Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJeffersonville MSRP Mayor Signature Stamped - 2019 rd 1 applicationApplicant Information    LEAD (LEGAL) APPLICANT: City of Jeffersonville  CHIEF ELECTED OFFICIAL (NAME & TITLE): Mike Moore, Mayor  MAILING ADDRESS: City Hall, Suite 250, 500 Quartermaster Court            CITY: Jeffersonville  COUNTY: Clark     CDBG COUNTY CODE: 019                       ZIP: 47130    PHONE: 812‐285‐6400 FAX: 812‐285‐6403     E‐MAIL: MMoore@CityofJeff.net      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (NAME & TITLE): Heather Metcalf, Director of Finance and City Controller      PHONE: 812‐285‐6422  EMAIL: hmetcalf@cityofjeff.net  FEDERAL I.D. /E.I.N. NUMBER: 35‐6001067  DUNS NUMBER: 071320964     CAGE NUMBER: 55YR8  SAMS EXPIRATION DATE: 11/19/2019      GRANT ADMINISTRATOR: Nicholas Creevy                                                BUSINESS OR ORGANIZATION: River Hills EDD & RPC   ADDRESS: 300 Spring Street, Suite 2a            CITY: Jeffersonville    ZIP: 47130    PHONE: 812‐288‐4624     FAX: 812‐288‐8105      EMAIL: ncreevy@riverhills.cc  DATE CERTIFICATION FROM OCRA EXPIRES: November 18, 2019    PROJECT TYPE: Main Street Revitalization – Streetscape Improvements                                   ESTIMATED # OF BENEFICIARIES: 45,395                                                                  LMI % OR SLUM/BLIGHT POINTS: 50                                                                                                                                         PROJECT FUNDING SOURCES Amounts should be rounded to the nearest dollar.   Amount 1. CDBG  Request $430,327  2. Lead and/or Joint Applicants $111,906  3. Loans $0  4. CDBG Program Income $0  5. Philanthropic Match  $0  6. In‐kind Match (Max 5% of grant request, or $25,000, whichever is  less)  $0  7. Private and/or Local Grants $0  8. Other Government Grants $0       List sources: $0  9. TOTAL MATCH                                      (add lines 2‐8) $111,906  10. SUBTOTAL                                         (add lines 1 & 9) $542,233  11. Ineligible Costs $14,032  12. TOTAL PROJECT COST             (add lines 10 & 11) $556,265     PHYSICAL ADDRESS OF PROJECT: Spring Street Corridor, from 10th Street to 14th Street (Hospital Segment)    METHOD OF PROCUREMENT (check one):    Grant Administrator:   RFP  Local Funds    Not Yet Procured   N/A      Architect/Engineer:    RFQ  Local Funds     Not Yet Procured   N/A    FAIR HOUSING ORDINANCE attached (check one):            Yes        No  (Only the ordinance language is needed; additional language from resolutions or minutes should not be included)    What year was the ordinance adopted? 2019        DRUG FREE WORKPLACE POLICY in place and attached (check one):     Yes        No  (Copy of entire policy must be attached to final application)    Is any part of this project in a floodplain?   Yes            No    Did the Community receive a CDBG Planning Grant pertaining to this project?  Yes            No       If yes, what is the grant number for that plan? N/A     Has the final plan from the planning grant been approved by OCRA?  N/A      Will the applicant unit of government have open CDBG grants at time of application?   Yes        No     If so, list them? N/A    In what Indiana Senate District(s) is this project? 46      State Senator(s) representing this district: Ron Grooms    In what Indiana House of Representatives District(s) is this project? 72    State Representative(s) representing this district:  Rita Fleming    In what US Congressional District(s) is this project?  IN 9                        Table of Contents  Project Narrative    Project Description 1   Project Need 2   Fiscal Impact 3  National Objective Identification 5  Beneficiaries 7  Project Budget    Summary Budget 8   Local Match 8   Detailed Budget 9  Citizen Participation 11  Media/Promotion 27  Readiness to Proceed    Readiness to Proceed Certification 28   Resolution Authorizing Application Submission and Local Match Commitment 29   CFO Local Match Letter 32   Status of Environmental Review 33   Environmental Form 7 34   Project Engineering and/or Architectural Services 37   Status of Permits 38   Status of Site Control 39  Displacement    Displacement Assessment 40   Local Displacement Plan 41  Program Specific Items    Program – Specific Project Development Issues (PDIs) 42  Legal    Financial Management Form 6.6 44   Applicant Disclosure Report 45   Fair Housing Ordinance 46   Drug Free Workplace Policy 55   Civil Rights Certification 68   Event and Signage Guidelines 70   Assurances and Certifications 72   Authorization of Submission 76  Appendix A: National Objective Documentation    Map of Jurisdiction and Project Area A‐1   Aerial Map Project Area A‐2   Floodplain Map A‐3   HUD LMI Data A‐4   Resolution Declaring A Slum and Blight Area A‐5  Appendix B: Project Description Documentation    Excerpts from Engineer’s Report B‐1   Excerpts from Spring Street Master Plan B‐3   Scope of Work B‐7   Supporting Planning Documents B‐8  Appendix C: Project Need Documentation    Public Survey Sample C‐1   Photo Documentation C‐2   Letter of Support – Lisa Green C‐4   Letter of Support – Kelli Selzer C‐5   Letter of Support – Phil Ellis C‐6   Letter of Support – Deborah Hannah C‐7   Letter of Support – Larry Jordan C‐8   Letter of Support – Bob Smith C‐9   Letter of Support – Billy Sue Smith C‐10  Appendix D: Fiscal Impact Documentation    Tax Sheet D‐1   Clerk/Treasurer’s Debt Report D‐3   Cash & Investments Combined Statement D‐4   Ending Fund Balance Explanation D‐9  Appendix E: Program Specific Documentation    Bonus Point Documentation E‐1   Slum/Blight Photo Documentation E‐3   Economic Incentives Documentation E‐5   Main Street Organization National Accreditation Documentation E‐7   Main Street Organization Strategic Plan and Sustainability/Fundraising Plan E‐9      Project Narrative  Project Description   The City of Jeffersonville is located along the Ohio River across from the City of Louisville, Kentucky and within its larger  metropolitan statistical area.  Population estimates indicate 45,395 total people residing in the City with 42.87% of  residents eligible as low to moderate income according to HUD data (A‐4).  The City is experiencing rapid growth,   development, and infrastructure improvements in multiple areas that require significant investments from the City   these include developments at: River Ridge, Allison Lane, the 10th Street (SR62) corridor, Veterans Parkway, historic  downtown, and several others.    The proposed project is a streetscape improvements project located at the Hospital Segment along Spring Street, from  10th Street to 14th Street (A‐2).  The project is located in the City’s Urban Enterprise Zone and is bookended by two major  gateways into the community identified in the City’s 2015 Comprehensive Plan (B‐8).  The Urban Enterprise Zone (UEZ) is  an area designated as in need of community and economic revitalization.  Jeffersonville’s UEZ was established in 2000  and offers a variety of financial assistance programs.  Additionally, the project area is near one of the City’s most  economically distressed neighborhoods with large public housing facilities in close proximity (B‐14).    The project is intended to improve bike and pedestrian facilities along the corridor while also improving the its aesthetic  appeal.  The project area was identified in the 2015 Comprehensive Plan as an area for strategic investment and a  corridor study was produced by United Engineering with recommended improvements in 2017.  The result of the  improvements will be a safer more appealing streetscape with an increase of pedestrian and bike users.  It will result in  less dangerous crossings by both pedestrians and bike users.   The City also believes it could lead to additional private  investment in the area.  These items will be measured by catalogues of incident reports to emergency service providers,  the number of additional bikes in area bike racks, the number of businesses filling vacancies.      The improvements in the Hospital neighborhood will provide connections of the existing sidewalk facilities.  Decorative  lighting will be placed on the west side of the street.  A stamped concrete curb strip will be placed along the west side of  the street. Dedicated bicycle lanes will be placed down both sides of the roadway.  The roadway will be milled and  resurfaced to provide a solid and smooth surface for bicyclists (B‐7).    The curb ramps and pedestrian crossings will be upgraded.  The cross walks will be restriped with enhanced cross walks  to provide aesthetic improvements and alert drivers to the presence of pedestrians (B‐7).    The Hospital Boulevard intersection will have the right turn lane will be removed and replaced with a tree lawn and  additional width pedestrian facilities. Additional trees will be planted between Hospital Boulevard and 10th Street. A  detached sidewalk will be installed in portions of this section as well (B‐7).    Bus shelters will be added at Sparks Avenue and south of the 14th street intersection.  The 14th Street intersection will  also have curb bump outs added to aid crossings and create a pedestrian refuge.  A public art display will also be added  adjacent to the relocated Depot Building.  Additional way‐finding signage highlighting points of interest will be added to  the neighborhood (B‐7).                  1 Project Need   The proposed project will address issues that have been identified and documented dating back to the 2012 Claysburg  Neighborhood Revitalization Plan and the 2013 Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, and even further to the 2000 UEZ  designation.  They are further acknowledged and addressed in the 2015 Comprehensive Plan and the 2017 Spring Street  Master Plan.  The project is also supported in the Comperhensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) Regional  Planning document (E – 1‐2).  Additional developments that have recently occurred heighten the projects priority in the  Community including significant private and public developments in and around the project area.    Currently the project segment exhibits a multitude of issues including: deteriorating sidewalks and curbs, unsafe and  uncomfortable pedestrian crossings, particularly at intersections, missing crosswalks, missing ADA compliant ramps, lack  of shade, limited transit stop amenities, overgrown and deteriorating traffic islands, cracked and broken pavement, and  broken or overgrown gutters and drains, and safety issues for bicyclist due to high traffic volumes, wide streets inducing  higher vehicle speeds, and a lack of a dedicated bike lane (B‐14).  The sidewalks, curbs, and crosswalks are seriously  deteriorated with missing segments, severe cracks, broken sections, missing curbs, non‐ADA compliant ramps and  crossings, and obstructed courses (C – 2‐3).  These issues would be a concern if they occurred anywhere in the  community but are amplified due to their location along the Spring Street corridor and the Hospital segment specifically.    As the 2015 Comprehensive plan indicates, the Hospital segment is bookended by two major gateways into the City at  14th Street to the north and at 10th Street to the south (B‐8).  Visitors exiting off the interstate and coming from  Clarksville are likely to commute through this segment.  It is both a primary vehicular traffic route but also a primary bike  and pedestrian route indicated in the 2013 Bike and Pedestrian plan (B‐15).  It is listed as the number 3 priority for bike  and pedestrian facilities for the whole City in that plan.  This is further exacerbated by the location of the Claysburg  neighborhood at the northern end of the segment.  The City will be establishing an Envision Center, a HUD  neighborhood support program, in Claysburg at the north eastern edge of the project area.    Claysburg, is a diverse and low income neighborhood with large public housing facilities located in it supporting  numerous elderly, disabled, and low income persons (B‐14).  The Claysburg Neighborhood Revitalization Plan completed  in 2012 describes the need for improved sidewalk connectivity to historic downtown, ensuring ADA compliance at  sidewalks and intersections, and a need for street lighting (B‐11).  This is particularly important because of the  demographics of the Claysburg neighborhood being more likely to use pedestrian, bicycle, and transit transportation  options.  This is substantiated by bus ridership in the area being among the highest levels in all of the City (B‐14).      While the issues have be present dating back to at least 2012 and even further back to 2000, recent developments in  and around the segment have caused the project to become an even greater priority.  The City recently established an  arts and cultural district to the south of the segment with significant investments at Picasso Park, the Fire Museum, and  art instillations throughout.  Just south of the Hospital segment at 10th and Spring the City announced a major $30  million development project to anchor the 10th Street gateway (B‐12‐13).  Further south private investment at the M.  Fine on Spring building redeveloped an underutilized industrial facility into senior housing.  Additional private  investment occurred at the Clark County Memorial Hospital, the namesake of the segment.   The hospital was recently  privatized and new construction has already begun, relocating the emergency room entrance from directly off Spring  Street onto Spark Avenue (B‐13).  Additional public investments in the heart of the historic downtown segment including  the Big Four pedestrian bridge, the Jeffersonville Marina, Riverstage, and the Ohio River Greenway have caused an influx  in pedestrian, bicycle, and overall visitors to the corridor further stimulating private investment (B‐8).    Letters of support for the project echo these facts with long time residents like Phil Ellis noting that the project area has  been forgotten for years, left to deteriorate, with improvements long over (C‐4, C‐6, C‐10).  Others, like Lisa Green also  note the developments near the river and in other parts of the downtown as important and exciting areas to be linked  to and included with (C‐4, C‐5, C‐7).  The residents all note the improvements are needed and express the hope for the  project to increase the safety and accessibility through the corridor and want to make it more attractive and be a source  of pride for the community (C‐4‐10).    These sentiments are further evidenced by a survey the community completed for the project (C‐1).  The survey was  distributed by local city councilmen and the Main Street Organization.  Respondents indicated that they overwhelmingly  2 support the project with over 95% of respondents saying so.  They noted that their top three improvements were  sidewalks, trees, lighting and public art, and pedestrian islands and crosswalks.  This indicates not only the desire for  safer pedestrian facilities but also a desire to eliminate the blight in the project area to create a beautiful community  that creates pride and attracts people and investment.    The convergence of all these factors has lead the reconstruction and redevelopment of the streetscape along the  Hospital segment of the Spring Street corridor to become a major priority for the City of Jeffersonville.        Fiscal Impact   The local match for this project will come from cash on hand from the General Fund and EDIT Fund.  The City has already  expended funds on the engineering for the Spring Street Master Plan which included four segments, one of which was  the Hospital Segment.  The funds used for the engineering of that segment, this project, was $111,200.  Additionally, the  City has started an over $1.4 million construction project for the Claysburg section of the Spring Street Plan, just north of  this project area.      As the funds for the local match are currently available, no new debt will be necessary for the City to incur to complete  this project.  The City already holds significant debt totaling nearly one‐hundred million dollars with annual payments  totaling nearly ten million dollars (D – 3).  An additional debt burden for the community is wholly undesirable.  The City’s  tax rate is also among the highest in the region making it currently untenable to raise taxes further (D – 1).    On‐going maintenance and sustainability of the project will be conducted through the public works department.  The  public works department will be responsible for maintaining the infrastructure improvements and repairing and  replacing damaged and/or deteriorated elements as they occur and under the advisement of the City Engineer.  Public  art in the segment will be overseen by the Arts Commission.  The Public Works Department along with the Arts  Commission and City Engineer will oversee the maintenance and project sustainability for the entire grant period and  continue into the foreseeable future including the next five to ten years.    While the City has the available funds to cover the local match for the project, it does not have the funds to complete  the project completely on its own.   The City has limited discretionary funds available for this type of project (D – 9).   Major infrastructure improvements along Holmans Lane, 10th Street, and Veterans Parkway, among others are already  underway siphoning what funds may otherwise be available.  Another expense anticipated that will siphon what little  available funds the City has are the Cane Run Pump Station improvements, a joint project to eliminate flooding in  Jeffersonville and Clarksville by replacing a 70 year old pump station.  This project alone will result in over $2 million  dollars additional spending from the City.  Cleanup and revitalization of the JeffBoat facility will also likely require  funding from the City.  The long time employer closed a 65 acre site along the riverfront in the Downtown area that will  require brownfield considerations.  Additionally, completion of the Spring Street Master Plan implementation, which this  is one segment of, is expected to cost in excess of three million dollars.  And finally, the City is anticipating a shortfall of  nearly $800,000 in property tax revenues due to circuit breakers this year.    As a result, the City must seek outside funding to complete the project.  The City considered the Community Foundation  of Southern Indiana, covering both Floyd and Clark Counties, but the foundation does not typically fund local units of  government and does not fund infrastructure projects.  The foundation typically focuses on non‐profits, education and  scholarships, and distressed populations like the homeless.  As mentioned before, the City already carries a significant  debt burden making additional burrowing unlikely.  Finally, the project does not qualify for INDOT community crossing  money as it is not primarily related to pavement improvements and the Community does not qualify for funding from  other agencies like the USDA.    Due to the described financial conditions including significant existing debt, relatively high tax burden, numerous  ongoing major projects, and a lack of alternative funding sources, CDBG funding appears to be the most appropriate  source of funding for this project.  In addition the current conditions of the project area are in need of redevelopment  with several blighted conditions such as deteriorating sidewalks, crumbling and broken curbs, over grown pedestrian  3 islands, cracked and broken drains and gutters, and broken pavement and biking facilities.  And the project will benefit  the Claysburg neighborhood which is Jeffersonville’s most diverse neighborhood but also one of its lowest income.   Completing this project would seemingly address both national objectives of eliminating blight and benefiting low to  moderate income people.  Perhaps most significantly, because the City does not have available funds to complete this  project without CDBG funding and it will not be completed without the financial assistance provided by the grant funds.    Applicant ‐ Attach the following documents in Appendix D:  Cash and Investments Combined Statement    Tax Sheet     Clerk/Treasurer’s Debt Report     Ending balances of discretionary funds with explanations of the future use of those balances                                                  4 National Objective Identification  Identify only one of the CDBG National Objectives listed below.    Benefit to Low‐ and Moderate‐Income Persons   Area Benefit   Limited Clientele    Prevention or Elimination of Slums or Blight   Area Basis   Spot Basis    Complete the following questions. Documentation supporting this section may be added as Appendix A. Please cite page  number for reference within this section (ex. A‐00). Census data from HUD must be provided even if an Income Survey  will be used.     Percentage served by the project from HUD Low/Mod Summary Data (Census):  42.87%    List the census tract number(s) that are included in the project area:  502    List the census tract block group(s) that are included in each of the census tracts listed in the previous question:  502.1, 502.2, 502.3    Explain why the National Objective was selected and how this project meets the criteria of that Objective.   Prevention or Elimination of Slums or Blight – Area Basis  1. What are the boundaries of the area?  The designated area in need of redevelopment due to blight are from 10th Street to 15th Street along the  Spring Street corridor including one block on either side (A‐5).    2. What are the conditions that cause the area to be considered blighted?  The project area is located within a low income neighborhood of Jeffersonville and contains a number of  aging commercial buildings, residences and public facilities. Due to existing street geometry, and a former  railroad spur, many properties in the area are oddly shaped and difficult to redevelop; current zoning does  not facilitate easy redevelopment either. Lack of maintenance and investment in the area has led to  deteriorating streets and streetscapes.  Deterioration includes crumbling and broken sidewalks, curbs, and  curb ramps; overgrown and cracking pedestrian island, faded or non‐existent crosswalks; and cracked,  broken, and non‐existent gutter and drains.    3. What percentage of buildings in the area are deteriorated? How are they deteriorated?  Approximately 20% of buildings showing signs of deterioration – chipping/cracking paint, cracking  foundations, failing windows, aging roofs/eaves.  Approximately 50% of buildings have deteriorating parking lots/landscape ‐ broken curbs/curb stops,  cracked or crumbling pavement, failing retaining walls.    4. What public facilities in the area are deteriorated? Describe this deterioration.  ‐ Spring Street  o Original limestone curbs are disintegrating quickly throughout segment  o Pavement is cracking throughout segment – numerous street patches along roadway.   o Sidewalks deteriorated in places  o Failing and non‐compliant ADA curb ramps  ‐ Wall/Spring/14th Street intersection  o Deterioration of pedestrian islands  o No ADA access on west side of street  o Center island on 14th, breaking up  ‐ Old Sidewalk on 15th street (going east toward park) is crumbled – almost a gravel path  5 ‐ Missouri streets lacks curb and gutter and sidewalk ‐parking lots not separated from street. Road  has been cut and patched in several locations for utilities    5. How will the proposed project remedy one or more of the blighted conditions described above?  The project will fix pavement, curbs, sidewalks and ramps on Spring Street. This will improve the look and  feel of the neighborhood and help slow neighborhood decline and encourage reinvestment.     If Prevention of Slum or Blight is used as the National Objective complete the following items. If Prevention of Slum and  Blight is not used remove this section from the application. Supporting materials should be included in Appendix A.    Select the items that apply:   Applicant has a Slum/Blight Resolution for project area (50 pts.)     The project site is a brownfield* (25 pts.)     The building or district is listed on the Indiana or National Register of Historic Places** (10 pts.)   The building or district is eligible for listing on the Indiana or National Register of Historic Places** (10 pts.)    The building is on the Historic Landmarks Foundation of Indiana’s “10 Most Endangered List” (15 pts.)  * The State of Indiana defines a brownfield as an industrial or commercial property that is abandoned, inactive, or  underutilized, on which expansion or redevelopment is complicated due to actual or perceived environmental  contamination. **Project may either be listed on or eligible for listing on the Indiana or National Register of Historic  Places. Both cannot be checked.                                                              6 Beneficiaries  Total beneficiaries must equal the sum of 1‐10. L/M and Non‐L/M must equal the sum of 1‐10.    Total Beneficiaries (all activities): 45,395      Total      %  Of the total  population in the  service area how  many are  Hispanic?      % Activity  Description  Number of People      SINGLE RACE 1. Number of Whites 36,479 80.36% 2,129 4.69%   2. Number of Blacks / African Americans 6,224 13.71% 41 0.09%   3. Number of Asian 390 0.86% 23 0.05%   4. Number of American Indian / Alaskan  Native 54 0.12% 18 0.04%   5. Number of Native Hawaiian / Other  Pacific Islander 14 0.03% 0 0.0%  MULTI‐RACE 6. American Indian / Alaskan Native &  White 186 0.41% 0 0.0%   7. Asian & White 309 0.68% 0 0.0%   8. Black / African American & White 1,366 3.01% 0 0.0%   9. American Indian / Alaskan Native &  Black / African American 0 0.0% 0 0.0%   10. Balance / Other 372 0.82% 159 0.35%       Number of Handicapped 6,868 15.13% 0 0.0%   Number of Elderly People 6,578 14.49% 0 0.0%   Number of Female‐headed Households 11,335 24.97% 0 0.0%   Number of Low/Moderate‐Income  People 19,461 42.87% 0 0.0%   Number of Non‐Low/Moderate People 25,934 57.13% 0 0.0%      7 Project Budget  Summary Budget   Complete the table based on the detailed budget. Amounts should be rounded to the nearest dollar.  ACTIVITY CDBG LOCAL  (with eligible In‐Kind) INELIGIBLE TOTAL  Construction  Costs  $430,327 $0 $14,032 $444,359  Professional Fees $0 $67,480 $0 $67,480  Labor Standards  ($5,000 max)    $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000  Land Acquisition  (if any)    $0 $0 $0 $0  Environmental  Review  ($5,000 max)  $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000  Administration  (Max 8% of  CDBG)  $0 $34,426 $0 $34,426  TOTAL  $430,327 $111,906 $14,032 $556,265  Note: Do not include any miscellaneous, contingency, general or similar costs in budget.  In‐kind match up to 5% of the grant amount or $25,000, whichever is less, may be included in the Local column  of the budget. For in‐kind match to be considered, approval prior to application must be obtained from the  CDBG Program Director, and a copy of the approval must be included with the application.      Local Match   List the sources of local match and leveraged funds. Amounts should be rounded to the nearest dollar.  Source Amount  City of Jeffersonville, General Fund and EDIT Fund $111,906        TOTAL LOCAL MATCH $111,906    8 Detailed Budget  A detailed itemized budget should be attached immediately following this page. This budget needs to show all costs of  the project, and identify each cost as eligible or ineligible. Amounts should be rounded to the nearest dollar.     ITEM CDBG LOCAL INELIGIBLE TOTAL  Construction Engineering $11,593     $11,593  Mobilization & Demobilization $19,322     $19,322  Clearing Right of Way $7,729     $7,729  Curb, Concrete, Remove $8,261     $8,261  Sidewalk, Concrete, Remove $4,951     $4,951  Excavation, Common $6,639     $6,639  Temporary Mulch     $874  $874  Temporary Silt Fence     $3,158  $3,158  Temporary Seed Mixture     $152  $152  Milling, Asphalt, 1 ½ IN $8,257     $8,257  QC/QA‐HMA, 3, 70, Surface, 9.5mm $57,259     $57,259  Asphalt for Tack Coat $2,404     $2,404  Sidewalk, Concrete $14,319     $14,319  Colored Concrete Sidewalk $22,947     $22,947  Curb Ramp, Concrete $20,456     $20,456  Curb, Concrete $44,059     $44,059  Bus Shelters (2) $17,484     $17,484  Water $8     $8  Sodding, Nursery     $7,225  $7,225  Flexi‐pave $1,093     $1,093  Plant, Deciduous Trees, Single Stem      $2,623  $2,623  Field Office, B $19,669     $19,669  Maintaining Traffic $19,322     $19,322  Sign Post, Square, Type 2, Reinforced $933     $933  Sign, Sheet, with Legend 0.080” $393     $393  Transverse Marking Thermoplastic  Crosswalk, White 24” $2,583     $2,583  Signal Cable, Control, Copper  3C/14GA $1,777     $1,777  Luminaire, Ornamental $13,113     $13,113  Light Standard, 14ft EMH, 12ft  Decorative $78,676     $78,676  Conduit, Steel, Galvanized, 2in $35,544     $35,544  Pavement Message Marking,  Thermoplastic, Bike Symbol $6,192     $6,192  Line, Thermoplastic, Solid, White, 4IN $1,805     $1,805  9 Line, Thermoplastic, Dotted, White,  4IN $66     $66  Line, Thermoplastic, Solid, Yellow,  4IN $1,486     $1,486  Transverse Marking, Thermoplastic,  Stop Line, 24IN $839     $839  Pavement Message Marking,  Thermoplastic, Lane Indication Arrow $574     $574  Pavement Message Marking,  Thermoplastic, (ONLY) $574     $574  Construction Inspection  $67,480   $67,480  Labor Standards   $5,000   $5,000  Environmental Review   $5,000   $5,000  Administration   $34,426   $34,426  Total Project Cost $430,327 $111,906 $14,032 $556,265     10 Citizen Participation  Two public hearings must be held at different stages of project development. One public hearing must be held prior to  submission of the proposal and the second must be held prior to the submission of the full application. For the proposal,  if the dates of the second public hearing are known please include them, if they are not known use “TBD”.   Note:  New public hearings must be held for each grant cycle, regardless of prior application(s).    Public Hearing Information Date  Notice of first public hearing 4/02/2019  Date of first public hearing 4/15/2019  Notice of second public hearing 6/03/2019  Date of second public hearing 6/17/2019  *Public Hearing must occur on or after the 11th day from the date the ad was first published.    Describe the methods used to solicit participation of low‐ and moderate‐income persons:  A public hearing notice was published in the legal ads in The News and Tribune on April 2, 2019 and available on their  website.  A second  public hearing notice was published in the legal ads in The News and Tribune on June 3, 2019 and  available on their website.    Denote any adverse comments/complaints received and describe resolution:  No adverse comments or complaints were received for this project.    Describe outcomes of 4‐Factor Analysis for Limited English Proficiency:  Based on the Four‐Factor Analysis, the City of Jeffersonville is not required to develop a LAP.  The City will make all  reasonable attempts to accommodate language access needs of residents requesting translation during citizen  participation activities.    If no comments were made by the residents during the public hearing, describe efforts to obtain input from resident  on the project?  A robust planning process has been completed for the Spring Street Master plan which included this project.  Multiple  public meetings were held to discuss the project.        Immediately following this page, please attach the following documentation in the order listed. Documentation for each  hearing should be packaged independently as Hearing 1 and Hearing 2.     Copy of Hearing Ad/Publisher’s Claim for both Hearings  Copy of Hearing Minutes for both Hearings  Copy of Sign‐In Sheet for both Hearings  Copy of response(s) to comments and/or complaints.  Copy of Four Factor Analysis  Copy of Language Access Plan (if required)  Third Party Authorization letter (if required)         11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-R- (p BEFORE THE COMMON COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE STATE OF INDIANA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION SUBMISSION AND LOCAL MATCH COMMITMENT RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA, AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE MSRP APPLICATION TO THE INDIANA OFFICE OF COMMUNITY AND RURAL AFFAIRS AND ADDRESSING RELATED MATTERS WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of Jeffersonville, Indiana recognizes the need to stimulate growth and to maintain a sound economy within its corporate limits; and WHEREAS, the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, authorizes the Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs to provide grants to local units of government for the elimination and prevention of blight; and WHEREAS, the City of Jeffersonville, Indiana has conducted or will conduct public hearings prior to the submission of an application to the Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs, said public hearings to assess the housing, public facilities and economic needs of its low- and moderate-income residents; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Jeffersonville, Indiana that: 1. The Mayor is authorized to prepare and submit an application for grant funding to address Streetscape Improvements along Spring Street from 10th Street to 14th Street in Jeffersonville including sidewalk, curb, pedestrian islands, curb ramps, lighting, bus shelters, and bike lanes and to execute and administer a resultant grant including requisite general administration and project management, contracts and agreements pursuant to regulations of the Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2. The City of Jeffersonville, Indiana hereby commits the requisite local funds in the amount of one-hundred and twenty-five thousand, nine-hundred and six dollars ($125,938), in the form of cash on hand from the General fund and the EDIT fund, as matching funds for said program, such commitment to be contingent upon receipt of MSRP funding from the Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs. 29 RESOLUTION NO.2019-R- CD This resolution shall be in full force and effect after its passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor. YES /k NO 11 i 4104 Arriroy Ai. ,,e,..,„r!..., ow-&-Ixor--- ri MT' ' lily, B 4 41 IF RESOLUTION NO. 2019-R- (p PASSED and ADOPTED by the Common Council for the City of Jeffersonville, Indiana upon this / 7 day of ji,_Q__ 2019. 0_i 01 L 1 ..t_ . astawny, Preside,/ Jeffersonville Co .n Council ATTEST: lezi- 7 Vicki Conlin, Clerk City of Jeffersonville, Indiana 30 RESOLUTION NO.2019-R- ( RESOLUTION NO. 2019-R- PRESENTED by me to the Mayor for the City of Jeffersonville, Indiana upon this / ,'; day of3j - 2019. ede_zic:- Vicki Conlin, Clerk City of Jefferson ' e, Indiana RESOLUTION NO. 2019-R- APPROVED by son this t day of 2019. Mike Moore, ayor City of Jeffer'enville, Indiana RESOLUTION NO. 2019-R- VETOED by me upon this day of 2019. Mike Moore, Mayor City of Jeffersonville, Indiana 31 32 33 Environmental Form 7 CDBG Environmental Review – Documentation Required by Agency (The list below is not all inclusive. Every project is different and may have unique requirements.) AGENCY DOCUMENTATION NEEDED Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) “Consulting Parties” Letter (authorizing Section 106 Review) Cover letter including a very good project description Color photos of the project area/site Applicable sections of the Interim Report to show historic properties Flood Plain Map w/Project Area Shown USGS Topographical Map w/Project Area Shown Aerial Photos and/or other Maps w/Project area Shown Archaeological Reconnaissance Report (if applicable) Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) Outdoor Recreation – Water Cover letter including the project description Flood Plain Map w/Project Area Shown USGS Topographical Map w/Project Area Shown Aerial Photos and/or other Maps w/Project area Shown Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) The initial submission is conducted on-line. See Form 7 for contact information. NRCS – USDA – State conservationist Cover letter including the project description Flood Plain Map w/Project Area Shown USGS Topographical Map w/Project Area Shown Aerial Photos and/or other Maps w/Project area Shown US Department of Interior – Division of Fish & Wildlife (www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/section7/s7process/index.html) Copy of documents submitted on line to FWS Copy of any response received, category 2&3 Flood Plain Map w/Project Area Shown USGS Topographical Map w/Project Area Shown Aerial Photos and/or other Maps w/Project area Shown US Geological Survey Cover letter including the project description Flood Plain Map w/Project Area Shown USGS Topographical Map w/Project Area Shown Aerial Photos and/or other Maps w/Project area Shown Indiana State Department of Health Cover letter including the project description Flood Plain Map w/Project Area Shown USGS Topographical Map w/Project Area Shown Aerial Photos and/or other Maps w/Project area Shown Tribal Consultation Cover letter including the project description Flood Plain Map w/Project Area Shown USGS Topographical Map w/Project Area Shown Aerial Photos and/or other Maps w/Project area Shown Revised – June 2017 34 Environmental Form 7 Environmental Agency Contact Listing Name and Address of Agency Date Contacted Date Comment Received Mr. Chad Slider Department of Natural Resources Division of Historic Preservation & Archaeology 402 W. Washington Street, Rm. W274 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2748 (317) 232-1646 Review and comment on the potential effects of federal and state undertakings 3/5/2019 4/4/2019 Please submit environmental requests electronically to the following email address: environmentalreview@dnr.in.gov . (If your submittal is by USPS mail and is more than 20 pages, we request two (2) entire copies (including cover letter) of your submittal to expedite the review and an e-mail address for correspondence.) Christie Stanifer, Environmental Coordinator Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish & Wildlife, Environmental Unit 402 W. Washington Street, Rm. W273 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2748 (317) 232-4200 3/6/2019 4/2/2019 Mr. Scott Pruitt US Department of Interior Fish & Wildlife Services 620 South Walker Street Bloomington, IN 47403-2121 (812) 334-4261 Scott_Pruitt@fws.gov 3/6/2019 Completed Electronically 3/6/2019 This is an online process only… Environmental Review link is http://www.in.gov/idem/5283.htm The IDEM early coordination contact person is Megan Tretter, Business and Legislative Liaison, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, 317-234-3386, mtretter@idem.in.gov 3/6/2019 3/6/2019 Ms. Lisa Bolton US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service 6013 Lakeside Boulevard Indianapolis, IN 46278 Submit ER requests to: lisa.bolton@in.usda.gov (317) 295-5842 3/6/2019 3/6/2019 Revised – June 2017 35 Environmental Form 7 Revised – June 2017 Ms. Marni Karaffa Geological Survey 611 N. Walnut Grove Bloomington, IN 47405-2208 (812) 855-5067 Preferred delivery method: email to IGSenvir@indiana.edu 3/6/2019 Online Process Mr. Mike Mettler Indiana Department of Health 2 North Meridian Street Indianapolis, IN 46204 3/6/2019 4/9/2019 Tribal Consultation https://egis.hud.gov/tdat (Enter project address and click on “Find Tribes” for Tribes with interest in project area.) Geoffrey Standing Bear, Principal Chief Osage Nation PO Box 779 Pawhuska, OK 74056 John Froman, Chief Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma PO Box 1527 Miami, OK 74355 Douglas Lankford, Chief Miami Tribe of Oklahoma PO Box 1326 Miami, OK 74355 3/6/2019 3/6/2019 3/6/2019 5/2/2019 None None For Projects Located in Kosciusko, Elkhart, St. Joseph and Lagrange Counties William Spalding US Environmental Protection Agency – Region 5 Ground Water and Drinking Water Branch (WG-15) 77 W. Jackson Blvd Chicago, IL 60604 Spaulding.william@epamail.epa.gov N/A N/A All grantees should contact the following Local Agencies County Planning Commission 3/6/2019 None County Health Department 3/6/2019 None 36 37 38 39 Displacement  Displacement Assessment  Use this page to assess displacement plans and strategy.     N/A ‐ No displacement will occur    1. Describe the need for displacement:            2. Substantiate the need for displacement:            3. Explain how displacement will be minimized:            4. Explain how the negative effects of displacement will be minimized:          40 Local Displacement Plan  Attach Local Displacement Plan even if displacement will not occur.    1. The City of Jeffersonville will consider for submission to the Indiana Office of Community and Rural Affairs, under its  various Community Development Block Grant funded programs, only projects and activities that will result in the  displacement of as few persons or businesses as necessary to meet State and local development goals and objectives.  2. The City of Jeffersonville will certify to the State, as part of its application process, that it is seeking funds for a project  or activity that will minimize displacement.  3. The City of Jeffersonville will provide referral and reasonable moving assistance, both in terms of staff time and  dollars, to all persons involuntarily and permanently displaced by any project or activity funded with Community  Development Block Grant funds.  4. All persons and businesses directly displaced by the City of Jeffersonville as the result of a project or activity funded  with Community Development Block Grant funds will receive all assistance required under the Uniform Relocation  Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended, including provisions of the Uniform  Relocation Act Amendments of 1987, Title IV of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of  1987.  5. The City of Jeffersonville will provide reasonable benefits and relocation assistance to all persons and businesses  involuntarily and permanently displaced by the Community Development Block Grant activity funded by the State in  accordance with appendices attached hereto, provided they do not receive benefits as part of such action under number  4 above.    41 Program Specific Items    Program –Specific Project Development Issues (PDIs)  Answer the PDIs for the specific program and project type of this application only. PDIs should not be included for any  other projects. Include appropriate documentation in Appendix E and cite page number for reference within answer  below (EX: see F‐00).      MSRP – Main Street Revitalization Program:   1. Explain how the lead applicant and the Indiana Main Street organization are working together for a successful  project.   The City of Jeffersonville has a strong Main Street organization in Jeffersonville Main Street.  It is a nationally accredited  Main Street Organization and is thoroughly involved with the redevelopment of the downtown area.  It has worked on  numerous projects with the City to advance this goal including hosting numerous events to attract visitors to the  downtown to support businesses, historic preservation projects such as moving several historic homes for the  construction of the Big 4 Bridge ramp, supporting grant programs such as Storefront Improvement Grants and Front  Porch project grants for residents.  More specifically to this project Jeffersonville Main Street has worked closely with  the City from the very start.    Main Street was involved in all the preliminary planning efforts including the development of the Spring Street Master  Plan produced by the City.  Members were included on the steering committee for that plan and attended multiple  meetings during its development.  They were also the entity that brought forth the grant opportunity to the Urban  Enterprise Zones board and subsequently supported it with the City Council.  They have assisted with gathering letters of  support for the project and they have helped distribute the project survey.      2. Please explain any other downtown economic development initiatives in the community, including local financing  initiatives (low‐interest bank loans, local RLF’s, etc).  The City of Jeffersonville several economic development initiatives to revitalize the downtown area including a Revolving  Loan Fund (RLF), a Tax Increment Financing District (TIF), Tax Abatements, and an Urban Enterprise Zone designation (E  – 5‐6).  The RLF offers low to no interest loans to small and emerging businesses which employ less than 50 people and  have less than $1 million in gross revenues.  The loans can be used for the acquisition of land, site improvements, job  creation/retention, purchase of equipment and other fixed assets, etc.  The City also has several TIF districts with one  located in the downtown area.  However, this TIF district’s boundaries are outside the project area.      The City offers a variety of tax incentives including tax abatements for up to 10 years for real estate and 5 years for  personal property applicable to businesses locating in the downtown area.  Additionally, the downtown and the project  area are part of the Urban Enterprise Zone (UEZ) which was established in the year 2000.  The UEZ offers numerous tax  incentives to property owners and developers including tax exemptions, reduction in sales tax, and tax credits.    Through a combination of these programs the City offers a robust set of programs and opportunities to promote  development in the downtown area.  The City has made and continues to make great effort to revitalize the downtown  and is attempting to continue this through the MSRP grant program.      3. Explain the financial participation of business owners (façades only).  N/A    4. Document blighted conditions with color pictures, etc. (in Appendix E.)   (E – 2‐3)    42 5. Answer the following items and attach documentation in the Appendix E:   Yes   No  Community Designated as a Nationally Accredited Main Street Organization. (E‐7‐8)   Yes   No  The Main Street Organization has a long‐term strategic plan. (E ‐9‐21)   Yes   No  The district is listed on the Indiana or National Register of Historic Places.*   Yes   No  The district is eligible for listing on the Indiana or National Register of Historic Places.*   Yes   No  The Main Street Organization has a sustainability/fundraising plan in place. (E‐9‐21) (E‐20)  * Project may either be listed on or eligible for listing on the Indiana or National Register of Historic Places. Both cannot  be checked “Yes”.         43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Drug and Alcohol Policy Prepared: Safety Manager Approved: Board of Public Works Revised: 01-01-2018 12-14-2011, 3-13-2019 12-01-2011, 03-13-2019 Date Date Date Scope The City of Jeffersonville prohibits any City employee from possessing, using, being under the influence of, manufacturing, distributing, or dispensing alcohol or non-prescribed controlled substances during working hours and at all times while on City property, in City vehicles, or conducting City business. As part of an effort to maintain the quality of City services and to ensure that the City of Jeffersonville is a safe and healthy place to work, a drug and alcohol testing program has been developed to detect the use of illegal substances and misuse of alcohol. The City wants to ensure that employees with substance abuse problems are referred to appropriate professional help, and to outline disciplinary procedures for those who fail to comply with the Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy. The CDL drug testing program is covered under a separate federally-mandated policy. Policy The City of Jeffersonville will test applicants who have been offered employment with the City, and those employees who hold a position that potentially impact public safety or the safety of co- workers (Safety Sensitive Positions). City employees will be subject to random, post accident, and reasonable suspicion testing. As a condition of employment, all City employees will be required to agree in writing to be tested for drugs and/or alcohol as outlined in this policy. 1 55 Definitions of Terms For purposes of this policy, the following definitions shall be used: • Accident or Unsafe Practice Testing – Employees involved in on-the-job accidents or who engage in unsafe on-duty or job-related activities that pose a danger to others or the overall operation of the City may be subject to testing. Based on the circumstances of the accident or unsafe act, the City may initiate testing when there is: 1. Evidence of an unsafe practice. 2. Damage to property. 3. Careless operation of a vehicle. 4. Injury to person(s). 5. A pattern of incidents. • CDL Driver – An employee who operates a commercial motor vehicle (gross vehicle weight in excess of 26,000 pounds) as a requirement of his or her job, whether full time, part time or seasonally. Drivers also include applicants for such positions. • Designated employer representative (DER) – An employee authorized by the employer to take immediate action(s) to remove employees from safety-sensitive duties, or cause employees to be removed from those covered duties, and to make required decisions in the testing and evaluation processes. The DER also receives test results and other communications from the employer, consistent with the requirements of this part. This will be the Director of Human Resources or the Manager of Occupational Safety and Risk Management. • Medical Review Officer (MRO) – Licensed physician who has specialized knowledge of substance abuse disorders and appropriate medical training to interpret drug test results. The MRO is responsible for interpreting and evaluating confirmed positive laboratory results in the context of the employee's medical history and other relevant biomedical information. • Negative Alcohol Test – Test in which the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) registers less than 0.02 % by weight. • Negative Drug Test – Test that fails to detect the presence of one or more illegal drugs or classes of illegal drugs at levels exceeding the cutoff levels established by national consensus standards. • Positive Alcohol Test – Test in which the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) registers 0.02 % or greater by weight. • Positive Drug Test – Test that detects the presence of one or more illegal drugs or classes of illegal drugs at levels exceeding the cutoff levels established by national consensus standards. • Possessing – Having something on the person or in a place under substantially exclusive control. 2 56 • Random Selection – Scientifically valid method requiring that all employees in the random selection pool have an equal chance of being drawn in every selection. • Reasonable Suspicion – Objective observations of an employee’s behavior and/or physical appearance that suggest drug and/or alcohol use. • Refusing to be Tested – Includes any of the following: 1. Failing to appear for any test within 45 minutes after being directed to do so; 2. Failing to remain at the testing site until the testing process is complete; 3. Failing to attempt to provide a urine specimen for any required drug test or a breath specimen for any required alcohol test; 4. Failing to provide a sufficient and valid urine specimen for a drug test or a sufficient breath specimen for an alcohol test without an adequate medical explanation; 5. Failing to permit the direct observation of a drug test specimen when required; 6. Failing or declining to take a second test as directed; 7. Failing to sign required testing documentation; 8. Failing to cooperate with any part of the testing process, or engaging in intentional conduct that obstructs the testing process. • Safety Sensitive Position – A position which includes one or more of the following: 1. Authorizes employees to carry firearms; 2. Requires regular contact with offenders; 3. Requires transportation of or decision-making with regard to the welfare of children or with regard to vulnerable adults under the care or supervision of City employees; 4. Gives employees access to sensitive information related to homeland security or criminal justice activities; 5. Requires employees, as a condition of employment, to obtain a security clearance; 6. Requires employees to engage in homeland security or emergency response activities; 7. Requires employees to directly inspect or maintain products, equipment, or services where the failure of such products, equipment, or services may directly endanger the safety of the public or internal operations; 8. Involves the prosecution of criminal cases; 9. Requires operation of heavy equipment; 10. Includes access to a controlled substance; or 11. Requires a commercial driver’s license or has to meet DOT regulations. • Substance Abuse Professional (SAP) – Licensed or certified physician, psychologist, social worker, employee assistance professional, or addiction counselor with knowledge of and clinical experience in the diagnosis and treatment of alcohol and controlled substance- related disorders. • Working Hours – All time for which the employee is being paid by the City including all time when the employee is clocked out during a shift for meals or for any other reason. 3 57 Prohibited Activities The following conduct is strictly prohibited as described in the Policy: • Using or being under the influence of and/or possessing illegal drugs; • Using or being under the influence of legal drugs that are being used in a manner other than prescribed; • Using or being under the influence of legal drugs whose use can adversely affect the ability of the employee to perform his or her job safely, without disclosing such to a supervisor prior to being detected; • Selling, buying, soliciting to buy or sell, transporting, or possessing illegal drugs; • Using alcohol within four (4) hours before performing a Safety Sensitive Position; • Using or being under the influence of alcohol at any time while driving or performing any other Safety Sensitive Position; • Consuming any amount of alcohol while on duty, while driving a City vehicle, or while conducting City business; • Testing positive for illegal drugs and/or alcohol in circumstances that violate this policy; • Refusing to consent to be tested for drugs and alcohol; • Failing to submit to a drug and/or alcohol test as directed by the City; • Failing to stay in contact with the City and its Medical Review Officer (MRO) while awaiting the results of a drug test; • Violating any applicable federal, state, or local requirements governing the use of drugs or alcohol; • Doing anything to obstruct the City's goals with respect to the abuse of drugs and/or alcohol; • Failing to report another employee’s possible violation of this policy when there is reasonable suspicion to believe the policy has been violated; • Intentionally reporting a false violation of this policy. An off-duty employee who is called in to work outside regular working hours, and has consumed alcohol within the past four (4) hours, shall notify his or her supervisor of that fact before reporting to work. The employee and supervisor are jointly responsible for determining whether the employee should report to work at that time. Any employee who violates the prohibitions in this section will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. Tests Required The City will conduct drug and/or alcohol tests under the following conditions: • Upon an offer of employment but before an applicant is hired for any position with the City (pre-employment drug testing); • For reasonable suspicion that an employee is under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol; • Following any vehicular accident while driving a City vehicle or on City business as defined under Post-Accident Testing; • On a random basis for Drivers and employees in Safety Sensitive Positions; • As follow-up to substance abuse counseling or as prescribed or recommended by an SAP. Pre-Employment Testing 4 58 This test is required before an applicant is hired for a position with the City. For purposes of pre- employment testing, applicants and current employees who are applying for a Safety Sensitive Position are collectively referred to as "applicant". Applicants will be subject to drug testing only. An applicant to whom an offer has been extended will be asked to agree in writing to comply with the City of Jeffersonville’s drug testing policy. The applicant will be notified to report for a drug test and given instructions for the collection procedures. All offers by the City to hire or rehire an applicant, or to transfer an applicant to a safety sensitive position, are conditional upon the applicant: • Agreeing in writing to be tested for drugs; • Taking a drug test as directed by the City and obtaining a negative result; • Executing the City's authorization form by which the City obtains past drug and alcohol test results for D.O.T. Drivers; • Complying with any other conditions or requirements of which the City advises the applicant at the time of the offer. Post-Accident Testing An employee, who is driving during working hours or at any time in a City vehicle, or on City business, must submit to post-accident drug and alcohol test immediately upon release from the accident. An employee who is not driving, but is a passenger and whose actions are believed to have contributed to an accident, may also be tested. An employee must submit to a post-accident test as soon as possible after an accident whenever: • Any person is injured; • The employee receives a citation for a moving violation involving the accident; • One or more motor vehicles involved in the accident incurs disabling damage and must be transported away from the accident scene; or • After any property damage. It is possible that an employee will be directed to submit to a drug and/or alcohol test at the scene of the accident by a law enforcement officer. When a test is conducted by a law enforcement officer, the employee is still required to take another drug and/or alcohol test at the City's testing site. Whenever an employee is involved in an accident during work hours and is not tested for drugs and alcohol by a law enforcement officer, the employee is required to notify his or her supervisor immediately. The supervisor will make arrangements for drug and/or alcohol tests in compliance with this policy. The employee is not required to delay necessary medical treatment in order to be tested, but should request a drug and alcohol test at the City's expense as a part of any medical treatment. Any employee who has an accident or near miss during working hours (e.g., slipping, falling, car 5 59 accident, etc.), may be required to submit to post-incident drug and alcohol testing immediately where the circumstances suggest that drugs, alcohol or impairment may have contributed to the incident. Refusal to submit to this testing may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination. All post-accident drug tests will undergo a rapid analysis which will produce a result within 15 minutes of obtaining a sample from the employee. If the rapid result is negative, the employee is released back to work. If the rapid result is positive, the employee will be suspended pending analysis from the laboratory as part of the MRO process. If the result from the lab is negative, the employee will return to work with pay for the days off. If the result is positive, the employee will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. An employee who refuses or fails to submit to a post-accident/incident drug or alcohol test as required, who unnecessarily delays reporting to the test site following an accident, whose test results are positive, or who intentionally obstructs the testing process will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. Random Testing Employees in Safety Sensitive Positions are subject to random drug and alcohol testing. Such tests will be given without advance notification. Under the City's random selection process, drivers, employees in Safety Sensitive Positions, Police Department, and Fire Department personnel will be kept in separate pools. Within each pool, every employee will have an equal chance of being selected each time a selection is conducted. This means that some covered employees may be randomly selected for testing more than one time quarterly, while others may not be selected at all. Appropriate safeguards will ensure that the identity of individual employees cannot be determined prior to or at the time of their selection. An employee who refuses to submit to a random test, who fails to report for the test as directed within 45 minutes, who tests positive, or who intentionally obstructs the testing process will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. Those individuals selected for a random test and are on verified personal, vacation, sick, and/or leave time will have that particular test cancelled and will maintain their eligibility for the next random selection. Fire Department line personnel who are selected on one of their “Kelly” days will be notified and required to report for testing on the next scheduled work day. Police Department line officers who are selected and are on first shift will get their notification and requirement to report when other city employees are notified. Officers working second shift work will be notified and required to report for testing when they arrive for their shift. Officers working third shift will get their notification and requirement to report at the end of their shift. Reasonable Suspicion Testing 6 60 Employees will be required to submit to a drug and/or alcohol test whenever the City has reasonable suspicion to believe the employee has used drugs and/or alcohol in violation of this policy. Reasonable suspicion will exist when an employee's appearance, behavior, speech, or body odor indicates drug or alcohol use. Such indications must be personally observed and documented by at least one City supervisor who has received training on the signs and symptoms of drug and alcohol use. The supervisor will maintain direct supervision of employee until the situation is resolved. The supervisor will then discuss the circumstances with the DER so that arrangements are made to observe or talk with the employee. If the DER believes, after observing and/or talking to the employee, that the conduct or performance problem could be due to possible substance abuse, the employee will be immediately required to submit to a breath and/or drug test. If the employee refuses to submit to testing for any reason, the employee will be informed that refusal would result in disciplinary action up to and including termination. The employee will be asked to release any evidence relating to the observation for further testing. Failure to comply may subject the employee to subsequent disciplinary action. All confiscated evidence will be receipted with signatures of both the receiving supervisor as well as the provider. The DER shall remove or cause the removal of the employee from a City-owned vehicle and ensure that the employee is transported to an appropriate collection site. All reasonable suspicion drug tests will undergo a rapid analysis which will produce a result within 15 minutes of obtaining a sample from the employee. If the rapid result is negative, the employee is released back to work. If the rapid result is positive, the employee will be suspended pending analysis from the laboratory as part of the MRO process. If the result from the lab is negative, the employee will return to work with pay for the days off. If the result is positive, the employee will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. The DER shall, within 24 hours or before the results of the controlled substance test are released, document in writing the particular facts related to the behavior or performance problems that led to the reasonable suspicion test and maintain this documentation in appropriate DOT files. If the rapid result is positive, the DER shall arrange for transportation to the employee’s residence or, where appropriate, to a place of lodging. Under no circumstances will that employee be allowed to drive. An employee who refuses or fails to submit to a reasonable suspicion test, whose test is positive, or who intentionally obstructs the testing process will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. Return-to-Work and Follow-Up Testing 7 61 An employee that has sought assistance in resolving problems associated with drugs and/or alcohol must be retested and obtain negative results prior to returning to the job. The employee will also be subject to unannounced follow-up testing for a period of time determined by and directed by a Substance Abuse Professional (SAP). An employee who refuses or fails to submit to return-to-work or follow-up testing, whose test is positive, or who intentionally obstructs the testing process will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. Testing Methodology and Integrity To ensure the integrity and accuracy of each test, all specimen collection, analysis, and laboratory procedures will be conducted in accordance with national consensus standards. This includes: • Procedures to ensure the correct identity of each covered employee at the time of testing; • A chain-of-custody procedure to ensure that the specimen is not mishandled, contaminated, or tampered with; • The use of a trained Breath Alcohol Technician (BAT) and approved testing devices for conducting alcohol tests; • Use of a laboratory that has been certified by the National Institute for Drug Abuse (NIDA) for drug tests; • Confirmation of an initial positive drug screen by a second analysis using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GCMS); • Confirmation of an initial positive alcohol screen by a second analysis; • Appointment of a qualified Medical Review Officer (MRO) to review drug tests results before they are reported to the City's designated DER. Drug Testing Process All drug tests conducted under this policy require the employee to provide a specimen of urine. All drug tests will be administered using the split sample methodology. Before being tested, each employee will be required to: • Present his or her personal identification; • Empty his or her pockets; • Execute a Custody and Control Form provided by collection site personnel. An employee who refuses or fails to cooperate will be treated as though he or she has tested positive and will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. Employees will be permitted to provide a urine specimen in private and without being directly observed by collection site personnel unless: • An employee previously provided an invalid specimen for which there was no adequate medical explanation; • Collection site personnel observe materials or employee conduct that clearly indicate or are consistent with an attempt to tamper with a specimen; 8 62 • The temperature on the original specimen is out of range; • The original specimen appears to have been tampered with. The collector must explain and document the reason for the directly observed collection. All specimens will be evaluated by procedures consistent with national consensus standards. At a minimum, urine specimens will be analyzed for the presence of the following drugs: Amphetamines Cocaine Opiates Barbiturates Methadone Phencyclidine Benzodiazepines Methamphetamines Propoxyphene Cannabinoids Methaqualone Oxycodone Specimens may also be analyzed for such other substances as may be required or permitted by state or federal law and necessary to enforce this policy. The City reserves the right to begin testing immediately for other illegal substances without prior notice. Employees are responsible for knowing the contents, appropriate dosage, and effects of prescription and non-prescription medications. Nothing in this policy prohibits an employee's use of a medication legally prescribed by a licensed physician who is familiar with the employee's medical history and specific duties and has advised the employee that the prescribed medication will not adversely affect the employee's ability to perform his or her duties safely. Under this policy, employees are required to inform their supervisors of prescription and non-prescription medications that may impair their ability to perform essential job functions. Medications prescribed for someone other than the employee will not be considered lawfully used under any circumstances. Before a confirmed positive test is reported to the City, the MRO will ask the employee to provide a list of any prescription and/or non-prescription medications being lawfully used by that employee at that time. A positive drug test may be declared negative by the MRO if the employee can prove that the drug which was used was prescribed by a licensed physician who is familiar with the employee's medical history and specific duties. This determination will be solely the responsibility of the MRO and his/her decision will be final. Employees have three hours from the time they are notified to produce a sample. In the event an employee is unable to produce a sufficient sample within a three-hour period and declares a medical condition is to blame, the employee will be required to submit to an evaluation by a licensed physician selected by the City to determine whether a valid medical condition exists to explain the problem. If the physician determines a valid medical condition does exist, the test result will be reported to the City as "negative." If the physician determines a valid medical condition does not exist, the employee will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination for refusing to be tested. 9 63 Results for All Drug Tests Before an employee's test result will be confirmed positive for drugs, the employee will be given an opportunity to speak with the MRO and demonstrate a legitimate medical explanation for the positive result. If the MRO determines that a legitimate medical reason does exist, the test result will be reported as "negative." If the MRO determines that a legitimate medical reason does not exist, the test result will be reported as "confirmed positive." If the employee's primary specimen tests positive, the employee will be notified by the MRO and advised that he or she has 72 hours to request that the secondary specimen be sent to another certified laboratory for analysis. Pending the outcome of the additional analysis, the employee will be suspended without pay. If the final test result is negative, the employee will be paid for the period of the suspension. A diluted specimen is an indication that an employee may have consumed a large enough volume of fluid to put the body in a temporary state of over-hydration. If an employee produces a negative diluted specimen, the employee will be scheduled for re-testing. The result of the second test will be the result of record. If the specimen is determined to be diluted on the second test, it will be treated as a positive. However, if an employee produces a positive diluted specimen on the initial test, the test will be treated as a “positive” and no further testing will be conducted. Alcohol Testing Process All alcohol tests conducted under this policy will be done using a breathalyzer. In the case of an alcohol test conducted by a law enforcement officer following an accident, the employee may provide either a breath or blood specimen, as requested by the officer. Alcohol tests will be administered by a breath alcohol technician (BAT) using a breathalyzer, except in cases of on-scene, post-accident testing conducted by law enforcement officials. Before being tested, the employee will be required to present a valid ID and sign a consent form provided by the BAT. An employee who refuses or fails to cooperate will be subject to disciplinary action. Prior to the alcohol breath test the BAT will instruct the employee on how to provide an adequate breath sample. In the event an employee is unable to provide an adequate amount of breath and declares a medical condition is to blame, the employee will be required to submit to an evaluation by a licensed physician selected by the City to determine whether a valid medical condition exists to explain the problem, If the physician determines a valid medical condition does exist, the test result will be reported to the City as "negative." If the physician determines a valid medical condition does not exist, the employee will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination for refusing to be tested. 10 64 Results for All Alcohol Tests If an employee’s initial test registers an alcohol concentration level less than 0.02%, the test results will be reported as "negative." If an employee’s initial test registers an alcohol concentration level 0.02% or greater, a second breath test will be performed to confirm the result. If the employee’s confirmatory test registers less than 0.02%, the test results will be reported as "negative." An employee whose confirmatory test registers up to a 0.019% will not have any action taken against them. If the test registers a 0.02% or greater, the employee will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. Disciplinary Action An applicant whose test results under this policy are confirmed positive will be removed from the application process. An employee whose test results under this policy are confirmed positive will be terminated and will be ineligible to reapply. Employees who refuse or fail to agree in writing to be tested for alcohol or to comply with the alcohol testing procedures outlined above will be terminated. Employees whose test results under this policy are confirmed positive for alcohol will be terminated and will be ineligible to reapply. Firefighters and Police Officers will be referred to their particular Merit Boards for disciplinary actions, which may include measures up to and including termination. If terminated, they will be ineligible to reapply. For all other violations of this policy, disciplinary action will be determined on a case-by-case basis. Police Officers assigned to undercover duties will be covered by Department Standard Operating Procedures and may receive special consideration under this policy. Upon notification of a confirmed positive test, the Chief of Police and the Designated Employee Representative (DER) will jointly determine whether such consideration is warranted. At their sole discretion, the positive test result may be treated as a negative result for disciplinary purposes. A written statement outlining the reasons for such a decision shall be attached to the report of the positive test result. Maintaining Contact with the City and MRO after a Drug Test 11 65 Employees who are tested for drugs are required to remain in contact with the City's Designated Employee Representative (DER) and/or MRO while awaiting the results of their tests. Employees are required to be accessible by telephone during this time. The MRO shall be selected and retained by the vendor that provides drug testing services. The MRO may change from time to time. The name and credentials of the current MRO are available upon request. An employee who refuses or fails to remain in contact with the Designated Employee Representative (DER) or the MRO will waive his or her right to speak with the MRO before a test is confirmed positive and will be subject to disciplinary action up to and including termination. Policies and Educational Information Employees will be given this policy statement. Drivers will also be given an explanation of DOT requirements. Each employee is required to acknowledge in writing that he or she has been given a copy of this policy, as amended from time to time. Employees who refuse to execute the required acknowledgment will be subject to disciplinary action. Applicants are required to execute the acknowledgment as a condition of being considered for employment. Voluntary Identification Any employee who voluntarily self-identifies as having a drug or alcohol-related problem will not be subject to discipline for volunteering that fact; however, this provision is not available to an employee who requests protection after being asked to submit to a test or after the employee’s use of drugs or alcohol becomes a personnel issue based on direct observation or other reliable evidence, such as an arrest or criminal conviction for a drug or alcohol-related offense. Rather, the employee must pursue counseling, rehabilitation, or treatment at the recommendation of a SAP to eliminate dependence on drugs or alcohol at their own expense. Employees who volunteer such information and participate in a counseling/rehabilitation/ treatment program are not relieved of their obligation to comply with this policy and applicable rules concerning alcohol and drugs. This provision is not available to an employee who requests protection after being asked to submit to a test or after the employee's use of drugs or alcohol becomes a personnel issue based on direct observation or other reliable evidence, such as arrest or criminal conviction for a drug or alcohol-related offense. If the employee is actively participating or has successfully completed the counseling/rehabilitation/ treatment program as verified in writing by a substance abuse professional or by a medical doctor, the employee will be eligible to work after passing a return-to-duty test, as described in this policy. Return to work is conditional upon the employee's compliance with individual responsibilities, which may include obtaining follow-up counseling and/or treatment as recommended by their counselor/doctor and SAP. Any 12 66 13 employee who is removed from service due to voluntary disclosure is not qualified to perform safety-sensitive duties including positions requiring a commercial driver’s license. Such employee shall be provided with the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of qualified substance abuse professionals (SAPs) who are approved by the City. Payment of Costs The City will pay the costs for all initial drug and alcohol tests required by this policy. The applicant or employee is responsible for the costs of any confirmatory tests. Any costs associated with a voluntary counseling/rehabilitation/treatment program will be at the employee's expense. Availability and Confidentiality of Test Results Any employee who has submitted to a drug and/or alcohol test under this policy is entitled to receive a copy of the test results, upon written request to the MRO. The results of all individual drug and alcohol tests will be considered confidential and kept in a secured location with controlled access in Human Resources in a file separate from his/her personnel file. The release of an individual employee's test results will be made only in accordance with the employee's written authorization or as otherwise required by applicable laws, orders, regulations, or ordinances. 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 Appendix A  National Objective Documents    Jurisdiction Boundaries    Jurisdiction  Boundary  Project Area  Project Area City of Jeffersonville with project area indicated  A - 1 Aerial Photo of Project Area    A - 2 USGS The National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed October, 2017. National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250Feet Ü85°45'9.67"W 38°17'8.61"N 85°44'32.21"W 38°16'40.37"N SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOODHAZARD AREAS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)Zone A, V, A99With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areasof 1% annual chance flood with averagedepth less than one foot or with drainageareas of less than one square mile Zone X Future Conditions 1% AnnualChance Flood Hazard Zone XArea with Reduced Flood Risk due toLevee. See Notes.Zone XArea with Flood Risk due to LeveeZone D NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D Channel, Culvert, or Storm SewerLevee, Dike, or Floodwall Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance17.5 Water Surface ElevationCoastal Transect Coastal Transect BaselineProfile BaselineHydrographic Feature Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Effective LOMRs Limit of StudyJurisdiction Boundary Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from theauthoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This mapwas exported on 2/21/2019 at 10:33:57 AM and does notreflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date andtime. The NFHL and effective information may change orbecome superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following mapelements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images forunmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used forregulatory purposes. Legend OTHER AREAS OFFLOOD HAZARD OTHER AREAS GENERALSTRUCTURES OTHERFEATURES MAP PANELS 8 1:6,000 B 20.2 The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. A - 3 Population Data    Picture: American Community Survey, HUD LMI (low moderate income)percentage data, screenshot.  A - 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2019-R- S BEFORE THE COMMON COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE STATE OF INDIANA A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING AREA NEEDING REDEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City of Jeffersonville desires to eliminate blighted areas within the corporate limits of Jeffersonville, Indiana, and specifically downtown Jeffersonville, and WHEREAS, identifying such areas is necessary for effective action to eliminate blighting conditions, and WHEREAS, public improvements such as curbs, pavement, sidewalks, curb ramps, and pedestrian islands have severely deteriorated, contributing to blighting conditions, and WHEREAS, the downtown area has experienced a cessation of private investment since the year 2000 and WHEREAS, 6% of first floor commercial space, 3% of second floor commercial space, and 9%percent of total commercial space in downtown Jeffersonville is currently vacant, and WHEREAS, 10% percent of downtown commercial buildings are deteriorated as evidenced by chipping and cracking paint, cracking foundations, failing windows, aging roofs and eaves, WHEREAS, the project activities are designed to address slums or blight on an area basis as defined by 24 CFR 570.483(c)(1), NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council for the City of Jeffersonville, Indiana that the following areas of downtown Jeffersonville hereby be designated as an area in need of redevelopment as defined by Indiana Code 36-7-14: Along Spring Street from 10th Street to the South to 15th Street to the North, and approximately one block to the east to Wall Street and Thomas V Bryant Drive, and approximately one block to the west to Duncan Avenue (See Appendix 1 — Boundary Map). This resolution shall be in full force and effect after its passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor. A - 5 RESOLUTION NO.2019-R- 5 YES NO V I" La r 4;4i 11151P'.' A.4 41, RESOLUTION NO. 2019-R- 5 PASSED and ADOPTED by the Common Council for the City of Jeffersonville, Indiana upon this /7 day of ..Tvnii 2019. Ed Zastawny, Preside/ Jeffersonville Comm) Council ATTEST: Vicki Conlin, Clerk City of Jeffersonville, Indiana A - 6 RESOLUTION NO.2019-R- 5 RESOLUTION NO.2019-R- .j PRJSENTED by me to the Mayor for the City of Jeffersonville, Indiana upon this JO day of 2019. icki Conlin, Clerk City of Jeffers•nville, Indiana RESOLUTION NO. 2019-R- APPROVED b, e upon his day of 2019. I I Mike Mo re, Mayor City of Je fersonville, Indiana RESOLUTION NO. 2019-R- VETOED by me upon this day of 2019. Mike Moore, Mayor City of Jeffersonville, Indiana A - 7 Appendix 1 —Boundary Map 4 #mss Ili:, 4... %lit:,-,...‘,Ii;.. 0' ,,,, NI. 1 x m . fid. A,. I,. 1 a r 1 l I a g 4';X'"' A' St 1..›.d 12RE 4_ 5 r v, 4 t }, Ads Uti s t t AVE _ ----..-='; t,.,,A.,,i4-;V::2)'::::,%-ir.4 ',c,, 1 *,, M4 -' M 1 4' a V Pi AL SLY.' 4"w • r 3\ _ .W 1''Y ST 47‘ 1:::.:a.: ,,,,,,,: e: , ,,-, e .A. L. T.,7 .r +.`';"' Area in Need of Redevelopment h Boundary 1' '4 ., i Via; A - 8 Appendix B  Project Description Documents  HOSPITAL – Follows Spring Street (10th Street to 14th Street/Wall Street) 3 Wall St 14th St13th StSparks AveHospital Blvd10th St12th St4 3 2 Spring St • Implement streetscape improvements. • Install pedestrian-scale streetlights, five per block, on the west side of the street. • Promote tree planting on private property adjacent to the sidewalk. General Segment Wide Recommendations: Clark Memorial Hospital 130B - 1 Hospital Segment   PROJECT DESCRIPTION  The improvements in the Hospital neighborhood will provide connections of the existing  sidewalk facilities.  Decorative lighting will be placed on the west side of the street.  A stamped  concrete curb strip will be placed along the west side of the street.  Dedicated bicycle lanes will  be placed down both sides of the roadway.  The roadway will be milled and resurfaced to  provide a solid and smooth surface for bicyclists.     The curb ramps and pedestrian crossings will be upgraded.  The cross walks will be restriped  with enhanced cross walks to provide aesthetic improvements and alert drivers to the presence  of pedestrians.    The Hospital Boulevard intersection will have the right turn lane will be removed and replaced  with a tree lawn and additional width pedestrian facilities.  Additional trees will be planted  between Hospital Boulevard and 10th Street.  A detached sidewalk will be installed in portions  of this section as well.    Bus shelters will be added at Sparks Avenue and south of the 14th street intersection.  The 14th  Street intersection will also have curb bump outs added to aid crossings and create a pedestrian  refuge.  A public art display will also be added adjacent to the relocated Depot Building.   Additional way‐finding signage highlighting points of interest will be added to the  neighborhood.  PERMITS  This segment will require a Rule 5 permit due to the ground disturbing activities.  No other  jurisdictional permits are required.  UTILITIES   This segment has several utility facilities running throughout.  There are aerial facilities for  communication and power running up the east side of the street.  There is buried gas and water  lines in the roadway and sidewalks.  The project elements will be designed around the existing  utilities, but coordination will be required.       131B - 2 Reference from the City of Jeffersonville Spring Street Master Plan (released 7/18/17)132B - 3 Reference from the City of Jeffersonville Spring Street Master Plan (released 7/18/17)133B - 4 Reference from the City of Jeffersonville Spring Street Master Plan (released 7/18/17)134B - 5 Reference from the City of Jeffersonville Spring Street Master Plan (released 7/18/17)136B - 6 Scope  The improvements in the Hospital neighborhood will provide connections of the existing  sidewalk facilities. Decorative lighting will be placed on the west side of the street. A stamped  concrete curb strip will be placed along the west side of the street. Dedicated bicycle lanes will  be placed down both sides of the roadway. The roadway will be milled and resurfaced to  provide a solid and smooth surface for bicyclists.    The curb ramps and pedestrian crossings will be upgraded. The cross walks will be restriped  with enhanced cross walks to provide aesthetic improvements and alert drivers to the presence  of pedestrians.    The Hospital Boulevard intersection will have the right turn lane will be removed and replaced  with a tree lawn and additional width pedestrian facilities. Additional trees will be planted  between Hospital Boulevard and 10th Street. A detached sidewalk will be installed in portions  of this section as well.    Bus shelters will be added at Sparks Avenue and south of the 14th street intersection. The 14th  Street intersection will also have curb bump outs added to aid crossings and create a pedestrian  refuge. A public art display will also be added adjacent to the relocated Depot Building.  Additional way‐finding signage highlighting points of interest will be added to the  neighborhood.  Jeffersonville Main Street Revitalization – Hospital Segment – Project elements  ‐ Connections of existing sidewalk facilities  ‐ Decorative Lighting on west side  ‐ Stamped concrete curb on west side  ‐ Bicycle lanes (road milled and resurfaced)  ‐ Upgrade curb ramps and pedestrian crossings  ‐ Restriped enhanced cross walks  ‐ Replace right turn lane at Hospital Blvd with tree lawn and additional width pedestrian facilities  ‐ Additional tree planting along corridor  ‐ Detached sidewalk at portions  ‐ Bus shelters at Sparks Ave and south of 14th St intersection  ‐ Curb bump outs at 14th St. intersection  ‐ Additional Way‐finding signs  ‐ Public art display adjacent to Depot Building    B - 7 Supporting Documents     Pg. 35, 2015 Jeffersonville Comprehensive Plan.  Map indicating Primary Gateways at 10th and Spring  Street and at 14th and Spring Street.    Pg 84, 2015 Jeffersonville Comprehensive Plan.  Development investments in downtown area.      B - 8     Pg 87, 2015 Jeffersonville Comprehensive Plan.  Identification of Spring Street as Strategic Investment  area.  Recommended improvements to streetscape along key corridors.  B - 9   Pg 24, 2017 Spring Street Master Plan. Public Engagement methods   Pg 25, 2017 Spring Street Master Plan. Public Engagement methods (continued)  B - 10   Pg 5, 2017 Spring Street Master Plan. Primary goals identified for Spring Street Corridor including  improving the quality, function and appearance of Spring Street, improving safety for all users,  increasing pedestrian comfort and walk‐ability, etc.    Pg 7, 2017 Spring Street Master Plan.  Recommended improvements to Hospital segment.    Pg 12, 2017 Spring Street Master Plan.  Claysburg Neighborhood Revitalization Plan ‐2012, relevant  recommendations from plan include improving sidewalk connectivity, ensure sidewalks and  intersections are ADA compliant, need for crosswalks and lighting.  B - 11   Pg 14, 2017 Spring Street Master Plan.  Recent adjacent projects to the corridor that have elevated the  projects priority.  B - 12   Pg 15, 2017 Spring Street Master Plan.  Recent adjacent projects to the corridor that have elevated the  projects priority (continued).    B - 13   Pg 16, 2017 Spring Street Master Plan.  Claysburg neighborhood demographics and need for multi‐ modal transit.    Pg 21, 2017 Spring Street Master Plan.  Primary issues in Hospital segment of Spring Street Corridor.  B - 14   Pg 17, 2013 Jeffersonville Bike and PED Plan.  Spring Street Corridor is high priority for bicycle route.      Pg 66, 2013 Jeffersonville Bike and PED Plan.  Pedestrian policies should connect neighborhoods with  commercial districts, neighborhoods with community facilities.    B - 15 Appendix C  Project Need Documents  City of Jeffersonville – Main Street Revitalization   Public Survey      The City of Jeffersonville is seeking input for a project to improve the streetscapes (sidewalks, curbs,  pedestrian crossings, etc.) along Spring Street from 10th Street to 14th Street.  The City is seeking grant  funds for the project.  1. Are you a City of Jeffersonville resident?    (yes     or     no)    2. Do you support streetscape improvements (sidewalks, curbs, pedestrian crossings, art, bus  shelters, trees, etc.) in downtown Jeffersonville, along Spring Street from 10th Street to 14th  Street?  (yes     or     no)    3. How important are improvements to the streetscape to you?  (circle one)  ‐ Extremely Important  ‐ Very Important  ‐ Somewhat important  ‐ Not so Important  ‐ Not at all important    4. Rank which streetscape improvements are most important/needed to you. (Rank 1‐5 with 1  being the most important)  ‐ Sidewalks  ‐ Bike lanes  ‐ Trees, art, and lighting  ‐ Crosswalks and pedestrian islands  ‐ Bus shelters    5. How often do you walk or bike downtown?  (circle one)  ‐ Every day  ‐ A few times a week  ‐ About once a week  ‐ A few times a month  ‐ Once a month  ‐ Less than once a month    6. Would you be likely to walk or bike downtown if the streetscape was improved?      (yes     or     no)    (Optional)  Name:                                                                                                                                      Address:                                                                                                                                                               Contact Information (phone or email):                                                                             C - 1 Photo Evidence          2/22/19: East Side facing North at ~350ft  North of 10th Street.No Sidewalk cracking 2/22/19: East Side facing North at ~450ft  North of 10th Street.  Deteriorating driveway  apron to nowhere, overgrown crumbling  curb/drive            2/22/19: East Side facing North at 12th Street.   Cracking and deteriorating sidewalk and curb 2/22/19: East Side facing North at  Wall Street  intersection.  Inconsistent sidewalk‐crosswalk  transition with deteriorating curb,  unprotected island with soft curb.  C - 2            2/22/19: East Side facing North 10 ft North  of Wall Street intersection.  Cracked and  collapsing sidewalk near curb.  2/22/19: East Side facing West 50 ft North of  Wall Street intersection.  Crosswalk to curb with  no ramp or sidewalk connection.                                 2/22/19: West Side facing South, 100  ft South of Spark Street intersection.   Missing sidewalk, badly cracked  asphalt at driveway apron to  nowhere.  2/22/19: West Side facing South, 50ft  North of Spark Street intersection.   Uneven narrow and obstructed  sidewalk and deteriorated curb.   Unprotected bus stop.  C - 3 C - 4 C - 5 C - 6 C - 7 C - 8 C - 9 C - 10 Appendix D  Fiscal Impact Documents  Indiana's Public Data Utility Property Tax Rates by County: STATS Indiana http://www.stats.indiana.edu/dms4/propertytaxes.asp 1 of 2 4/3/2019, 9:13 AM D - 1 Property Tax Rates by County: STATS Indiana http://www.stats.indiana.edu/dms4/propertytaxes.asp 2 of 2 4/3/2019, 9:13 AM D - 2 Debt Class Description or Purpose Ending Principal Balance as of Dec. 31, 2018 Principal and Interest Due in 2019 Governmental Activities Revenue Bonds 2008 Tax Increment Bonds for Veterans Pkwy & Thompson Rd $1,550,000.00 $251,639.00 Revenue Bonds 2013 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds 2013 - Series A $1,730,000.00 $155,268.76 Revenue Bonds 2013 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds 2013 - Series B $6,120,000.00 $776,490.00 Revenue Bonds 2013 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds 2013 - Series C $4,280,000.00 $393,437.50 Revenue Bonds 2013 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds 2013 - Series D $2,570,000.00 $329,020.00 Revenue Bonds 2013 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds 2013 - Series E $1,750,000.00 $74,375.00 Notes and Loans Payable Infrastructure Bank Loan INDOT Overpass Construction $2,098,702.18 $270,000.00 Notes and Loans Payable Notes for Purchase of CASI $117,282.97 $38,739.96 SubTotal $20,215,985.15 $2,288,970.22 Debt Class Description or Purpose Ending Principal Balance as of Dec. 31, 2018 Principal and Interest Due in 2019 WASTEWATER Revenue Bonds 1999 SRF Sewage Works $781,701.00 $630,728.64 Revenue Bonds 2008 SRF Expansion of Downtown Treatment Plant $7,877,000.00 $552,429.70 Revenue Bonds 2009 SRF Improvements $989,000.00 $103,376.40 Revenue Bonds 2010A SRF Improvements $1,735,000.00 $151,008.00 Revenue Bonds 2010B Revenue Certain Additions, Extensions & Improvements $1,000,000.00 $1,893,512.51 Revenue Bonds 2011 Series A SRF Tenth St Lift Station and Certain other Improvement $18,710,000.00 $1,153,472.00 Revenue Bonds 2011 Series B SRF Brownfield Remediation $407,863.00 $39,000.00 Revenue Bonds 2011 Series C SRF North WW Treatment Plant $15,985,000.00 $1,201,446.60 Revenue Bonds 2012 SRF WWWTP Improvements $9,260,000.00 $698,247.10 Revenue Bonds 2013 Sewage Works Refunding (1999, 2003, 2005A) Revenue Bonds $7,305,000.00 $610,875.00 Revenue Bonds 2017 Series A Sewage Works Refunding (2010)$12,800,000.00 $0.00 SubTotal $76,850,564.00 $7,034,095.95 GRAND TOTAL $97,066,549.15 $9,323,066.17 4/3/2019 9:07:45 AM Page 1 Jeffersonville Civil City, Clark County, Indiana Debt Statement - 2018 D - 3 Local Fund Number Local Fund Name Beg Cash & Inv Bal Jan 1, 2018Receipts Disbursement End Cash & Inv Bal Dec 31, 2018 Governmental Activities 101 General Fund $7,659,537.75 $33,890,056.47 $35,805,966.94 $5,743,627.28 201 Street Dept MVH $2,950,992.12 $2,145,262.04 $2,816,704.72 $2,279,549.44 202 LOCAL ROADS & STREETS $702,163.73 $863,275.78 $637,986.62 $927,452.89 203 STREET DEPART NON-REVERT $4,292.65 $24,192.66 $28,485.31 $0.00 204 PARK & RECREATION $1,940,916.20 $2,713,561.77 $3,669,075.31 $985,402.66 207 FIRE DEPARTMENT NON-REVER $180.00 $65.00 $245.00 $0.00 209 Parks Activity $126,241.18 $550,465.27 $607,968.79 $68,737.66 210 ANIMAL SHEL. SPAY/NEU PRO $2,003.00 $38,390.45 $35,194.50 $5,198.95 218 CITY ENGINEER NON-REV. $9,051.88 $0.00 $9,051.88 $0.00 221 CASH CHANGE $660.00 $0.00 $0.00 $660.00 222 PETTY CASH $953.14 $0.00 $143.14 $810.00 226 SHARE OF GAMING REVENUES $342,168.90 $266,298.01 $238,500.80 $369,966.11 229 UNSAFE BUILDING/DEMOLITION N/R $100,299.63 $60,870.72 $45,107.28 $116,063.07 230 8th St. StormSewer Separation Project $0.00 $1,500,000.00 $0.00 $1,500,000.00 232 The Chapel Lake Park Project NR Fund $0.00 $2,900,000.00 $218,899.98 $2,681,100.02 233 Planning and Place-Making Improvements $14,592.01 $29,956.96 $12,833.80 $31,715.17 236 CLERKS RECORD PERPETUAT $9,740.19 $12.30 $0.00 $9,752.49 240 RIVERSTAGE $43,360.73 $282,133.47 $282,541.41 $42,952.79 244 SANITATION $2,390,487.21 $2,250,750.58 $2,253,580.75 $2,387,657.04 248 Grant - JFD Port Grant $0.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 249 GRANT - YOUTH COALITION $9,860.00 $6,250.00 $8,982.66 $7,127.34 Page 14/3/2019 8:49:01 AMIndiana Gateway Report gateway.ifionline.org Jeffersonville Civil City, Clark County, Indiana Cash & Investments Combined Statement - 2018 D - 4 Local Fund Number Local Fund Name Beg Cash & Inv Bal Jan 1, 2018Receipts Disbursement End Cash & Inv Bal Dec 31, 2018 Governmental Activities 255 VEHICLE MAIN FUEL & REP $1,180,499.18 $1,081,616.41 $1,149,004.26 $1,113,111.33 256 Community Crossing Transportation Grant $737,580.62 $0.00 $737,580.62 $0.00 257 Special LOIT Distribution $4,589,123.44 $0.00 $1,226,493.86 $3,362,629.58 260 Community Crossing Grant (Holman''s Lane) $0.00 $1,340,000.00 $0.00 $1,340,000.00 264 CITY ATTORNEY DIVERSN FND $6,525.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,525.00 265 DONATIONS $57,757.36 $201,353.49 $71,641.73 $187,469.12 268 CITY PRIDE COMMITTEE NR $6,508.85 $32,000.00 $29,790.91 $8,717.94 269 THUNDER COMMITTEE NON-REV $63,287.47 $25,577.32 $48,855.09 $40,009.70 271 PUBLIC ARTS $188,901.39 $101,112.12 $114,454.11 $175,559.40 273 Abbey Road on the River $0.00 $23,500.00 $23,414.89 $85.11 274 Port Grant 2016/2017/2018 - Federal $0.00 $45,851.00 $45,851.00 $0.00 276 Nachand Fieldhouse Rehabilitation $101,267.57 $1,663,533.34 $1,004,550.27 $760,250.64 277 SPRINT LEASE NON REVERTIN $124,542.47 $16,672.50 $0.00 $141,214.97 278 SPRING STREET MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION $1,665,000.00 $0.00 $213,385.00 $1,451,615.00 279 ECONOMIC DEV ABATEMENT $268,078.71 $110,039.61 $60,000.00 $318,118.32 281 TIF63-VOGT VALVE ALLOC $998,665.65 $776,256.21 $630,195.00 $1,144,726.86 283 TIF64-GALVSTAR ALLOC $2,135,837.20 $974,491.79 $716,559.20 $2,393,769.79 284 POLICE FALLS LANDING C $141,935.60 $0.00 $4,416.67 $137,518.93 287 TIF66-KEYSTONE ALLOC $480,514.15 $192,163.64 $143,035.00 $529,642.79 289 TIF67-BETHNOVA ALLOC $38,330.89 $68,024.91 $106,355.80 $0.00 Page 24/3/2019 8:49:01 AMIndiana Gateway Report gateway.ifionline.org Jeffersonville Civil City, Clark County, Indiana Cash & Investments Combined Statement - 2018 D - 5 Local Fund Number Local Fund Name Beg Cash & Inv Bal Jan 1, 2018Receipts Disbursement End Cash & Inv Bal Dec 31, 2018 Governmental Activities 290 DEPARTMENT OF LAW N/R $7,261.67 $0.00 $3,726.04 $3,535.63 291 TIF57,61-ICR ALLOC $14,385,138.03 $9,591,157.14 $8,704,456.45 $15,271,838.72 295 TIF62-HARB, FALLS ALLOC $3,634,779.56 $2,784,031.48 $2,959,610.02 $3,459,201.02 300 2013 Falls Land Ser A DSR $159,256.26 $0.00 $0.00 $159,256.26 301 CUM. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $380,058.19 $105,082.52 $59,479.05 $425,661.66 302 2013 ICR Series B DSR $778,371.75 $0.00 $0.00 $778,371.75 303 2013 Falls Land Ser C DSR $400,468.76 $0.00 $0.00 $400,468.76 304 2013 ICR Series D DSR $274,634.66 $0.00 $0.00 $274,634.66 305 2013 ICR Series E DSR $128,162.84 $0.00 $0.00 $128,162.84 307 FIRE PENSION $668,022.34 $1,247,752.33 $1,259,562.96 $656,211.71 308 POLICE PENSION $416,929.35 $771,023.90 $825,467.75 $362,485.50 309 2016 Redev Ref Bond DSR (2006ABC) $852,966.23 $6,434.56 $0.00 $859,400.79 310 Place Based Investment Grant (Triangle) $230,780.55 $136,976.15 $265,178.16 $102,578.54 311 Tourism Bond 2017 $936,043.94 $3,948.61 $189,526.70 $750,465.85 312 2016 Redev Ref Bond Sinking (2006ABC) $5,644.31 $830,272.23 $822,825.00 $13,091.54 313 Desitination Development Grant $0.00 $110,000.00 $3,949.00 $106,051.00 321 FEDERAL ASSET FORFEITURE $97,423.32 $52,089.75 $49,548.27 $99,964.80 351 POLICE NON-REVERTING FUND $58,861.60 $26,290.78 $12,765.61 $72,386.77 367 2017 Redev L/R Bond 10th Street -$418,766.14 $3,830,907.45 $4,314,876.65 -$902,735.34 368 2017 Redev L/R Bond 10th Street DSR $2,535,745.62 $19,129.11 $0.00 $2,554,874.73 369 2017 Redev L/R Bond 10th Street proceeds $6,618,920.19 $4,866,728.70 $8,659,682.44 $2,825,966.45 Page 34/3/2019 8:49:01 AMIndiana Gateway Report gateway.ifionline.org Jeffersonville Civil City, Clark County, Indiana Cash & Investments Combined Statement - 2018 D - 6 Local Fund Number Local Fund Name Beg Cash & Inv Bal Jan 1, 2018Receipts Disbursement End Cash & Inv Bal Dec 31, 2018 Governmental Activities 380 REDEVELOPMENT OPERATING $1,400,624.68 $587,691.96 $908,864.71 $1,079,451.93 381 REDEVELOPMENT CASI $220,569.99 $95,004.00 $128,751.84 $186,822.15 382 REDEV REVOLVING LOAN $514,341.23 $26,830.51 $400.02 $540,771.72 383 REDEVOLOPMENT GRANTS $59,060.03 $0.00 $0.00 $59,060.03 386 REDEV VETERANS PKWY RETAI DSR $132,071.27 $122,677.01 $0.00 $254,748.28 388 2018 EPA Brownfield Grant $2,946.13 $3,472.00 $3,660.80 $2,757.33 390 RAINY DAY FUND $4,658,363.85 $0.00 $0.00 $4,658,363.85 402 SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION $349,649.26 $1,450,000.00 $1,007,973.57 $791,675.69 403 CUM. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT $779,298.41 $179,043.38 $190,259.77 $768,082.02 404 COURT MONEY DUE TO STATE $6,139.50 $0.00 $6,139.50 $0.00 406 COURT COST DUE COUNTY $268.00 $0.00 $268.00 $0.00 408 CONTINUING EDUCATION $41,117.43 $0.00 $0.00 $41,117.43 409 LOCAL LAW ENFORCMNT CONT. ED. $137,913.35 $28,967.00 $27,448.88 $139,431.47 410 JEFF BLDG AUT OPER N/R $766,044.59 $320,000.00 $183,430.12 $902,614.47 414 2015 JAG Grant $0.00 $426.00 $0.00 $426.00 415 2016 / 2017 CHILD RESTRAINT GRANT $53.60 $0.00 $53.60 $0.00 416 2018 JAG Grant $0.00 $34,190.00 $21,539.20 $12,650.80 420 JEFF BLDG AUT CAP IMP RES $366,207.45 $70,000.00 $59,281.00 $376,926.45 430 PUBLIC SAFETY - LOIT $2,074,579.15 $3,157,761.14 $2,555,934.79 $2,676,405.50 Page 44/3/2019 8:49:01 AMIndiana Gateway Report gateway.ifionline.org Jeffersonville Civil City, Clark County, Indiana Cash & Investments Combined Statement - 2018 D - 7 Local Fund Number Local Fund Name Beg Cash & Inv Bal Jan 1, 2018Receipts Disbursement End Cash & Inv Bal Dec 31, 2018 Governmental Activities 444 ECONOMIC DEV INCOME TAX $1,676,139.88 $2,780,906.81 $2,904,684.14 $1,552,362.55 500 NON-REVERTING HEALTH INS. $1,631,019.48 $8,958,714.91 $7,710,333.32 $2,879,401.07 700 PAYROLL $195,383.18 $11,459,052.63 $11,461,117.41 $193,318.40 SubTotal $76,254,349.36 $107,855,295.88 $108,322,647.07 $75,786,998.17 Drainage 612 SEWAGE DRAINAGE $1,396,876.58 $2,235,726.85 $1,602,441.93 $2,030,161.50 SubTotal $1,396,876.58 $2,235,726.85 $1,602,441.93 $2,030,161.50 WASTEWATER 604 Wastewater Pre-Treatment $23,841.92 $9,665.00 $531.00 $32,975.92 606 SEWAGE OPERATING & MAINT. $9,955,326.93 $19,586,959.10 $21,971,415.74 $7,570,870.29 607 WW SINKING FUND $228,331.05 $3,228,549.25 $3,053,925.00 $402,955.30 609 SEWAGE CUMULATIVE IMPROVE $448,254.17 $2,676,446.17 $2,628,107.53 $496,592.81 610 WW SRF SINKING FUND $14,078.12 $4,140,500.38 $4,108,138.02 $46,440.48 611 WW DEBT SERVICE RESERVE FUND $7,098,565.89 $25,332.37 $0.00 $7,123,898.26 632 WW 2016 Sewer BAN $77,434.83 $0.00 $77,434.83 $0.00 635 WW CAPACITY FEE $6,070,753.91 $2,730,193.48 $35,771.50 $8,765,175.89 641 2017A WW Refunding Bond (Ref2010) $13,993,892.75 $30,757.80 $136,555.56 $13,888,094.99 SubTotal $37,910,479.57 $32,428,403.55 $32,011,879.18 $38,327,003.94 GRAND TOTAL $115,561,705.51 $142,519,426.28 $141,936,968.18 $116,144,163.61 Page 54/3/2019 8:49:01 AMIndiana Gateway Report gateway.ifionline.org Jeffersonville Civil City, Clark County, Indiana Cash & Investments Combined Statement - 2018 D - 8 Ending Fund Balances    General Fund ($5,743,627.28): Fund for general operations must be kept at 15% reserve best practice to  keep at 25% reserve for property tax funds.  This fund will be affected significantly by Circuit Breakers  this year being much higher than anticipated.      Street Department MVH ($2,279,549.44): This fund is now split between restricted and unrestricted  funds.  Current funds dedicated to a variety of road projects.    Local Roads and Streets ($927,452.89): Funds reserved for current road projects and winter  maintenance.     Park and Recreation ($985,402.66): Fund will be significantly affected by higher Circuit Breakers than  anticipated, fund must be maintained with at least 15% reserve, best practice is 25%.  Monies from this  fund currently dedicated to major park development, Chapel Lake park.    Share of Gaming Revenues (369,966.11): Monies from this fund are dedicated to the Homeless  Coalition, the RiverStage, and Special projects.    Planning and Place‐Making Improvements ($31,715.17): This is a non‐reverting fund for the sole  purpose of planning and place‐making improvements as overseen by the Director of the Planning  Department.  Project activities would be inappropriate for this fund.    Special LOIT Distribution ($3,362,629.58):  Used for local and arterial road projects.  Currently monies  from this fund are committed to the ongoing project at Holmans Lane involving the widening of a major  arterial road.    Public Arts ($175,559.40): A non‐reverting fund designated for the use of the Public Arts Committee.   This fund would be inappropriate for project activities.  This fund has been used for the implementation  of the recently named Arts District along the Spring Street Corridor to the south of the Project Area.    Spring Street Master Plan Implementation ($1,451,615.00): This is a non‐reverting fund for the sole  purpose of the Spring Street Master Plan Implementation.  Monies in this fund are currently dedicated  for the Claysburg Neighborhood project section currently under construction.  This section is the  northernmost section of the Spring Street Project area and just north of the project area for this  proposal.      Economic Development Abatement ($318,118.32): This fund is accumulated from Tax Abatement Fees  and is for the sole purpose of economic development projects that directly expand or attract business  development.    Cum. Capital Improvement ($425,661.66): These funds can be used for various capital improvement  projects including public ways and sidewalks.  The monies in this fund are currently dedicated to  software and hardware purchases and improvements through the City’s IT Department necessary for  the general operation and security of the City.    Federal Asset Forfeiture ($99,964.80): This is a non‐reverting fund for the accounting of asset  forfeitures and administered by the Chief of Police and subject to the approval of the Board of Public  D - 9 Works and Safety.  Monies from this fund are primarily used for public safety, Police, Fire, and EMS  purposes.     Redevelopment Operating (1,079,451.93): This fund has no revenue source, currently used for  operational expenses and maintenance, remaining held in reserve.    Rainy Day Fund ($4,658,363.85): This fund is for emergency use only.    Sidewalk Construction ($791,675.69): This is a non‐reverting fund for the purpose of maintenance and  construction of sidewalks.  Funds currently committed to ongoing projects throughout the City including  10th Street redevelopment and Holmans Lane.    Cum Capital Development ($768,082.02): This fund is for the construction or improvement of City  owned property.  Currently, monies in this fund are dedicated to the Cane Run Pump Station  improvements to alleviate flooding near the 10th Street and Spring Street intersection.    Economic Development Income Tax ($1,552,362.55): This fund is being used for some of the Park  operating expenses, and is being held for Cane Run Pump Station project.  D - 10