HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-R-07 RESOLUTION NO. 91-R- ~
RESOLUTION APPROVING STATEMENT OF BENEFITS FOR
PURPOSES OF REAL PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT
WHEREAS, Huber Tire Company, Inc., has petitioned the
Common Council of the City of jeffersonville, Indiana, for
processing a tax abatement for both additional office and
warehouse space and for new manufacturing equipment; and,
WHEREAS, Huber Tire Company, Inc., has submitted a
Statement of Benefits on the form prescribed by the Indiana
State Board of Tax Commissioners for such purpose; and,
WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of Jeffersonvilie,
Indiana, has previously determined that the jeffersonville
Inc.,
Research and Industrial Park in which Huber Tire Company,
is located qualifies as an economic revitalization
pursuant to Indiana Code 6-1.1-12.1 et seq.
area
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of
the City of jeffersonville that it specifically finds as
follows:
1. That the estimate of the value of the redevelopment
or .rehabilitation is reasonable for projects of the
nature described in the Statement of Benefits
submitted by the developer.
That the estimate of the number of individuals who
will be employed or whose employment will be retained
can reasonably be expected to result from the
proposed described redevelopment or rehabilitation.
That the estimate of the annual salaries of those
individuals who will be employed or whose employment
will be retained can be
from the proposed
rehabilitation.
reasonably expected to result
described redevelopment or
That all other information requested from the
developer has been submitted, and the benefits
described in such information can be reasonably
expected to result from the proposed described
redevelopment or rehabilitation.
That the totality of
or rehabilitation
deduction.
benefits for said redevelopment
is sufficient to justify the
Be it further resolved that the Common Council of the City
of jeffersonville, Indiana, hereby approves the application
for deduction presented by the Statement of Benefits filed by
Huber Tire Company, Inc., and that said developer shall be
entitled to the following deductions:
A. For new computer equipment as scheduled in the
Statement of Benefits and utilized in the
manufacturing process a deduction in accordance with
Indiana law shall be allowed for a period of five (5)
years commencing with the filing and perfection
thereof in the Clark County Auditor's office.
B. For improvements to real property as scheduled in the
Statement of Benefits a deduction in accordance with
Indiana law for a period of ten (10) years commencing
with the filing and perfection thereof in the Clark
County Auditor's office.
Passed and adopted this ~ day of ~ ,
1991, by the Common Council of the City of Jeffersonville,
Clark County, Indiana.
~,~A~RS 'L-.' CARTER
PRESIDENT, COMMON COUNCIL
ATTEST:
CLERK_TREASU~R~CE~ v
Presented by me as
City of Jeffersonville,
~. , 1991.
Clerk-Treasurer to the Mayor of the
Indiana, this ~ day of
CLERK_TREASuRiE~R'~
Approved
and signed
, 1991.
by me this ~ day of
~A~-0~D~ti5~' f. 0REM
Jeffersonville City Council
Huber Tire Company '~
3215 Industrial Parkway, Jeffersonville, IN
STATEMENT OF BENEFITS STATE BOARD OF TAX COMMISSIONERS
INSTFiUCTIONS. (I.C. 6'f.l't2.1) THIS PAGE TO BE COMPLETED BY APPUCANT · ~ .~. .' ·
deouct~on. Effective July t, 1987. . .
7~p Cc~e
'47130
., . : SECT[ON I LOCATION, COST AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT .: i:.:~ ~:: :.~i':'
L~catron of proper~y ~f OHferent from above Taxing Oisttlc!
$ ams
and description of teal property improvements anct I er new manufacturing equipment to be acquire(l:
14,700 sq. ~t. add~'tion $320,000 .: Purchase $60,000 worth o£ computers
(3,000 o~±ce) (11,700 m~. and.*~a=ehouse)
Anticipating an.additional 16 employees
Eatirnate~ ~tamng Oats Esumate Compmtma Date
,, ,, (Attach additional sheets if needed) 12-1-90 4-1-91
SECTION I] ESTIMATE OF E~PLOYEES AND ~ALARIES AS RESULT OF PROPOSED PROJECT ,: ::;...:
;urrent ~umoer -~;,t, ;~s, 0 0 0 Numeer6Retainea S;l:;e~, O00 Num~Ier ~c6aiti°nal ;~;a~;s~ 000..
SECTION III ESTIMATE TOTAL COST AND VALUE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
REAL ESTATE iMPROVEMENTS I MACHINERY
Current Values
Plus estimated values of proposed project
Less: Values of any property being replaced
Net estimated vatues upon completion of project
. COST I ASSESSED VALUE. I COST I~SSESSED VAGUE
250,000 I 85~000 I 250,000 I85,000
320,000 110,000 60,000 I25~000
575,000 [ 195,000 I 310,000 t 110,000
SECTION IV OTHER INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE DESIGNATING BODY
I hereby certdy that the representations on this statement are true.
FOR USE OF DESIGNATING BODY
iMPACT ON TIlE CURRENT YEAR TAX RATE FOR THE TAXING DISTRICT INDICATED ABOVE
t '
Tax Rates Determined Using The Following Assumptions Total Tax'Rates
1. Current total tax rate. , ,
2. Approximate tax rate if project occurs and no deduction is granted. I $
· Approximate tax rate if project occurs and a deduction is assumed. $
Assume an 80% deduction on new machinery installedan~lor a50% deduction assumed on real estate improvements.
We have reviewed our prior actions relating to the designation of this economic revitalization area and find that the ap~31icant meets the
general standards aaopted in the resolution previously ap~3roved by this body. Said resolution, passed under lC 6-1.1.12.1-2.5, provides
the following limitations as authorized under lC 6-1.1-12.1-2:
A) Th?..designated area has been limited to a period of time not to exceed
calender years. *(See Below)
B) The type of deduction that is allowed in the designated ~rea is limited to: ~ Yes ~ No
1) Redevelopment or rehabilitation of real estate improvements. [-], Yes ~ No
2) Installation of new manufacturing equipment r-~ No
3) No limitations on type of dedu=tion (check if no limitations)
C) The amount of deduction applicable for new manufacturing equipment installed and first claimed eligible for
deduction after July 1, 1987, is limited to $ cost with an $ assessed value.
Also we have reviewed the information contained in the statement of benefits including the impact on the tax rate incoroorated herein.
end have determined that the benefits described above can be reasonably expected to result from the project and are sufficient to justi~
the applicable deduction.
If e commission council town board or county council limits the time period during which an area is an economic
revitilization area, it does not limit the length of time a taxpayer is entitled to receive a deduction to a number of year~
oesignated under I.C. 6-1.1-12.1-4 or 4.5 Namely:
· : ', · j ~ ' NEW MANUFACTURING ii??:: ' ";'"i ~ ;'; :! REDEVELOPMENT OR REHABILFrATION OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMEN
For Deductions Atlowed Over A Perio<t Of:
Year of Deduction
1st
2nd
· 3rd
I Year of
Percentage Deduction
100%
95%
80%
65%
5O%
0%
1st
2nd
3rd
4tn
5th
6th
7th
8th
9th
10tn
Three (3) Year
Percentage
100%
66%
33%
Six (5) Year
Percentage
10o%
85%
66%
50%
34%
17%
Ten (10) Year
Percentage
100%
95%
80%
65%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
5%