Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay 5, 2025 Council Minutes COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA May 5, 2025 Regular Meeting Minutes The Common Council of the City of Jeffersonville, Indiana met for the Regular Meeting on May 5, 2025. Council President Stoner along with City Clerk Gill called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.The meeting was open to the public in person as well as live streamed via the City Website using Zoom. INVOCATION: Council Vice President Burns led the invocation. There was a last minute emergency at the church so Pastor Michael Dorsey of House of Refuge Community Church had to cancel last minute. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: The roll call was conducted by City Clerk Lisa Gill and present in Council Chambers were Council Vice President Burns, Councilperson Semones, Council President Stoner, Councilperson Reed, Councilperson Webb, Councilperson Snelling, Councilperson White ,Councilperson Hawkins, and Councilperson Anderson. 9 Council Members were present in Council Chambers. Heaven Williams, Council Youth Advisor was present for the proceedings. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Council Vice President Burns made a motion to Amend the Minutes for Regular Meeting on April 21, 2025, seconded by Councilperson White; motion passed, 9-0. Council Vice President Burns made a motion to approve as amended the Minutes for Regular Meeting on April 21, 2025, seconded by Councilperson Semones; motion passed 9-0. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Councilperson Reed made a motion to approve the Agenda, seconded by Council Vice President Burns; motion passed 9-0. CLAIMS TO APPROVE: Civil City$ 2,336,481.91 Council Vice President Burns made a motion to approve the Civil City Claims, seconded by Councilperson Semones; motion passed 9-0. Parks$ 62,180.61 Councilperson Semones made a motion to approve the Parks Claims, seconded by Councilperson Reed; motion passed, 9-0. REPORT OF THE CLERK: Clerk Gill- No Reports. REPORT OF THE YOUTH ADVISOR: Miss Williams stated that this will be her last meeting as the Youth Advocate. She gave thanks to everyone for the opportunity and is happy to see the program continue on. She gave a special thank-you to her mother who was in attendance along with her brother and sister. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 1. Heather Metcalf 2025-OR-18(PUBLIC HEARING) Ordinance of Additional Appropriation This is for the Workers Compensation and Property Causality Insurance claims and premiums. Council President Stoner opens a public hearing for anyone for or against the Ordinance.There are no speakers or comments, public hearing closed. Motion to approve on the Second and Third Reading by Councilperson Snelling, Seconded by Councilperson Semones; motion passed 9-0. 2. Heather Metcalf 2025-OR-19 (PUBLIC HEARING) Ordinance of Additional Appropriation This is for Fire Pension Professional Services. Council President Stoner opens a public hearing for anyone for or against the Ordinance. There are no speakers or comments, public hearing closed. Motion to approve on the Third and Final Reading by Councilperson Semones, Seconded by Councilperson Webb; motion passed 9-0. 3. Heather Metcalf 2025-OR-20(PUBLIC HEARING) Ordinance of Additional Appropriation This is for Fire turn out gear. Council President Stoner opens a public hearing for anyone for or against the Ordinance. There are no speakers or comments, public hearing closed. Chief Grant made a statement giving thanks on behalf of the Fire Department and Fire Fighters. Motion to pass by councilperson Reed, Seconded by Councilperson Anderson; motion passed 9-0. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Public Comment: No Comments. 2. Les Merkley 2025-R-7 Resolution Approving the Order of Plan Commission and the Declaratory Resolution of the Jeffersonville Redevelopment Commission Les Merkley states that this is in reference to establishing the Cities first Residential TIF. "A few years ago the Indiana General Assembly authorized the establishment of such TIFS. This would be the first one in the City of Jeffersonville.This is a very unique piece of property, this is the former East Lawn School property on 8th Street.The Redevelopment Commission has attempted for the last few years to sell or lease the building that was there, it has since been torn down. Now the Redevelopment Commission has entered into a development agreement with DC Development to construct approximately fifty single family homes on the property with a starting price of$235,000. Again this is a Resolution that would approve that.This is a long process required by Statute.There's already been two meetings that redevelopment has addressed this matter.The most recent was a public hearing and the Planning Commission most recently approved the adopted order determining that the proposed residential TIF conforms with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Jeffersonville. Now it becomes in front of the City Council and if it's approved tonight it'll go back to the Redevelopment Commission for another public hearing that will take place on May 28th at 4 PM.The need for the Residential TIF is pretty straight forward, affordable housing is obviously a need. This property is very unique where it's situated,there's been challenges in attracting a developer. This Residential TIF will allow the TIF dollars that are captured in that development to help offset the infrastructure improvements that the developer will be forming to make this happen.The developer is here tonight, DC Development, the representative is here if you have any questions regarding the development. But this is a Resolution that requires one vote or one reading and then it will go back to the Redevelopment Commission on May 28th. This is a contingency in the development agreement for closing and the development is for the establishment of the Residential TIF." Council President Stoner asked who the representative from DC Development was and invited him to speak. Chris Jackson with DC Develop, developing the River Rail Landing property from the East Lawn. He stated they're excited about the development and the unique opportunity for both them and the City as a partnership. In the last five years prices for building materials have increased by about three times of what they were, so building affordable housing has been a challenge. In order to make that property feasible and affordable they've come up with a good partnership with the City to benefit the residents and be a great addition to the community. Another unique thing about it is that it lays next to the old railroad track and they're allowing connection for future walking trails and stuff associated with that. It's also located close to the school (Parkview Middle School) so it will make a good addition for the City. They're looking forward to working with the City with the partnership and having a good product when it's done. Councilperson Snelling asked how many houses are planning to be built and Chris responded with around sixty houses. Councilperson Snelling also asked if any of the houses will be less than $235,000. Chris answered that the starting price range will be about$215,000-$235,000, somewhere around there. Councilperson Snelling remarked that $235,000 isn't too affordable for someone just starting out. Chris stated that he agrees with that but that there aren't any other new build houses for under$200,000 in the region. Councilperson Snelling asked if it's possible to put ten percent of the houses at a lower price to make them more affordable and Chris said they'll think about it and see what they could do. Chris said he understands the price concerns but with the building material costs, he doesn't want to say yes to a lower price if they won't be able to follow through on it.They're aiming for the low $200,000 mark and there's several fluctuations that can help that. Councilperson Webb asked how it works when they pay property tax, being a TIF District, where do the funds go. Les Merkley answered that a Residential TIF operates just as any other TIF and Principle. Right now that property is garnering no income tax at all. Once the home is built the property tax it garners will go back into the TIF Fund, not the General Fund. Les Merkley stated this is the first Residential TIF and unique, he doesn't foresee this becoming common, and that it's kind of a complicated development agreement but the outcome is that the TIF dollars are helping to offset the cost. Council President Stoner asked Chad Resichl to explain a little bit about the Comprehensive Plan and how do they prioritize infield development, and how a project like this is very important to the City. Chad stated the Comprehensive Plan in downtown Jeffersonville and adjacent neighborhoods are really encouraging the infill of development in some of those areas. Where they have one off properties where they can add additional housing, that's an easy way for them to increase taxable revenue for the City without having to increase a lot of infrastructure. He stated The Comprehensive Plan certainly speaks to this, they wouldn't have rezoned it if it didn't. Council President Stoner said that expanding our infield development and residential development in that area helps to keep 10th Street alive. He thinks it's critical to keep expanding and developing in that area. Motion to Approve by Councilperson Semones, Seconded by Reed; motion passed 9-0. 3. Chad Reischl 2025-OR-21 ( PUBLIC HEARING) Ordinance of Rezone Request for Property Located at 3611 and 3618 Utica Sellersburg Road from R3 (single family Residential-Small lot) to Proposed Zoning M2 (Multi-Family Residential-Medium Lot) This will require a public hearing, this is an Ordinance rezone for a property at 3611 and 3618 Utica Sellersburg Road. Chad Reischl stated the applicant is requesting to rezone two pieces of property along Utica Sellersburg road, a little South of Highway 62 and a little North of New Chapel. He's asking to rezone from R3 to M2 for the purpose of building a forty-six unit apartment complex on the site.This site backs up to Bridge Point Commons and the Fair Field Inn. This is a growing area that's seen a number of development projects in recent years, including another apartment complex of similar size. It's already been presented to the Plan Commission and comes to you (City Council) with a favorable recommendation. Councilperson Semones asked if this will be across from where the new middle school is being built and Chad confirmed that is correct. Council President Stoner asked Chad to share information on The Technical Review Committee and its purpose. Chad explained their office has a Technical Review Committee meeting every month where someone from Waste Water, Building Commission, Fire Department Etc., all of those Departments are invited to come to the meetings.They go over all the projects on hard docket with them to get comments and feedback. The purpose of the Technical Review Committee is so that city Agencies and Departments have the ability to weigh in on the different developments. Council President Stoner asked if there are any representatives from the development agency who would like to speak and invited them up. Nathan Grimes with Renaissance Design Build on 17 South Indiana Avenue in Sellersburg Indiana, spoke along with Jared Portacolleen, the developer and owner of the property. While meeting the Ordinance and requirements of the City,they've decided on forty-six units for that property. Nathan Grimes is the engineer and surveyor for the project. Jared is with Port Building Systems, they build custom homes and also a pool company that puts in-ground pools in. this is the first project specifically with apartment complexes. They estimate a price point for monthly rent between $1000 and $1500 per unit. The Council Members voiced concerns regarding the traffic congestion in that area with the new middle school being built there as well.The ratio for families in Jeffersonville currently are about thirty percent multi-family and seventy percent single-family. The Council Members went back and forth with discussions before Council President Stoner opened the floor for public hearing at 6:54 PM. Calvin Gould of 3617 Utica Sellersburg Road lives next door to where the new apartment complex is proposed to be. He stated that he's lived there for approximately forty years. He has concerns that the rezoning will lower his home and property value. He also has concerns of traffic congestion as forty-six units would bring ninety-two or more new neighbors and vehicles traveling that road. He read a few excerpts from the Jeffersonville Comprehensive Plan and explained how it would negatively affect him. He thanked the Council for their time and allowing him to speak. With no other speakers present Council President Stoner closed the public hearing at 6:59 PM and opened the floor back up for Council comments and discussion. Councilperson Semones and Councilperson Reed lead the Council discussion and Council President Stoner asked Chad Reischl to explain the process of informing neighbors of such changes. Chad Explained that there are three main things they do. The First is they publish all of the meeting items in the newspaper.The second thing they do is post a sign on the property and the third thing is they send direct mail to everyone that is within two-hundred feet of the property. Councilperson Reed makes a motion to Table this item, until they can get more information and further discuss at the next Council Meeting and get more feedback. Motion seconded by Councilperson Webb; motion to Table passed 9-0. Attorney Larry wilder confirmed they can table this item and pick back up at the next Council Meeting. Attorney Les Merkley informed the Council that they have to act within ninety days otherwise the Planning Commission decision stands. Further discussion on 2025-OR-21 will be on the next Council Meeting May 19, 2025. 4. Chad Reischl 2025-OR-22 ( PUBLIC HEARING) Ordinance of Rezone Request for Property Located at 4219 and 4223 Utica Sellersburg Road from R2 (Single Family Residential-Medium Lot)to Proposed Zoning M2 (Multi-Family Residential-Medium Lot) Chad Reischl stated this applicant is also on Utica Sellersburg Road, on the North side of Highway 62 between Highway 62 and Charlestown Pike. They're looking to rezone two parcels of land currently zoned R2 and looking to rezone to M2, which is Multi-family medium scale. They're seeking to create a small Tiny Home development of nine, five-hundred square foot homes to be rented. They have to rezone to M2 because of the number of homes on the site. This one also comes from The Planning commission with a favorable recommendation. There were recent construction upgrades to Utica Sellersburg road between Highway 62 and Charlestown pike.The road was widened as part of the Charlestown Pike Widening Project. There are new sidewalks, a widened road with curbed gutters, etc. Councilperson Semones had a question for the developer, Paul, on why the units will be rental units and not for sale by private ownership.The developer stated there are a couple reasons for that. One is that they've had a lot of success with these particular units in a similar development in the Hanover College area. By renting the units they can guarantee that the up keep is maintained at no burden to the renter.They've had the Hanover property since the middle of last year, around July 2024, and was the first one. Council Vice President Burns asked what the price point would be on the rent.The developer stated depending on one or two bedroom units it will be between $1000 and $1400 a month rent. Paul said they'll have a full kitchen, full bath, front porch, front/back/side yard with landscaping and lots of windows.They're a nice cottage style home. Paul is with KGF Homes and he is the central manager specifically for the Tiny Homes/Cottages.The Council Members had discussion of pros and cons. Council President Stoner asked for more details on the quality and sustainability of the homes. Paul explained the home siding isn't a standard vinyl siding, it's a smart siding, a high end material. The windows are very energy efficient, not cheap windows.They transport the homes themselves so they are well built and sturdy.They will be on a crawl space foundation and anchored. They'll have spray foam insulation and luxury vinyl plank flooring with Sherman Williams paint. Council President Stoner opened up the public hearing at 7:16 PM. Barry Hullett of 4225 Utica Sellersburg Road lives directly next door to the location in question. He and his family have lived there for four and a half years and stated that all of the neighbors are opposed as well. He has concerns for traffic congestion and safety. He said he was originally drawn to that area because the homes were more spaced out and a low population density. He said he understands the legitimacy for a project like this but believes there are better locations that are better suited for that type of community. He thanked the Council for their time. Eva Hullett, wife of Barry and also at 4225 Utica Sellersburg Road, said her biggest concern with this project is how close it is to their house.They chose that house because of the privacy with the trees and fields, that there is space between neighbors and not houses right on top of each other. She has concerns for traffic congestion due to other construction in the area. She thanked the Council for their time and for letting her speak. Kelly Curry of 4819 Salem Noble Road, said a deceased relative use to live on that road and she still travels it every day. She has concerns about the rental units being rented instead of owned. She stated that even though the road was previously widened it's not fit for that much traffic plus the trucks from the Quarry. She said that it will be a nightmare and she's opposed. With no other speakers or comments, Council President Stoner closed the public hearing at 7:26 PM and opened Council discussion. Councilperson Semones asked the developers to address some of the concerns spoken and to give insight. After their explanation and perspective given Council President Stoner asked Attorney Larry Wilder if they could vote Contingent or if it needs to be a straight vote. Larry Wilder answered that it needed to be a straight vote due to the commitments in the documents being enforceable. Attorney Les Merkley added that they can approve a rezoning with any contingencies, that's allowed under Statute.The problem is if they do that then it would have to go back to the Planning Commission for them to sign off on. Larry Wilder clarified that they can vote contingent but it would go back to the Plan Commission and the Ordinance wouldn't be passed today. Councilperson Reed summarized what was discussed in the previous Plan Commission Meeting. The Council Members engaged in discussion and Council President Stoner thanked the residents and neighbors for coming out and speaking and being actively involved in the topic at hand. Chad Reischl mentioned that if they rezone from R2 to M2 and the project developer backs out or decides to sell, that opens up the possibility for a big apartment complex to be built there. Chad said to be specific with the contingencies to try to avoid that from happening. With advice from Les Merkley the Council decided to Table the Ordinance discussion. Motion to Table by Councilperson Webb, Seconded by Councilperson Reed; Motion to Table passed 9-0. 5. Chad Reischl 2025-OR-23 Ordinance for Adoption of the Downtown Jeffersonville Master Plan (SEE ATTACHED) Chad went over his presentation for The Master Plan for Downtown Jeffersonville. It consisted of six main slides: Purpose, Study Area, Process, The Plan, Physical Plan, and Policy Planning. Councilperson Semones and Council Vice President Burns gave thanks to Chad for his presentation. His creativity and organization really shined through with this Packet and the extra effort he put into it. Council Vice President Burns commented that his presentation of The Master Plan was well thought out and one of the best ones he's seen, including paid professional plans. After other Council comments and discussion Council President Stoner opened the public hearing at 7:50 PM. Laura Williamson who lives in Sellersburg on buttercup Circle out by The Chicken House said she and her family frequent Jeffersonville a lot as there's more to do down here and more options for restaurants. However there are two areas they avoid going at night and that's Court Avenue by the old Hardees and at Spring Street and 10th Street. She said she's glad to see those two areas included in The Master Plan and is excited to see what's done with that area and all the improvements. With no other speakers or comments Council President Stoner closed the public hearing at 7:51 PM. motion to approve on the First and Second Reading by Councilperson Semones, Seconded by Council Vice President Burns; motion passed 9-0. Council President Stoner asked if the Council Members wanted to do a quick recess and bathroom break. Council Vice President Burns made a motion for a five minute recess, Seconded by Councilperson Semones; Motion to recess passed 9-0 at 7:53 PM. Council President Stoner called the Meeting back in order at 7:59 PM. 6. Susan Cowen with Baker Tilly SB1 Impact on Fire Territory Plan (SEE ATTACHED) Susan Cowen was zoomed into the meeting and went over the packet presentation for the Financial Impact Analysis, the proposed City of Jeffersonville District Fire Protection Territory. Susan made a general comment before diving into the presentation. She stated that "SB1 has really changed the focus of what you can do and the process now to go through to form a fire territory. All of the information received during the public hearing back in February were set on a process where the fire department developed a budget and then a levy was calculated to support that budget. What SB1 did is flipped the script on everybody. So in our case the budget that was previously created is no longer able to be supported by the limitations of SB1. SB1 Has capped the operating levy for a fire territory going forward to forty cents (0.40). Our current rate to support our territory was 0.62. So there's a fairly significant chunk of levy there now that we won't be able to collect and it's going to limit our growth going forward.The only way the territory will get increased levies is if there's significant enough growth in Net Assessed Value. That is the other portion of SB1 that could create issues. Because over time SB1 has items that could potentially limit our Net Assessed Value Growth." Council President Stoner asked a clarifying question-"you had mentioned this will not impact the way that LIT is essentially taken from other entities. Why is that?And then where does the fund, where does it come from if it doesn't come from the other entities?" Susan answered the question with an eight minute long explanation with input from Paige Sansone, who is also with Baker Tilly. Council President Stoner opened up public comment at 8:36 PM. Joe Jarles is the President of The Utica Township Fire Protection District Board, he lives at 1995 Hillview Court in Jeffersonville. Councilperson White invited him to speak as a guest and partner for that agenda item. Council President Stoner asked Attorney Les Merkley to start the timer for public comment. Council President Stoner stated they can extend the speaking time for Mr.Jarles as long as there's a consensus among the Council.Joe Jarles stated this was the first time he'd seen the report (refer to attached packet) and had some general questions for Baker Tilly. Susan Cowen added that as a potential participant in the Territory he's welcome to email them (Baker Tilly) any questions he has,just to make sure to copy the Council and City in the emails as well.Joe Jarles asked a questions of Baker Tilly and Council President Stoner interrupted to clarify that questions need to be submitted in writing, not openly asked during public comment, following the precedent set at other previous meetings. Councilperson White stated that he invited Mr.Jarles to speak as a guest and to allow him to ask his questions. Councilperson White stated as a member of Council he's allowed to do that and has the right to and it will be honored. Council President Stoner said they'll have a parliamentary investigation. He told Attorney Larry Wilder there is some contention and asked him to walk them through that. Attorney Wilder responded that Evan Stoner is the Council President and Chair of the meeting, therefore as the chair of the meeting he conducts the meeting. He suggested rules be adopted by the body for the meetings, and they follow the rules that've been adopted and as the Chair of the meeting he goes forward. Councilperson White had asked Mr.Jarles to come to the podium to speak and he suggested, based off what he was hearing, that he asked questions of your experts (Baker Tilly). Your Experts (Baker Tilly) have expressed they would answer those questions if they were put in writing.To Council President Stoner he suggested he decide how to go forward because he in fact is the Chair of the Meeting. Council President Stoner Stated to Mr.Jarles that if he had comments to address them to the Chair(himself). If he had additional questions to please submit those in writing to Baker Tilly. Council President Stoner said they've set a precedent.They'd asked a county commissioner to not ask direct questions of Baker Tilly, but to submit them in writing also. Council President Stoner stated he's only one person on a board of nine Members. so if they wanted to allow Mr.Jarles to ask direct questions of Baker Tilly, and wanted to allow him to go over the allotted four minutes of public comment time, he asked that Councilperson White make a motion and to have a vote. Council President Stoner explained that the rules state that if there is consensus among the Council to allow someone who's speaking in public comment to extend their time, it needed to be a motion by the Board. Council President Stoner asked Councilperson White to make a motion so that Mr.Jarles could speak further.The Council Members agreed to let Mr.Jarles ask his questions of Baker Tilly. In response to Joe Jarles question, Susan Cowen with Baker Tilly answered she wasn't comfortable quoting numbers on a calculation that isn't part of the information shed presented. She said shell gladly prepare that and send it to the Council, to Mr.Jarles, the Attorneys, and everyone tomorrow morning. However she wasn't comfortable quoting that number and didn't want to say something that's wrong that causes more consternation or confusion. She'd rather prepare the numbers appropriately and send them out in the morning. The Council Members agreed and responded that was fair. Joe Jarles asked a couple other questions of Baker Tilly and Susan responded with answers that lead to discussion and clarification among the Council members and attorney Les Merkley.Joe Jarles thanked the Council for allowing him to ask his questions and hopes that they can continue to work together and cooperate and that this doesn't turn adversarial. Council President Stoner asked Susan to explain more of why specifically, this is a risk for the City of Jeffersonville to take. Susan summarized that there are multiple variables that can change and increase and they're not yet sure what their impact will be. Paige Sansone of Baker Tilly gave an explanation that we're now limited to a Tax Rate.That Tax Rate is only going to generate revenues based on a certain assessed value. Whereas before SB1 we had a guaranteed property tax levy. But now under this condition, levy will change,the revenue will change based on the assessed value changing, and not the rate but the revenue. SB1 has made this a risky endeavor because were locked in at a rate rather than a property Tax Levy. Deputy Chief Jason Sharp of the Fire Department stated it's important to first acknowledge that there's a lot of frustration over the situation but that everyone has been great partners, from their friends on the Council to their friends on the Utica Fire District. He thinks they've put together one heck of a plan with this Territory. Obviously with SB1 passing and some of the provisions based in that, they knew that there was going to be a great impact into the level of service that they wanted to provide. Once they'd received some information from Baker Tilly and got an idea of what that money might look like, Ann and Dustin and several other people went to work to try and figure out what this could potentially look like. He said they've whittled it down to just a mere fraction of what this service was intended to be. Once they'd run some numbers with Ann and Baker Tilly it seemed like with all the language and SB1, all the changes that will be happening regarding LIT going away in 2025, he thinks it's fair that it's going to take some time to build these service models out to get a real look at some of the projections. From the Fire Departments end there's a lot of uncertainty on how this looks. He said that he would hate for them to be in a position where it comes out that they can't even take on what they currently have. He thinks that's a real possibility and invited Ann to speak briefly before he continued. Ann Langley with Jeffersonville Fire Department stated that she's spoken with Susan (Baker Tilly) and the City Controller (Heather Metcalf) and she's crunched the numbers as much as she could. For 2026 they could get by, 2027 is unsure, and 2028 there's clearly no answer for yet. She said it's risky and Council is the fiscal body, they set the budget and it's our(Fire Dept.)job to manage what they set. And if it's not enough then they (Fire Dept.) look bad because they can't manage what the budget is because it's not enough. Or if they have to lay off cause the City takes a hit,that's not good in the whole situation. So when they ask her"Ann what can you do?" she puts out scenarios, and then they answer yes they want to go forward or no they don't, she just sets the numbers down. For them to hear unknowns from not only professionals like Baker Tilly but also the City Controller (Heather Metcalf), they're the ones that have to listen to that. Deputy Chief Jason Sharp Continued to say that at the end of the day they were all depending on these fiscal experts to give them good advice. He thinks it's going to take some time for them to understand this Bill and its totality, even outside of what the Cap would be, and what might happen to Net Assessed Value and with the LITs. He thinks there's just too much uncertainty and although it's the Councils decision he wouldn't feel comfortable moving forward with it at this time. He said he's happy to answer any questions they have. Council President Stoner opened up the floor for Questions and discussion at 9:00 PM. The Council Members engaged in discussion with Deputy Chief Sharp and voiced their concerns. Baker Tilly confirmed the due dates for submission are this summer, the DLGF has requested it by June 30th, but there's nothing written in the Statute.The DLGF requested that these fire Territories be submitted no later than June 30th so they'll have time to work it before the budget season.The Equipment Replacement Fund portion, which is the smallest portion, has to be in by May 31st. the Council Members Continued a conversation with Susan and Paige by asking questions and getting Clarification. Council President Stoner addressed Deputy Chief Sharp and stated that he'd discussed with a lot of passion about the creation of an EMS proposal under this. He asked what his thoughts were on the fact under this new proposal the EMS would be cut out. Deputy Chief Sharp said they've looked at this a bunch of different ways, to the point of what it would take minimally as far as staffing. They've even changed around Truck Accompany assignments that have a minimal staffing of four and moving the engine company assignments to a minimal staffing of three,just trying to find different ways to make it work. He stated obviously at the four percent Cap the best they'll be able to get out of this Territory, which originally was going to be two additional companies utilizing three different houses and an EMS element, is essentially one station at Utica so the extra station that would've been going to River Ridge had to be cut out. The EMS had to be cut out. He said they've whittled it down to just a mere shell of where they started. He commented that once they started looking at where they were as far as monies and everything, they're not completely convinced they can maintain what they have, much less brining on nine. He said whenever that happens he would hate to be taxing citizens and not be able to provide them with that service. He has a problem with that but ultimately it's not up to him it's the Councils decision. Councilperson Snelling asked if he agrees that the growth on the East End of Jeffersonville is inadequate and what do them as a Council do to fix the problem. Councilperson Snelling said that it's time to step up and find a proper solution. Council President Stoner agreed with Councilperson Snelling and stated that as someone who was elected by the people in Jeffersonville his first priority is to the citizens of Jeffersonville. Council President Stoner mentioned that one piece they haven't discussed is what it would look like from a legal perspective if they had to rescind something like this. With the Equipment Replacement fund coming at the end of May, he thinks they need to get more legal guidance on that. He said it appears through conversation they would need to have an Ordinance that would rescind it and potentially not send it to the DLGF. Council President Stoner mentioned Susan might be able to give them more insight on that topic and that they need to get awareness around what it would look life if they had to walk it back. Deputy Chief Jason Sharp pointed out that the Territory addressed three different topics. He stated that the City of Jeffersonville has had a lack of coverage in the East End where they've needed some additional help and some additional units. Utica obviously had a problem where their town was left in shambles and they were absolutely lacking in protection. And then of course the emergency medical services problems that have existed for well over a decade. They've had so many private service providers come and go and had an absolute lack of Paramedic training. He stated that there's been no paramedic training in Clark County since 2012 and that's a massive problem.This territory was aimed to fix a lot of things, and all three of those issues were going to be taken care of. However now with SB1 that was abruptly ended, by no one here's choice, that's just where they're at now. Councilperson Snelling mentioned the city was in contracts now to cover for this year and all of the events happening, but that next year is a whole new ball game. He said they can cancel anything they want/need to and take that money and put it towards public safety because public safety has to be the number one. Council President Stoner commented that they have to have conversations with the other Entities in the County.That they need to get everybody to the table in some way, shape, or form and to be a collective conversation. Councilperson White stated that he's sent everyone a budget that he worked on with administration before he got the news that they are of the opinion they are now. He thinks it provides them with groundwork or a basis to move forward as they're making some modifications and then operating the Territory for next year. They'll have to see what happens with SB1 and what revenue will look like.They'll see if they modify it or not at the next session. He said with the budget he sent around he thinks they're able to do what's needed to protect the Utica Partner in this. As well as increase the financial health of the City to some extent. Council President Stoner asked if there's any further discussion from the council or Baker Tilly or anything additional. Susan Cowen stated as a reminder that a territory's not permanent. We have the opportunity if we get into it and determine it's not feasible, we can vote by the end of March in a given year to disband.The Levy is then divided up proportionally based upon the Nav and returns to the Units. So we wouldn't be left with no Levy to support Fire nor would Utica be left with no Levy to support Fire, if we disband. COMMITTEE REPORTS: No Committee Reports. ATTORNEY COMMENTS: Larry Wilder— "Yeah if I might just to clarify something. So first and foremost I want to go back to what I've said from the beginning of representing any government body.The implication was that things I said about the procedure for your meeting was designed to specifically benefit one particular member of the board.That is incorrect.The President of the board was, is by your all's rules, who is in charge of running the meeting.That was my point. Secondly, my point was that the process of how an individual called upon by a member, and these are your all's rules, so I'm trying to follow your all's rules of law. A member can call on an individual to comment to the body. If any member of the body objects to that, then that person cannot go forward based upon being called upon by the member only, reading your all's rules. What I was trying to encourage was for the President, no matter who the President is, to do just what the President came to do. Which was ask the board if they wanted to yield their rules.That was all that I was doing. Now Mr. Stoner, you just happened to be the President, so that advice apparently seemed to benefit what you were wanting to do. I was just merely trying to give you all some guidance on what your rules were. So I apologize for trying to help you all stay within the lane of the rule of law that you all have adopted. So for what it's worth, I'm merely going to give advice based upon what I perceive the rule of law is, or your all's rules.That's my only comment, thank-you all very much. Les Merkley—No Comment. DEPARTMENT HEADS: Council President Stoner thanked Mr. Wilder, Department Heads and Chad Reischl, Chief Kavanaugh, Chief Grant, and everyone for being there, he knows that it was a long meeting. COUNCIL COMMENTS: • Councilperson White—No Comment. • Council Vice President Burns—No Comment. • Councilperson Semones—No Comment. • Councilperson Anderson—No Comment. • Councilperson Reed—No Comment. • Councilperson Webb— No Comment. • Councilperson Hawkins—No Comment. • Councilperson Snelling—No Comment. • Council President Stoner—"I just want to clarify two things and I'll be very brief. I do not speak for this entire Council and I just want to make sure that's publicly said, that I do not speak for the whole Council. I view my role as generally operational and trying to operate the meeting. Secondly Mr.Jarles I do apologize for how that interaction happened. Here's my thing, we've had experiences in the past where people yell things from out there and there's just a proper order for how the meeting has to run. And that's the only thing I was trying to do is keep proper order and make sure that it's done correctly. So with that, I appreciate everybody's time, public service and being an elected office, it doesn't just happen quickly. It doesn't just happen in one meeting or two hours or sometimes it goes really late, and I just appreciate everybody's support." ADJOURNMENT: Council Vice President Burns made the motion to ADJOURN the meeting at 9:17 p.m. DISCLAIMER: These minutes are a summary of actions taken at the Jeffersonville City Council meetings. The full video archive of the meeting is available for viewing at www.cityofjeff.net for as long as this media is supported. APpiOVED BY. el' Evan Stoner, o ncil President ATTEST: Li Gill, Clerk I I /4 a) INWN • LA' 0 O (`/ ' CO 4_4 u T O W ZE5 �--> >, c c� Q O 0 4 i► ` •rAb *4i Eo o " c o ku L D O U c6 C i 4--I 0 C c6 0_ (-) 4-$ a .. . , -;,ft ,i- iii-, } . . . • v 464 '4'ir:.44:- ,,. 72:4-4. ' - dve l':- N":. ....>:.. 4 4 * Air 1 1w t 4 ;. .. V +"�',,.; Nib.,! } 411A1 11,4, le ra - i '1 s ue IV}a ili'' 1 \ _ 1 Ii1/4 6 i , t ., N. is 4 U_ IC Q 2 (I) lao C o o co o -0 cn x 0 4� CO Cl) .>o CD Co- O U i C IX E co c3 To CD CL o 413 u' o (1) 4) cD co0 I-- . • . • 4i r& • 4 VIA' E 1- tin •� O u) -ac a) F a) _� c� c to cz c N to C p O U) co E 0 > O (6 - 0- +--'a: 1- U) -0 > O (f) < a) O Q a) }, C6 U U U i a) X cn = O C ( a) C CO r +-1 ° N J ' Q- - N i a) I L it c1) O O O- 0 0 0 0 0 e- O +-' Q Q .� O O O a u) Q Q }' O Q Q c 0_ W -0 o (6 (C � U) = co CJ W _J . . • I- . . a . . . U ! UU1d AoiI od. Based on Senate Enrolled Act No. 1 ilk Ile fi • ,A 1 is . . FINANCIAL IMPACT ANALYSIS The Proposed City of Jeffersonville and Utica Township Fire District Fire CC bakertilLy Protection Territory (Clark County, Indiana) April 22. 2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS FIRE TERRITORY FINANCIAL IMPACT ANALYSIS: SCHEDULE OF ASSUMPTIONS 1 SCHEDULE OF BUDGETED RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS-2025 FIRE SERVICES- CAPITAL AND OPERATING 2 ESTIMATED LEVY AND RATE ATTRIBUTABLE TO FIRE SERVICES-2025-CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE 3 SCHEDULE OF BUDGETED RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS-2025-FIRE DEBT SERVICE 4 ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX RATES AND LEVIES-PROPOSED FIRE TERRITORY-2026-2028 ... 5-7 ESTIMATED CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE-2026-CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE-GENERAL FUND 8 SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED DISTRICT TAX RATE IMPACT 9-10 ILLUSTRATIVE SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED TAX LIABILITY IMPACT: CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE OFW(009)TAXING DISTRICT 11 CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE 1FW(010)TAXING DISTRICT 12 UTICA TWP-JEFF CITY(039)TAXING DISTRICT 13 CHARLESTOWN TOWNSHIP-JEFF CITY(042)TAXING DISTRICT 14 UTICA TOWNSHIP(033)TAXING DISTRICT 15 UTICA TOWN(037)TAXING DISTRICT 16 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED IMPACT ON CIRCUIT BREAKER TAX CREDITS 17 SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED IMPACT ON LOCAL INCOME TAX("LIT") 18-20 SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED IMPACT ON VEHICLE EXCISE TAXES 21 i bakertilLy Baker Tilly Advisory Group,LP and Baker Tilly US.LLP,trading as Baker Tilly,operate under an alternative practice structure and are members of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd.the members of which are separate and independent legal entities.Baker Tilly US,LLP is a licensed CPA firm that provides assurance services to its clients Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP and its subsidiary entities provide tax and consulting services to their clients and are not licensed CPA firms ©2025 Baker Tilly Advisory Group.LP PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA) FIRE TERRITORY FINANCIAL IMPACT ANALYSIS PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY,INDIANA) SCHEDULE OF ASSUMPTIONS 1.) The state-wide maximum property tax levy growth rate for non-Fire Territory related levies is assumed to be Levy Growth Year Factor 2022 _ 1.043 2024 1 040 2025 1.040 2026 Est. 1.040 2027 Est. 1.040 2028 Est. 1.040 2.) Certified and estimated net assessed values' 2024 Certified 2025 Certified 2026 Est. 2027 Est. 2028 Est. (1) (1) (1) City of Jeffersonville $ 2,708,967.695 $ 2,943,504,231 $ 2,943,504,231 $ 3,207,578 098 $ 3,324,550,874 Utica Township Fire Protection District 186,926.701 210,255,351 222,563,367 230,439 050 239,051,758 City of Jeffersonville TIF Incremental AV(2) 1,453,791,419 1,371,267,812 1,514.516,592 1,386,948,077 1,422,580.615 Totals $ 4 349,685.815 $ 4 525,027.394 $ 4.680.584.190 $4 824.965.225 $ 4,986 183.247 Change 4 0% 3.4% 3.1% 3.3% (1)2026-2028 based upon Policy Analytics analysis dated January 30,2025. (2)Includes captured incremental assessed value for the Falls Landing/Harbours(T10300), InnerCity Roads(T10301),Jeff Bethnova(T10302),Jeff Galvstar(T10303),Jeff Keystone(T10304), Jeff Vogt Valve(T10305),Jeff Boat Project Area(T10309),Riverview Allocation Area(T10310) and River Ridge(T01500)TIF Districts. 3,) Estimated Circuit Breaker Credits as a percentage of property tax levy' 2024 2025 Est. 2026 Est. 2027 Est. 2028 Est (1) (1) (1) (1) Fire Territory N/A N/A 13.0% 13 5% 13.8% City of Jeffersonville 14.0% 13.8% 18 4% 19.8% 20.1% Utica Township Fire Protection District 0.1% 0.1% 7 5% 9 5% 9.8% (1) 2025-2028 are based on Policy Analytics'analysis dated January 30,2025.For the Utica Township Fire Protection District,2026 assumes the Special Fire Debt property tax levy will remain. 4.) The Fire Territory budgets are assumed as follows. Operating' Capital' Totals Year 1 (2026) $ 17,231 000 $ 1,434,500 $ 18,665,500 Year 2(2027) 17.662,700 1,470,400 19,133,100 Year 3(2028) 18.194,300 1,514,700 19,709,000 "Operating budgets are based on SB1 and Fire Territory Operating rate cap of$4000. Capital budgets are based on the maximum statutory rate for the Equipment Replacement Fund of$.0333 5.) Auto Excise,CVET,and FIT as a percentage of levy 2024 2025 Est. I 2026 Est. I 2027 Est. I 2028 Est. Fire Territory N/A N/A 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% City of Jeffersonville 5 0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% Utica Township Fire Protection District 8.0% 8 0% 8.0% 8 0% 8.0% 6) Provider Unit-City of Jeffersonville (Internal Use Only) (No assurance provided on this financial analysis) 4 PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY.INDIANA) SCHEDULE OF BUDGETED RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS-2025 FIRE SERVICES-CAPITAL AND OPERATING(1) Index Utica Township 1 BUDGETED RECEIPTS City of Jeffersonville Fire District 2 Property Tax Levy-General $ 9,418,436 - 3 Property Tax Levy-Special Fire General - 137,297 4 Property Tax Levy-Special Cumulative Fire - 70,015 6 Less Estimated Circuit Breaker Credits (1,297,821) (242) 7 8 Net Property Tax 8,120,615 207,070 9 LIT-Certified Shares 3,536,631 61,230 10 LIT-Public Safety 554,360 11 Financial Institution Tax Distribution 12,244 - 12 Vehicle/Aircraft Excise Tax Distribution 388,981 16,246 12 Commercial Vehicle Excise Tax Distribution(CVET) 70,638 144 14 15 Total Budgeted Receipts 12,683,469 284,690 16 17 Utica Township 18 BUDGETED DISBURSEMENTS. City of Jeffersonville Fire District 19 General 20 Personal Services 12,979,857 - 21 Supplies 100,430 - 21 Services and Charges 401.870 - 23 24 Subtotal-General 13,482.157 25 25 LIT-Public Safety 27 Supplies 175,500 • 28 Services and Charges 217,000 - 29 Capital Outlays 161,860 - 30 31 Subtotal LIT-Public Safety 554.360 - 32 33 Special Fire General 34 Personal Services . 1,250 35 Supplies 300 35 Services and Charges 198,450 37 38 Subtotal-Special Fire General - 200.000 39 39 Special Cumulative Fire 40 Capital Outlays 50,000 42 43 Total Budgeted Disbursements 14,036,517 250,000 44 45 Budgeted Surplus(Shortfall) '$ (1,353,048) $ 34,690 46 47 48 Property tax levy allocated to fire services 9,418,436 207,312 49 Divided by net assessed value(2025) 2,943,504.231 210.255,351 50 51 Subtotal 0.003200 0.000986 52 Times$100 100 100 53 54 Estimated Tax Rate Attributable to Fire Services(2025) $ 0.3200 $ 0.0986 (1) The City of Jeffersonville does not currently operate an ambulance service. (2)2025 budget assumes a$2,000,000 additional appropration for Fire personal services. (Internal Use Only) (No assurance is provided on this financial analysis.) 2 PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA) ESTIMATED LEVY AND RATE ATTRIBUTABLE TO FIRE SERVICES -2025 CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE General Fund Budget for Fire Services(2025) $ 13.482,157 Divided by Total General Fund Budget 45,337,498 % Fire Budget to Total General Fund Budget 29 7% Times Estimated 2025 Levy for the General Fund 31,672,106 General Fund Tax Levy Applicable to Fire Services 9,418,436 Divided by Certified 2025 Net Assessed Value 2,943,504,231 Subtotal 0.003200 Times 100 100 Estimated Property Tax Rate Attributable to Fire Services (2025) $ 0.3200 (Internal Use Only) (No assurance is provided on this financial analysis ) 3 PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA) SCHEDULE OF BUDGETED RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS -2025 FIRE DEBT SERVICE Index Utica Township Fire 1 BUDGETED RECEIPTS. District 2 3 Property Tax Levy- Fire Equipment Debt $ 84,523 4 Less Estimated Circuit Breaker Credits (99) 5 6 Net Property Tax 84,424 7 Vehicle/Aircraft Excise Tax Distribution 7,031 8 Commercial Vehicle Excise Tax Distribution (CVET) 62 9 10 Total Budgeted Receipts 91,517 11 12 13 BUDGETED DISBURSEMENTS: 14 Fire Equipment Debt Service 91,746 (1) 15 16 Budgeted Surplus(Shortfall) $ (229) 17 18 19 Property tax levy allocated to fire services 84,523 20 Divided by net assessed value (2025) 210,255,351 21 22 Subtotal 0.000402 23 Times$100 100 24 25 Estimated Tax Rate Attributable to Fire Services (2025) $ 0.0402 26 27 Notes: 28 (1) Fire Truck Bonds of 2018 mature January 1, 2030. 29 The Fire District will continue to levy this debt service rate until 30 the bonds are paid off. (Internal Use Only) (No assurance is provided on this financial analysis.) 4 £f 0 \Z To `\ar Z.; Ca 7.73 K000 ( � iiiE % \ / cti � 0c % a oTi r ( § $ c a ; % em0 z } * j 9 / \ C 7c \ - / ) / / a / \ } a \ CD _ ® ® \ 2 c -0 ƒ f m 73 (D � . ° ® 3 \ �\ \ 1.4 (\ \ § or 0 ¥ _. / / } 2 m / \ E f E i ƒ - c - 0 ) £ CD -00 # ® co a 7 _ § x } 2 �92, ( / -I rk . - o � \ CD \ \ \ � . > X / ° m a z § > \ / a w c � ° q 0 7, z 0 ® a a z ro ) 2 $ 77 coal ■ U os ( � � ƒ 3 � $ a0.1 \ $ [2 -D f � -o i (� 2 0 2 / - _'co / 17 $ 0 \ ■ ) \ ƒ 2 5 -0 -4 k TA CD m \ -1 \ 7CO ( 2 -< 2 / EA 0 a/ / co a= E co co ( m 7 ƒ \ m a 1 IA IV 0 a � ) mm o Z v � « � CJ � —s2 n = \ S D2F ƒ El'E \ } n o \ § § \ [ = / ! ! = E ro ( £ , E E & : ! {) . . y \ \ 5\ \ cof $ \ _ ` a) m - 2cE / } � e — { C co \ \ 5 co co/ c — ` aal 01 ° CD 77 72 m 3 ) /2 \ . 0 2 = - 7 } 72 r. ) \ • - _ § A c . DJEy « ! > @ 0 9 . / , ƒ m \ Cu CU o / \ \ 0 \ on co J - 0 { F a a ; w7 x / ) f — } [ § at 3 ƒ \ c \ �� � } / \ _ \ \ k \ _ c a �C no NJ `m } ) 7 / - z ) � - � k � s B % cn § i ■ � a / co c & E3 j > § / — � _\� } q ƒ § co \ 0 @ m °- �—- - — ƒ7 — i20E m § 2 \ E j ( oo « ( f 2 § 0 ~ f I } \ k CD CD § o 49 CD co C 3 (0 / i \ N CD / § / Xim 0 m .0 a Z '0 C m o m i5. y U1 A 0.) N -, CD p 0 3 g ooK z d 3 T co N N D V1 0T N• = 0' 3 Q -n 7 d cr C ai C a N (D x 3 VD) a O �l N. 0 to• cD < (D C N to o C N O a % o w co y u' y 0 w c/) N V1 N ^.. a o A A N m 3 a CO 3• m (D N CO co N Vl C O 01 01 N a ^ m m _ _ a m a < al oo co a co D C o w L.)°1 m n_ a O v (D O S. P. N 'D CD Q O M _ o O O V 3 15 N 0 (7, W N a L7 C 1 0 rD x..,„ 3 O DC CP m cv D m • o x ° Ii v 1n a) AO A f y Q m Z fi w coo n. m m co -I Z co < < w 7 o O -t F a a c D r 7 P.iii co a nuu)i x — D a y x co -o a ccC w 3 r- .0 O 1_ CD DJ a) p d m to rn c�o —irn aa N < _ z < o CC o w 0 D n ?la, w coL..) rC o a -Iv NO m N < *o m= CD 61 iv (30 or vm mX V -xJ D TCv Efl x , CD - A0ry OD 'o < v C. < o w E A cu cn iuo v -, O m 7 0 0 0 CO i0 0 O T '9 •••c 53- 77 m N 3 m cm) a. x —I n 73 O '9 = Z cn ut co C 0 E CO 0Xi m LO C..) m 7 73 O O N 0 0to O 000O 77 j m 3 m a -I i _t, a o m A m N co < A A CD V W 0 O C 0 O N D W X. CO 3 C C ln i 4.14 Lo co D JCO 7 A C ✓ -CA 0 0 — 0 0 PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA) ESTIMATED CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE - 2026 City of Jeffersonville - General Fund General Fund Index 1 Operating Receipts: 2 2025 Property Tax Levy (before adjustments) $ 31,672,106 3 Less: Adjustment for Fire Territory (9,418,436) 4 Plus: MLGQ (104.%) 890,147 5 Less: Circuit Breaker Tax Credits (18.4% of levy) (4,248,422) 6 7 Net Property Tax 18,895,395 8 Auto Excise, CVET, & FIT 1,586,773 9 Other Receipts 16,270,294 10 11 Total Operating Receipts 36,752,462 12 13 Operating Disbursements: 14 2025 General Fund Budget 45,337,498 15 Less: 2025 Fire Budget (13,482,157) 16 17 Total Operating Disbursements 31,855,341 18 19 Change in Fund Balance 4,897,121 (Internal Use Only) (No assurance is provided on this financial analysis.) 8 PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY,INDIANA) SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED DISTRICT TAX RATE IMPACT City Of City Of Charlestown Jeffersonville Jeffersonville Utica Twp- Township-Jeff Ofw(009) Ifw(010) Jeff City(039) City(042) District Tax Rate Impact-Fire Territory(2026): District Tax Rate-2025 $ 2 9625 $ 3 1060 $ 2 8842 $ 2 9018 Estimated Increase/(Decrease)Due to Fire Territory' Minus estimated 2025 fire property tax rates (0 3200) (0 3200) (0 3200) (0 3200) Plus Fire Territory property tax rate 0 4333 0 4333 0 4333 0 4333 Net Impact Due to Fire Territory 01133 0 1133 0 1133 01133 Estimated District Tax Rate-2026 $ 3 0758 $ 3 2193 $ 2 9975 $ 3 0151 Estimated Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 3.8% 3.6% 3.9% 3.9% City Of City Of Charlestown Jeffersonville Jeffersonville Utica Twp- Township-Jeff Ofw(009) Ifw{010) Jeff City(039) City(042) District Tax Rate Impact-Fire Territory(2027): Estimated District Tax Rate-2026 $ 3 0758 $ 3 2193 $ 2 9975 $ 3 0151 Minus reduction for cash reserve levy - Plus Annual Levy Growth - Estimated District Tax Rate-2027 $ 3 0758 $ 3 2193 $ 2 9975 $ 32151 Estimated Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% City Of City Of Charlestown Jeffersonville Jeffersonville Utica Twp- Township-Jeff Ofw(009) Ifw(010) Jeff City(039) City(042) District Tax Rate Impact-Fire Territory(2028): Estimated District Tax Rate-2027 $ 3 0758 $ 3 2193 $ 2 9975 $ 3 0151 Plus Annual Levy Growth - - - Estimated District Tax Rate-2028 $ 3 0758 $ 3 2193 $ 2 9975 $ 3 0151 Estimated Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Notes. (1)2025 district tax rates we based on 2025 certified district rates per the Clark County DLGF Budget Order (2)Per SB 1-tax rates are assumed to be $4000 for operating levy and$0333 for the Equipment Replacement Fund for 2026-2028 (Internal Use Only) (No assurance is provided on this financial analysis) 9 PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA) (Cont'd) SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED DISTRICT TAX RATE IMPACT Utica Township Utica Town (033) (037) District Tax Rate Impact-Fire Territory(2026): District Tax Rate-2025 $ 1 6858 $ 1.8146 Estimated Increase/(Decrease)Due to Fire Territory Minus estimated 2025 fire property tax rates (0 0986) (0.0986) Plus Fire Territory property tax rate 0 4333 0.4333 Net Impact Due to Fire Territory 0.3347 0 3347 Estimated District Tax Rate-2026 $ 2.0205 $ 2 1493 Estimated Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 19.9% 18.4% Utica Township Utica Town (033) (037) District Tax Rate Impact-Fire Territory(2027): Estimated District Tax Rate-2026 $ 2.0205 $ 2 1493 Minus reduction for cash reserve levy Plus Annual Levy Growth Estimated District Tax Rate-2027 $ 2 0205 $ 2 1493 Estimated Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 0.0% 0.0% Utica Township Utica Town (033) (037) District Tax Rate Impact-Fire Territory(2028): Estimated District Tax Rate-2027 $ 2 0205 $ 2 1493 Plus Annual Levy Growth - - Estimated District Tax Rate-2028 $ 2.0205 $ 2 1493 Estimated Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 0.0% 0.0% Notes. (1)2025 certified district rates per the Clark County DLGF Budget Order (2)Per SB 1 -tax rates are assumed to be $4000 for operating levy and $0333 for the Equipment Replacement Fund for 2026-2028. (Internal Use Only) (No assurance is provided on this financial analysis) 10 PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA) ILLUSTRATIVE SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED TAX LIABILITY IMPACT (-) ' -Ft A O W ry 3 a D " w u, N 0 EA in cn 3 w EA cn 69 fA EA EA EA CD rn m N H a o U n) 3 V. N 2, 3 W n, a m o C Q O 0 o, A O Cr. 0 O r 0 O U, 0 co C O N Ifni C 4t g', N n m H O 0 O O 0 0 O D) 0 O 0 O E. „„ N c �D c m 'y^ m c o 0 o n c o 0 0 7a o 0 o o y m p� y C, Q y <a O O 0 Z O O O O O O O O x m S ° m c a m O o a c o o y o 0 0 0 = O y n N y N M O ? cn 7 a Q y Q O <D 4++ En C EA N N EA p W N C) 69 fD N N c0 A '9 O W N O p Q O "a X 0 co 0 fn a , N - cD O O - O O ^ O O a, O A C ] N O a ry a W A V W o O O O O O O O V N .�.. N y W fD (p a V W a O O O O O O O O W ID )p 2 y`[ N b "g a -8 Q 01 EOD O d CO 0 00 0 N 0 o O A a y N � o y x 2 k a N n m j C N cD b O Q C f0 N .„ EA C � EA N) EA ,3 W EA EA x c, CD (D a 0) = p c0 A V 2 O V' N N W N En N N O, n'< cD Q N c) 0, 1 W CO O O O O O O coW O Q (D C O Q a O' . t0 ,c,-- O O O O '. O O O N .. co na Q Q n Q�. b, m u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,,, m o m a 6 0 o O o 0 o d o 0 0 m o 13 ,,„ m 8 Q o N S) x % 0 if.! y x n Q'C 4', Q O O N e N n . o b u9, co O O v, 0 0 W CO w CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 CD c CO O .- 0, cn co Q, CO .. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 7 Z,', a a a 3 CO 9 69 o to, o 0 0 0 0 o e o a o o m n v m' a �, `° o m a m I Fa o et � o v m 1 m y 13 O b `O a a a, 0 EA EA I 0 O�. a [n C a y -O cn NJ A V EA EA EA 69 O O O C (A fA fA W 7 7 1N71 O O O y Q % OT ', D N Q O O O 00 O 00 0 0 0 0 7 p W r a Q m o n In CDC c r y N W cD C m o x O. o m cn --4 a) Z <D N N c2 -,. a N EA EA (A EA !A 69 EA EA EA EA EA n a Hi?. > 0 Q m a y ,D A N 7 0 y Q a v, ^, O 0 0 0 O O O N y 7 3 < Z m ry N -I,.?. O Q CD O V O 0 O 0 0 O O CP 7 ! y < < C d C R ry a % O O CT O C O O C O O (Q ? rn f. n, ...7 m m'Q �a m 'm'_ a m n c m 7 _ O N '< C ? + 7 - 3 D CS ' N N O ' O Fi> EA 64 4, EA C `� 3 0 Z m a n .� Q' m C ti - m A o- CCA v — wlb, wN m 0 SDJ D 0 o = c.,N y H m o w C) 0 0 0 o 0 0o m rO.a �' I m { 7�C '1 (p y p, y <O O O O O O O OO Xa 7 C a rn °v 0 0 0 0 00 ,., Vd' fD OT O Dd )` N y n' `CC j a O Q N rn c --4 y m _ O V)J7NW N ? Q 1pED , [n cD R in N o = c < Z y D (7 No a m o 0 0 0 0 0 o Co o n 3 ,- -I N„. N b O O O O O O OO O 7 9 p IM Z = O EO c Cn 4 p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 (7 � ? O D 'O O v rn m S. E Q � G o X D O '4x m n r ') G) - 0 N a 0 0 V, 4) N Cl) EA (A CA to EA d W m -� ? c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o y n - M y • x m Q c 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 7 N ; C) o n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 o m °C-' f { o 3 n ° 3 m ED m m m D 1 v 0 O Q. 0 A 0 69 0 EA EA EA EA 3 x a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y o a -4 Z t.N _ N O o O o O o 0 O o 0 0 m y • N O o 0 o O o O 0 O O O iC ? rn n .. -E Q. m .c A N m o a A m a () ') p OJ a Q fD CD N V - Cam), N _ER � W N 69 EA � N ,, a "' y m A O O O O O cn W G W < d CO O C O 0 O 0 0 0 N CO O, CO o OOO OOL.,0 � CD _ Ft.CD O 5 h.,= O e `C o N m �+ o 0 0 o c o 0 0 o O o 0 • o a O n O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 7 41 0 y o 0 0 a o a e j O S. 4 3 0 0 0Le 4 co 0,1 ▪ N < ET, ID EA 69 EF EA EA EA EA EA EA CA LA 7 7 N CU 2 0 0 O 0 0 0 C O O 0 0 O y 7 C y `C O O O O O C O O O O O 7 c CD y C O 0 O O CD CIO O O O 0 CC p) O CD ✓ y D N CO m Cl o ig y Q CD ig x CT o N EA EA En 69 EA EA CD EA EA CD (A y 0 0 i iii 0 0 0 0 o C o 0 0 0 0 y 7 O y ~ O O O C O O O O 0 O O 7 a - X O 0 0 O 0 0 CD O CD tQ 7 A .< C) T 2) o d d ` y ` N `� H o VI N 3 (0 N EA En 3 w N - _, a d 0 N D c m y c Q D b o (A moo , o cn o o m o o cn o ,n c v e `^ ,, cD ', a `� mWWW'''"' 0 Cl 0 6 0 0 o C 2 o o O o N ,. k " a Q 3 ^ 0 0 0 °' c o o 0 a o 0 0 0 SI n N O E9 ,p o n m - d o ._ S d v a = a c b m > > c En CO EA to Cl. EA 3 Q N cn b Q O a' o b § d ID A v o E' N EA FA N O W N - EA ED El C o Q O -R x (D O N a ED ED A ED C O O O . O O 0, A .N. d �_ N b N x b d N 0) C Zn. C O 0 0 -, O O O 0, O C cA N .0. '� p, '� d b Q co A N o o O C O A O O O d 4o pi, A m .c b 3a •�b° a o0o coD COA oar 0 0 0 o a o 0 o A a '� O. • mod^ o m CO x z 0 x b D d j - ,4 c V A -_ a ._ a o H O W O N y^ . C - EA G (n EA EA 3 w EA EA x fp x 3 •C O V E C D N n,_ w NJ _. 0) y N 'Q ', Q fD d OO 'CO C0 O C O C ET - C 0 0 0 0 C V C • O' .33 Q O O. O O O O C 0 OO C O ON O O O NI a'CD b ; 36 ? 606 E, 0000 ° 'abbe,n 6 m n n o G., ? b o 0 0e 0 0 0 0 o O • o 91 O -13 C Fe Np a a- W x d ID- E- En N x InG`C C.) Q O Q N n N e 0 0 C T. 0 O C 0 •• C 0 0 w C) N 2 0 a al0 N N N.) . 0 0 O O O O C 'co W O 3 e e c o e e e eceo Q \ a NO t d c, O O a n E° A bh CD' � 1-en C.. d 0.. p o d Q d ° O O b DD QOl v EA EA n C7 > Cl)00 43 -3EA EH (n M A E EO `m b V: E, C V w mjO 0 0 0 O 0 opQ W d ? Q oo V o O y j 0 `� Q O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O GI y L o _ o m Q d O O H C c T co Eta_ Eo 0 '" ES N m Q 3 (n m Z % w m y o O C w 'i Cl) o a o' n b W b y C EA U, N -3 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 N N O - Z N h. 3 Q c. b C Q ED m tD A o O o C O C C in 7 m < < C d Cu D a0 a CoO A N 0) O O O C O O O �I g m E_ d m 3b C 64 m a ro Cr) m ", o N `c = 7 �? 3 D 0 0 EA o n N N O CO '� EA _,. EA EA EA EA EA - C "- z m .2 .. m y m ap o �, 0 cn N w N OD NJ m y o a ^ E,,a h N Ep ° 0 0 'Cu' 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 V N E c_ < � ci < o\°°i '� v, d (C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 x Eo O Q 3 O N b Q O O o O C C o O O O o ,w,., - T1 0 _ m a,b o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO pi m p D N a0 C c> O N v; N ED C 0 w C 0 � rn a c0 m a y � a 5. Z mo` n n No IL .?-3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C) 3 > EZi, „,� -, N U o O O o O C C C o 0 0 7 m Z = No'° c cn @ o e e e o e e o e e e ° . 0 O O 'C so �. S. cc D A C CO 0 Q CD N O ~ Z 61 ED G N M C D m w x 3 n, r 71 N > -' N C EA EA in EA EA FA EA EA EA EA EA d co m m o m Eo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d a F D x CO Q o o O o 0 0 0 0 o C o 7 0 x n 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a O O o m * 1 Q --r c ; m vD = C o, g v C) m m > Q3 at CO N EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA EA 7 o 9 -I Z d b o 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 o d C E-73C_ ry a O O o 0 0 o C o 0 o O O G m Ep 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 tO N 3 W Q Eo n N A y x -, a O b ' ?1 1 -3 EA N 0 En En Z1 d -cD 0 O. CA Ln C0 LEI O v pET NJ N.) OD A -<Q O O O nQ O O C 0O 0 OO 000 ma . O 0 O Q OOo 0 cwc. C C O C O O CD tti O. D 9, C Np CO N e Oa .16z Cc C 0 O C 0 0 C C 0 O C) . o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = m ° e e e e e e e e e e 0 a o t 3 m ID m 1 44) En ,` rn D C En p CD EA EA EA EA EA EA EA <A EA 69 EA d n o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C o y c .....- En o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z n O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O C EG d PI 0 o^ c EP m En 39 m CD a ^' ;sir,. COlit o0, o x 3 ID N EA EA EA EEE EA (A EA EA EA EA EA ? O d C� 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 O 0 Co o 'n m o 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 O. E^ x o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 O EC C CI) CD L n 11 xi O m N 3 a ? p ` u ` ti n EA EA (A 3 EA En (A EA 3 (A EA 69 EA o: , 'o N D Z. 3 D m y c Q D 8 o (NP A o (NA o o r O O o C fG L DI 3 E^ = �FF^^^^^^ o o 0 0 0 0 0 0+ 0 0 o c - ro W C 3 W Lc' fn y 3 - to • O O G O O O o O O C O N � m3 � � 3 n3 " � 3 0 0 0 °i o 0 0 o m o 0 0 0 �o o` _ o 3 o n 3 m o I n a (n i n a ( 0 1 a > > ? n EA _, (A n EA v, 69 p En En te 3 _ m N y y -C Q O 3 C 3 W J C.) OI V C (J, N _ S W -NJ 6J9 N m W N O-, %-o k ": k aO N a, to fv0 o A V O 0 O O A 0 O o c N ? _' fr N 3 N 3 v (p 1 N fP m 0 O C O o 0 0 o C n W W °' '� o 3 •3 n °' w y o 0 0 o iD o 0 o c a •.N. .� " A J O N ' X 2 S 4 y j N k - a a O c, ry o O O N N ,n„ N M y, O fA N N (A ,�,. W N (A X k 0 CO A W O Ot Op c o CD a n a O A N O O C O O O (l, m O 3 a n Q O a n Oi ^ d N N 0 0 o O N o O CD CD O CO N CD (n 3 c 3 Eo - o 0 o T` o 0 0 (c n o a Q,' R 1 a`C 3 o fOJ, (p a o 0 0 0 W o CD o a o a y y n o, C N % • %.< (ano ¢ a -. m n 01 CI d o O ^ ONj 0 0 CO O O W O 0 0 O •• O O O O n CD G CO O W (T CO (0 (O -- o O O O O O O (D 7 re N 3 3 (.,c0 69 e o e e e e e e e e e mo $ no 3 ao o0a, vz m -0 0 U EA N v C n 2 H O o o b t 0 a ry . EA O N CO a o ((, n- H fT (EA}, N EA (A EA EA (A EA (A f�., j m fp 0 3 fs O A -, o O O O O O O O m 7 O O a a 3 W n o N •T O O O O O O b b O 7 e m 1 a o a f' a EJ 0„ 0 o O o 0 CO O 0 o O C r a C T c n m 3 m e re 0, nEoa CD - _ a o N, m 0 3 -11 m z y e N • 3 M MI EA. o y a 7 a a.o 'Cl): OD co N o 0 0 0 0 0 o N y ° 3' D Z m (D n a a o n a f o 0 o O o 0 0 C m < < y O N O D 3 O C (Vlt O O 0 C C 0 C J (O 7. .... m F C a - A = b fD a s W K n y r a m 3 a m a s m C m O Q o N .c m ? 3 = 3 t' D �_ " U O N 3 A N 69 F` N (°" 69 N E� EA O " r O N CCD (7 - N ) N 0 CO A N 0 O O C O O Vn N m '� Z7 C C D k per° o A N o O O O C 0 0 fT N C -i 1 fC c (Nil y a to A NCC A O O O C O O O lb - = * p n n _ m y v o ran 3 m a`a of m o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn a m p D a " N a m s ,_ fn Z O O = (e a (Ni, 3 u Qm 43 < Z- re m' U . e n 2 a Ocn D O N a O 0 O O O O O O O O C n 3 x E c o — O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o o y y m O = j '- N a C (N1, g e e e o e o e e e e e o ti p 0 o`9 a3 n C 03 N fail Wto fEaD D p O e O r -nm c u3 m La a o fL=_1 2 cn a EA 69 CO EA EA (A EA CO EA EA (A = 0 N 03 m .< O y to o O o 0 o O O o 0 0 O m fn h m n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n r c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m * <n p o co• c v c g n n m W >co 3 -1 N ? (D a EA EA EA EA EA (A EA EA (A 69 69 0 12 1 Z a C a a C 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m 'o ? x a o 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y (an (: EE o c o 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 (n m El 3 m n 3 ,e p X, -74 ^ rn K O T o - O .. d • (• gyp Q N m A v O V, N CO IA � N N •..� 1 n n ' m A N O O O 0 0 O o l O W • F W A N '_ O O O 0 O O O 6 W k O O C O C C O C a ? U O W 0 O C O O O O f0 r a a a' o Q 3 a F H O e • N Q O O O O O O O O O O O n FeO o D o 0 0 0 0 0 o O in 0 o N a W -0 H e e e e e e o e o 0 0 D ° a c (O O 0 3 3 0 co (O 3 x en • cm O 3 EA 69 EA EA 69 EA EA 69 EA (A EA 7' D a a c O O CD O C O C O 0 0 O O m c' m - • o 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 CD CD C `� c C • 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 C F. a o a co NO3 m n o ,—__. , m 02 (an a x n 3 3 C E9 C EA EA 69 O 0 O EA (A (A fA O O O O EA (A 69 fA aO O O O y (D o ( nyi o 0 0 0 0 0 o C o 0 o O S a CC o 00 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 CC 3 •G a n - z o Io ?a ` °i D (�` EA to 3 VI EA EA VI 3 (n EA E. EA w G (n y G d O N 0 [Nn - O U O O r O O 0 o N re, y y C Q.H o 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O O C O ^ 0 0 c y c n y c c o0 0 0 m o 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 °' a 3 (D o m a o` o 0 0 m o 0 0 ? 0 0 0 0 I n a n m a n N a 0 Cr ° o c m lU 01 N EA 0 G 8 EA fn (A p EA EA V+ N - N N a y b ° tD O b 3 -.I W fn O to N 7 w N H a N N O R O K X O In R (n (o CC ED O O 0 o A o o O O A 7 - ED b (p (L nt m C f7i O 0 O O O O O 0 W - CD 1D o a 3 ° a b a N u o 0 0 0 0 0 0o c ..2 m w Nd.� D a .• R V CO v w 00 0 0 o N o 0 0 of • °'a ' o -, b i'v a s •o a o x ° (D ED O a to N p1 � E. _, EA C (A EA EA P. (A 0 (A x ° CD C R R n z O v' N ' O O 0 - O 0 (n CO y 0 fD (A O O 0 O O O 2 n n R ° CD n a N 7. . v W o O O O N O O O iTOI -- CO b a CC (gyp n G CC Cr, " 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 04 m o (n o a n o ...CI') a o U 'C x ° x n co- O Q Q -� p A - e -0 m (E,',E n > o) O o w w w 01 0 0 0 0 •• 0 0 0 (a C) m CO o iv a m in in .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 o io 7 m N 3 ° W ° o a a e o o a o 0 0 0 o n o 3 b o von m m -0 y m m m o I� O O n '° m w m m n a o ° a b , 0 a.0 En Ol (A s9 EA n y -CD a 0. p N- R D N ['n' J (n N N EA to fA (A 09 EA W 7 = m a O D b ° cD cn O CC -I 0 O o 0 0 o O O Do p O `C r4 t ( Q n e N O' co O O o O O O O co C L j i]`C a O O O 'O OCCCC O O O c A d r o I- T co zo m o' n H D, m o m D, o o n��, m o m m m n 3 3 O N Ca a °i CO�� GP EA N 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 N y j 3 ~ Z 01 m R a 'Co '&, o 0 0 c o 0 0 u, 3 < < N W �"W o C D' o o u, O O O C O O O V m 0c a, a CC m F- 01 a m b ID a,` W R 7 (D 3 D Fo' d j c a o a = y 3 n 2 (D N O G cb N �° FA �' fA V EA cA 69 EA d C > r O m S a cn m m C o a 0 C cy, N _ w N EA m r.' f .Z1 D C O j (D N C D "' H O (T ONt o 0 0 O O o O N d C < -4 `"b y 'o �" co o 0 0 0 0 0 C x O N � C C H CC G A (n O O O O o O O °i V - 0 O 0 0 m m m m Eb'a_ 4o v' Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °' mr , m c -Di Q .p a n 0 a' m Q. 7 2 0 O m 0, 4, m u j e -. 13 D < y 7 p N co o O o c o O O 0 O 0 0 n 3 m o D n o b __ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 lo L. Z S c1 N a e e e o 0 0 0 7 .n. 3 0 O 13 O N N 4 0 o e N (_l 1 Z ° CA W H N `a K D O cr c n c r m ro CD m m DC - , u. n EA (A EA N EA EA (A EA EA EA EA 7 2 N• N W l7 o 7 y N o 0 O O O O O O O 0 o IV 2 G r b N k R O O O o o O 0 0 0 0 0 7 c X CO c 0 O O O O 0 0 O O O O LO DI * 'E p ° 0 7 m n c m W D n m 0 CD W (2 n 3 V 0 O d a CO G (A EA EA EA EA EA CO H EA EA EA 7 O G 2 R ('j N b O O O O O O O O 0 O O W 2 9 ET/ ? Cl- a O O O 0 O O O O O O o > j o m (/� a, O c, c, O 0 O O O O 0 O A 7 M A CDN n a X in x O T m b n - O o (D K (A EA EA EA EA EA EA EA A A N N n CD co A 0 (n N w N 69 < En NAn � o N rn o000 0o O `� N 0 0 N L., c, O O O O O PW ? A 003 O 0 O O O O m CN < [A oO O O O O Oa c. O us `Z CD G <D Q 9 N G y' N e b (n 0 0 0 O O O O 0 O O 0 7 ° o n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o no, co a e o 0 0 0 o o o o a` Z.) O ' f m o m 4 if m n D AR EA EA [A di (A (A EA EA W 7 2 'I.' o' O O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 a.(01,� ,� 0 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C c o o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co D, En N^ IFSc 01 c m o o m Cb EU 4m or z n 3 N '° CD IA EA EA CD O 0 0 to 0 (R O O O O EA (A EA EA 0 O O 0 7 ° CD .... CD DV O o 0 0 O 0 C O O o - Q. x c o 0 0 0 o c 0 0 c 0 A a m n -n 0 N IX' • D o�, % 173..... y m 2 e, fA v� 3 e, co to .n 3 fn fA to 0 o • y 3 y 0 x ` O J O u, 3 O CNl) — O 0 O V, C D N S y y n c C)-, y o0 0 C m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 <C (D i (D c co y 30• O C 'co n O O O O O O C co N Co m a S Co co _a 3 0 o c m o 0 0 0 d o 0 0 co o, cli,1) v y o<, co 2 g CD 0 a (T• w . C , a 0 (A v, En a f, v+ EA O EA (A fA y Nco ND y a n O O O D n Q, T ? WA lLA NJO NfDN• D CD 7 a CD 0 0) ? N CD O Q E.CD N▪ D O (D (D A N - NAN ON (pfDm n 3 y _ Q A w Aw m COO o rn Z- M X d, °jD D 'C to n P A J 0 A J J N xdDa -o D c Xa j 0Oxl OG ccooN3OO co n H (DD YEn En En O Cfl EA EA 7 v, CA (A D ° O co 0 fO A EA NN DC n0 0 `C j AJ 0o OJ 0) CO <JDN0) C a Co aOQoa ; XcND A m 0) N N Co 0 0 ,s, Cv (� y C ? G (D cn f0 CO A u CO A CO O $ A Cl, O W cn co 0 p-, CD ^ ,D n a N O V, Oo CO CO CO N (.) CD D • D ° o m' e x iD m � _m 00 fD to H " `C CD x 01 ! e 3 w n o O _ o, ° o co co co fo co m co co .. co co m co n Co c0 O co co c0 co O CO CO Co DC 3 c (n ° - d N e .. o e o e e e e e o COa a o 3 D 3 c0 o a ro A Ei d CD m o 0 D L m a `�° a m o o 0 • co a, •4 0 Cn O V, LA QD v) EA CO EA CO) di nLA D O b D n co DC Ca - Cn - CO (a A N j > m (p Cp , y 'O co, ) N 0) O O N m A 0) J (y O O N D O c CP N 0) Cl) N N Cn CO 7 c (_ vl ,Q n CD O) (D CD CP N N j (P N O 0) O N CO D1 r m N C 0 ,, D (D O r ° W O) 0, N 0) CO N N v co C TI D a D, O a COD m c O -i ..0 O N-ciQ o X CG — N O N CL CA C j CA CA L to CA CA LA 0 O 7 H 0 CO K C<D O N d D O coCD CZ 43 A m A C ON) C.) coff N A 0) 0 y G G cocn co• N 1 co 'c D D fp co O 00 CO CO A A N CO O A K O. Cn r `D e DC 0 CD cn . m c m O Cn D N cr, 4 N (1 0 3 C7 Z CD d ? O N N ^ ? d) CA (A CA LA N v+ _. -• D C O _ (y CD D O y- (D tD A co A N C ..0 CD 6, a (n O` CD A J O J OD CO - 0) m O cr N m C O = C) C D H ° \ 0 ? A OAi CO CO 0 N X N O C1 N v N N D C w to C v: fOi) G O 0< co CA CO COO O N W CO W O' m 0 -{ a n 0 3 y m j I 0 2 0 CA ? N N H DC a N e I ? C Z s p ? a m m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 3 a > CA N 0 co N N n ' 0 O O O O O O O a C O N 0 O -I ZO = .c a\° 2 G N) CD Elie e e o o e e e o 0 .ni F. N ° G N m 0 e o CC I d -4 2 O m 0, D ___ ) 0° D• D O (D • m n c .0 DC C x' 3 Q. DC CA fA CA CA CA LA CA (A fA EA fA S 0 W m m E. CD (D O. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 co a N O, y En n O O O O O O O a o 0 0 0 0 • ;0 �+ 3 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C O O A IN * — 0 .. NO 0 X O Q. * { Enz n n 7 3 n ° CO -0 -1 o n a n C a D co m N En EA CA EA CA EA CA fA EA EA EA -I Z u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 Lg. = Co co a 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ? DC o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M = $ A _ m - CD A ( 3 y a T -i m O 0 y X OC fA L CA (A fA fA EA (A EA fA a .0 D n N O CO A CC A -� ((A N J CP N -I ,� W Q ry A W 00)) W 00) A c.J3 00)) 0 CO 0 N ll O co Co A J A J 0) 00 cO O C co coC W O c.,, 03 COP ACP COO O N (J O n N O .2 ax n GI e.,-, 0 Q • p)' CD Z co3 C 3 NO 0 O O O 0 O O O O O 0 n H N C O O O O O O 0 O O o 00i a 0, e e o o o e o 0 e 0 e 0 N O O A O • W a_ o O C a o m n CD x y fA fA CA CA CA CA EA EA CA EA EA ? m Co N _ 3 C O O 0 0 O 0 O O 0 O CO O A m Cf (D O a a O a CO 0 O a a a = C '< y a n 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c, to, `C G co O^ S. —' co co co 0 N mCO 3 C N fA fA fA (A EA EA EA EA fA CA fA c O . 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 C o 0 0) 0 t. CD a 0 0 O 0 O o o O 0 O fD 7. 0 CO O O 0 O O O O O O O O LfD,17 K O y i -n N_ (D " D n - a N A ti; 2 FA v rn 3 (A to to w 3 cn <n C. EA G - 0 0 - 049 ` y X `. O W N Cll N Cr-C) W N C Cu 0 in' ` 3 y y M CD 0 O W , 00 O O A O co O O r O O O O » D °i y 3 CD y y y 3 y O O C n O o O O a O O O O CO ,CT Po' 3 (`Dn a o 0 0 m o 0 0 O y o 0 0 o m °-)., 2 -,o; m 2 c, 3o ? (D 0 m 7 x y cn m y n y a 0 3 1 N O c .c_' S (n w EA (A (. fn fn fA di FA _Ci' CO0 N O N a b W -, ° J W CD -4 W J J 7 W A J w CT — p (D b 1 K a Po paj 0) M. y N - W A ^ OW) U O f ? N " D . j 3 a ,c a 0o 0, m D ' a Z x ma o- cc, c b CD 0 ai n o- v v o " '- b 0 v -- a x (a o nco b W aN A.) (Jt (n N _ N fA )C 01• y O (D-`G O O O o O O Oi (L j co n r..) o 4.n n co y N O O is) d MaO Q nn oOa X - --4 ,o O 0 O O a A (D coCCbs ? n q ' a- N O O O N N.) N.)a D „„ _ d coCD A O o `(4 W lD ° o, ro y �C, 0 x on) ° (S O Cl W .. n ° c 0 W N - (b co oo 6) a A A a .. CA CD Cp- co n 3 c m 0 j iii y c O-^ A A A A A A A A A A A 0)) O CD N - .g W (A e e o •• e e e e e e e e = '0 O o, 0 3 b 3 9 m c 0 ° CO O v . O N Q O -0 j (D d (� (°n O a C4 a b 0 m - 0 w (j (A CO (A EA EA (A (A en C) > N b - b n b m (n - (n N a N m lD N a N y (n N O N N Ch N a 0) J (0 y j O O y Co N 01 Cr CO CT N) 01 W Q C O a m n y o N j j N A j O , _. (fl c r V N) N N C T O W co r T D m 0 (b m ° a s En m b N ny v `m ° m z cn co e x N C m V) EA V1 69 N E. EA EA FA C) 3 " > 0 ea Z CD O 0 a e. CD N EA 7 1z Q.,• 'G C{D % y b a m OW CO A A N O O 0) N A » O G G y N CL Q. W b O 1 Fr,C •J W J W Co A m N [D O IG ? m r c co 'C 1 b ry J O O 0) CO (I) (b A N Co K a Cn r m co D2) ' o m a N d C m (7 (n a m a`c ,-- 4 3 3 nr 2 (p d N N 'C >. lA (A 03 (j w (•A EA W (A 6N y D D O (D O N CD No N Cl) N N (A r y CD N 4 CN)) O' Co A O O O O O 0) ( -< •� j Cn x `C y O � N J 00 0 o O W A c, N % C O T. OC 3 n N Vni x 3 0 - in v O O O O m N Oo J v n T C) a s CD b y y (D 0 O U1 0i O O 0 0 N N N W W O > CD N 1D ° N G b y Uc a N o C C -1 o w 5 O S ? m o 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 o A 3 o > y D W -I Z _ N o O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 y 2 .,c m o = �,< W a' n O °' m o o e o 0 0 o e o 0 7 .ni l O V 7 \ Z c) N h ° t0 D T N ° c Gn N O CD ' Z n k D D 3 ------- CD X D o d o m ci. 3• N m y o r T 4) o o x 0 4 v 0D m D 7z EA (A (A (0 60 (I) (n EA (A (A E» 0 (D a o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 o d Cr) y a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c a C 'fl %) N- �)- ? CD O O O O 0 O 0 O O O 0 C� O 0 x c -< 0 • z n c 3 m cs o n c z a y d co - m a () (» (n (a (n (A H+ EA (» EA EA 0 0 n 0 y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o y = 'p -( Z O_ C.S. co D O O O o o O O O o O O !� -( . at a 73 m 3! 'i 0 E. y X O fA w (n 49 EA 6. (n W EA (A m b P E O O C) O 0 N N N '� O U' _ x CD J CO J O O 0 0 W A (f 0 N (4 CD C G 0 N 0 O O O CL N m J m3. J O O O CP - CIDn N A N m 0 O O O NO IV A) co iii ,c Ft; x 7 y Q N Q(D o 0 3 O O O 0 O O O O O 0 0 O 0a `C. y N O O O O O O O O O O O W b C o o e e e e e o e ',:;',' e m w a cc (4 c m '0 -. ` a O x " 7(A (A EA (n (n (n (n (A (A (A EA D N y 30 O O O O O O O 0 O 0 DU4 in' CD (D O O o O O O O O O O O 7 'C G) Cr 0 O O O O 0 O C O O O O C10 y (4 0 co CD O' C °i co N Q g CD to EA EA (A (A V) (A (A EA FA EA 7 0 0 cu x O O O O O O O O O O 0 y O O O C O O O O O O O 7 a (gyp O N O O O O O O O O O O 0 C� - 00 y U) PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA) SUPPLEMENTAL DATA PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY.INDIANA) SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED IMPACT ON CIRCUIT BREAKER TAX CREDITS 2026 PROPOSED FIRE TERRITORY Baseline 2026 Est. Change 2027 Est. Change I 2028 Est. Change Clark County $ 3.412.859 $ 4.181.068 $ 768.209 $ 4.605.665 $ 424,597 $ 4.893.329 $ 287,664 Bethlehem Township - - - Carr Township 2,362 2.417 55 2.668 251 2,869 202 Charlestown Township 13,958 15,234 1,276 16.828 1,594 18,007 1,179 Jeffersonville Township 136.267 165.576 29.309 183,881 18,305 196,226 '2,345 Monroe Township • - Oregon Township Owen Township - - - - Silver Creek Township 14,706 14..631 (75) 15.989 1.358 17,192 1,203 Union Township • - • Utica Township 4,629 7 125 2.496 8.121 996 8,595 473 Washington Township - - • Wood Township - • Jeffersonville Civil City 5,870,979 5,728,013 (142.966) 6,417,327 689,314 6,793,476 376.149 Jeffersonville-Utica Township FPD Fire Territory - 2,629,472 2,629,472 2,818,774 189,302 2,976,332 '57,558 Charlestown Civil City 441,195 444.007 2.812 488.974 44,967 524,286 35.306 Clarksville Civil Town 1 6 937.741 6,756,118 (181,623) 7,243,643 487,525 7.701,226 457.583 Borden Civil Town • • - Sellersburg Civil Town 156 4'8 162.176 5.758 183,003 20,827 196.248 13.245 Utica Civi,Town 35 18,476 18 441 23.690 5.214 25.247 1,557 Borden-Henryville School Corporation - - - - - West Clark Community School Corporation • Silver Creek School Corporation 825.771 829.653 3.882 984.666 55,013 922,172 37.505 Clarksville Community School Corporation 2.366 031 2.297.521 (68,510) 2,390,774 93,253 2.476,749 85.975 Greater Clark County School Corporation 6.351,094 8,432.520 2 081.426 9,162.934 730,414 9.543.484 380,551 Jeffersonville Township Public Library 590,491 717.504 127.013 788.801 71.297 834.871 46,070 Charlestown-Clark County Contractual Library 89.816 112.303 22.487 125.228 12,926 133.963 8.735 Jeffersonville Flood Control 412.172 471.133 58,961 518.409 47,276 552.417 34,008 Charlestown Fire 83,874 84.206 332 91.786 7,580 97.939 6.153 Tn-Township Fire Protection District 258.028 259.172 1 144 282,334 23.162 299.727 17,393 Monroe Township Fire Protection - - Utica Township Fire District • 6,406 6 406 8,030 1.623 8,196 166 New Washington Fire Protection District Clark County Solid Waste Management District • Totals $27,968.426 $33,334,731 $ 5,366,305 $36,261,525 $ 2.926,794 $38,222,545 $ 1,961,020 Note: Circuit Breaker loss amounts do not include amounts for Over 65 Circuit Breaker Credits (Internal Use Only) (No assurance is provided on this financial analysis) 17 PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY,INDIANA) SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED IMPACT ON LOCAL INCOME TAX("LIT") (Certified Shares) 2026 PROPOSED FIRE TERRITORY Baseline 2026 Est. Change 2027 Est. Change Clark County $ 7,914,242 $ 7.914,242 $ - $ 7,274.304 $ (639 938) Bethlehem Township 2,203 2,203 2,125 (78) Carr Township 13,944 13,944 13,317 (627) Charlestown Township 52,509 52,509 - 50,386 (2 123) Jeffersonville Township 247,258 247,258 227,131 (20,127) Monroe Township 20,819 20,819 - 19,975 (844) Oregon Township 4,996 4,996 - 4 574 (422) Owen Township 6,376 6.376 - 5.490 (886) Silver Creek Township 45,469 45,469 43;602 (1,867) Union Township 6,624 6.624 - 5,987 (637) Utica Township 10,582 10,582 10.388 (194) Washington Township 6,556 6.556 - 6.276 (280) Wood Township 36.015 36,015 - 34.711 (1,304) Jeffersonville Civil City 9,295.925 9,295,925 - 10,613,517 1,317 592 Charlestown Civil City 975,287 975,287 - 872,369 (102.918) Clarksville Civil Town 5.296,619 5,296.619 - 5,066.328 (230.291) Borden Civil Town 53,042 53,042 - 50,832 (2 210) Sellersburg Civil Town 688,371 688,371 - 659.697 (28 674) Utica Civil Town 45.467 45.467 - 43.608 (1.859) Jeffersonville Township Public Library 562,317 562.317 - 528,338 (33.979) Charlestown-Clark County Contractual Library 389,538 389,538 373.596 (15.942) Jeffersonville Flood Control 413,991 413.991 - 397,323 (16,668) Charlestown Fire 513,621 513,621 - 379,207 (134.414) Tri-Township Fire Protection District 1.110,025 1.110,025 - 1,055,179 (54 846) Monroe Township Fire Protection 96 398 96,398 89,552 (6.846) Utica Township Fire District 47,575 47,575 - 33,665 (14.010) New Washington Fire Protection District 85,282 85,282 - 79,674 (5.608) Totals $ 27,941,051 $27,941,051 $ - $ 27,941,051 $ - Notes. Certified shares are allocated to taxing units(except schools)based on the amount levied in the previous year by each entity as a percentage of the sum of those levies If a fire territory is established beginning with taxes payable in 2026, local income taxes will be impacted beginning in 2027. Additionally, IC 36-8-19-7 5 provides that each participating unit in a Fire Territory for purposes of allocating certified shares is considered to have imposed a part of the property tax levy imposed for the territory (Internal Use Only) (No assurance is provided on this financial analysis.) 18 PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA) SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED IMPACT ON LOCAL INCOME TAX ("LIT") (Economic Development) 2026 PROPOSED FIRE TERRITORY Baseline 2026 Est. Change 2027 Est. Change Clark County $ 3,211,821 $ 3,211,821 $ - $ 2,843,318 $ (368,503) Jeffersonville Civil City 3,481,273 3,481,273 - 4,042,716 561,443 Charlestown Civil City 372,232 372,232 - 310,815 (61,417) Clarksville Civil Town 1.958,637 1,958,637 - 1,842,428 (116,209) Borden Civil Town 19,528 19,528 18,496 (1,032) Sellersburg Civil Town 253,436 253,436 - 240,040 (13,396) Utica Civil Town 16,757 16,757 - 15,871 (886) Totals $ 9,313,684 $ 9,313,684 $ - $ 9,313,684 $ - Notes: In Clark County, economic development is allocated to the County Unit and municipalities based on the amount levied in the previous year by each entity as a percentage of the sum of those levies. If a fire territory is established beginning with taxes payable 2026, local income taxes will be impacted beginning in 2027. Additionally, IC 36-8-19-7.5 provides that each participating unit in a Fire Territory for purposes of allocating certified shares is considered to have imposed a part of the property tax levy imposed for the territory. (Internal Use Only) (No assurance is provided on this financial analysis.) 19 PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA) SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED IMPACT ON LOCAL INCOME TAX ("LIT") (Public Safety) 2026 PROPOSED FIRE TERRITORY Baseline 2026 Est. Change 2027 Est. Change Clark County $ 2.551,285 $ 2.551,285 $ - $ 2,315,255 $ (236,030) Jeffersonville Civil City 2,996,693 2,996,693 - 3,378,054 381,361 Charlestown Civil City 314,400 314,400 - 277,656 (36,744) Clarksville Civil Town 1,707,452 1,707,452 - 1,612,503 (94,949) Borden Civil Town 17,099 17,099 - 16.179 (920) Sellersburg Civil Town 221,908 221,908 - 209,967 (11,941) Utica Civil Town 14.657 14,657 - 13,880 (777) Totals $ 7,823,494 $ 7,823,494 $ - $ 7,823,494 $ - Notes: Public Safety LIT is allocated to the County Unit and municipalities based on the amount levied in the previous year by each entity as a percentage of the sum of those levies. If a fire territory is established beginning with taxes payable 2026, local income taxes will be impacted beginning in 2027 Additionally, IC 36-8-19-7.5 provides that each participating unit in a Fire Territory for purposes of allocating certified shares is considered to have imposed a part of the property tax levy imposed for the territory. (Internal Use Only) (No assurance is provided on this financial analysis.) 20 PROPOSED JEFFERSONVILLE AND UTICA TOWNSHIP FPD FIRE PROTECTION TERRITORY (CLARK COUNTY,INDIANA) SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED IMPACT ON VEHICLE EXCISE TAXES 2026 PROPOSED FIRE TERRITORY Baseline 2026 Est. Change 2027 Est. Change 2028 Est. Change Clark County $ 2 072 361 $ 1.901.946 $ (170,415) $ 1,896,606 $ (5,340) $ 1890,639 $ (5,967) Bethlehem Township 361 331 (30) 330 (1) 329 (1) Carr Township 5.413_ 4,968 (445) 4,954 (14) 4.936 (16) Charlestown Township / 15,754 14,458 (1,296) 14.417 (41) 14,372 (45) Jeffersonville Township 51,501 47,266 (4.235) 47,133 (133) 46,985 (148) Monroe Township 8,762 8.042 (720) 8.019 (23) 7,994 (25) Oregon Township 1,545 1,418 (127) 1.414 (4) 1,410 (4) Owen Township 1,822 1,672 (150) 1,667 (5) 1,662 (5) Silver Creek Township 14.408 13.223 (1,185) 13,186 (37) 13.145 (41) Union Township 3,109 2,854 (255), 2,846 (6) 2.837 (9) —_Utica Township 2.211 2,029 (182) 2,023 (6) 2.017 (6) Washington Township - 1.859 1.706 (153) 1.701 (5) 1.696 (51 Wood Township 12,234 11,228 (1,006) '1196 (32) 11,161 (35) Jeffersonville Civil City 1,931,695 1.772,821 (158.874) 1,767640 (4,981) 1,782,211 (5.559) Jeffersonville-Utica Township FPD Fire Territory • 1,014.032 1.014.032 1,045,900 31,268 1,080.200 34,900 Charlestown Civil City 265.558 243.717 (21,841) 243,032 (685) 242.268 (764) Clarksville Civil Town 1.307.394 1.199,866 (107,528) 1,196,495 (3,371) 1.192.733 (3,762) Borden Civil Town 18.797 17,251 (1,546) 17,203 (48) 17.149 (54) Sellersburg Civil Town 140.627 129.061 (11,566) 128,698 (363) 128.293 (405) Utica Civi'Town 9,678 8.882 (796) 6.857 (25) 8 829 (28) Borden-Henryville Schoo,Corporation 851 458 781.429 (70,029) 779.234 (2,1951 776,784 (2,450) Silver Creek School Corporation 872,588 800621 (71.767) 798.571 (2.250) 796.060 (2.511) Clarksville Community School Corporation 397,832 365.112 (32.720) 364.086 (1.026) 362,941 (1.145) Greater Clark County School Corporation 3.136.181 2.878.243 (257.938) 2,870.157 (8 086) 2,861,132 (9.025) 179.268 164,524 (14.744) 164,062 (462) 163.546 (516) Jeffersonville Township Public Library 109,608 (346) Charlestown-Clark County Contractual Library 120 145 110.264 (9,881) 109.954 (310) Jeffersonville Flood Control 70.864 65.035 (5.829) 64.852 (183) 64,648 (204) Charlestown Fire 160.855 147.625 (13,230) 147.210 (415) 146.747 (463) Tri-Township Fire Protection District 402.457 369,357 (33,100) 368,319 (1,038) 367,161 (1158) Monroe Township Fire Protection 47.040 43.171 (3,869) 43,050 (121) 42.915 (135) Utica Township Fire District 23,347 6,735 (16.6121 8.735 8,735 New Washington Fire Protection District 23,509 21 547 (1,9621 21 487 (60) 21.419 (68) Totals $12,150,634 $12,150,634 $ - $12.150.634 $ $12,150,634 $ Note Illustration based on changes associated with the Fire Territory only Does not include changes related to the annual maximum levy growth quotient Units not receiving vehicle exise were excluded (Internal Use Only) (No assurance is provided on this financial analysis) 21