Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-R-25 1993 AGREEMENT BETWEEN TIlE CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA AND TIlE JEFFERSONVILLE-CLARK COUNTY BUILDING AUTHORITY PROVIDING FOR THE EXCHANGE OF ALLOCATED SPACE AND PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS IN THE CITY-COUNTY BUILDING AND PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT OF RELATED EXPENSES BY CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA CIVIL GOVERNMENT WHEREAS, Clark County, Indiana government through its Board of Commissioners ("the Board") and Jeffersonville city government through its Mayor and Common Council ("the City") are tenants to an existing lease ("the lease") wi~.h the Jeffcrsonville-Clark County Building Authority ("the Authority") which lease commenced in 1968 and provided for the renting of space by the Authority to the City and County respectively; WItEREAS, the Board is required under Indiana law to provide courtroom space and court facilities to all circuit, superior and county courts that are located in Clark County, Indiana; WIIEREAS, the Board has proposed certain terms of transfer of space, and payment obligations, to the City by way of a letter issued on September 3, 1993 ("the letter") by the President of the Board and directed to the Mayor and President of the Common Council of the City'; WilEREAS, the Agrcemeat provides for certain transfers of space presently leased by the Authority to the City and for certain common usages of public meeting space in the City-County Building, Jeff:rsonvillc, Indiana by bo'h representatives of the County a~d the City; WHEREAS, the proposed terms further provide for a net annual savings in lease rental and maintenance expenses by the City that would n~rmally be payable to the Authority under the lease; WHEREAS, all parties herein acknowledge that the rental rates an,.! calculations provided in the letter are based on the 1992-93 total budget for tl:c Authority. 3.11 parties 2:rther agre: that such total budge'; for ti',e Authority, payable and funded from the City ar.d County, respectively, may increase or decrease fron: time to rinne duri::g the remainder o7 the lease' Page 2 WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the letter, and by execution hereon, the Board will be responsible for payment of all expenses related to change and renovation of the existing City Council meeting room, Second Floor, Judicial Wing, City-County Building, into a courtroom facility. The Board further will be responsible for all renovations necessary to effectuate accommodation of the City detectives in the currently existing County Council room, Third Floor, Administrative Wing, City-County Building and the Board will further be responsible for all changes and renovation that are necessary to accommodate the multi-purpose meeting room on the Third Floor, Room 308, Administrative Wing, City-County Building; WHEREAS, the City and County agree that the exchange of space and expense obligations provided in the letter will result in an annual savings to the City, reducing the amount of monies that are required to be paid to the Authority under the lease. NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT AGREED BY TIIE CITY, THE COUNTY AND TIIE AUTItORITY AS FOI,LOWS: (l) That the City accepts, approves and agrees to the terms and proposals for space exchange, expense payment and future allocation of space and rental obl;gations contained in the September 3, 1993 letter signed by' Ralph Guthric, President of the Board of Commissioners of Clark County, Indiana, consisting of five (5) pages plus an attachment, which document is incorporated by reference herein and made ~, part hereof; (2) The City has executed this Agreement by and through the City Executive and by and through the President of the Common Council of the City of Jeffers¢:nville. These signatures have been attested to by the Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Jeffersonville; (3) The Bo'trd has executed this Agreement by and through its Board of Commissioners. These signatures have been attested to by the Auditor of Clark Ind~ County, '~ (4) The Authority has executed this Agreement by and through its President and ''m~s; ~:=,,~...,.o;o"ot',~ h~s been ,~:tested~' to by the Secretary of the Jeffcrsonville-C!ar'..: Page 3 (5) That upon execution of this Agreement the Board shall be immediately entitled to commence that renovation work that is necessary to effectuate the terms of this Agreement for the Superior Court No. 2, for the Jeffersonville detectives office and for the multi-purpose meeting room. (6) The Authority agrees to reallocate space in the City-County Building pursuant to this Agreement and to allocate future billings accordingly; (7) The Mayor and President of the Common Council of the City of Jeffersonville are hereby designated by the City, along with the President of the Board of the County, to discuss and settle any incidental issues that may arise during the implementation of this Agreement. The President of the Board of Commissioners is likewise so authorized on behalf of the County. TiIIS AGREEMENT SIGNED AND APPROVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON¥ILLE, INDI.a2qA AS INDICATED BY TIIE MAYOR'S SIGNATURE AND THE SIGNATURE OF TIlE PRESIDENT OF TItE COMMON COUNCIL BELOW ON SEPTEMBER 27, 1993. CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA BY: Raym~nd J. Parker, Jr. , Mayor COMMON COUNCIL OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA BY: Re, bert Potter, President Attest: Richarcl Spe neet ~C!erk~'~-'~s~ ret City o~: Jcffersonv'ille, indiana Page 4 TI-nS AGREEMENT SIGNED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA AS INDICATED BY THEIR SIGNATURES BELOW ON /69./~'~/'~ Attest: p. Oro X' d tor U]ark'County, h',diana BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA: Ralph Outhrie, President ~regory/L. Is~rigg Y TillS AGREEMENT SIGNED AND APPROVED BY TIlE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TIIE JEFFERSONVILLE-CLARK COUNTY BUILDING AUTIIORITY AS INDICATED BY TIlE SIGNATURE OF TIIE PRESIDENT OF TIlE BOARD AS SIIOWN BELOW ON BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE JEFFERSONVILLE-CLARK COUNTY BUILDING AUTHORITY BY: Prcsid~t Attest: S~c'rctary RALPH GUTHRIE PAUL F. GARRETT GREGORY L. ISGRIGG BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS CLARK COUNTY CITY-COUNTY BUILDING JEFFERSONVILLE~ INDIANA 47130 812-285-6276 · 812-285-6275 FAX 812-285-6366 DANIEL E. MOORE, Attorney ROBERT L. SCOTT, Superintendent HYUN T. LEE, Engineer September 3, 1993 Mayor Raymond J. Parker, Jr. Mr. Robert Potter, City Council President c/o Room 404 city-County Building Jeffersonville, Indiana 47130 Dear Mayor Parker and Council Members: This letter is a follow-up to a meeting this past week with each of you, Steve Stemler from the City Council, Dennis Simon from the County Council and Mr. Moore and Mr. Gillenwater, attorneys. We met to discuss the County's request to make a space exchange in the city-County Building so that Superior Court No. 2 could begin its operations in what is now the city Council meeting room on the second floor, judicial wing. Under the law, the County Commissioners are required to provide court space for all circuit, superior and county courts. Superior Court No. 2 provides service for all citizens of Clark County, whether living in cities or towns or in the unincorporated county. This court handles criminal cases, welfare cases, divorce and civil matters and needs to be centrally located, with the other courts so as to prevent great inconvenience fox transport of prisoners by local police departments. It needs to be in the same building as the jail and clerk of the court. County government, due to prohibitive expenses, is planning to auction the courthouse annex building where the court is now located~ along with the local we!f~.~re department. The County believes the exchang~ of space proposal i set out in this letter can realize a service to the City as well as a financial savings to your budget. Both the City and Couaty annually pay rent for (a) debt retirement and (b) maintenance of the City-County Building. This last category is termed "additional rental" to the Authority and is subject to change annually while Mayor Raymond J. Parker, Mr. Robert Potter September 3, 1993 Page 2 Jr. the "fixed rental" always remains the same ($313,000.00) to retire the building bonds. Pursuant to a 1990 agreement between the City and County, settling some then-existing space issues, the city is now charged with 26.648% of both fixed and additional rental, while the County pays 73.352% of both. Space in the building is comprised of three designations as follows: (1) city space (2) County space (3) Unallocated space (19,437 square feet presently) (59,503 square feet presently) As space arrangements change from time to time, the Authority is empowered to adjust the rental percentages accordingly. Neither the city nor the County are specifically charged for rent of unallocated space. With the above information as background, and considering our recent meeting and the meeting between County representatives and the city's police detectives thereafter, the County would like to propose that it assume possession/allocation and rent obligations for what is now the City Council meeting room and its supporting offices (3,004 square feet). We also propose that the City assume possession/allocation of the current County Council meeting room as enlarged by the space adjustments shown on the attachment to this letter (1,188.4 square feet). The City detectives have recently inspected this space, as the County is willing to enlarge it, and have approved it for their needs. This location places the detectives in close proximity to the Prosecutor's office and also provides a law enforcement presence on the administrative side of the city-County Building, for the benefit of all individuals working there. ~ The square footage to be allocated each government under this proposal would change to: CO~NTY 59,503 - 936 - ia4 + 61,427 (PFeviously) (County Council Room) (Weights & Mea,~res) (New Court Area) Mayor Raymond J. Parker, Mr. Robert Potter September 3, 1993 Page 3 CITY 19,437 (Previously) + 936 (County Council Room + 144 (Weights Measures) + 108 (Previously Unallocated) - 3~004 (Court Area) 17,621 The County further proposes that Room 308 in the administrative wing of the building become a multi-purpose meeting room for all city and County councils and boards. Aside from letting our constituents know that we can share space and work together, this entire proposal works several economic benefits for city government. I will briefly set them out here. A starting point is determining the rental rate per square foot of space in the building. Because of the size of the Authority budget in 1990, it was agreed that the rental rate in that year was $12.34/sq. ft. The 1992-1993 Authority budget is $900,000.00, a reduction from the 1990 budget. By dividing the total square feet already allocated, plus 10S square feet to be added to the proposed new location for the city detectives (current County Council area), the total square footage at issue is 79,048. By dividing this number into the total Authority budget, a rental price per square foot of $11.39 results. Under the County proposal: (a) (b) (c) The County will assume, and save the City the rental expense for 3,004 square feet (new court area) x $11.39/sq. ft. or $34,215.56. This space will become County space for Superior Court No. 2. The County will enlarge the current ~ounty Council meeting room by taking space from the cu~;rent Weights and Measures office and by utilizing certain hallway space so that the detectives occupy a total of 1,188.4 square f~et. The City will pay the rent for this space of ~$11.39/sq. ft. x 1,188.4) $t3,535.8%. This space will l~ecome city space for its detectives. The percentages allocated in the building will change to the County occupying 61,427 squa,e feet, while the city occupies 17,621 square feet. Thus, the percentages of occupancy/rent obligation will be as follows: Mayor Raymond J. Parker, Mr. Robert Potter September 3, 1993 Page 4 Jr. (d) County: .777% city: .223% The County will grant the City a perpetual right to utilize the multi-purpose meeting room, with no rental expense to the city, thus saving the City a rental expense of ($11.39/sq. ft. x 1,056 square feet in this room, x .223) $2,682.20; (e) The County will pay the following expenses under this proposal: 1. Renovation of current city meeting room into a traditional courtroom facility; 2. Renovation of ne~z city detective area as per plans of Chief Elliott and detectives; 3. Renovation of multi-purpose meeting room (e.g., carpet, walls, sound system); 4. Installation of accordion-type wall to expand capacity of this room up to, approximately, I10 people (more than current city Council room); 5. Moving crews and expenses, if necessary. The net savings to the city, using the most recent Authority rates available, is $23,361.89. The savings will be greater as the cost/sq, ft. increases with the size of the annual Authority budget. Additionally, the County will provide scheduling, maintenance and repair services for the multi-purpose meeting room. The Commissioners and County Council believe that this effort in moving a court that serves all citizens to the p~imary seat of government, while cooperating and sharing current administrative space, demonstrates to the public that we can, indeed, work together. The County makes this proposal in good faith based on present circumstances. We believe it plovides ~enefits to both governments involved. Mayor Raymond J. Parker, Mr. Robert Potter September 3, 1993 Page 5 Jr. Please let the Commissioners know if City government will agree to this exchange of space and rental obligations and the mutual use of Room 308 perpetually for meetings of the city Council and the city's boards. With the building auction pending, it would be helpful if we had an agreement within the next two (2) weeks. Very ~ruly yours, Ralph Guthrie, President Board of Commissioners of Clark County RG:pf cc: Paul F. Garrett Gregory L. Isgrigg Dennis O. Simon Daniel E. Moore Michael A. Gillenwater