HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-1998
r
I
I
r
"
r
r-
t
I
l
r
r
l
,
r
t
r
t
r
~, .,
t
r
I
r
,
,
"
r
r
t
r
r
I
.
...-.
,
r-
L
f
t
r
l
r
f
L"
r
l
;..,...,..
[
[
r
r:'l
\"""'-'"
'~
Ia~,r)
r
L..
TOLE OF CONTE~
Letter From the Facility Manager . .
Organization . .
Wastewater Treatment & Collection . . . . .
Facility Safety & Training
Industrial Pretreatment & Laboratory.
Community Involvement.
Goals & Objectives . .
.... 'EMC~diie;o;.r
. . . . .1
.4
. / .. 5
.16
. . . .17
. . .19
.20
n
\. ~
r
r
L
rt
t-:J
r
c
c
n
&Me ~ Report 1
etter From the Facility Manager
EMliAii.iiUliI1?epoii
On behalf of the entire Jeffersonville-EMC Team, I would like to present
our May 1997 - April 1998 Annual Report of the Jeffersonville Wastewa-
ter Treatment Facilities.
In the past year, our employees have enjoyed a high level of success and
personal development. Improving the knowledge base of our workforce
is critical to EMC's ability to stay abreast of the ever changing water
quality criteria. This ongoing improvement in our staff is also essential
to meeting our demand of outstanding customer service. The wastewater
utility will be continuously challenged to find new and better ways to
improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the wastewater collection
system and treatment facility.
Let me assure you that the staff is dedicated and determined to put forth
the effort needed to improve the facilities operation in the next year and
in the years to come. EMC's focus will be to continue to expand and
deliver a higher level of customer service and to challenge one another to
add value for the City of Jeffersonville at every opportunity.
This Annual Report illustrates the progress we have made in expanding
and improving our system, our facilities, and our service to the citizens
of Jeffersonville. EMC appreciates the loyalty and support shown by the
City. In return, we are totally committed to:
THE EMC PLEDGE
and lVur Guarantee of
PERFORMANCE
QUALITY & COST
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL . MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
~ ~. /J~
~~'7~~
Scott J. Timmermann
Facility Manager
n
H
"
l
r
f
!
r'
i.
r-
I
f
I .
t:
t,
~.;
r
I Li
r
t "
EMC~.Repo1't 2
ORGANIZATION
EMC Annual Report
The Director of Operations oversees Contract Compliance
within EMC's Clark County operations and providing sup-
port to the Facility Managers with technical and administra-
tive issues. AB well, he is responsible for insuring EMC's
business philosophies are followed in each of the Clark
County Operations.
The Facility Manager is responsible for the day-to-day opera-
tion of the wastewater treatment facility and collection
system, the enforcement of the industrial pretreatment
program, the capital improvement program, cost control, and
client service. The facility manager reports directly to Mayor
Galligan and the Board of Public Works & Safety.
The LaboratorylPretreatment Supervisor is responsible for
the supervision of the laboratory procedures and quality
assurance/quality control (QNQC), industrial pretreatment
program, process control procedures, day-to-dayoperations
of the lab, monitoring and making necessary adjustments to
the treatment processes, and the monitoring and enforcement
of the industrial pretreatment program. He also insure's all
federal and state reporting requirements are met (DMR's,
MRO's etc.).
The Administrative ABsistant's duties include payroll, ac-
counts payable, personnel records, insurance and personnel
benefits. She provides administrative support to Manage-
ment and staff.
The Five plant operators are responsible for making decisions
in process control, making necessary adjustments, completing
preventive and corrective work assignments, and responding
to potential problems originating from the treatment pro-
cesses, The operators assist in the lab, collection system and
pretreatment program on an as needed basis.
n
t
ORGANIZATION
EMC Ati1utat R~P(Jrt^
r
It- ',g
~
The six collection system maintenance personnel are responsible for customer
service as it relates to utility locates, sewer televising, sewer cleaning, removing
blockages, system map updating, preventive maintenance to lines, manholes,
combined sewer overflow; preventive and corrective maintenance to thelift
stations, response to emergency calls and complaints, inspection of new con-
struction, and line installation.
r
t
The EMCjJeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facilities Organization Chart
can be found on the following page.
r
f
t
[
r-'
l
f
r-
L ...,
EMq A1tIUJ4/ Rtport .J
~]
'''""''-]
Organization
PhilipR. Thompson
irector of Operations
""~~""'.1
"- -
--1
Scott J .
Timmermann
iFacility Manager
Kevin 1.
Wright
ssistant Facility
Manager
Carl Schmutte
ablPretreatment
Coordinator
Operators
Sonny Brannon
Danny Miles
Brian Cain
Barbara Coleman
Joe Tackett
EMC A.ttnutlf Report 4
"--:1
-1
Steve James
Collection System
Supervisor
Stephanie
ower
dministrative
ssistant
Maintenance
Donnie Griffin
Hershel Hamby
Mike Arms
Wayman Payne
Robert Luney
".=~=I :::::1
~-1
EMC Annunl Report
n
n
r;;
"11
! :1
C...J"
f1
Il~
n
L
r
r
r
f
L
W~STEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECTION .. ........ .
EMC An:nuIlI Repori
Operations
The Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility is a two-cell oxidation
ditch extended aeration activated sludge plant consisting of the following
treatment process units.
Preliminary Treatment
Secondary Treatment
Final Clarification
Disinfection
Final Effluent Disposal
Solids Thickening
Solids Processing
The Treatment Facility and its staff
experienced many obstacles this past
year. The facility treated approximately
1.759 billion gallons from May 1, 1997 to
April 30, 1998 for an average flow of 4.82
million gallons per day (mgd). The
following graph illustrates the monthly
Flow averages from May 1, 1994 through
April 30, 1998.
With the increased volume of wastewater, an increase in the strength of
the wastewater occurred as well. The higher strength sewage was a result
of an increase in production of materials within the industries that dis-
charge to the City's sewer system and the continued growth and develop-
ment of residential and commercial properties. The operators worked
diligently to ensure that these challenges and obstacles had a minimum
impact on the quality of the effluent discharged to the Ohio River.
Facility Flow Volume
May 1994 through April 1998
_ 1994-95 c:J 1995-96 c:J 1996-97 _ 1997-98 ~ Thsign limit
12
10
8
6
4
2
o
-
~ L ~ .. J J
l ~. +
1
Ivhy June July Aug &pt. ill. Nw. The. Jan. Feb. 11rrch April
EMC An:nuIlI .Report 5
n
,...,.,
I:,
~
r
~
r
~,
Ii
r
lei
ill
WSTEWATER TREATMENT & COl,.l,.ECTlQN . .
EMC A.n1tuIlf Repoft
The average daily effluent Carbonaceous
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD)
concentration was 3.4 mglL per day.
The effluent Total Suspended Solids
(TSS) average 7.8 mg/L per day. The
annual average removal efficiency was
97% for TSS and 99% for CBOD and
97% for NH3-N.
The following graph depicts the monthly effluent averages of CBOD and
the TSS from May 1997 through April 1998.
EMC A.n1tuIlf RqJort 6
I"
I
I.~..;~. I
, " _.' J' I
n
n
WSTEWATER TREATMENT &. C,Q4!'€€!!9~~];.j,:,;'.
The following table depicts the effluent Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen
Demand (CBOD) and the Total Suspended Solids (TSS) since EMC
began its contract with the City.
~1h
D~I;D~I
C8(D
Pemit
Ibs..
D:I;D~I;;I
,,~,." _..,~..,,_.,
II/hy 1994 2 15 75 650 ..... 5 18 188 781
Jure 1 15 32 650 . 4 18 128 781
Ju1y 2...... 15 61 650 6 18 184 781
. August 1 .15 :D 650 1;>'&' 18 178 781
StfXenfff 1 15 32 650 6 18 191 781
();:t@" 1 15 31 650 6 18 186 781
Noverrber 1 25 34 1034 7 :D 239 1301
Dxenrer . 2 25 70 1034 6 :D 210 1301
J3Q\IllIY 1995 2 25 63 1034 8 :D 254. l:Dl
Bijua1y 2 25 49 1034 7 :D 170 1301
Ma'dl 2 25. 48 1034 6 :D 144 1:D1
April 2 25 44 1034 4 :D 88 1:D1
',>' "NIl)' 1 15 29 650 4 18 115 781
Jure 3 15 70 650 2 18 46 781
Ju1y .,.. T' 15 19 650 5 18 96 781
August ""r""/' 15 Tl 650 5 18 134 ,~L,..
Sep:enfff 1 15 19, 650 6 18 116 '!1st'."
();:tcber 1 15 24 650 6 18 144 l:Dl
Noverrbf:'f 1 25 22 1034 9 :D 198 1301
Dxerrter 1 25 Tl 1034 17 :D 456 1301
Jan\llllY 1996 4 25 143 1034 16 :D 572 l:Dl
.'-'
RtJ;uary 5 25 l37 1034 12 :D 328 l:Dl
Ma-dl 4 25 182 1034.., 10 :D 454 1:D1
April 5 25 244 1034 n :D 537 1:D1
~,,'*,'
WI
EMC Annu4f Report 7
,'_ ';: '_:':'_ ,'0:. }',_:.', .1., ......:.;.'.:~. :::"':: -,
n
n
o
o
n
IT
n
IT
IT
IT
lIT
I t:1
IT
~
~
r
r
r
r
r
EMC A.1t1tuaI Report 8
WSTEWATER TREATMENT & COLLIgCTlON .. ...
. . . EMC A.1t1tuaI Report
. .
Mooth OJOI) OJOI) QJQD OJOI) "ISS TSS TSS "ISS
mdl'''''' Pemit lIE. Pemat mWJ. Pemit lis. Pennit
oWl k oWl lhs.
May 5 15 340 650 12 18 818 781
J1.me 3 15 144 650c' 5 18 239 781
July 4 15 145 650 6 18 218 781
August 3 15 96 650 5 18 1ro 781
Sept~mber 2 15 83 650 7 18 250 781
October 4 15 142. 650 20 18 7(1) 781
November" .' ," 2 25 80 1004 I' 4 30 1ro 1301
Deoember 4 25 192 1004 15 30 722 1301g:;'c~ .
January 1997 2 25 93 1004 5 30 233 1301
FebruaIy I' . 3 25 146 1004 7 30 341 1301
Mach 19 25 1683 1004. ro 30 5314 1301
April 3 25 141 1004 5 30 235 1301
May 4 15 200 650.. 11 18 575 781
June 3 15.. 176 650 5 18 294 781
July 3 15 100 650 9 18 324 781
August 3 15 11l 650 6 18 221 781
..
September ' 3 15 96 650 6 18 192 781
October 3 15 50 650. 6 18 180 781
November 3 25 95 1004 5 3D 159 1301
Deoember 6 25 2p 1004 19 30 670 1301"""
January 1998 3 25 118 1004 10 30 393 1301
February 3 25 133 1004 4 30 177 1301
Mach 3 25 119 1004 5 30 199 1301
April 4 25 187 1004 7 30 328 1301
. , -. ,
The following table depicts the influent Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxy
gen Demand (CBOD) and the Total Suspended SolidsfrSS) , EM
began its contract with the City.
.
C
::"""") ~".""J :""""'"", ~., :'1 :"c'"'] "M'] '''I : I M"',' I"] :"') '"1 ".....)'.'] ~ ~ ~ ,"'~""""]
'astewater Treatment & Collection
EMC Annuof Report
I ~sign % ~sign % ~sign % Total
! Month Flow (MGD) Umit ~sign 155 (lbs) Umit ~sign BOD Qbs) Umit ~sign Rain
I May 1994 4.50 i 5.2 87% 6,042;'! 10,105 60% 3,490 i 10,581 33% 2.~
I June 3.~~ 5.~_ 74% . 8'~038 ~9,1Q.~ 80% 3..:~~3. 1O,5~~ 36% ~J_~-1
I ~ -H~ ;~; ~: ~~ ~ ~~: ~ ~g~: ~: ;~~::J
I Sept _?-:.~J 5.2 73% _8,:.T~f?'ffi' 1Q,1~~ 86% _4,~~ I ~...~~.1-. 45% _?6_~~
'I' Oct 3.71 5.2 71% 8,493 10,105 84% 4,356 10,581 41% 2.~~j
Nlv 4.09 5.2 79% 9,483 10,105 94% 4,025 10,581 38% 3.~
~c -4~i'9 I 5.2 81% 10,434 10,105- 103% -3~886 10,581 37% -=1.4.5 I
Jan 1995 3.~1 I 5.2 73% -9~i3-1 iO~105 91% -3~64 ! 10,581 37% 3.75 I
Feb _2.92 I 5:~ 56% -y,3':3 10,105 63% 2,710 I 1.ll,581 26%~. .60.. I
March 2.87 5.2 55% 5,572 I 10,105 55% 2,480 110,581 23% 2.05~
April 2.63_-.J 5.2 51 % ~.. ,2.~.1. 1 '10, leis 42% ~8~'.O.2!l.~ 21% -islG
May 3~.~ 67% ~~I.ll'-~ 36% 1,622 I 10,581 15% 1O.25!
June 2.79 5.2 54% 4,824 i 10,105 48% 2,683 10,581 25% ~}5 I
July 2.31 I 5.2 44% ~,244 110,105 42% 1,809 10,581 17% ~_O!
Aug 3.22 5.2 62% 6,338 10,105 63% 3,491 10,581 33% 3.45 I
Sept -2.33 5.2 45% ~~~~} 10,105 59% _3,02~ !9,5_S.~ 29% 1.6U
Oct 2.87 5.2 55% 6,235 10,105 62% 3,124 10,581 30% 5.25 I
Nlv 2.64 5.2 51% 7,449 . 10,105 74% 2,519 10,581 24% 2.75 I
~c ~.22 .. 5.2 62% -9)1l 10,105 91% 3~620 10,581 34%-:-~
Jan1996 _i:~9 5.2 83% 8,229 10,105 81% ~ 67% _5:00.1
Feb 3.28 5.2 63% _~-,_480 10,105 84% 6,620 10,581 63% 2.63 I
March 5.45 5.2 105% 1l,091 10,105 1l0% 9,045 10,581 85% 5.98 I
April ~-:.~ 113% 12,148 10,105 120% 9,075 I 10,581 86% 6.50 I
EMC AnnuIlI Report !J
:Cl:~"J:ITdJ:'"1"1:~"J'~J!~"I:~771!CJ~J:'I'J;ml~~I""Ir~IL
'astewater Treatment & Collection
I .. W"'_,
Ihign %
I l\1onth Flow (MGD) limit Ihi:
I May1996 8.17 ~~ 157%
I June ~5~4 15.-:2_ 1100;6
, July _4.36 5.L- 84%
Aug ~.83 ' 5.2_ 74%
Sept _~.?? 5.2 95%
ili 4.25 5.2 82%
Nlv 4.80 5.2 92%
~c 5.77 5.2 111%
Jan 1997 5.59 5.2 108%
Feb 5.84 5.2 112%
I\1arch 10.62 5.2 204%
April 5.63 5.2 108%
May 6.2,7 5.2 121 %
June 7.05 5.2 136%
July 4.32 5.2 83%
Aug 4.43 5.2 85%
Sept 3.84 5.2 74%
ili 3.60 I 5.2 69%
Nlv 3.81 5.2 73%
--'..-" -~
~ 4.23 5.2 81%
Jan 1998 4.71 5.2 91%
Feb 5.31 5.2 102%
I I\1arch 4.77 5.2 92%
I April 5.62 I 5.2 108%
'eport
Ihign
155 (Ibs) limit
14,513 I 10,105
~1}, ~~~--++9-,_~9.?_
11.672 I 10.105
-~,"~~-~.
11,148 10,105
12,865 10,105
-'.---'
11,059 10;105
13,771 10,105
14;725 10,105
-~~',~=.-
19,581 10,105
22,892 10,105
22,586 10,105
17,584 10,105
18,145 10,105
13,347 10;105
13,979 10,105
11,925 10,105
~-~, --~~
9,166 10,105
12,539 10,105
8,516 10,105
9,208 10,105
10,920 10,105
7,661 10,105
9,309 10,105
9,187 10,105
%
'~si'
----!.!.
144%
123%
116%
1100;6
127%
109%
136%
146%
194%
227%
224%
174%
1800;6
132%
138%
118%
91%
124%
84%
91%
108%
76%
92%
91%
BOD (Ibs)
10,902
--
10,149
9,345
10,312
9,928
-~-~=
8,471
11.689
~sign
limit
10,581
--
10,581
-----",--
10,581
10,581
--
, 10,581
I 1638i
lTO.581
11,020 10,581
16,597 10,581
15,732 10,581
-.
13;197 10,581
10,330 10,581
9,726 10,581
8,937 10,581
12.862
10.581
"._-
11,817 10,581
10,160 10,581
10,439 10,581
10,359 10,581
8,290 10,581
8,838 10,581
8,636 10,581
11,656 10,581
8,812 I 10,581
%
~si'
----!.!.
103%
96%
88%
97%
94%
800;6
1100;6
104%
157%
149%
125%
98%
92%
84%
122%
112%
96%
99%
98%
78%
84%
82%
1100;6
83%
Total
Rain
7.30
3.72 '
3.40
1.90 I
-9~621
~
~
-~~
3.85 I
12.251
6.30 I
2.31 I
I
7.15
5.05
0.55
3.95
~1~
1.47 I
3.35
4.30
4.15
1.65
5.85
7.60 I
~I
[
I[
Ir
Ir
~
Iff
I II
I[
lIT
lIT
!IT
[
[
I[
r
r
[
[
[
[
Wt4STEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECTION
EMC ArmuaI Report
Collection System
The Jeffersonville collection system continues to expand at a swift pace.
We currently have approximately 120 miles of sanitary sewer line, 25
miles of combined sewer line, 29 lift stations, and 16 combined sewer
overflows (CSO's). The collection system is a vital part of the City's
infrastructure in providing safe and efficient transportation of wastewater
to the treatment facility. As the community continues to grow, we must
always look at implementing new technologies to insure excellent service
is provided to the City's residents and businesses. The majority of our
efforts this past year focused on the removal of sump pumps and roof
down spouts from the collection system, compliance with the newly en-
acted United States Environmental Protection Agency combined sewer
overflow regulations, upgrade of various pump stations, compilation of
records and reports to create an accurate account of manholes, CSO's and
line segments throughout the older sections of the community. Some of
the major accomplishments this past year were:
. We continue to improve and enhance the preventive mainte-
nance program as related to the collection system. Our goal is to
clean an average of 15,000 linear feet per month. This past year we
averaged 16,628 linear feet per month or 199,540 linear feet per
year (37.8 miles). The following graph depicts the linear feet
cleaned per month from May 1997, through April 1998, May, 1996
through April, 1997 as compared to May, 1995 through April, 1996
and May, 1994 through April 1995.
Sanitary Sewer Cleaned
01994-95 .1995-96 01996-97 .1997-98
45000
40000
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
o
Adddd
[(I
i)
May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April
EMC ArmuaI .Report 11
... .1
n
t I
o
n
n
n
n
n
IT
IT
IT,
IT,
IT,
IT)
[
Wi
n
r
r
WSTEWATER TREATMENT.& COLLECTION
EMC Armuaf Report
.. We continue with our efforts in improving the efficiency of
the 29 lift stations. Collection Systems personnel have per-
formed several upgrades to improve equipment efficiency and
reduce emergency callouts. Evaluations of the older lift stations
have been completed. These evaluations will help the City deter-
mine its short and long term capital improvement needs.
. Collection systems personnel have conducted sump pump
inspections in the Meadows Subdivision to insure no surface runoff
or groundwater was being directly discharged into the sanitary
sewer system. Local and state plumbing codes prohibit a person
from connecting roof downspouts, sump pumps or other sources of
surface runoff or groundwater to a building sewer or building drain
which in turn is connected to the sanitary sewer system. Illegal
connections were located and those residents were notified and
complied with the disconnect notice.
EMC Armuaf Report 12
,I
n
o
n
'n
IT:
IT
IT:
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT;
IT,
f
[
[:
m
m
r~
tI J
WSTEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECTION
EMC A.mtuaf Report
Residuals Management
For the year ending April 30, 1998, the Jeffersonville facility generated,
and disposed of 1,237 metric tons of residual solids from May; 1997
through April, 1998 as compared to 1,223 metric tons from May 1996
through April 1997 and 1189 metric tons from May 1995 through April
1996 and 972 metric tons from May 1994 through April 1995. The in-
crease in solids for the 1997 contract year was due to an increase in the
organic loadings that entered the facility and
were processed at the solids handling facility.
The biosolids were disposed of at the Outer
Loop Recycling & Disposal Facility located in
Louisville, Kentucky.
EMC continues to look at alternative disposal
methods that may be more cost effective and
environmentally beneficial to the community.
Some of the alternatives being considered are
land application, compo sting and or pasteur-
ization. The following graph depicts the total
monthly biosolids removed from the facility
for May 1997 through April 1998 as compared
to May 1996 through April 1997 and May
1995 through April 1996 and May 1994
through April 1995.
Comparison of Biosolids Removed
April 1994 through May 1998
.Biosolids 1994-1995
. Biosolids 1996 - 1997
200
180
160
'" 140
>=
0 120
E-<
()
'1:: 100
0)
:::E
:>. 80
'-<
Cl
60
40
20
0
May June July
Biosolids 1995-1996
OBiosalids 1997-1998
A~
Aug Sept Oct Nav Dee Jan Feb Mareh April
EMC A1tnuaI Report 13
I
Q
n
o
n
IT:
n
n
IT
iIT
IT;
f'
f)
r;
r
r
r
r
~
WSTEWATER TREATI1At::N,!~S?~~'!5TI,?I:.ri':~RepoTt
Maintenance
Since EMC began operatingJefferson-
ville, we have implemented a proactive
preventive maintenance program to
ensure all work orders are completed in
a timely manner. By the use of our
computerized MP2 programs, we are
able to prioritize work tasks, track the
work to completion and develop a
historical record of the equipment.
Preventive maintenance work orders are generated daily, weekly,
monthly quarterly, etc. and designated to the appropriate personnel.
Corrective or immediate maintenance work orders are given top prior-
ity and assigned to the appropriate work group. Operators and mainte-
nance personnel have done an excellent job and have been very effec-
tive in completing work orders in a timely manner. There were 314
unscheduled work orders completed this past year. Some of the more
significant work orders are presented below.
. Replace D.O. Probe in the Labo
ratory
Replace Electrical Breakers at
Crums Lane I
. Repair #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5
pump at 10th Street Lift Station
Replace 2" portable trash pump.
Repair # 1 pump at Spring Street
Lift Station.
. Rebuild Grit pump and replace
mechanical seal.
. Replace hose to theJet Truck
and purchase new nozzles.
Replace Motor Control for sewer
camera.
Repair #2 pump at Ewing Lane
Lift Station.
Replace 3" portable trash pump.
. Repair #2 pump at Camp
Powers Lift Station.
r
l
EMC A.nrtuIlf Report 14
. Repair # 1 pump at Louise Street
Lift Station.
. Replace belt on Dewatering Press.
. Replace Steering Valve on Belt
Press.
. Repair #2 Non-Potable Water
Pump.
. Replace two damaged radios.
. Replace breaker on vertical mixers.
. Install 10" Check Valve for Blower
Room.
. Install electrical wiring and related
components to Phase I alarm
system upgrade.
. Install hose racks at Facility
. Replace Switch Gear for Mill
Creek Lift Station.
. Replace 2" portable trash pump.
I
IT
IT
IT.
n
IT;
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT:
IT:
[.
[I
[,
[]
m
f:
W. STEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECT/O,! .... '. . . . ..... '.^
EMC AntuuJf Report
Capital Improvement Expenditures
The Capital Improvement Program is necessary to ensure safe working
conditions for all employees, proper operation of the collection system
and treatment facility, to maximize effluent quality, to protect the City's
assets, and continue to enhance and improve equipment efficiency. The
following is a list of projects completed this past year:
. Purchase of Fall Protection Equipment
. Purchased Combined Sewer Overflow Signs
. Portable Flow Meter and Sampler
. Replaced Digester Air Line
. Replaced 1987 Dodge Ram with 1998 Dodge 3/4 Ton
Truck.
EMC .Amtmrf Report 15
~u
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT;
IT,
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT:
r
~:
[
1,[:
. '.!
i ;'..J
m
rr
n,,,,
PCILITYSAFETY & TRAINING
EMC Annual Report
The safety of our employees is EMC's number one prior-
ity. In 1997-98 there were four reported injuries, all were
within the collections field and none of the accidents
resulted in lost time. EMC has been very successful for
the year with a 98% safety rating at the wastewater treat-
ment facility.
EMC provides an annual safety training schedule to
Indiana Department of Environmental Managment
(IDEM) for approval for continuing education credits
(CEU). We are proud that our facility offers our employ-
ees the chance to receive 30 CEUs each year. During
1997 -98, EMC operators received training in several
safety areas, including confined space entry, first aid/CPR,
lockout/tagout procedures, personal protection, hazardous
communications and electrical safety.
Operations personnel have also received specific technical
training in lab safety procedures, computers, process
control and process operational theory.
All of these training sessions were conducted on-site, and
by in-house staff with the exception of First Aid/CPR.
The First Aid/CPR course was held at the Clarksville
Wastewater Treatment Facility and was given by Susan
Tomasallo. Several members of the staff received addi-
tional training through off-site seminars, workshops, and
short courses which included Maintenance Pack (MP2)
training, Basic Electrical Troubleshooting Techniques and
Process Control Training. For the contract year of 1997-
98 employees together earned a total of 37 continuing
education credits.
The Indiana Water Pollution Control Association
(IWPCA) does an annual safety inspection of all wastewa-
ter treatment facilities in the State of Indiana for the
Annual Burke Safety Award. This year, the Jeffersonville
Wastewater Treatment Facility was the recipient of this
award for their outstanding safety program. The J effer-
sonville Wastewater Treatment Facility takes extreme
pride in our record of no lost time accidents as it contin-
ues to grow beyond 1,252 consecutive days.
'-.1
IT
IT
IT
IT
[,
IT:,
':'\
IT:
IT
IT
I[
lIT:
1m
[,
r
[
r
[
[:
fl
~--_.
tDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT & LABORATORY
EMC .Armuaf Report
Laboratory
The laboratory analyzes plant and pre-
treatment samples for process control and
to maintain compliance with our dis-
charge permit. Routine analysis includes:
pH, Total Suspended Solids, Biochemical
Oxygen Demand, Chemical Oxygen
Demand, settleability tests, Ammonia
Nitrogen, Chlorine Residuals, Percent
Total Solids, Fecal Coliform and E. Coli.
Our laboratory is also equipped with a Graphite Tube Analyzer and an
Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer that are used for Copper, Chro-
mium and Zinc Analysis.
EMC is providing training to all new full-time employees to perform labo-
ratory procedures, and we now have six operators trained in providing
laboratory analyses.
Industrial Pretreatment
EMC monitors nine permitted industries in the industrial pretreatment
program with one more operating under a draft permit. These industries
are Custom Plating, Dallas Group, George Pfau & Sons, Philadelphia
Quartz, Louisville Barrel, Alumnitec, Voss Clark, Wyandot and Industrial
Water Recycling. They are monitored through sampling and inspections
as well as self monitoring reports. On July 13, 1997 a meeting was held
with A.W Goodman & Associates to discuss the 90-day loading study
which was conducted at the three main lift stations, 10th Street CSO,
Spring Street Lift Station, Mill Creek Lift Station, 10th Street Lift Station,
several "domestic" only locations and the five significant industrial users.
Mter the 90-day study was completed it was decided to hire Rust Environ-
mental & Infrastructure to evalute the flows and loadings into the waste-
water treatment facility. Sampling was also conducted at Clark Memorial
Hospital to determine the strength of their discharge and loadings and
possible impact on the wastewater treatment plant.
EMC A1uutaf .Report 17
IT
IT
IT
IT
IT:
IT
IT:
IT
IT
IT
IT
[.
[
r
[
[
[
r
r
tDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT & LA130RATORY
EMC Att.1UJJlI Report
Enforcement actions were taken against several industries. Sixteen No-
tices of Violation (NOV's) were issued. Most of the NOV's consisted of
Oil and Grease violations. The remaining violations were minor and
infrequent.
We continue to work with all of the industries to insure compliance with
the industrial pretreatment program and assist with their commitment
towards their own pollution prevention programs.
EMC A1truttzf Report 18
"".1
o
o
n
IT
IT
IT
IT:
[,
IT
IT
IT
IT
[
[
~:
rr
ll'
m
[
~
Cmmunity Involvement
EMC Annual Report
1997-98 Community Involvement
EMC is committed at being a good corporate citizen and presenting the
wastewater facility as a positive asset for the City. During the past year
EMC has contributed to the Clark County FOp, American Red Cross,
GRC Little League Baseball, YMCA, Lincoln Heritage Council Boy
Scouts of America, Sting Soccer, Hoosier Youth Baseball League, J effer-
sonville NAACP and March of Dimes. EMC is also a member of the
Southern Indiana Chamber of Commerce, as well as the Indiana Cham-
ber of Commerce.
In the upcoming year, we plan to continue our commitment to the City.
This year we plan to expand our participation in the community to
include the Repair Fair and the Jeffersonville Family Festival.
EMC A1t1tUIlf Report 19
1
T
T,
, ,
GOALS & OBJECTIVES
EMC Annual Report
1997-98 Goals/Objectives
EMC conducts an annual Business Planning Session which allows us to
set our team and personnel goals for the upcoming year. EMC feels that it
is important that the staff have obtainable goals and objectives to work
towards. By setting these goals and giving the staff the tools needed to
accomplish them, we feel that productivity increases, employees show
pride in their work and a more efficient and professional operation is
provided to the residents of Jeffersonville. The following is a brief sum-
mary of these goals and objectives:
· Provide excellent customer service. Respond to complaints
in a timely manner and follow-up on "all" complaints.
· No permit violations.
· Assist the City with the issuance of a final National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit (NPDES).
· Continue in-house training for all personnel.
· Revision of industrial discharge permits.
· Revision of sewer use ordinances.
· Perform a full audit of the operation to ensure
contract and regulatory compliance.
· Improve alarm monitoring system so to improve employee
response time during emergency situations, complaints.
· Continue to educate and provide awareness of all of the
environmental impacts at the wastewater treatment facility.
. Continue to work with the City on long and short term
plans for the development of the community.
. To become more recognizable and continue to participate in
community service projects and charities.
EMC A1UUIIII Report 20
r, .
"
GOALS & OBJECTIVES
EMC An1UlJlf Report
· Educate key personnel in understanding the budget process
and cost control.
· Hold weeldy department meetings and monthly staff meet-
ings to discuss and resolve issues, concerns or complaints.
· No accidents or injury's, especially lost time accidents.
IT
· Average at least 98% for year on monthly safety inspec-
tions.
· Indiana Water Pollution Control Association to perform
a safety audit and the facility receive a state and federal award.
· Revise all standard operating guidelines by August 1, 1997.
· Employees work towards obtaining or upgrading state certi-
fication.
r
. All scheduled work orders to be completed within 30 days
of issuance.
· Receive 1997 Burke Safety Award.
· Received IWPCA Safety Award.
r
EMC A1UUIIlf Report . 21