Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997 r: \ , a1tc..:.:;.' o JEFFERSONVILLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY r t f L-. ' r FLOWS & LOADINGS AND ELECTRICAL EXPENDITURES ANNUAL REPORT r- ' t L~ I \, , [ r' I r l !i.'c....' r-"' ! ' . b Prepared for r i . "",~. 1HE CITY OF JEFFERSONVIllE r-' ,...... , r l BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS & SAFETY June 5, 1997 --= ~, \ , I il I [I i! "'~ ['I I' cd D [ r ....."".. [ r: [, '" [ l, r r: I, " r iou, [ [, J [ [ [ C ~ TABLE OF CONTENTS II Annual Flows & Loadings . Cover Letter . May 1996 - April 1997 Flows & Loadings Summary . May 1994 - April 1997 Flows,& Loadings Comparison . May 1994 - April 1997 Flows & Loadings Graphs fl Annual Electrical Ex~enditures . Cover Letter . May 1996 - April 1997 Electrical Expenditures Summary . May 1996 - April 1997 Electrical Expenditures Graph -----r--T ~ =<, ~, ==' ~, ENVIRONMENT AL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION June 5, 1997 PARIC CENTRE 689 CRAIG ROAD ST LOUIS. MISSOURI 63141 314-432-8070 Board of Public Works and Safety CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE City/County Building Jeffersonville, IN 47130 RE: Wastewater Flows and Loadings Dear Sirs/and Madam: r Enclosed please find a table and graphs that illustrates the flows and loadings to the wastewater L, treatment facility for the period of May 1, 1994 through April 30, 1997. The loadings have been calculated by using the monthly average influent flow in million gallon per day (mgd). Total Suspended Solids (TSS), and Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) were calculated in milligrams per liter (mg/l), for example: [ [ flow (mgd) x mg/l x 8.34(conversion factor) = lbs. As outlined in the contract agreement between EMC and the City of Jeffersonville, benchmark loading's in the first year of the contract are used to determine if a 10% increase or decrease in loadings to the facility has occurred during the previous contract year (Page 7 of the contract). This mechanism is used to determine if the compensation paid to EMC should be adjusted upward or downward to reflect the change. The following percent changes occurred this past year: ~ Flow (mgd) Pounds of Total Suspend Solids (TSS) Pounds of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) increased 60% increased 99% increased 216% ~ ... The increase in flows and loadings created a significant impact on EMC's cost to operate the treatment facility. The expense items most impacted by the increased loadings were electrical, chemical usage (polymer), and sludge disposal. .-- , ..-. I . i [ r , t , .. June 5, 1997 Board of Public Works and Safety Page 2 Pleasec.()nta<::tIIl~ at your earliest convenience to discuss the enclosed information and to negotiate an adjustment in compensation paid to EMC. Should you need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 1(~~~~ Kendall S. Coleman Director of Operations enclosures cc: Anne Marie Sedwick, City Attorney Philip McCauley, Deputy Mayor Bob Goldman, Billing Office Manager Richard Spencer, City Clerk/Treasurer Craig MundIe, CFO Greg Coboum, Vice President o Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility May 1996 - April 1997 Loadings D; 1 ..1 D:' .... . . .~ , j 01 jJ r o C,; -~' .'i o [I ,J D ~ MONTH FLOW (MGD) TSS BOD (LBS.l lLBS.l Per Day Per Dav Per Dav May 1996 8.17 14,513 10,902 June 5.74 12,447 10,149 July 4.36 11,672 9,345 August 3.83 11 ,148 10,312 September 4.96 12,865 9,928 October 4.25 11 ,059 8,471 November 4.80 13,771 11 ,689 December 5.77 14,725 11 ,020 January 1997 5.59 19,581 16,597 February 5.84 22,892 15,732 March 10.62 22,586 13,197 April 5.63 17,584 10,330 Dailv AveraQe 5.80 15,404 11,473 o o r o [I .J Jeffersonville L~_J ~ r--'I a;_~_cc~..:J t~:~~;~-;~j L~_I LI L..:.~nJ r:::.::J L:::J n:L.] ----Jeffersonville Wastewdter Treatment Facility May 1994 - April 1997 Loadings FLOW (MGD) FLOW (MGD) FLOW (MGD) TSS TSS TSS BOD BOD BOD Month 1996-97 1995-96 1994-95 1996-97 1995-96 1994-95 1996-97 1995-96 1994-95 May 8.17 3.46 4.50 14,513 3,593 6,042 10,902 1,622 3,490 June 5.74 2.79 3.84 12,447 4,824 8,038 10,149 2,683 3,843 July 4.36 2.31 3.68 11 ,672 4,244 8,311 9,345 1,809 3,913 Aug 3.83 3.22 3.55 11 ,148 6,338 7,668 10,312 3,491 3,819 Sept 4.96 2.33 3.81 12,865 5,962 8,726 9,928 3,022 4,798 Oct 4.25 2.87 3.71 11,059 6,235 8,493 8,471 3,124 4,356 Nov 4.80 2.64 4.09 13,771 7,449 9,483 11 ,689 2,519 4,025 Dee 5.77 3.22 4.19 14,725 9,211 10,434 11,020 3,620 3,886 Jan 5.59 4.29 3.81 19,581 8,229 9,231 16,597 7,084 3,864 Feb 5.84 3.28 2.92 22,892 8,480 6,393 15,732 6,620 2,710 March 10.62 5.45 2.87 22,586 11,091 5,572 13,197 9,045 2,480 April 5.63 5.85 2.63 17,584 12,148 4,211 10,330 9,075 2,178 Daily Average 5.80 3.48 3.63 15,404 7,317 7,717 11,473 4,476 3,614 Operated and Maintained By Environmental Management Corporation L:J L~~=J 1......21 L.J i=~~1 1'7'.:'1 L..::.1 E...! L.::.J red C:J JnfluentFlow Data May 1994 - April 1997 L:'] t.:...:] [L~I L"J . FLOW (MGD) 1996-97 FLOW (MGD) 1995-96 . FLOW (MGD) 1994.95 12 10 8 6 4 2 o May June July Sept Oct Nov Jan Feb March April Dee Aug Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Operated and Maintained By Environmental Management Corporation [ ,.~~J L.~.J [:::'J ~.:~:nJ :_.~ 1 L. ~_ J t~:::,.J L'. ....1 !_~LI 1.:"::'1 .--InfluentPounds-of TSS---- May 1994 - April 1997 ~:-: 1 [:~,...I r-~ 1 ::. 1 . TSS 1996-97 TSS 1995-96 . TSS 1994-95 5,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Operated and Maintained By Environmental Management Corporation :,. _. 'I ~ . ... J 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 :___1 ~ _. I 1__.1 C-~J L;J t: :1 L:'-J :' J I ..... I ~_=:J r ..:..._1 [~-J ~.. - _~ I nlnfluentPoundsofBon- May 1994 - April 1997 .BOD 1996-97 BOD 1995-96 . BOD 1994-95 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 " u May June July Aug Oct March April Nov Dee Jan Feb Sept Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Operated and Maintained By Environmental Management Corporation r- L. r t v' r , I Examples of items not paid for by EMC, but are not limited to, the following: ~ Change in scope of services ~ Capital expenditures as defined hereinafter ~ Any damages which result from an Act of God, the City, or any third party Wastewater Flows and Loadings. At the end of the first twelve months of the Agreement, EMC will submit the following data to the City for the purposes of establishing benchmark flows and loadings for the Facilities. A verage Annual Daily Flow: A verage Daily Influent BOD: A verage Daily Influent TSS: 3.635 MGD 3649 lbs. 7753 lbs. Upon the City's approval of this data, the above blanks will be filled in with the appropriate figures and will serve as the benchmark data for this Agreement. If during any twelve month period the average flow and/or loadings increase or decrease by 10% or more, the compensation to EMC may be adjusted upward or downward to reflect the change. Theparties will negotiate this adjustment to reflect actual cost data submitted by EMC, to the extent that such data are available and can be traced to the flow and loadings changes. ' Compensation. During the first twelve months, the City shall pay EMC, as compensation for the services to be performed as described in this Agreement, the sum of $97,624.08 pe~month ($1,171,489.00 annually) with adjustments as specified hereinafter. Monthly payments are due the 10th of each month for which services will be rendered, upon presentation of invoices by EMC. Late payments shall accrue interest at the then current prime rate plus one percent per annum on the unpaid balance. The amount of compensation due EMC as outlined above may be reduced by a maximum of 15% of the annual overhead and profit line item in the "cost analysis and proposal schedule" of the Cost Proposal submitted to the City by EMC based on unsatisfactory levels consistent with thee "Quarterly Performance Scorecard" executed by the City and EMC, which is incorporated by reference' herein. It is understood that each quarterly review would place at risk one-quarter of the maximum annual amount defined above. Of this annual compensation amount, $1,071,489 shall be adjusted on May 1, 1995 and on every subsequent May 1 date of the contract term. The adjustment will be based upon the percentage change in the CPI-North Central Class D for the entire period preceding each adjustment date. Annual compensation adjustments will be cumulative. Notwithstanding the actual percentage change in CPI, it is agreed that the minimum amount of the adjustment based on the CPI change shall be 3% annually and the maximum amount shall be 6%. (See the "Example" contained in "APPENDIX C" for future years of the contract) Page 7 of 12 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 701 CHAMPION ROAD JEFFERSONVILLE. INDIANA 47130 812-285-6451 FAX 812-285-6454 June 5, 1997 Board of Public Works and Safety CITY OF JEFFERSONVll..LE City/County Building Jeffersonville, IN 47130 r RE: Wastewater TreatmentFacilities Annual Electrical Expenditures Dear SirsIMadam: Please find enclosed a table that details the annual electrical expenditures for the wastewater treatment facilities during the period of May I, 1996 through April 30, 1997. The expenditures include the wastewater treatment facility and all 29 lift stations. The actual expenditures for this period was $208,148.43. As discussed on page 8, (Electrical Cap) of the contract between EMC and the City of Jeffersonville, the cap was exceeded. Th~ cap for the above mentioned period of time was $186,414.60. The difference between the actual expenditures and the cap was $21,733.83. Due to the expenditures exceeding the electrical cap, EMC is to reimburse the City in the amount of$21,733.83. The reason for the increased electrical cost can be attributed to the extremely wet weather, and increased Total Suspended Solids and Biochemical Oxygen Demand Loadings to the facility. The wet weather re..quired a significant increase in pumping at the various lift stations and increase in equipment use at the wastewater facility in order to provide proper treatment of the excessive amounts of wastewater. As always, EMC appreciates the opportunity to serve the City of Jeffersonville. If you may need additional information or would like to discuss this report or any other aspect of the operation, do not hesitate to contact me. Wastewater Treatment Facilities Annual Electrical Expenditures June 5, 1997 Page 2 Sincerely, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION k/~ Scott J. Timmermann Facility Manager enclosures cc: Ann Marie Sedwick, City Attorney Phil McCauley, Deputy Mayor Bob Goldman, Billing Office Manager Kendall Coleman, Director of Operations Craig MundIe, CFO !:~=I I:..:"" !f~==:1 !=~~I E:.::::I I .:::) I"; .::-,1 r--l Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Total Monthly Electrical Expenditures May 1996 - April 1997 Annual Electrical Expenditures ELECTRICAL CAP = $186,414.60 BUDGET Plant KWH Plant KVA Line Cap. Budget Actual DIFFERENCE Useage Demand 84% Savings $14,765.75 $17,609.06 ($2,843.31) 329,000 704.20 $1,009.82 $14,765.75 $17,346.28 ($2,580.54) 369,000 743.60 $1,066.32 $14,765.75 $15,461.61 ($695.86) 312,000 706.60 $1,013.26 $14,765.75 $16,083.60 ($1,317.85) 348,000 726.60 $1,041.94 $15,918.00 $15,910.40 $7.60 291,000 663.40 $951.32 $15,918.00 $16,452.76 ($534.76) 294,000 655.60 $1,118.13 $15,918.00 $17,365.34 ($1,447.34) 349,000 608.30 $1,037.46 $15,918.00 $17,890.26 ($[,972.26) 382,000 582.00 $992.60 $15,918.00 $18,659.02 ($2,741.02) 353,000 647.80 $1,104.82 $15,918.00 $20,405.91 ($4,487.91) 360,000 708.00 $1,207.49 Mar-97 $15,918.00 $19,069.20 ($3,[51.20) 352,000 657.00 $1,120.51 Apr-97 $15,918.00 $15,894.99 $23.01 336,000 606.20 $1,033.87 1 TOTALS I $186,414.60 I $208,148.43 I $21,733.83 I 4,075,000 I 667.44 I $12,697.561 Over/Under Budget = $21,733.83 YTD = $20~14a43 * Average monthlyelctrical cost for 1996/1997 = $17,345.70/mo. * * Actual 1997/1998 Electrical Cap = $191,027.40 *** Projected 1997/1998 Electrical Cost = $207,582.23 r:::J ~ :=J c=l ~' ' ,----, ,'""'='.","=-- -~.:- J _______... --~~_~~_~,_': ~_c- - - _ _ ~_____ _.._,_ J___-'--"-__ ~~':o,:::J ~:.::] ~ ~:::-J :- ;;;J $25,000.00 $20,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 t...L~J Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility- 1996 - 1997 Overall Electrical Expenditures --+- Actual __ Budget $0.00 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 l"- I"- l"- I"- 0\ ";' ";' 0\ 0\ ";' 0\ ";' 0\ 0\ ";' ";' >. c:: "3 bJl 6- t) ~ u C: ~ .. .. eel ;:l ;:l <) 0 <) eel eel 0., :B -. -. <( <Il 0 Z 0 -. :B <(