- No Motion passed 5-4 After the vote was conducted Council President Stoner asked Mr.Jarles if he wanted to continue speaking or if he was finished. Mr.Jarles took this time to step back to the podium and began with I expressing disappointment in the wavering support for the fire territory agreement, particularly after the passage of Senate Bill 1. He emphasized that Utica has fully honored its commitments to Jeffersonville, including terminating its prior fire protection contract with New Chapel to enter into the inter-local agreement for a joint fire territory. He also went on to explained the personal and political battles he faced to uphold the agreement, including fighting opposition within his community, clashing with the school board, and even suing the commissioners to remain on the Utica board. He stressed that despite facing backlash and burning bridges, he remained committed to the partnership because he believed it was necessary for both Jeffersonville and Utica. He criticized the council for reconsidering the fire territory at the first sign of significant opposition and called for unity. He argued that this partnership was a "once in a lifetime opportunity" to improve fire service for both communities, specifically citing the underserved East End of Jeffersonville. Mr.Jarles outlined tangible benefits Utica has offered, including: • Renovating a firehouse in Eastern Jeffersonville for Jeffersonville's use • Donating three new fire trucks to the territory • Providing access to critical areas like River Ridge, the port, 1-265, and Utica He further explained that, financially, if the territory is dissolved, Utica could eventually survive independently by resetting their levy to $889,000 in 2026, but for now, both communities need each other to proceed. Without the fire territory, Utica cannot afford to properly staff or fund its fire protection services, even at a volunteer level. Mr.Jarles closed by urging the council to "stay in the fight" alongside Utica,just as he and his board have done, for the betterment of both communities. COMMITTEE REPORTS: None. ATTORNEY COMMENTS: Larry Wilder— No Comment. Les Merkley— No Comment. DEPARTMENT HEADS: None COUNCIL COMMENTS: Councilperson White- Encouraged his fellow council members to verify the information discussed by consulting directly with Greg Tilley and reviewing documentation, especially concerning the financial projections and budget assumptions tied to the fire territory. He expressed concern that the city's administration may have misrepresented or mishandled information related to the proposed $4.8 million in savings and the fire department's budget. White asserted that the leadership of the Jeffersonville Fire Department—specifically Deputy Chief Sharp—had, for the past decade, emphasized the need to close coverage gaps, particularly in the East End. He claimed the recent change in their position against the fire territory stems from pressure by the mayor rather than genuine operational concerns. 4 He criticized the administration for inflating the fire budget by including items that weren't initially planned, such as health insurance and other additions. This, he explained, led to backlash and ultimately influenced the creation of Senate Bill 1. He admitted he supported the budget at first and now feels misled, saying he has "egg on his face." White maintained that the fire territory would generate additional tax revenue, which could help offset the financial limitations caused by SB1. He mentioned two fire apparatus currently ordered that the city has no funding plan for—funding that could be realized through the fire territory. He advocated for: • Individual or group meetings with Baker Tilly to clarify financial details • Hiring an independent municipal advisor to assist with future city budgets • Obtaining all contracts between the administration and Baker Tilly for transparency • Scheduling any special council meetings around his absence from July 18-21 Overall, Councilman White emphasized fiscal responsibility, transparency, and staying committed to a plan that many—including fire department leadership—had long supported. Council Vice President Burns— He clarified the reason behind his "no" vote on the School Resource Officer(SRO) agreement. He emphasized that his vote was not against having a resource officer, but was based on financial concerns. The agreement would require the city to contribute $75,000, while the schools would pay $66,000, and he stated the city does not have $75,000 available—particularly given the uncertainty surrounding Senate Bill 1 and its financial impact. He acknowledged that there may be future changes to SB1, but pointed out that nothing has been finalized yet, making it risky to commit funds the city doesn't confidently have. He expressed agreement with returning to the negotiating table on the matter and showed support for the committee efforts led by Ms. Reed and Mr. Webb, stating he looks forward to receiving further updates from them. Councilperson Semones—She offered remarks reaching to the public, recognizing the significance of upcoming holidays —Juneteenth and Independence Day (4th of July) — both of which, she noted, celebrate freedom in America. She encouraged White Americans to take time to understand the historical importance of Juneteenth, emphasizing its equal significance to the nation's past, present, and future as Independence Day. She also highlighted that June is Pride Month and mentioned the opening of a new mosque in her district. She also extended a warm welcome to all residents, regardless of orientation, religion, citizenship status, age, income, ability, or race, inviting them to become involved in local government and reach out to her with any concerns or interest in engagement. She closed by reaffirming her commitment to inclusive representation and community outreach. Councilperson Anderson— No Comment. Councilperson Reed— Expressed appreciation for being allowed to attend remotely via Zoom, explaining that she and her family are currently on vacation. She requested that any potential special meetings be scheduled after their return, noting they would be back Saturday. She also informed the Council that there would be physical copies of all Youth Advocate applications available at the next meeting for review prior to voting, which is expected to take place in early August. She committed to clarifying the details and resending prior materials to ensure everyone is prepared. She concluded by thanking the residents of District 5 for the opportunity to serve in her position. Councilperson Webb— Expressed his concerns regarding both the school resource officer funding and the fire territory proposal. On the resource officers, Webb stated that the schools need to increase their contribution, pointing out the significant amount of tax dollars allocated to schools compared to the general fund. He emphasized that all schools and students deserve equal protection, regardless of district. Regarding the fire territory, Webb acknowledged the passion and dedication that some have invested in the project. While he expressed a desire for the fire territory to succeed, he admitted being torn on the issue. He explained that although he takes risks in his personal occupation, he is unwilling to gamble with taxpayer money. Webb said he wants clear assurances on what the city can and cannot afford, especially given the uncertainty surrounding Senate Bill 1. He concluded by stating his support for the concept of the territory but reiterated the need for financial clarity and confidence before proceeding. Councilperson Hawkins—No Comment. Councilperson Snelling— No Comment. Council President Stoner— Began by echoing Mr. Webb's comments and recognizing the efforts of Mr. White, Mr. Snelling, Mr. Jarles, Ms. Khauri, and Mr. Leverett in the ongoing discussions about the fire territory. He acknowledged the confusion surrounding the issue and expressed disappointment that no members of the fire leadership were present at the meeting, especially given their request for the council to rescind the fire territory ordinance. He emphasized the importance of their presence at any upcoming meetings so they can answer for their position directly. Despite the uncertainty regarding the fire territory, he noted that progress continues on other priorities, specifically mentioning advancements on the health insurance initiative and the police contract, with further information expected soon. He then raised the need to schedule a special meeting since the next regular meeting was not until July 7. After checking the availability of council members and other scheduled city meetings, the council agreed to hold the special meeting on Monday,June 23 at 6:00 PM. In closing, Stoner reflected on earlier comments about "burned bridges" in the context of local politics. He acknowledged the challenges and division that can occur but emphasized his hope that relationships can be repaired. He underscored the council's responsibility to the people who elected them and to the broader community, stating that they owe it to their constituents to do everything they can to restore trust and unity. ADJOURNMENT: Council President Stoner made the motion to ADJOURN the meeting at 7:54 p.m. DISCLAIMER: These minutes are a summary of actions taken at the Jeffersonville City Council meetings. The full video archive of the meeting is available for viewing at www.cityofjeff.net for as long as this media is supported. APP VED BY: Evan Stoner, Council President ATTEST Lisa Gill, Clerk LEGISLATIVE SERVICES AGENCY OFFICE OF FISCAL AND MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT LS 7244 NOTE PREPARED: Apr 10,2025 BILL NUMBER: SB 1 BILL AMENDED: Apr 9,2025 SUBJECT: Local Government Finance. FIRST AUTHOR: Sen. Holdman BILL STATUS: As Passed House FIRST SPONSOR: Rep.Thompson FUNDS AFFECTED: X GENERAL IMPACT: State&Local X DEDICATED FEDERAL Summary of Legislation: Property Tax Provisions General Obligation Bonds:This bill places restrictions on the issuance of certain general obligation bonds. Farmland Assessments:This bill amends a capitalization rate percentage under the statewide agricultural land base rate determination. MLGQ: This bill provides that the percentage cap used to determine the maximum levy growth quotient (MLGQ)is 4%in 2026. Annual Levy Growth:The bill provides that,notwithstanding any growth in a political subdivision's assessed value(AV)in the previous year,a political subdivision's ad valorem property tax levy shall not exceed the ad valorem property tax levy for its last preceding annual budget,unless the fiscal body of the political subdivision adopts an affirmative tax rate and tax levy increase by ordinance following a separate public hearing.It requires a resulting decrease in tax rates for each political subdivision in which there was an increase in the political subdivision's AV in the previous year,subject to any affirmative tax rate and tax levy increase adopted by the fiscal body of the political subdivision. Excess Levy Appeals: This bill phases out the authority for the Department of Local Government Finance (DLGF) to permit an excess tax levy that is based on AV growth, school transportation costs, and other circumstances.It retains the provisions that permit an excess tax levy if the civil taxing unit cannot carry out its governmental functions in the case of annexation, a natural disaster, an accident, or an emergency, and for property tax revenue shortfalls resulting from erroneous AV. Personal Property De Minimis Exemption: This bill phases in an increase in the acquisition cost threshold for the business personal property tax exemption from$80,000 to$2,000,000. SB 1 1 PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA) ESTIMATED CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE - 2026 City of Jeffersonville - General Fund General Fund Index 1 Operating Receipts: 2 2025 Property Tax Levy (before adjustments) $ 31,672,106 3 Less: Adjustment for Fire Territory (9,418,436) 4 Plus: MLGQ (104.%) 890,147 5 Less: Circuit Breaker Tax Credits (18.4% of levy) (4,248,422) 6 7 Net Property Tax 18,895,395 8 Auto Excise, CVET, & FIT 1,586,773 9 Other Receipts 16,270,294 10 11 Total Operating Receipts 36,752,462 12 13 Operating Disbursements: 14 2025 General Fund Budget 45,337,498 15 Less: 2025 Fire Budget (13,482,157) 16 17 Total Operating Disbursements 31,855,341 18 19 Change in Fund Balance 4,897,121 (Internal Use Only) (No assurance is provided on this financial analysis.) 8 4 egplenem:°na°4aeaa gg g°Me.g `'°$C lIggMg°g°aedae'A aRo g o t a°o 4o g g e o 0 o 'o O N O b bb d�C ON. d d d Nd N d N0 d d d<N Nd 000N d N N N N if mommgmemm<emmm< g m°me: gagMgeggtgg g"P'e*geg memmmmme<m° egggggg m bbbm.,;nmbMMN m mNNmm m rom bnlp tG �,+m ha0mdn mbm mNmO+ )M O mM M b�/IM NNM bbmdmM N d OimNm'ON 4 U U ,mN mme, V ggg e MN m, Oip N mip mm N eNNIA,OO hiOmO y NggemNmr mOpg, mm�i.leg m demo mM deoeggg E N O f f ;-,- aft, m 4 ry O i M b N n N m pp p YO N m R f d m^m N O n ObitO 00 dm m W ry N N O O N O N O, � ONMNo�VNOf v p,M pN OO p N N�umf'Ib_pm Q O NNOM N"m , O V NM HN d---V N b'0 d" y mm n �bO da00bN ^ v n N N o N V m ^M O M N N QU��pp ��pp ��pp mm eeDD OO �1pO 1pO, NW n H.C7,Oii tT,Ovmi d0 LL, O ouNDON�Npmi�0a0,ENOOm,am,e,n i-U, HEOblbp Ei1 W n r bm A-E o0000ry E,,P 0 N VV Om b O O q ^^ M d N n n M v�ro N N m b _ '-M-m d m m o O•,,d M - o>O d Ip o U y M n N_ E.2 c2 mO, b ENO Nd Om 0 Mmm,,p- mmNMn m m p Omnr o 0O 0O n D Wi OOl a LCN dNmi2A MW b N N -§Mbn-E bRr.2N-NnN ON EN K W U F LL e O 8q p O O O d MM v�i'O O O, �p rn N N m ttyy ��pp � N�Nb Nm nN�IIM n m Op,tOONd,bY =,,ni , m Nn,EEb aN,YOn Lacci l iri d OOOn N_W OnMd 11pp N � � �p O W IOO G m n p m OO R 112 y M m M!N N N N n O V N OIOb, ,N N b' ,,W N N W ry d F a M n N O N ,n Y n O N M N N b R n ry N W U yw N n y N •- b_ m m � om N m d d M N �u m�nn`�oo�� m`8iwnnmu'nNm w�M omm rnornnn' .fie ddddrnm0o'P n mwrv�oN, Ooo mN�rn "'ry m M o;mN 8"8 h 22 d;P,W m and P.*2 f mE. ',H O N O m O L y M m N m v,m 2 O,D•N M M A m N m - V N f O M N OOi ^ N M ^M o r 4 O N N n .-.-m m m c� c t E d •- p O W NN " N m d O mM P N O dI n o A M nOMn M ^ N m N 0 0 > Onfa'0 oab' pydNdOmmVNN mmm 2U." N omaFP, N Q > M OI M d naCi.\a U E E'9 c (V a J N_ W` II e� E >_n a n rv^,ONNONmrn�N�pp opo2 o rnryN �e�epppp bd M ♦♦ r�pp pp mJ� 31y bmn MrM b00m Nb m, OO d�Om v0f rmiO 'O,W nm A M�N N d0�OO,M N� ^tOV ON 00 m OMMnM W vi,'M �p M VV rt 2 w Nm M ^MiD Nm Y dN H HO NNN--f N tDINn mNN d �^Od bmio Ob NaF.'n .Z/LL U b m .- lV g.M N M N m N--m N m M d b b n N n W J. J T y J ..9 ii yy POW M N ^ry m , O N 0 0 0 n O,O m N n n N N O m _N m O y m e W b 000 L e .• mb M ,tb v N 2O d IV 8 and m C2CM2NSMOOmig� 103222 NM iI Y 1mN0 m ��p ObiI .2I0 -m 2 ON.2OI d 2 M mD ,i d M M mNN�ro dN 80'tN0 ,F., O Nb mN NNN d REIN a NO M W M nYl dm MrvMM N mmmN m p U H J V vi �.- �N� N !.M! M m nv N,-.-_b Y b b W n C mry Z LL K J« n MM Oln b ,Ui.b OOmr N�O bmN O n H11E mN N o+q�n m NR 0000 c F � EH �N� N mme po ro°i Ery lommlowm�rn vo Rv, mm dinmry �rnp U y Cy ,543z M m N M 0 a 0! N M T sg vdi m 1 a+ N m rn N N f N d rv,p^ip v(Vi M O O N E M f O O M n N M ,, m n ro 9 1 U U f N M N n (V b y b N o. m O r ��pp m m,p m omNm eepp ccpp pp o O J M a p 0 n_d Om,pm,V ub, M amp ry b>t�p O O,N N N Y O M Y 1 0 A d V O n M b nm O N d N vmi 0 0 i A i Om Mm M O Ol N N a N M f N d M d m lNN rn V N.n'2„6 -n,,v v,,,FLif MNM NaM?3..O :a V N N OY Nmm M b v N m..� y �� a0N` - NN�n b U N M m 0 O LLrr rIL I LLr3I LLrLLd I rLLLL3 I r3 LLrm `n nm' EE E 1i O 0 oUn4m ooEEo9 O U y r B pt v Q a$ , aS -oUi o O o06 az c 8 oa _ gd3 w wE 2 8 N` Nn wLL n � F0cU- nn m c ccU ac � . Nia=o o-42 ,- w. ,,anz' r 6-61. 0e2?,�T$ a ; t EPo atMel,e ovuE1 --aa '5,c2 E o . 5-, allo1n .1- 2 ~ ocEg-m 1vc000; wm nom ° Ug2aFr rtiU = >3 YE1ULLLLLL m UUUUUr ' EOYn mI NI ? C3OOYyav 0mUF- tU5 ll- I aE 4ra85UU ; N8 g8 oppL ; orro30 As� g5?0 _ 4 �u ° -c o p= . Lc = cAom LL Edc m-,2Et .g )>qmytgt, 3W ),I LL-I 0ZO�3$c� ¢1am�inti. miudfo8v530urOi5mg�ugLuLug uisZ a d f m m m m m w N m N W.2 r,4 r y t 4 2,m `A r 6 x m 6 m A m 6-6-g i m Y A A m%%' x w,,1 A m`„ x ,A U U U U U U O O O D U O O U O D U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0 U U U U U U 0 U U U U U U U U U U 0 U 0 U U U 0 0 Wss Oen to C C co C 0 aca E 'O 4 7 7 E m x as E a) O C M C r > (n a) O a a' t- O 'O I— N a) E N W >- 0 co o cv o 0 I- N 0 CC > a rn I0a j O 0) Z I- as `-'. O a u F cc N W F I- W to O a 0- CC T a. o m W 0 0 N N CY Wcy, T e+ a) c6 a C c0 Q a Ili a > a Z 0 a.) o _1 Yv m Q aX0m N C a a p T o N f— C 'II N C = Z ' O 0 Z Lo rn O y Z } w N O CO1- 5 C 0 Z W i1 it D Q0 D Q UVQ@ O m N Z U Q a' a x E M Q a) W X a co F� N to c c J Q Esi O d a) (O J H 0 t - a) > Y 0. C Z I- O a o m a a. o S Z u_ 0 x 3 v o N w a x ° Q W >, E N - x N 1- O 9 _ • (!) a) E d T O N O x a) ro a o F ` f6 0. a) 4 y 0 0 a E a') o T U a w o n-0 a) N m O N m O O O O) a) a) -0 .O S a) L> a) .4- d' O 5 Q a] > co co -0 a) to to ° o .E a 1 a) N 12, d E W co ✓s a E N U N jA V V o a7 C N 41 V a) N N Y Q M n m m o °) -o a) Z C n) @ 0 O N v) . n a 7 4) > a j E a) YO C a) x a) C 'O O (o N L CO " _ C U. -0 E v) a) W C x p U U N_ rn C E R zE0U2 C E u ° a) CV CO V to - m a to o a m a z o. Q N O w CL 4 , " 88e { S 88888888888888 1 S Sob 88 80 888 8 � � Ns ;";174m asss §s 80 § ' mSg � S Ni o E 1 BS oR888S88a8! §8 }£[i 8 oo 88882888888880 eo Sooy NOOS2BN ,W1 2jN NR$ §gcV-Y n 21;8n 888 O n Nn -- '[ y 8 8 nN^ 0 oNn e{ N g n J :12SN888888888p8 ' .`888888 88888888888882 O HE 88 8 r iAp22M8m ""' ".I n'.°S S8...8��S8-3m `� 8 o '8 ge$ 80 8g �n �l�3 V oo E858 a x v n n ,ss+, N p t g m a 1 u "'o J Z r ta' = LL d L w 2 w o z n ry ry w U' n 7f 2; ma' rc = f z j m>c I ace v E N F !:A a c y m r 2 �i r m U = i �• J O W a F d=i i _ ro n m O c k n 1 '. fir' j j W ?w a '4 d d 2 J n G U '"w d ° ¢ o. Lit: Q m y P. p'w 1 O f0 °C WW !.1 E a U' 0 2 (%1 UI W N° a 1 (� Q N h ° Y y R O w " a 2 G a z m 2 $ E C `! c = N Q 4 Y 2 3 # '`�f F W J F f J ar .� fi" °" _ks E 4 fg ,4 4 d r I :LLyRi, �� a'- = Yam �€ ZQ cN m.m T ,Jf/) a,f a .1 u,c d g rj m]. 4 �# l')aU4 20 UQ O C a a Og$i_tmoa�"m�E�iQ N € =``affN//» �og� �'-` _. A eQo g4aw o - `Ea $§ w!N`a E=Irignaa Otiq e c m�'2;10RMIL( ?v3B pQ a�L�Q z v - z14 npa�UUOLLIThhO,i1-O U,W9'9OciOc H323wzd=�' 2 'r �0 OQjOO n$' $_ . wU . o j LL d_ 8 VV8888 s888 8 88 om 8m ,RBj� An I O =a .Posing v$ ,°2A 8° f n K � v N.-� ,ro w Nn r a o 11fw 0 z m a w K n¢ m z LLa ` ir: ao N z ; 3> o " U Y .; Z a t on K a = U QU 9 1/1 2 w O 13 II1110 . o x z Q U d N LL w a p W U _ D j U' W J j 11 K 0 m - .Q n c ro F� �m W �� F- o> a a .'n of v r -r a a azLo m mw arc Y N .44 2 3 E. s `%A t F w� �f o ° N ww z a 3 E d .`� Q E 2 d �zoo r„>. S5 ' - a s ¢ y 2 Q [o da rd NN y6 N QN- F-N AN m - -4 .O V w Fp Ua H o Q ZO t m N d~mm N r E Ux371 J c w d F W d°m 4 U j e =j a 1 .` J. 1 Q a d a w O O KN - gK�m9 y Fs ti F O a P¢¢U U LL LL lL i? O Ji~g 0 U n H f f O Q U U U a° a�x 3 w z .'n ;-.2 =a c 0 Q tttiii `.F O w U) ° i N N -NN N.-N NN(0 a MM .h r