Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSECURITY RISK MANAGEMENT CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT 1. Basic Services. Security Risk Management Consultants, LLC., hereinafter referred to as SRMC, agrees to perform all services outlined in the SCOPE OF WORK of the AGREEMENT, which is attached hereto. These TERMS AND CONDITIONS shall supplement the AGREEMENT and become a part thereof. To any extent that they conflict with the AGREEMENT, the AGREEMENT shall take precedence. Terms used herein shall have the same meaning as set forth in the AGREEMENT unless otherwise defined in this document. It is understood that the SCOPE OF WORK and fees outlined in the AGREEMENT are based upon information available at the time the AGREEMENT was prepared. Should additional information become available at a later date, SRMC reserves the right to modify the SCOPE OF WORK and fees. SRMC will have no duties or responsibilities other than those outlined in this SUPPLEMENT or the SCOPE OF WORK of the AGREEMENT. 2. Billing and Payment. Unless otherwise specified, SRMC will submit an invoice each month for services performed the previous month or based on conditions outlined within the proposal as a percentage basis. The invoice amount will be based on time expended on the PROJECT at our standard hourly rates or the incremental portion of the PROJECT completed as a percentage of the total contract fee plus any reimbursable expenses, as more specifically set forth in the AGREEMENT. Payment for services rendered is due upon receipt of the invoice. Any payment not received with 90 days of the invoice date is subject to an interest charge of 1% per month. If an invoice remains unpaid for more than 90 days, SRMC reserves the right to suspend service and/or withhold documents until the overdue amount is paid. SRMC will assume no liability for delays caused by the suspension of service and will be entitled to payment from the CLIENT for any additional costs associated with restarting the PROJECT for this reason. 3. Additional Services. Any service performed by SRMC that results from: (i) oral or written changes in or additions to the SCOPE, extent, or character of the PROJECT requested by the CLIENT or other involved parties; (ii) revisions to a service previously performed when such revisions are not caused by errors on the part of SRMC; (iii) changes in or additions to the SCOPE, extent or character of the PROJECT due to circumstances not considered at the time the AGREEMENT was entered into; or (iv) changes in building code requirements shall be considered additional services. Fees for additional services will be billed separately from and in addition to fees for the SCOPE OF WORK specified in the AGREEMENT. Unless otherwise agreed upon, fees for additional services will be based on time expended at our standard hourly rates plus any reimbursable expenses. Estimated fees for performing any additional services shall be provided if requested by the CLIENT. 4. Reimbursable Expenses. Costs incurred by SRMC for travel, transportation, lodging, meals, printing, postage, deliveries, and/or application/submittal fees for the Project paid on behalf of the CLIENT will be considered reimbursable expenses. Unless otherwise noted in the AGREEMENT, reimbursable expenses are supplemental to the fees established in the AGREEMENT and will be billed separately at the direct cost to SRMC. 5. Client Responsibilities. The CLIENT shall guarantee SRMC and its agents and SUBCONSULTANTS free right-of-access to the PROJECT site for the purpose of obtaining survey and/or other site-specific information necessary to complete the SCOPE OF WORK. This right-of-access shall be in force from the date the AGREEMENT is executed through the completion of the SCOPE OF WORK. The CLIENT shall notify SRMC of any hazardous materials or conditions, including, without limitation, environmentally hazardous materials or conditions, known or suspected to exist at the PROJECT site. The CLIENT shall indemnify and hold harmless SRMC from any and all costs, liabilities and expenses (including attorney's fees) related to any hazardous materials or conditions at the PROJECT site, except to the extent they are introduced by SRMC. The CLIENT agrees to provide SRMC copies of any information at its disposal that is pertinent to the SCOPE OF WORK. The CLIENT agrees to notify SRMC promptly whenever the CLIENT observes or otherwise becomes aware of any problem, defect, or change in the PROJECT. The CLIENT agrees to respond within a reasonable time to requests by SRMC for information or other items necessary to complete the SCOPE OF WORK. 6. Liability. SRMC makes no warranty or guarantees regarding the services to be performed. SRMC will use the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar conditions by reputable members of the security consulting profession. The services to be performed by SRMC under the AGREEMENT are intended solely for the benefit of the CLIENT. Nothing contained herein shall create any duties on the part of SRMC toward any person or persons not a party to the AGREEMENT including, but not limited to, the PROJECT contractor, sub- contractors, or suppliers or their agents, officers, employees, insurers, or sureties. The CLIENT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless SRMC from any third party claims, including reasonable attorney's fees, except when such actions are shown to be a direct result of SRMC's sole gross negligence. SRMC's total aggregate liability for any damage due to its errors, omissions or professional negligence will be limited to a sum not to exceed the lesser of SRMC's fee or professional liability insurance coverage. 7. Standard of Care. In providing services under this AGREEMENT, SRMC will consistently endeavor to perform with the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances. SRMC will provide its services as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progression of SRMC's part of the PROJECT. Regardless of any other term or condition of this AGREEMENT, SRMC makes no express or implied warranty of any sort. All warranties, including warranty of merchantability or warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, are expressly disclaimed. Security Risk Management Consultants, LLC. Terms and Conditions Rev.2.1 10/30/13 8. Consequential Damages. Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary and to the fullest extent permitted by law, neither the CLIENT nor SRMC shall be liable to the other for any incidental, indirect or consequential damages arising out of or connected in any way to the PROJECT or this AGREEMENT. This mutual waiver of consequential damages shall include, but not be limited to, loss of use, profit, business or income or any other consequential damages that either party may have incurred from any cause of action whatsoever. 9. Hidden Conditions of an Existing Structure or Project. A condition is hidden if it is concealed by existing finishes or cannot be investigated by reasonable visual observation. If SRMC has reason to believe that such a condition may exist, the CLIENT shall authorize and pay for all costs associated with the investigation of such a condition. If(i) the CLIENT fails to authorize such investigation after due notification or (ii) SRMC has no reason to believe that such a condition exists, SRMC shall not be responsible for the existing conditions or any resulting damages or losses resulting thereof. 10. Indemnifications. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the CLIENT agrees to indemnify and hold harmless SRMC and its SUBCONSULTANTS from and against any and all damages, losses or costs (including reasonable attorney's fees and defense costs) caused in whole or in part by the CLIENT's acts, errors or omissions or those of anyone for whom the CLIENT is legally liable. SRMC further agrees to indemnify the CLIENT for damages arising from SRMC's own negligent errors, acts, or omissions. 11. Dispute Resolution. All claims or disputes between the CLIENT and SRMC arising from services provided or any duties or obligations performed under the AGREEMENT shall be submitted to mediation. If mediation is unsuccessful, they shall be submitted to binding arbitration administered by the American. Arbitration Association. Both parties agree that any judgments or rulings issued through arbitration shall be final. The venue for all arbitration hearings shall be in Columbus, Ohio. The laws of the State of Ohio shall govern the AGREEMENT and this SUPPLEMENT. 12. Execution of the AGREEMENT. Execution of the AGREEMENT by both parties will constitute authorization to proceed with the SCOPE OF WORK. Unless otherwise specified, SRMC will commence work within seven (7) days following the execution of the AGREEMENT. If any provision of the AGREEMENT is determined to be invalid, the remainder of the AGREEMENT shall not be affected and shall be valid and enforced to its fullest extent. 13. Termination of the AGREEMENT. Either party may terminate the AGREEMENT upon giving seven (7) days' written notice to the other, whereupon the parties shall have no further obligations under the AGREEMENT and this SUPPLEMENT. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each party is responsible for the timely performance of its obligations under the AGREEMENT and this SUPPLEMENT, including full payment by the CLIENT to SRMC of Security Risk Management Consultants, LLC. Terms and Conditions Rev.2.1 10/30/13 accrued fees and reimbursable expenses, through and until the date of termination. 14. Ownership of Documents. All documents produced by SRMC under this AGREEMENT, including electronic files, shall remain the property of SRMC and may not be used by the CLIENT for any other purpose without SRMC's written consent. Any such use or reuse shall be at the sole risk of the CLIENT who shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless SRMC and its SUBCONSULTANTS from any claims and/or damages arising thereof. Electronic files are not contract documents and cannot be relied upon to be identical to contract documents because of changes or errors induced by translation, transmission, or alterations while under the control of others. The use of information contained in electronic files is at the user's sole risk and without liability to SRMC and its SUBCONSULTANTS. 15. Defects in Service. The CLIENT shall promptly report to SRMC any known or suspected defects in the CONSULTANT's services. The CLIENT further agrees to impose a similar requirement to notify SRMC on all its contractors in its CLIENT/CONTRACTOR agreement and shall require all subcontractor agreements at any level to contain a like provision. Failure of the CLIENT or the CLIENT's CONTRACTORS or SUBCONTRACTORS to notify SRMC shall relieve the CONSULTANT of the costs of remedying the defects above the sum such remedy would have cost had prompt notification been given when such defects were first discovered. 16. Construction Activities. SRMC shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any person performing any of the work, the instructions given by the CLIENT or its representatives to anyone performing any of the work, or the means and methods of job-site safety. 17. Force Majeure. Any obligation of SRMC under this AGREEMENT shall be temporarily stayed and extended for the period of time its performance is impeded by an ACT OF GOD or other non-financial event outside of SRMC's control. 18.Waivers. No failure or delay of any party hereto in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right hereunder. 19. Unenforceable Provisions. If any term, paragraph, clause, condition, or provision of the AGREEMENT or this SUPPLEMENT is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions of the AGREEMENT and this SUPPLEMENT shall remain in force and in no way be affected, impaired, or invalidated. The AGREEMENT and this SUPPLEMENT shall be construed as if the invalid, void, or unenforceable provisions were omitted. 20. Notices. Any notice, demand, or other communication (NOTICE) required or desired under the AGREEMENT or this SUPPLEMENT shall be in writing and deemed to be sufficiently Security Risk Management Consultants, LLC Terms and Conditions Rev.2.1 10/30/13 given or served, for all purposes, if sent by postage prepaid, return receipt requested, certified or registered mail, delivered by prepaid courier service, or transmitted by facsimile with evidence of receipt to the address of the parties set forth in the AGREEMENT. If NOTICE is sent by certified or registered mail, NOTICE shall be deemed given two (2) days after being deposited in the facilities of the U.S. Postal Service. If NOTICE is sent by prepaid courier service or facsimile, NOTICE shall be deemed given upon receipt provided the sending party has evidence of said receipt. Any party may change the address to which a NOTICE is to be sent to it by NOTICE to the other parties as provided above. Client Initial /'-Y?/Y? Date JiaLl Security Risk Management Consultants,LLC. Terms and Conditions Rev.2.1 10/30/13 Sn n n iso East Mound Street,Suite 308 R I v i Columbus,OH 43215 614.2243100 Phone g614.224.3252 Fax Security Advisors www.srmcllc.com May 22, 2017 Amir Mousavi Director of Safety City of Jeffersonville, Indiana 5000 Quartermaster Jeffersonville, Indiana 47130 Dear Amir, Thank you for the opportunity to discuss your needs and to provide this updated proposal for a comprehensive security assessment of the Jeffersonville City Hall complex, replacing the proposal provided in March 2016. In an effort to solidify project expectations, we've put together the following Scope-of-Work statement covering the activities discussed to address this comprehensive security assessment of City Hall. Security Risk Management Consultants, LLC (SRMC) will use applicable security "best practices," a review of City Hall security and police incident reports, and stakeholder input as a guide to effectively review and assess site and building security and the overall security posture and operations on the campus. Based on our conversation, we believe SRMC is exceptionally qualified and well-positioned to provide the required Services in a professional, timely manner and have provided as a separate attachment, our experience with like facilities and clients. Our background in in state and local government facilities and operations, risk assessment, and extensive consulting experience, has given our team the skills essential for the success of this project. As you know, Security Risk Management Consultants, LLC (SRMC) is an independent security consultancy that has no affiliations with any security vendors or product manufacturers. Our assessments and recommendations are based on our extensive experience in the security market place and not on a desire to sell particular technologies. Our approach includes thorough fact-finding and evaluation, the identification of critical issues and applicable standards, and the development of recommendations appropriate for our client organization's culture and capabilities and the risks within its environment. We consider this process a partnership and accomplish these tasks in a collaborative, interactive manner. We identify and work with key stakeholders, seeking their input to ensure our work product is consistent with the organization's needs. SRMC's business model is focused solely on the security industry. Our knowledge of the industry is vast as we work with many large and mid-size system manufactures across many Threats Evolve. Principles Endure. Mr Amir Mousavi City of Jeffersonville, IN May 22, 2017 Page 2 different vertical markets. Along with our technical capabilities. SRMC has extensive experience assessing the needs to assess issues associated with security awareness, workplace violence and staff training. The SRMC staff subscribes to the Code of Ethics of the International Association of Professional Security Consultants (IAPSC) and ASIS International. Our consulting philosophy is based upon developing partnerships with our clients. We openly share our knowledge and experience in the belief that well-educated, informed clients make the best technology and process decisions. SCOPE-OF-WORK STATEMENT As part of our process, we will provide an assessment of technology, operations, security policies, procedures and processes at the Jeffersonville City Hall Complex. Our review will include: • Conduct a security assessment of the Jeffersonville City Hall Complex and its environs to identify organizational assets and the threats, risks, and vulnerabilities that may impact these assets. This process will include a high-level lighting survey of the exterior as well as identified parking areas. • SRMC staff will meet with critical building stakeholders, city leaders and department heads to gain an understanding of critical assets, facility operations, public accessibility, threats, risks, high value areas, mayoral protection, city council functions, building access and hours of operation and other overall facility issues that may be discovered. • SRMC staff will assess the building, review any security technologies including access control, door alarms, video surveillance, and duress alarms for functionality, design effectiveness, and overall use and management of these systems. • SRMC staff will conduct an on-site physical security survey reviewing the area including the application of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) and perimeter security. • SRMC staff will review the existing overall security program effectiveness, response to emergency needs, • SRMC will identify personnel and significant physical security threats and risks. This will be accomplished in conjunction with The Jeffersonville Division of Police and other appropriate law enforcement agencies. Mr Amir Mousavi City of Jeffersonville, IN May 22, 2017 Page 3 • Based on our findings, we will provide you with a comprehensive report which will outline our findings and specific recommendations to provide a reasonable and appropriate level of security programming for the Jeffersonville City Hall facility. • SRMC will provide a one-day on-site visit to present our report and findings to city leadership. IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THIS PROCESS, SRMC STAFF WILL NEED: • Access to the building during normal business hours and at night. Areas of security concern may be photographed for later review. • Facility floor and site plans. • Information regarding any significant security incidents or concerns expressed by staff members, elected officials, or others. • Your assistance with setting up meetings and focus groups across a single day period. • The authority to discuss site security and crime concerns with the local law enforcement agency. CAVEAT Full implementation of the recommendations included in our report cannot guarantee that Jeffersonville City Hall Municipal Complex will be crime free. Rather, the purpose of this assessment is to assist the City Administration and staff in reducing the potential for incidents by improving facility access, security technologies, operations, facility management, and staff awareness to the potential for problems. Security technology is only one part of the total security system. Other components of the overall security strategy must include the application of policies, procedures, and processes combined with appropriate staff training and participation, and law enforcement participation.. Recommendations reflect our understanding of the security issues at that time. Since crime prevention and reduction are dynamic processes, technology and security procedures should be routinely reviewed and updated to reflect changes in the environment. Mr.,Amir Mousavi City of Jeffersonville, IN May 22, 2017 Page 4 PROJECT TEAM We know from experience that a successful assessment requires a tightly integrated team of professionals that provides a single point of contact and accountability to the client. We have found that a cohesive, collaborative team provides the best work product. The multi-disciplinary SRMC team is experienced in working this way. The SRMC team will be comprised by company President Chad Parris, PSP, CSC who will be the single point of contact for this project. Chad brings extensive expertise and is an industry expert relative to security technologies and will review all aspects of the security technology needs. Supporting Chad will be staff consultant James H. Clark, CPP who will provide all security programming, policy and procedure reviews, public safety interface and assess overall security operational needs. Team member bios are attached to this document. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND COSTS SRMC will provide two staff consultants for this project to be on site up to one and a half days to conduct all assessment activities outlined in the scope of work plus a return trip to conduct the presentation. SRMC can accomplish this project and provide the City of Jeffersonville with a high-quality assessment report with recommendations for the City Hall Municipal Complex. We will provide the above noted services for a fixed fee of thirteen-thousand, two hundred ninety dollars ($13,290.00) plus an estimated two-thousand one-hundred fifty dollars ($2,150.00) in expenses for a grand total of$15,440.00. Expenses include travel mileage, hotel and meals and will be invoiced at cost with no mark up. All travel time is billed at half our effective consulting billing rate of$185.00 an hour. STANDARD BILLING PRACTICES Absent purchasing policies preventing them, it is our standard billing practice on assessment projects to request payment of a 35% retainer ($4,252.80) of our total fees prior to commencing on-site work. However, we recognize this is a time-sensitive endeavor and will schedule our site visit upon the City of Jeffersonville's acceptance of this proposal. We generally bill in two (2) additional increments: another 35% of the total fees will be invoiced upon completion of our initial site visit, an additional 30% will the delivery of the report with recommendations. Mr.Amir Mousavi City of Jeffersonville, IN May 22, 2017 Page 5 SUMMARY We hope this proposal is consistent with your requirements and understanding. Please let us know if we have misstated the scope. It can be adjusted as necessary. Additionally, please call me if you have any questions or need additional clarification. Thank you again for the opportunity to present this proposal and we look forward to the opportunity to work with you on this important endeavor. Sincerely, Accepted by: Chad Parris, PSP, CSC Sig ature President Printed Name/Title Date For: SRMC, LLC For: City of Jeffersonville, IN JCP/jcp Prop_Jeffersonville_I N_052217.doc John "Chad" Parris, PSP, CSC President — Security Risk Management Consultants, LLC EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Chad brings a unique combination of significant end-user and consulting experience to our team. As a consultant, he has over 17 years of experience in security technology assessment, master planning, design, project management, and implementation. His expertise lies in his thorough understanding of integrated security technologies and his ability to effectively communicate with both technical and non-technical stakeholders. As an end user, Chad was responsible for the security technologies on multiple campuses of OhioHealth and the security operations of Battelle Corporate Headquarters. He has performed assessments, developed effective technology designs, and managed technology implementation at a wide range of occupancies. Project Duties Relevant Project Experience Security Project Executive Security Master Planning City of Columbus,OH USA Security Technologies Assessment, Planning, Design, Project Management, Project Executive: Security program and technology assessment at multiple facilities. Developed standards for City-wide security technologies Expertise including access control and video, developed specifications for security systems, managed installation Threat/Vulnerability Assessment and testing, commissioned systems. Lead consultant for the City's Municipal Neighborhood Video Technology Assessment Surveillance project among dozens of others. Security Management Systems Related Projects: City Hall, Franklin County Municipal Court,all Division of Fire and Police facilities,the Video Surveillance Systems Health Department's main campus and multiple clinics, office buildings at 99-109 North Front Street, Video Management Systems the Jerry Hammond Building, 120 West Gay Street, 111 North Front Street (Office Tower and Parking Master Planning Garage),Hoover Reservoir,and 30 Recreation and Parks Neighborhood Centers. Network Video Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Nashville,TN USA Enterprise Access Control Assessment, Planning, Design, Project Management Project Executive: Security and technology Intrusion Detection assessment, planning, design, written plans, specifications, bid support, project management, Emergency Personal Protection implementation oversight and system commissioning for over 45 projects, including development of Perimeter Protection Systems access control, CCN, duress and intrusion detection standards. Currently working on the new Family Mass Notification Justice Center and the new Metro Nashville Police Headquarters. Related Projects: 430 Myatt Drive, Nashville Metropolitan MTA and Regional Transit Authorities(RTA), Education Metro Nashville Police Department including numerous police precincts, Crime Lab, multiple Fire Kent State University Stations and the Fire Training Academy, Fleet Maintenance Shops, Parks and Recreation facilities, multiple Libraries including the Main Library,and Public Health Center. Professional Certifications Physical Security Professional Tennessee Department of General Services, Nashville,TN USA (PSP) Assessment Planning, Project Executive: Comprehensive physical security technology assessment to Certified Security Consultant include recommendations for system enhancements and prioritized equipment upgrades and security related implementations with associated itemized cost estimates for each faciltiy visited. Provided a go- (CSC) forward strategy for upgrading and/or replacing dated and end-of-life systems with goals for systems integration and centrailized management and monitoring while developing a cost sentstiive budget and Professional Affiliations mitigation strategy. Preparing to enter the design phase for the assessed facilities. ASIS International Related Projects: William R. Snodgrass Tennessee Tower, Andrew Jackson Building, Andrew Johnson IAPSC Building,Citizens Plaza,and twelve(12)other Office and Public Service buildings. Years of Experience Shelby Municipal Complex,Shelby,OH USA 30 1 17 Years with Firm Assessment, Planning, Design, Project Management: Technology assessment, planning, design and implementation oversight for the new mixed-use Municipal Complex housing the Police, Municipal Court,jail and other related functions. SRMC 4 Trusted Security Advisors James H. Clark, CPP EXPERIENCE SUMMARY Jim brings over 30 years of experience in security management and law enforcement and 25 years of experience as an independent security consultant to our team. As a consultant, he has performed hundreds of security assessments for government, institutional and corporate clients including university campuses, healthcare, psychiatric and special care facilities, high-rise office towers, performing arts and entertainment centers, hotels, mixed use retail environments, critical infrastructures such as mass transit operations and airports, and over 200 institutional and corporate headquarters. Mr. Clark also brings extensive and highly respected experience in forensic security, specifically with litigation support in matters involving campus environments and healthcare facilities. Relevant Project Experience Project Role City of Columbus,Columbus,OH USA Security Assessor Assessment, Policy and Procedure Review, Training: Conducted an assessment of City Hall to Policy and Processes determine progress of the implementation of previous recommendations and identify new threats and vulnerabilities. Prepared new job descriptions for the security staff. Expertise Related Projects: Cuyahoga County,OH Administration Building,County Parking Garages. Threat/Vulnerability Assessment City of Lakeland,TN USA Master Planning Assessment, Planning,Project Executive: Security vulnerability assessment of City Hall and the Public Benchmarking Works facilities to include security technologies, policies and procedures,the application of CPTED,and Emergency Preparedness Planning the overall security program effectiveness. Recommendations were developed and prioritized providing Security Programming an appropiate level of security programming. CPTED Related Projects: Benchmarking for City of Baltimore,State Attorney's Office on metal detector usage, Security Training Summit County Children's Services. Mass Evacuation Strategies Litigation Avoidance Division of Water,Cleveland,OH USA Assessment, Planning:Security site assessments of four water treatments plants and dozens of pump Education stations, water reservoirs, and water lines throughout the region served by the Cleveland Division of Buffalo State College(SUNY) Water. Worked extensively with the consulting engineers and Water Division staff to identify threats BS I Criminal Justice and vulnerabilities in the system. Provided written guidelines for implementaton of systems,equipment and policies to enhance the Division's protection strategy. Professional Certifications Related projects: Cleveland Public Power, Cleveland Cable Network, and Cleveland Water and Certified Protection Professional Wastewater facilities throughout the service region, Southeast Oakland County Water Authority, Oakland County Drain Commission, City of Sterling Heights, City of Bloomfield Hills, Metropolitan (CPP) Government of Nashville and Davidson County. Professional Affiliations Geico Insurance, Chevy Chase,MD USA ASIS International Assessment Policy and Procedure Review, Recommendations: Performed campus-wide security IAPSC vulnerabilty assessment including security effectiveness,technology applicatons, physical controls and IFCPP the impact of community crime. Related Projects: First Energy,Progressive Insurance,Eaton,National City Bank(now PNC),Scotts. Years of Experience 33 1 11 Years with Firm George Washington University,Washington,DC USA Assessment, Policy and Procedure Review, Recommendations: Performed security vulnerability assessment and risk analysis using an all-hazards approach for the Foggy Bottom and Mount Vernon campuses. Included reviewing safety and security staffing, policies, operating procedures, and emergency and incident management plans and recommending revisions or changes as necessary to ensure these activities adequately support safety and security options for reducing risks posed to GW. Related Projects: King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Howard University, Harvard University,University of Virginia,University of Southern Connecticut +-' SRMC Trusted security Advisors