The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11) November ......"";'"";,;::~~~"::;.:;;;",.;,':.;~~:'.;:;~:::::;:::-- -.c-c". .~-_.-.' --.', -- ,-. . ~..',..""_,,,,.~,,",,,,,.'.,,i:'\',,;c_',,,.\..' JEFFERSONVILL.E WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILI Monthly Operations ReI November, 2004 Prepared for: Peggy Wilder ,~,--~- _~~I"" .' _.._..."..~y~_~---,.,....,.,..,...~.,-~-~,.",-c-..~.'-.,,~.~.,.,.',." ..~_..~,_.~~.....".~y,'''-,.-.-., . -.' ~ STRAND AssociATES. iNc,4 E Ned. (NE E- R. S EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Rob Waiz, Mayor and Jeffersonville Sewer Board Mark Sneve, P.E.~ . January 10, 2005 Review of EMC WWTP operations - November 2004 We have completed our monthly review of EMC's operations. The following items summarize the attached memo: The WWTP received the following percentage of design flows and loadings during November and the previous 12 months: November 112% -126% 76% 93%' 139% 12-month rollin 107% 109% ,69% 93% 117% One Weekly TSS permit limit violation occurred during November. TSS levels were elevated for one: day as the result of solids backing up from the RAS plJmpstation into the chlorine contact tank effluent. ',' No other effluent permit violations occurred. The activated sludge process is operating well. Activated, sludge settling steadily declined during the November. EMC should monitor this trend closely and be prepared to add polymer to assist settling during peak flow periods. All, other process parameters are within acceptable ranges. Summary of EMC's Activities: Pretreatment · Annual Inspections were performed at Voss-Clark and Cargo Clean · Industrial User permits were revised and reissued following the IDEM inspection. Lift Stations and Collection System · EMC cleaned 7,495 feet of sanitary sewer and 7,919 feet of stormlCSO sewer. EMC televised 1,774 feet of sanitary sewer lines. All 21 trouble spots were cleaned. · EMC Vactor-cleaned 3 catch basins and hand cleaned 304. EMC vactored out 7 pump stations. · A total of 35 service calls were made in November (4 main back-ups and 31 residential service line back- ups). The main back-up calls resulted in minor property damage to one or possibly two residences. · All pump station floats, switches, and pumps were cleaned and exercised per EMC's contract. · All pump station generators and CSO gates were exercised. · Minor repairs were made at four pump stations. · There were a total of four CSO events. Plant · RAS pump #3 was pulled from service and is being refurbished. S:\@PEH\901--950\944\002\WRD\Review ofEMC\Review ofEMC Operations - November 2004 exec sumdoc , I '" .' sa. STRAND AssoCiATES INC.' E NGIN EE F< 8 D Information Only MEMORANDUM IZI Project Specific 2-944.002 D Policy Memo - File With TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Rob Waiz, Mayor and Jeffersonville Sewer Board Mark Sneve, P.E. '&15 - January 10,2005 Review of EMC WWTP OperatiQns - November 2004 We have completed our monthly review ofEMC's operations. The purpose of our review was to evaluate plant data and operation strategies to verify that EMC is operating the wastewater treatment plant in the ~est interest of the City of Jeffersonville. We reviewed the following to complete our review of oper~tions for the month of November: · Current contract between EMC and the City of Jeffersonville. · EMC's DMR and MaR for November 2004 (received by e-mail 12/16/04). Strand Associates, Inc. discussed operating conditions with EMC during the month. Our review focused on EMC's monthly operation report (MaR). We have produced five pages of graphs from the monthly data provided (consistent with past monthly reviews). WWTP Loadings The first page of graphs presents influent mass loadings and influent flows compared to design values. We have also included a historical trend chart showing the monthly average and 12-month rolling average. · Influent BOD loading averaged 112% of the design loading (10,581 lbs/d). The highest peak loading event of 54,364 lbs/day was observed on November 11th, which coincided with a 2.S-inch rainfall event. There were no violations of effluent BOD limits during November. The 12-month rolling average loading for BOD is at 107% of design. The influent BOD graph shows daily, 7-day, and 28-day moving average mass loadings for the month. · The TSS loading averaged 126% of design loading (10,105 lbs/d). The highest peak loading event of 40,773 lbs/day was observed on November 11th, which coincided with a 2.S-inch rainfall event. On November 11, 2004, a Weekly TSS permit violation occurred due to a heavy rainfall and the MAS:das\S:\@PEH\901--950\944\002\WRD\Review ofEMC\Review ofEMC Operations. November 2004 memo.doc ,., , Review of EMC WWTP Operations - November 2004 Page 2 January 10, 2004 temporary reduced capacity of the RAS pumps, not due to high influent loadings. The 12-month rolling average loading for TSS is at 109% of design. The influent TSS graph shows daily, 7-day, and 28-day moving average mass loadings for the month. · The NH3~N loading averaged 76% of the design loading (867 lbs/d). The highest peak loading event of 2,702 lbslday was observed on November 11th, which coincided with a 2.5-inch rainfall event. There were no violations of effluent limits during November. The 12-month rolling average loading for ammonia is at 69% of design. The influent ammonia graph shows daily, 7-day, and 28- day moving average mass loadings for the month. · The influent flume data has been reported to IDEM as the plant flow since April 1, 2001. The peak flow capacity of the WWTP is 22.8 mgd and the peak sustained flow capacity is 16 mgd. The average flow during dry weather days in November was 4.82 mgd or 93% of the plant capacity (5.2 mgd). The average flow during the entire month of November was measured to be 7.23 mgd or 139% of the plant capacity (5.2 mgd). The peak daily flow reached 19.17 mgd on November 11th, which exceeded the "rated" capacity of 16 mgd. This coincided with a 2.5-inch rainfall event. Rainfall in the month of November was 7.8 inches, which is well above the typical November rainfall of 2.9 inches. The 12-month rolling average dry-weather flow is at 93% of design. The 12- month rolling average of all-weather flow is at 117% of design. The influent flow graph shows ,.daily,T-day; arid 28-..;day moving average influent flows'for the month. '. When the Anoxic zone project iscompletecl, the rated capacity of the treatment plant will be increased. The following table reflects the increase in capacity. . .. . ,. Current Design Design With Anoxic Zone Project Capacity 12 Month MV A as % Capacity 12 Month MV A as % of Capacity of Capacity Average Flow, mgd 5.2 93 (dry) 6.0 81 (dry) 117 (all) 101 (all) Peak Hourly Flow, mgd 22.8 NA 25.0 NA CBOD, Ibid 10,581 107 10,800 105 TSS, Ibid 10,105 109 11,700 94 NH3-N, Ibid 867 69 790 76 Effluent Quality The next page of graphs presents the plant performance for effluent CBOD, TSS, and ammonia compared to the weekly average and monthly average effluent limits. The 7 -day moving average (MV A) effluent concentration is used to compare the weekly permit limit, and the 28-day moving average effluent limit is used to compare to the monthly average effluent limit. November is the last month of 'more stringent' summer effluent limits. . Effluent CBOD concentrations were below permit limits during November. MAS:das\S:\@PEH\901--950\944\002\WRDIReviewofEMClReview ofEMC Operations.. November 2004 memo.doc\OlO905 51 STRAND ASSOCIATES,INC." E;-":G!NE;;;::-~S' .f Review of EMC WWTP Operations - November 2004 Page 3 January 10, 2004 · The 7 -day MV A effluent concentrations for TSS concentrations were above the permit limits. On November 11, 2004, there was an unexpected discharge of solids that caused a violation of the weekly TSS permit limit. The discharge was caused by a back-up in the RAS pump station causing solids to flow out of the scum decant pipes in the chlorine contact tank. The monthly average effluent concentrations were below the permit limits during November. · Effluent NH3-N concentrations were below the permit limits during November. Activated Sludge Process The third page of graphs presents typical activated sludge parameters. . The first graph shows the food to mass of volatile organisms (F:Mv) ratio. For extended aeration activated sludge wastewater treatment plants, the target F:Mv is typically between 0.08 and 0.1. The activated sludge plant averaged 0.13 for the month of November due to the' extreme loadings resulting from the first flush phenomenon in your combined sewers. This is reasonable but higher than typicaL The next graph shows the sludge volume index (SVI). SVI is an indicator of settleability of the - mixed liquor. SVls below 150 are not cause for concern. SVI above 150 suggests poor settling characteristics. SVI levels for the month averaged 218. The SVI increased during November. EMC ,should continue to monitor SVI very c10selyand be. prepared to add polymer to aid settling in the final clarifiers d~ringpeakflow events.. . : The next graph shows the organic loading rate for the oxidation cijtch activated sludge, process. . Your activateci sludge process was designed with ~OLR:of' 15-lb BOp/clayllOOO cf. The 28-day running. average OLR varied between 12.8 and 16.6 throughout the month. The maximum day OLR of 77 lb BOD/day/WOO cf was due to heavy rainfall experienced on November 11th resuspending settled matter from the combined sewers aftera dry period. The average OLR was 16lb BOD/day/WOO cf which is slightly higher than the design rate due to the extreme influent loadings resulting from rain events. The next graph includes the solids loading rate (SLR), a measure of the mass of solids in the influent to the clarifiers. "Ten States Standards" limits the solids loading rate to less than 35 lb/d/sf of clarifier surface area. The chart shows the daily, 7-day MV A and 28-day MV A SLR. The SLR averaged approximately 17-lb/d/sf with a daily peak of 28-lb/d/sf during the month. We have included a chart that shows the daily SVI and SLR data versus the curve from WEF MOP 8 and a curve specific to the Jeffersonville plant. This Jeffersonville curve was created by reviewing data from peak wet weather events over a three-year period as part of the CSOP update. Operation above this curve has resulted in effluent TSS violations. The chart d~monstrates that the plant is operating below the "textbook" and Jeffersonville curves. The data points that fall on the 'textbook' curve did not cause a solids washout. The next plot is for mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS in mg/L). The MLSS concentration of the activated sludge plant varied between 1,900 and 3,400 mg/L averaging about 2,900 mg/L. Typically, MLSS ranges from 2,500 to 4,500 mg/L for the extended aeration process. EMC no longer targets a MLSS concentration to control the process; they now target a constant sludge age. ... . . . . MAS:das\S:\@PEH\901--950\944\002\WRD\Review ofEMC\Review ofEMC Operations - November 2004 memo.doc\Ol0905 sa. STRANO A$SOCIATEs,IN-C'" E;-.: t7:l! N E F.: P, 8 ...-' " , Review of EMC WWTP Operations - November 2004 Page 4 January 10,2004 In the past, when the MLSS concentration dipped below 2,000 mgIL the nitrification process was affected. · The next graph shows the mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (ML VSS in mgIL). The ML VSS concentration of the activated sludge plant varied between 1,300 mgIL and 2,300 mgIL averaging about 2,000 mgIL. This range is acceptable. The MLVSS shows the same trending as the MLSS graph. The historical minimum ML VSS to sustain complete nitrification appears to be 1,800 mgIL based on previous operational data. The effluent ammonia concentration was only slightly affected on the days when the MLVSS concentration dropped below 1,800 mgIL. No process upset occurred. · The next graph shows the yield of solids from the activated sludge process. The yield is defined as the pounds of TSS produced per pound of BOD removed. For an extended aeration activated sludge plant, a yield between 0.8 and 1.1 is reasonable. Your plant had the 28-day moving average yield of 0.7, an artificially low number due to the loss of solids that resulted from the RAS pump station backing up into the chlorine contact tank scum troughs. · The last graph shows the Sludge Age, a measure of the average time a microorganism spends in the activated sludge system. We recommended that the activated sludge process be operated to maintain a constant sludge age rather than a constantMLSS. The average sludge age during the month was 21 days with the targeted sludge age range of 20 to 22 days: In, summary, the activated sludge process is performing 'Well (BOn andNH3-N removal)" TSS removal:,' . . was' also good except for, the days following the large rain. event on November 11 tho SVI levels.: increased in November, EMC should monitor this trend doselyand be prepared to add polymerto_assist~, in settling in theJinal clarifiers. We recommend adding an anoxic zone preceding the oxidation ditchto . ,', improve the poor settleability of the sludge observed.in-'early.2000, eatly 2001, late 2001, early 2002, , early 2003, lite 2003, and again in early 2004. 'Such a tank could be added during a major reconstruction process, due to the need to disrupt process flow. The proposed anoxic zone (or selector tank) project has received IDEM approval and can be bid in the next few months now that the Council approved the proposed rate increase. EMC's Monthly Proiect Status Report (According to EMC's November Executive Summary) Plant · One Weekly TSS permit violation occurred during the month. All other effluent quality parameters were within permit limits. The high effluent TSS on November 11 was due to the RAS pump station backing up and causing solids to run out of the scum troughs in the chlorine contact tanks. The possibility of installing valves on each of the scum lines at the CCT is being discussed. The RAS pumps are being refurbished. . . Pretreatment · Annual sampling has been completed. · Annual Inspections were performed at Voss-Clark and Cargo Clean MAS:das\S:\@PEH\901--950\944\OO2\WRD\Review of EMC\Review of EMC Operations - November 2004 memo,doc\OI0905 sa. STRANO ASSOCIATES,INC." ENG!NEEi"lS Lift stations and Collection System . EMC cleaned 7,495 feet of sanitary sewer (70,333 feet/contract YTD) and 7,919 feet of storrnlCSO sewer (47,528 feet/contract YTD). EMC televised 1,774 feet of sanitary sewer lines (12,316 feet/contract YTD). EMC surface-cleaned 305 catch basins and Vactor-cleaned 3 catch basins. All 21 trouble spots were cleaned. A total of 35 service calls were made in November (4 main back-ups and 31 residence service line back-ups). The main back-up calls resulted in minor property damage to one or possibly two residences. EMC vactored out 7 wet wells due to solids and grease buildup. There were four CSO events in November. Pump station floats, switches, and pump~ were cleaned and exercised according to EMC's contract. The generators at 10th Street, Spring Street and Mill Creek Pump Stations were exercised. CSO gates were cleaned and exercised. Minor repairs were made at four pump stations. CSO overflows continue to be monitored by using chalk lines and small blocks of wood. .. ,. . The pick,-up truck and sludge hauling truck wererepaired~' , . '" ~ I * Review of EMC WWTP Operations - November 2004 Page 5 January 10, 2004 · Industrial User permits were revised and reissued following the IDEM inspection. . . . . . . . . . . . f:.".,; /'. :"'/' cc:,', John Toombs /JorgeLanz, JTL Tim Ctawforcl,.EMC Jack Jordan, Sewer Board Jeffery Caldwell, Sewer Board .' r(.;' Attachments MAS:das\S:\@PEH\901--950\944\OO2\WRD\ReviewofEMC\Review ofEMC Operations - November 2004 memo.doc\010905 sa. STRAND ASSOClATeS,INc." F.~G!NEERS r Jeffersonville WWTP Strand Associates Influent BOD, IbId vs. Design Loading I-Daily -7 d MVA 28 d MVA - - Design Loading I 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 o f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::JC)b< f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::JC)b< f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ ,,{f) ~"P ~"P ,..,{f) ~"P ~"P ~"P B"P ~{f) dy"P ,,{f) ~"P ~"P (\{f) ~"P ",,'\ ",,'\ ",,'\ ",,\' ,,~ ,,~ . ,,\" . ,,\" ,,\" ,,\" ,,{l.- ,,~ ,,(l) ,,'{l.- ,,{P ",' " " " " " " " . 1\ 1 \ 1 \ ^- 7"""- I Y ~ ~ .., '-- Influent TSS, IbId vs. Design Loading 40000 30000 20000 10000 o f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ cl>' f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ ,,{f) ~"P ~"P (;.{e ~"P ,,{f) ~"P B"P A.,{l.-r::s dy"P ~"P r:}"P ~'V (\{f) ~"P . ,,'\ . ,,'\ . ,,'\ ~" ~ ,,'\ ~\" ~\" ,,\" ~\" ,,\" .:{l.- ,,~ ,,{l) ,,{l.- ,,{P " -", " " " " " " " " " " Daily -7dMVA 28 d MV A - - Design Loading I Influent NH3-N, IbId vs. Design Loading Daily -7dMVA 28 d MV A - - Design Loading 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 o b< b< b< b< b< ~lI< b< _lI< f::J<::J f::J<::J f::J<::J f::J<::J f::J<::J f::JIJ- f::Jr::s f::JIJ- ~"P r:}'V ~"P ,.., {f) ~"P ~'V ~"P B'V ".:s ",,'\ ,,~ ",,\' ",,'\ ,,\" ,,\" ,,\" " " " cl>' cl>' cl>' cl>' cl>' cl>' cl>' r::s r::s r::s r::s r::s r::s r::s A., {f) dy"P ~'V r:}'V ~"P (\ {f) ~'V ,,\" ,,\" ,,{l.- ,,~ ,,(l) ,,'Q; ,,{P " " " " " " " Influent Flow, mgd vs. Design Flow (all data) Daily -7 d MVA 28 d MV A - - Design Flow I 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 o f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ f::J~ ~"P ~"P ~"P ,.., {e ~"P ~"P ~"P B"P ~ {f) dy"P ~"P r:}"P ~'V (\ {e ~'V ",,'\ ",,'\ ",,'\ ",,\' ,,~ ,,~ ,,\" ,,\" ~" ,,\" ,,'{l.- ~'1; ,,{l) ,,{l.- ,,{P " " " " " " " " " " . - . - . - Jeffplantdata-1104.xls 1/9/2005 . Jeffersonville WWTP Slrand Associates Jeffersonville Influent Flow - ALL FI,.OW Percent of Design (5.2 mgd) c Cl '0 2: All days" Monthly Average 12monthMVA-all '~~ 150% 130% / \ ':E ~: ~~ ~'--:. ~~~~~~~/ .~~~~~~ '0 1: CIl l:! CIl 0. ~~~#~ft~~~~~f~P~P~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ #~#~~~#~#~~~#~#~~~#~#~#~#~#~#~ Month Jeffersonville Influent Flow. DRY DATA ONLY Percent of Design (5.2 mgd) c Cl 'iij CIl a '0 1: CIl C) t 0. DIY Days - Monthly Average 12 month MVA - Dry I '-1 :~ ~: ..~ : :~~~~^~~~,~.~, j~=/~> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ #~#~~~#~#~###~#~#~#~####~~#### Month Jeffersonville Influent BOD Percent of Design (10,581 Ibsfday) c CI 'j a o. C' CII C)' :p; D., Monthly Average 1~ monlh MVA 140% ~ 120% 100% ' ;~~ :~~':~'?7 :~~<yf~(~C'~5: ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~p~#~~~~~~~~~~ ~~#~#####~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~ Month c Cl '0 2: Jeffersonville Influent TSS Percent of Design (1 0,105 Ibs/day) Monthly Average 12 month MVA I :~<~jA~,'< :'~~ '00% ~ 140% 120% 100% :: =:. : : ~ y:;.....-> ';" '0 1: ~ K. ~~~#~?~F~P~~~~~~~P~#~Y~~~~~~~~ #~#~#~#~#~###~#~#~#~#~~~#~#~#~ Month Jeffersonville Influent NH3-N Percent of Design (867 Ibsfday) c CI 'iij CD a '0 1: 8 ~ Monthly Average 12monthMVA. I '00% E ~ :: .~~~~~v:~~..,,~~~~~,..~~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ P ~ P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ #~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~ Month Jeffptanldala% 01 deslgn.x1s 1/9/2005 Jeffersonville WWTP Weekly Effluent CeOD vs. Permit Limit /- - Wk. Ave. limits --+-7 d MYA Effluent I 30 "" . . "" - "" . . - "" "" . . - - "" I . - ~ T .... ~ 'Y ~ E 20 C g 10 o o 11/1/2004 11/812004 11/1512004 Date 11/2212004 11/29/2004 50 Weekly Effluent TSS vs. Permit Limit , . 7 d MYA Effluent - - Wk. Ave. limits I ..... 40 ..... lJ) E 30 en 20 t/) I- 10 \ "" . . "" ""- . . - -\- . .. "" "" .. . I , "'- - y y o 11/1/2004 11/8/2004 11/1512004 11/22/2004 11/2912004 Date ..... 3.0 'i>> E 2.0 Z ~ 1.0 Z 0.0 11/1/2004 11/8/2004 11/15/2004 Date 11/2212004 11/29/2004 S:\@ PEH\901--950\944\002\SPR\Plant data\Jeffplantdata-11 04.xlsReport Effluent 20 ..... 'i>> 15 E C 10 o m o o 11/1/2004 Monthly Effluent CeOD vs. Permit Limit I . 28 d MY A Effluent "" - Mo. Ave. limits I 11/812004 11/15/2004 Date 11/22/2004 11/29/2004 Monthly Effluent TSS vs. PermitLimit I . 28 d MYA Effluent" "" "" Mo. Ave. limits I 21 "" . . - - "" .. .. - "" .. . . - - ..... ..... lJ) 14 E en f!! 7 11/8/2004 11/1512004 11/2212004 11/2912004 o 11/1/2004 Date Monthly Effluent NH3-N vs. Permit Limit .1 ~ 28 d MY A Effluent"" "" Mo. Ave. limits I 2.0 ..... 'i>> 1.5 E Z 1.0 I C'l :i: 0.5 Z 0.0 11/1/2004 11/812004 11/15/2004 Date 11/2212004 11/29/2004 Strand Associates 1/9/2005 '\ .' Jeffersonville WWTP F:Mv I -Daily -7dMVA -28dMVA I .00 I I l~I'~)~d?~.~.~ . ' "',<)' ",,,<)' ",4' ,<0<)' ",,,,<)' \"", \,,f' \,,,<)' \.:;.<)' \,,,,<)' {il \q}<3' \1'<)' {ll {il .... ... ..... .... .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SVI I -Daily -7dMvA -28dMvA I ~I~F~- i :l(~~:~~~1 "',<)' "',,<)' ",4' ,<0<)' ",<f" \"", /,,cr- \,4' \.:;.<)' \,,,<)' (1:'", {1,4' {I' i/<)' \<fl .... ..... ..... .... .... .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OLR, Ib BOD/d/1000 cf I -Daily -7dMvA -28dMvA I -It 80 70 60 50 40 30~ 20 10 o -f A ...., \,,,' \# <j" <0<)' f.><)' ,<)' # ,4' ~<)' ,,<)' ,,,' ,,<)' ,,<)' ~<)' ;#'.. . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ # SLR, Ib MLSS/d/sf ~I~=~.~~VA;V~I ~I <)' ;#' ;#' <)' ;#' <3' # 4' <)' # <)' ~ # <)' ;#' .....:::.'" ,~~ .....~~ .......<:-: .....::.0;; ..;;........~ ~.... ~... ~0 .:::..... .:::.q,.... ~r{} .:::.to .::.rV .:::.1) .... .... ... .... .... ..... .... .... .... ... S:\@ PEH\901--950\944\002\SPR\Plant data\Jeffplantdata-11 04.xlsReport AS ,:1 Strand Associates MLSS, mg/L ~lS ,~~~v~ ~I ,if&',if#<<>"<<>"&'-<f>'<<>"A-,if",' ~,if,if ~q;;' ~tp 41.-- <:-'{t ~17 o$17 ~'V 4/7 ",{/7 ~17 .:::.0/ ~'V" ~~ (I."{t' ~ct' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MLVSS, mg/L I-Daily -7dMvA -28dMVA! 2800 2400 2000 1600 1~0 ~rlrlrI~~~#~#~rlrI~# ~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yield, Ib TSS/lb BOD rem L..........7dMVA -28 d MVA! 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 . ""'.&'''''&'..cl>..cl>#..cl>,if&'#### ,,' ,# , # ,,# " , ~ # # # , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Sludge Age, days !-7dMVA -28dMVA I ~l~ ?~ ~~I ,~ f6>ci' n,<JS" {l,<JS" rf' ",,,,<JS" rI 4l ~{l,<JS" ,If" ,{l,<JS" #. rI {l,<JS" ;j)<3' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ # ~ ~ ~ .... .... ... .... .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1/9/2005 Jeffersonville WWTP Daily Data for SVI and SLR plotted on curve from WEF MOP 8 (Figure 11.25, Design Solids Loading versus SVI) Assumes no solids inventory in the Clarifier and multipoint Drawoff of settled sludge 500 400 300 :> tJ) 200 100 o o Jeffplantdata-1104.xls SLR vs SVI for November 2004 Daily data shown as scatter vs. two curves one from MOP 8 (typical relationship) and one for Jeffersonville (specific relationship based on plant data at peak flow) Data points above curves represent excessive solids loading I + Daily Data -MOP 8 Curve-"-Jeffersonville Curve I . Zone uof excessive solids loading Zone of acceptable solids loading. + ' . t +' .,. +. ~ +++ + 10 20 30 SLR, Ibldlsf 40 50 ."'C.~ . t "..' , l".,..... Strand Associates 60 1/9/2005 .,. '" City of Jeffersonville Summary of Ongoing Public Works Projects Strand Associates, Inc. January 10,2005 1. Monthly Review of WWTP Operations . WWTP is operating well; settling has declined, and should be monitored closely. . November review will be presented at the January 10 Sewer Board meeting. . Two items need attention at the WWTP; shut-off valves should be installed in the chlorine contact tank scum pipes and the RAS pump capacity needs to be restored. These improvements will prevent solids from entering the effluent through the scum pipes as a consequence of the RAS pump station backing up. 2. Sludge Application Study · On hold for data collection (flow and sludge concentrations). 3. Long Term CSO Control Plan . ORSANCO Louisville area wet weather final report was' expected in Fall 2004. We have" not seen their final report. Next CAe meeting will.be sbheduled to discuss IDEM COlnments (when received). . TheCS,O ;Public Notification program~s .being 'fully implemented as required. City. must sendsignage letters out in'January.and.:hokipublicmeeting (preceded by letters and::; legal notices) in March. .,. , , . " Long Term 'Control Plan was submitted to IDEM by April 30 with an Addendum on September 15. IDEM has reviewed the plan for completeness and did not identify any deficiencies. IDEM sent letter to City on December 8. , '. . '. ,. u'.. ,,'~ 4. Sewer System Master Planning (with JTL) . Rate increase was approved by the Council on December 6, 2004. 5. Design of Improvements to WWTP . Upon commitment from City to fund the project, bids can be solicited. Respectfully Submitted, STRAND ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~~ Mark A. Sneve, P.E. sa. STRANO ASSOC;A TES, iNC.- e '" ,:;: N;::: E n f, MAS:das\S:\@PEH\901--950\944\002\WRDlSewer Bd Exec Sum\2004\JeffSewerBdExecSumOJ05.doc/Ol109/05 SANIT ARY SEWER BOARD MEETING AGENDA Meeting: Monday January 10,2005 4:00 PM; Mayor's Conference Room; 4th Floor, Room404; City-County Building; Jeffersonville, IN 47130 1) Call to Order by Executive Member 2) Roll Call 3) Approval of Agenda 4) Approval of Minutes 5) Approval of Claims SPEAKER SUBJECT RESULT 6) Antonio Lowe Sewer Tap In 6011 Corr Circle 7) Consultant & Engineer Report 8) Bob Miller City Engineer Comments 9) Board Member Comments I. E ItII C ENV/lloNMENTAL MANAGEMENTCORPORAT/ON A Boe GROUP COMPANY 701 CHAMPION ROAD MUNICIPAL SERVICES JeFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA 47130 www.emcinc.com TEL: (812) 285-6451 FAX: (812) 285-6454 ) . Executive Summary Monthly Operation and Maintenance Report November 2004 Following are summaries for operation and maintenance at the wastewater treatment plant, and maintenance of the collection system and lift stations for the month of November 2004. Plant ~ ~ Effluent quality was within NPDES permit limits. There was one violation during the month. It steamed from a large rain event on the 11 th and the fact that we had one RAS pump out of service for maintenance. Settleable solids averaged 673 for the month; it is the same time of year that the satiability increases each year. There were 23 wet days (defined as a day having at least 0.1 inch of rainfall and three days afterward)resulting in an average plant flow of7.96 MGD, and 7 dry days with an average flow of 4.82 MGD. The percentages of design flow for the plant were 153.0% wet weather~nd 92.7% dry weather average. The total average influent flow for the month was 7.226 MGD, which is 138.8% of design. The facility received an average influent BOD loading of 11,834.2 this is 111.8% of the design. The facility received an average influent TSS of 12,729.3 lbs/day; this is 125.9% of the design. The facility received an average influent Ammonia of659Ibs/day, this is 76.0% of the design The maximum rainfall event during the month was on November 11 at 2.5". The high TSS reading on the twelfth was due to theRASline being overloaded, therefore causing the solids to run out of the scum troughs in the chlorine contact tanks. We have been discussing .. the possibility of installing valves on each of the scum lines. We have one of the four pumps left to be rebuilt, at that point we will be performing draw down test to see what the rates are. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Pretreatment ~ Annual sampling has been completed for the year. ~ Per IDEM Pretreatment audit, most permits were re-written. ~ Annual inspections were preformed at Voss-Clark and Cargo Clean. Lift stations and Collection System Lift stations and Collection System n . Crews cleaned 7,495 feet of sanitary sewer (57,828 feet/contract YTD) . Crews cleaned 7,919 feet of stormlCSO sewer (43,036 feet/contract YTD) . Crews televised 1,774 feet of sanitary sewer lines (10,597 feet/contract YTD) . Crews hand-cleaned 304 and vactor-cIeaned 3 catch basins. . All 21 trouble spots were cleaned and or checked during the month. D/ In the month of November collection crews made 35 sewer calIs 31 being residents or other problems and 4 being in the city's main lines, with some damage to one resident possibly two. . 1029 Morris Ave. crews cleaned and vactored 300'removed build up of solids, line is flat and is one of our trouble spots. . 2024 Blue Bird Dr. crew cleaned 150' from 307 Hopkins Ln. up to Blue Bird Dr. opened line. Crew then televised line and found roots, crew then used root cutter to remove roots. . MIH at Ewing Ln. and Viking Dr. crew cleaned and vactored 500' removed blockage of grease and solids. . 615 Mockingbird Dr. crew found blockage to be on Cheryl Dr. crews cleaned and vactored25q' opened line, found blockage to be a root problem. There was some damage t? resident of615 and possibly to the resident of 613. ~ Collections crews worked with different departments of the city on various city projects, and a few businesses jobs around the area. . Took vactor truck to Pearl St. to dye a feeder for Bob G. . 820 E. Maple St. televised c/o out to main line needs dug out in street showed Bob G. . 820 E. Maple St. televised 200' to check for damaged line. . Televised line at Aquatic Center 420' line had separated has infiltration, forMark Wright. . Televised 329' on 1500 block of Ellwanger to check for damaged line showed Mike L. will need repaired . Televised a tap from an mlh at 1538 Ellwanger to check for damages, leaking into C/B showed Mike L. will need repaired. . Televised 30' on Hopkins Ln. to locate buried M/H marked in green called Bob G. . Televised 298' to locate tap at lot #40 in Artic Springs marked in green. . Crew went to Meigs Ave. two times to televise line, wasn't ready. . Crew monitored Silver Creek station two days so plumbers could work on resident's grinder system at 5707 Hamburg Pike. r . Collections crews cleaned and vactored 270' of storm drainage for the drainage crew. Collections crews' street pre-maintenance schedule. . . Trouble spots list completed 5,300' of sewers cleaned and vactored throughout city. . 7 wet wells were vactored out due to solids and build up of grease. . Collection crews cleaned 304 c/b tops off due to leafs and heavy rains throughout the city, there were two days city employees were off and both days we had rain events. . Collections crews cleaned and vactored 3 c/b due to poor drainage. . Collections crews cleaned and vactored 3,530' of sewers in the Eastgate subdivision. . Collections crews cleaned and vactored 1,140' on Riverside Dr. Rocky's, Buckheads, Kingfish and River Point Dr. . Collections crews cleaned and vactored 1,375' ofPQ Industries line. . Collections crews also cleaned and vactored 2,599' of sewers in different areas of the city. . C.S.O. gates were exercised and greased also blocks of wood and chalk lines were maintained on the C.S.O. weirs to help determine by-passing. . 1 m/h was cleaned and vactored due to build up of solids. . Collection crews televised 449' on Cheryl Dr. to locate reason for back up on Mockingbird . Collection crews televised 48' on Hopkins Ln. to check for damage or roots in line. Collections crews lift station pre-maintenance schedule [/ . All lift stations floats, switches, pumps, alarms and electrical and mechanical components were cleaned, exercised, and inspected for proper operations. I . n t , r . Bar screens at 10th St. were cleaned as needed. . Generators at 10th St., Spring St., and Mill Creek stations were operated, inspected, and exercised for proper operations. . Collection crews pulled pumps # 1 and 2 at Crums Ln. #2 to remove rags and debris. . Collection crews cleaned the grease off probes and out of check valve at Cedar View. r: ~ ~ ~ r L: r f t r t t , I! r. I l . ~ r t n ;i r ,. , r, L r ~ ~ r t r ./ t Repairs in the Collection system . Crews pulled pump #3 in RAS station to take and be rebuilt. . 4 light ballast were replaced in lab. . Took sludge tru~k to vehicle maintenance to repair trailer brakes. . Crew Replaced float at River Port #2 . Took dodge pickup truck to vehicle maintenance for new water pump. EMC r! f Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Monthly Operations Report 1.0 EFFLUENT QUALITY During November, effluent quality was within NPDES permit limits for CBOD, TSS and NH-3. Table 1.1 summarizes the effluent quality data. Attachment A contains Time Series Plots of Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) values. Attachment B contains Time Series Plots of Aeration Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS) and Sludge Volume Index (SVI). r r, , ! Carbonaceous Biochemical 25 mg/l 4.7 mg!l Oxygen Demand (CBOD) Total Suspended Solids 30 mg/l 14.7 mg!l (TSS) Fecal Coliform MPN 2000 colonies!100ml 571.2 coloniesll OOml Chlorine Residual 0.06 mg!l 0.01 mg!l Ammonia 4.5 mg!l 0.1 mg/l Average Flow 5.2 design 6.96 MGD ~ : iJ R ,j Table 1.2 Wet Weather vs. D n ~ n n n n n Average Flow of Wet Days Number of Dry Days Average Flow of Dry Days *Wet Day = Rain (>0.1 in) and three days after 7.96 MGD 7 4.82 MGD 2.0 DESIGN LOADINGS LIMITS The Flows and Loadings report for May 1994 through November 2004 can be found in Attachment C. 3.0 FACILITY OPERATIONS Attachment D contains a list of septic haulers that discharged at the facility during the month of November. 1 Je.ffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Monthly Operations Report During November, the treatment processes performed very well. All parameters were well within State and EP A limits. Average influent flow was 134% of the plant design capacity. Abnormally high effluent TSS was experienced on 11.12 due to the back-up of the RAS station into the chlorine contact tanks. A solution to this problem has been discussed and approved by the Board. 3.1 PRETREATMENT Pretreatment activities for the month included the following: . Yearly inspections were made at Voss-Clark and Cargo Clean. . A N.O.V was issued to Voss-Clark for non-testing of permitted metal parameters. . Permits were renewed for Brinley-Hardy and Altec. . Final letter was submitted to IDEM in response to their Pretreatment Program Audit letter of 9/16/04. 4.0 SEWER MAINTENANCE CALLS Table 4.1 represents all sewer maintenance calls for the month. r- 11/01/04 Call-Out 705 Graham St. Odor in bsmt y r 11/02104 F. Desimone 835 8t St. Backup - main ok y 11105104 Precision 601 Mockingbird Backup - main ok N 11/05/04 D. Craig 3310E 10th St. - Backup/Odor - Shot to try and N 126 assist - no luck 11/09/04 Precision 1322 Ridgeway Backup - main ok N Kinman Plumbing (643-9215) r, had resident opened by the time ./'1 11/09/04 B. Fisher 222 W. Chestnut y f crews arrived - insist was on city - will TV to determine n 11/09/04 Highway Press 2199 Hamburg Pk. Backup - main ok N 11/10/04 K. Stewart 830 Morris Backup - main ok Y 11/10/04 Precision 409 Myrtle Backup - main ok N n 11/11/04 D. Carter 5707 Hamburg Pk. Grinder system failed - caused N force main to run through house 11/11104 M. Clark 2008 Blue Bird Dr. Backup - main ok N 11/12/04 Precision 216 Hopkins Ln. Backup - main ok N n 11/15/04 Stemler 1407 Spring Backup - main ok Y 11/16/04 Norton & 1202 Spruce Backup - main ok N Assoc. n Backup - Drainbusters ran 100' 11/17/04 M. Lovian 805 E. Penn St. but did not relieve, crews then y 100 ran 100' and 0 ened up resident 11/19/04 Drainbusters 813 Marigold Backu - main ok N n 11/22/04 Stemlers 1430 Ridgeway Backup - main ok N 11/22/04 Stemlers 1025 Rhonda Backup - main ok N 11/22/04 Precision 1208 Birchwood Backup - main ok N n 2 Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Monthly Operations Report 11/22/04 Precision 815 Cherry Drive Backup - main ok N 11/22/04 Stemlers 613 Mockingbird Backup - main ok N Backup - plumber said he put in 11/24/04 W. Romans 1806 Utica Pk. 50', but crews noticed he did not N have 20' on truck - truck was unmarked 11/24/04 Suzie-City 808 Rose Backup - main ok, but shot to N 110 Atty's office assist resident R 11/26/04 M. Brown 1507 Elwanger Backup into bsmt. - main ok y ~ 11/27/04 M. Brown 1507 Elwanger Backup into bsmt - 2n call- y main stilI ok r. 11/27/04 Precision 3014 Douglas Blvd Backup - main ok N ~ 11/29/04 Stemlers 2113 Fountain Crest Backup - main ok N { 11/30/04 Stemlers 3016 Sherman Dr. Backup - main ok N 11/ 10/04 City Crews Ewing Lane & Vicking Manhole overflow N 500 Drive 11/13/04 C. Gardner 808 & 806 Rose Clean out overflow N 40 11/18/04 J. Adams 1029 Morris Blockage - flat line Y 300 Blockage - Roots- 11 /21/04 Greenwell 615 Mockingbird some damage to N 145 resident 11/29/04 Dewer 2024 Bluebird Blockage - roots N 150 Crews monitored Silver 11/13/04 D. Carter 5707 Hamburg Pk Creek lift station so that N plumber could replace grinder pump 11/26/04 S. Varble 4602 Dumbar Water Main break N ,....., , t r-o ~ ~ fl t"J n 4.1 ELECTRICAL EXPENDITURES n n n Table 4.6 represents the facility electrical expenditures for the month as well as providing a year to date total. November $16,150.41 $ 13,360.00 ($2,790.41) n Year-To-Date $115,319.44 $93,520.00 ($21,799.44) n " .) Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Monthly Operations Report 5.0 FACILITY SAFETY & TRAINING A safety inspection was conducted on December 2, 2004. The rating was 100%. There were no deficiencies reported. Our plant is still in excellent shape. A copy of the Safety Inspection Report is included as Attachment E. fJ '<- 6.0 SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM AND PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE G ! Lift stations and Collection System r f I . Crews cleaned 7,495 feet of sanitary sewer (57,828 feet/contract YTD) . Crews cleaned 7,919 feet ofstorm/CSO sewer (43,036 feet/contract YTD) . Crews televised 1,774 feet of sanitary sewer lines (10,597 feet/contract YTD) . Crews hand-cleaned 304 and vactor-cleaned 3 catch basins. . All 21 trouble spots were cleaned and or checked during the month. In the month of November collection crews made 35 sewer calls 31being residents or other problems and 4 being in the city's main lines, with some damage to one resident possibly two. r L . 1029 Morris Ave. crews cleaned and vactored 300'removed build up of solids, line is flat and is one of our trouble spots. . 2024 Blue Bird Dr. crew cleaned 150' from 307 Hopkins Ln. up to Blue Bird Dr. opened line. Crew then televised line and found roots, crew then used root cutter to remove roots. . M/H at Ewing Ln. and Viking Dr. crew cleaned and vactored 500' removed blockage of grease and solids. . 615 Mockingbird Dr. crew found blockage to be on Cheryl Dr. crews cleaned and vactored 250' opened line, found blockage to be a root problem. There was some damage to resident of 615 and possibly to the resident of 613. n Collections crews worked with different departments ofthe city on various city projects, and a few businesses jobs around the area. n . Took vactor truck to Pearl St. to dye a feeder for Bob G. . 820 E. Maple St. televised c/o out to main line needs dug out in street showed BobG. . 820 E. Maple St. televised 200' to check for damaged line. . Televised line at Aquatic Center 420' line had separated has infiltration, for Mark Wright. . Televised 329' on 1500 block of Ellwanger to check for damaged line showed Mike L. will need repaired . Televised a tap from a m/h at 1538 Ellwanger to check for damages, leaking into C/B showed Mike L. will need repaired. n n fl fl n 4 c [j Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Monthly Operations Report r: . Televised 30' on Hopkins Ln. to locate buried M/H marked in green called Bob G. . Televised 298' to locate tap at lot #40 in Artic Springs marked in green. . Crew went to Meigs Ave. two times to televise line, wasn't ready. . Crew monitored Silver Creek station two days so plumbers could work on resident's grinder system at 5707 Hamburg Pike. . Collections crews cleaned and vactored 270' of storm drainage for the drainage crew. [} fj r-; ~~ Collections crews street pre-maintenance schedule. c . Trouble spots list completed 5,300' of sewers cleaned and vactored throughout city. . 7 wet wells were vactored out due to solids and build up of grease. . Collection crews cleaned 304 c/b tops off due to leafs and heavy rains throughout the city, there were two days city employees were off and both days we had rain events. . Collections crews cleaned and vactored 3 c/b due to poor drainage. . Collections crews cleaned and vactored 3,530' of sewers in the Eastgate subdivision. . Collections crews cleaned and vactored 1,140' on Riverside Dr. Rocky's, Buckheads, Kingfish and River Point Dr. . Collections crews cleaned and vactored 1,375' ofPQ Industries line. . Collections crews also cleaned and vactored 2,599' of sewers in different areas of the city. . C.S.O. gates were exercised and greased also blocks of wood and chalk lines were maintained on the C.S.O. weirs to help determine by-passing. . 1 m/h was cleaned and vactored due to build up of solids. . Collection crews televised 449' on Cheryl Dr. to locate reason for back up on Mockingbird . Collection crews televised 48' on Hopkins Ln. to check for damage or roots in line. c c r, r: G Collections crews lift station pre-maintenance schedule c . All lift stations floats, switches, pumps, alarms and electrical and mechanical components were cleaned, exercised, and inspected for proper operations. Bar screens at loth St. were cleaned as needed. Generators at 10th St., Spring St., and Mill Creek stations were operated, inspected, and exercised for proper operations. Collection crews pulled pumps # 1 and 2 at Crums Ln. #2 to remove rags and debris. Collection crews cleaned the grease off probes and out of check valve at Cedar View. . ,G . c . . o Repairs in the Collection system 5 I I r ! r' t n , t Attachment A Time Series Plots CBOD & TSS f' , to'; n i.J n n n ~ n n -"'::1 :r:r:J-"'J L~ --"':1 --'1 J effersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Effluent CBOD / TSS CBOD - w TSS.... - . Permit CBOD - - - - Permit TSS 40 35 30 25 20 .... -.... -.... -.... -.... -.... -.... -.... -.... -.... --.. --.. --.. --.. --.. --.. - ~.. - ~.. _..- - -- - -- - -- -.... -.... -.... -... - - --.. --....-..... 15 10 ff " 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 November 2004 r ~ ' f r: ~ I L r t ; t Attachment B n tl in Time Series Plots MLSS & SVI ~ n n n n IT IT -'<::1 L:-J 4500 - 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 . 1500 1000 500 ,..,.-. .. - o , ~.~. :J,:;:'TI , .. / ....... .. . ---.., ;01. .<>_~J -.::) r"~'J '~'j " ,.. 1----' .. '" /n '" ~~"-'1 J effersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Aeration Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS) mg/l - .. MLSS mg/l \Wfdtw.@,w-'WiDesingLimitMLSS '" '" - - -\ '" '\ - , " ""'" ..' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 - . I / , , I , r.. __ \ \ / I , I '.I , v November 2004 Operated and Maintained by: Environmental Management Corporation ""....'1 ~ ...."'"",,...,.., '-"""-:J ;::J [':"1 :::'1 :"'"''''':1 350 300 250 200 150 Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Aeration Mixed Liquor Sludge Volume Index (SVI) mIfgm - '" SVlml/gm Design Limit SVI /' " " /'" ~ 1>>a?1':3 ~:@ll .. /" I if " jf ,= "'- " if ~ m> i " '" if / '" if '" " " 100 50 o i " --- .. " .. ........... '\ v " I " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 November 2004 Operated and Maintained by: Environmental Management Corporation I I fl t;: r ~ Attachment C r: u Flows & Loadings Report D n I \ I .~ .~~..., .:::::1 L:!:J L:::1 := .""'l C::-:I r ~"'-) ---Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility--- May 1994 - November 2004 4.50 5.2 6,042 lO, 1 05 3,490 10,581 2.35 3.84 5.2 8,038 10,105 3,843 10,581 3.70 3.68 5.2 8,311 10,105 3,913 10,581 2.25 3.55 5.2 7,668 10,105 3,819 1 0,581 2.40 3.81 5.2 8,726 lO,105 4,798 10,581 3.65 3.71 5.2 8,493 10,105 4,356 10,581 2.20 4.09 5.2 9,483 10,105 4,025 10,581 3.85 4.19 5.2 10,434 10,105 3,886 10,581 4.45 3.81 5.2 9,231 10,105 3,864 10,581 3.75 2.92 5.2 6,393 10,105 2,710 10,581 1.60 2.87 5.2 5,572 10,105 2,480 10,581 2.05 2.63 5.2 4,211 10,105 2,178 10,581 2.80 3.46 5.2 3,593 10,105 1,622 10,581 10.25 2.79 5.2 4,824 10,105 2,683 10,581 3.35 2.31 5.2 4,244 10,105 1,809 10,581 2.50 3.22 5.2 6,338 10,105 3,491 lO,581 3.45 2.33 5.2 5,962 10,105 3,022 10,581 1.60 2.87 5.2 6,235 10,lO5 3,124 10,581 5.25 2.64 5.2 7,449 10,105 2,519 10,581 2.75 3.22 5.2 9,211 10,105 3,620 10,581 5.85 4.29 5.2 8,229 10,105 7,084 10,581 5.00 3.28 5.2 8,480 10,105 6,620 10,581 2.63 5.45 5.2 11,091 10,105 9,045 10,581 5.98 5.85 5.2 12,148 10,105 9,075 10,581 6.50 8.17 5.2 14,513 10,105 10,902 10,581 7.30 5.74 5.2 12,447 10,105 10,149 10,581 3.72 4.36 5.2 11,672 10,105 9,345 10,581 3.40 3.83 5.2 11,148 10,105 10,312 10,581 1.90 4.96 5.2 12,865 10,105 9,928 10,581 9.02 4.25 5.2 11,059 10,105 8,471 10,581 2.60 4.80 5.2 13,771 10,105 11,689 10,581 4.10 5.77 5.2 14,725 1O,lO5 11,020 lO,581 4.90 5.59 5.2 19,581 10,105 16,597 10,581 3.85 5.84 5.2 22,892 10,105 15,732 lO,581 12.25 1 of 4 Operuted flmI Maintained by: Ellviromnelltal Management Corporatioll ~::::l ~ =:l ::::J c::::I L''''~ I L'lJ ----Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment F acility-- May 1994 - November 2004 10.62 5.2 22,586 10,105 13,197 10,581 6.30 5.63 5.2 17,584 10,105 10,330 10,581 2.31 6.27 5.2 18,145 10,105 9,726 10,581 7.15 7.05 5.2 13,347 10,105 8,937 10,581 5.05 4.32 5.2 13,979 10,105 12,862 10,581 0.55 4.43 5.2 11,925 10,105 11 ,817 10,581 3.95 3.84 5.2 9,166 10,105 10,160 10,581 1.47 3.60 5.2 12,539 10,105 10,439 10,581 1.47 3.81 5.2 8,516 10,105 10,359 10,581 3.35 4.23 5.2 9,208 10,105 8,290 10,581 4.30 4.71 5.2 10,920 10,105 8,838 10,581 4.15 5.31 5.2 7,661 10,105 8,636 10,581 1.65 4.77 5.2 9,309 10,105 11,656 10,581 5.85 5.62 5.2 9,187 10,105 8,812 10,581 7.60 5.57 5.2 8,640 10,105 10,917 10,581 4.71 5.83 5.2 10,016 10,105 10,794 10,581 7.46 4.90 5.2 8,418 10,105 6,661 10,581 7.90 5.04 5.2 8,112 10,105 7,356 10,581 4.22 4.03 5.2 8,302 10,105 8,100 10,581 0.05 3.62 5.2 7,216 10,105 6,612 10,581 2.40 4.01 5.2 7,525 10,105 7,659 10,581 2.60 4.67 5.2 10,399 10,105 8,919 10,581 3.35 6.63 5.2 13,381 10,105 10,064 10,581 11.40 5.36 5.2 9,566 10,105 7,868 10,581 2.50 6.00 5.2 9,508 10,105 7,756 10,581 3.40 5.70 5.2 12,360 10,105 10,126 10,581 3.32 5.35 5.2 10,976 10,105 9,281 10,581 2.10 6.45 5.2 11,404 10,105 10,759 10,581 6.30 5.57 5.2 8,362 10,105 9,523 10,581 0.70 5.49 5.2 7,921 10,105 9,569 10,581 0.95 3.96 5.2 5,945 10,105 6,209 10,581 0.70 3.77 5.2 6,949 10,105 7,703 10,581 2.70 3.80 5.2 8,050 10,105 7,796 10,581 2.70 4.49 5.2 9,287 10,105 7,564 10,581 6.17 4.51 5.2 8,839 10,105 6,883 10,581 4.65 7.26 5.2 10,354 10,105 9,324 10,581 6.10 2of4 Operated (tIltl Maintained by: Elll'irmllnentlll MllIUlgemellt Corporation ::::J .~......, f"""""1 .''''''', ''''~ c::J :S'''j ,~:_~c:) Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment F acility-- May 1994 - November 2004 5.45 5.2 8,727 10,105 8,045 10,581 2.75 5.49 5.2 8,608 10,105 6,227 10,581 3.70 4.03 5.2 7,932 10,105 7,293 10,581 1.00 4.17 5.2 8,347 10,105 7,512 10,581 4.11 3.67 5.2 8,172 10,105 6,183 10,581 4.11 3.92 5.2 6,800 10,105 6,310 10,581 4.11 4.03 5.2 6,756 10,105 5,478 10,581 4.11 3.85 5.2 7,000 10,105 5,683 10,581 0.40 4.50 5.2 7,769 10,105 7,619 10,581 3.15 4.64 5.2 7,894 10,105 8,320 10,581 3.15 4.64 5.2 7,894 10,105 8,320 10,581 3.15 5.13 5.2 8,001 10,105 7,787 10,581 2.20 4.60 5.2 6,867 10,105 7,711 10,581 2.35 4.22 5.2 7,321 10,105 7,391 10,581 1.65 4.49 5.2 9,362 10,105 8,201 10,581 3.80 4.20 5.2 7,286 10,105 8,056 10,581 4.20 4.36 5.2 8,072 10,105 7,818 10,581 4.50 3.95 5.2 7,379 10,105 7,116 10,581 4.50 4.30 5.2 7,926 10,105 7,674 10,581 3.85 5.52 5.2 9,852 10,105 9,576 10,581 1.60 5.31 5.2 9,477 10,105 8,990 10,581 1.50 6.27 5.2 8,576 10,105 6,955 10,581 4.65 5.48 5.2 8,821 10,105 8,044 10,581 2.25 4.97 5.2 6,922 10,105 5,886 10,581 3.85 6.92 5.2 9,465 10,105 8,541 10,581 2.15 6.88 5.2 9,980 10,105 8,488 10,581 6.05 7.20 5.2 11,109 10,105 9,187 10,581 4.45 6.25 5.2 11,415 10,105 9,435 10,581 6.45 4.60 5.2 7,404 10,105 9,207 10,581 1.05 4.36 5.2 9,491 10,105 6,909 10,581 1.85 4.90 5.2 8,790 10,105 7,563 10,581 9.25 5.12 5.2 10,462 10,105 7,900 10,581 4.25 5.09 5.2 15,592 10,105 11,090 10,581 3.45 6.14 5.2 9,444 10,105 9,068 10,581 7.30 4.77 5.2 6,992 10,105 6,517 10,581 0.70 6.44 5.2 9,190 10,105 10,617 10,581 4.19 3of4 Operated fwd Maintained by: Em4rOlllnelltttl Mtlllllgemellt Corporation L:n t-".~=J L~.=J ~r.=J i:~:] ; !.t:::l r~"",' L:1 ["""'..] C":'J LL~:_)r:."~J ..~=J U:.J -;jeffersonville Wastewater TreatmentF acility un May 1994 - November 2004 4.92 5.2 8,742 10,105 9,173 10,581 2.30 5.59 5.2 8,969 10,105 9,636 10,581 5.50 7.37 5.2 9,800 10,105 9,580 10,581 10.58 5.00 5.2 8,402 10,105 8,604 10,581 2.60 4.69 5.2 9,613 10,105 7,807 10,581 3.75 5.26 5.2 9,615 10,105 9,711 10,581 5.95 5.80 5.2 10,236 10,105 8,942 10,581 7.00 4.79 5.2 9,646 10,105 9,445 10,581 2.15 6.00 5.2 10,559 10,105 12,227 10,581 5.55 5.90 5.2 9,603 10,105 12,482 10,581 3.25 7.06 5.2 10,603 10,105 12,521 10,581 4.80 6.28 5.2 12,484 10,105 12,781 1 0,581 1.85 5.76 5.2 11,336 10,105 11,948 10,581 4.15 6.21 5.2 11,142 10,105 12,315 10,581 6.10 8.58 5.2 14,613 10,105 14,553 10,581 9.30 5.79 5.2 9,791 10,105 10,586 10,581 2.50 5.44 5.2 9,749 10,105 10,301 10,581 5.20 4.82 5.2 10,063 10,105 9,643 10,581 2.85 4.18 5.2 8,581 10,105 7,811 10,581 0.25 5.41 5.2 11,696 10,105 8,608 10,581 7.75 1 7.80 4of4 Opefllted (lml MlIintailU!{/ by: Environmental MalUlgement Corporation Septic Haulers Delivery Report r- f . Loads Delivered To Treatment Facility Hauler August Hauler Total (YTD) Rumpke of Indiana 20 22,500 TOTAL 86 86,900 r f ' r, I n Gallons Delivered To Treatment Facility Hauler August Hauler Total (YTD) Rumpke of Indiana 20 22,500 TOTAL 86 86,900 n n o ~ i n In I I r- l t r ~ r i Attachment E r ~ r- ~ ~ J Safety Inspection Report ~ n ~ I n n n n n n r- I r- . ~ ~ EMC Monthly SAFETY INSPECTION CHECKLIST r- I 1 *Mark only if NOT in compliance ,..-.. i 1 t ,....., t I H ADMINISTRA TIVE OFFICES - 18 Written Site Emergency Plan/training. Updated OSHA 200 log Written Chlorine/Sulfur Dioxide program, copy of actual standard, training Written Fire Extinguisher program, copy of actual standard, training Written Hazardous Communication program, copy of actual standard, training Confined Space program, copy of actual standard, training Written Emergency Action Plan program, copy of actual standard, training Written Lockout/Tag Out program, copy of actual standard, training Blood borne Pathogen program, copy of actual standard, training Personal Protection Equipment program, copy of actual standard, training All employees trained and understand Risk Management Plan Personal Protection Equipment available for visitors Safety Committee with both employee and management participation Written "Right to Know" Program MSDS sheets available to employees Process Safety Management Plan (for plants mandated to have) Housekeeping Hearing disciples - documentation r . , t n PREMLIMINARY TREATMENT - 4 n n n Wet or oil on floors No or bad ventilation Bar screenings on floor Housekeeping PRIMARY TREATMENT - 1 Housekeeping n n fl LABORATORY - 11 Proper chemical storage (containers labeled) Emergency shower and eyewash Inspection of emergency shower and eyewash Acid spill kit n r' i ~ r, r 1 t ' Sample refrigerators marked "Bio Hazard" Signs of food or drink in lab Fume hoods in proper working order or inspected Proper sharps/broken glass container Personal Protective Equipment available and used Tongs or special gloves for moving hot items available and used Housekeeping BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT - 2 N/A Safeguards in the pure oxygen system Housekeeping ADVANCED TREATMENT - 1 Housekeeping n DISINFECTION - 14 " t ! -' Housekeeping ..- I CHLORINE: Working exhaust fans at floor level Leak detection alarm system Alarm bad on S02 Ammonia hydroxide available to test for chlorine leaks SCBAIl 0 minute escape packs are properly inspected and full Proper chlorine wrench readily available Chlorine cylinders properly chained to wall and tons secure New washers readily available Windsock and lor other wind directional apparatus exist Warning signs in place Chlorine stored separately from other chemicals Risk Management Plan n n UV: N/A N/A Warning signs in place Proper Personal Protective Equipment in place BIO SOLDIS HANDLING - 2 n n n Combustible gas detection system in place and calibrated Housekeeping in u L"" r- t ' f : MAINTENANCE/GARAGE - 13 r , t i r- ~" ~ Proper guarding of grinders, etc. Lockout/Tag Out equipment available Vehicle Safety Checklist in place Sharps container for glass, cutting blades, etc. Hand tools in proper working order Eye protection provided for bench, free standing, and hand tools Lighting of work bench adequate Hoist, lift, jack, chains, pulleys available for lifting and moving heavy objects Metal waste can marked for oily and/or paint soaked waste only and lit secured Piping, hoses, etc. Stored properly Heavy duty extension cords used when appropriate Personal Protective Equipment signs posted Housekeeping BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS - 34 n t " ( ! o IT IT" """ ~.. ,< l J IT N/A N/A Chemical storage tanks are labeled Containers labeled Stairways are unobstructed Area below stairway are unobstructed Work areas are adequately lighted No Trip Hazards visible Exits clearly marked Emergency lighting adequate and functioning Fire extinguishers inspected All electrical wires in proper repair Electrical control boxes are not used for storage above or below, or otherwise blocked Electrical boxes doors secured Lockout/Tag Out in use where needed Outlets not overloaded Extension cords are not passing through openings without proper protection Handrails in good condition Chain guards in place where possible danger exists Guards over drive chains and gears are in proper working order "T" valves in walkways are adequately marked Automatic start signs properly displayed on machinery where needed Piping is color coded (legend available) or marked with content name Potable and non-potable water lines are clearly marked and distinguishable from each other Hatch covers in place Levee around pond or lagoon in good condition Life rings, jackets, hooks, etc. available around open tanks or ponds c n n n r, J;.j ~ ;0 t , r-"' ~, ~ r: e t r-: i I t ) Sampling equipment is sufficient to prevent climbing over handrails or other hazards to get samples Flammables are stored in appropriate cabinets or buildings and marked as such No Smoking signs posted near flammable areas Exit lights are in proper working order Housekeeping r { MISCELLANEOUS - 14 r t . t r, L N/A ['. N/A [ n r; t ! t.. " 1iI,~..C'" n U n L n n ,n n n. L: Man lifts inspected yearly Ladders in proper repair and working condition Personal Protective Equipment is provided First aid kits are available in all work areas and properly stocked Emergency Response Team (in plant or local) is available and aware of emergency plan Overhead crane inspected annually by qualified personnel Weight limits displayed on both sides of overhead crane Forklift operation training is provided Air gap and/or back flow prevention device on water line inspected and recorded annually Heat exchangers and/or boilers inspected annually Lockout/Tag Out Program audit documented Lockout/Tag Out training of "affected, authorized and others" conducted OSHA signs posted Facility: Jeffersonville Inspector: Jason Reister ,- Ii L: Date: 12/02/04 G , Scoring: r tJ If the plant is not in compliance with the item listed put a checkmark on the line next to the item listed. Feel free to write comments next to or near the item. Ifin compliance, leave blank. If not applicable to the plant (some items may not be), write N/A ("Not Applicable") on the line. Count up the total number of "Not Applicable" items. Subtract the "Not Applicable" from the "Total Possible" points. This will give you the "Adjusted Total". Subtract the number of "Not in Compliance" from the "Adjusted Total". This gives you the total "In Compliance". Divide the number of "In Compliance" by the "Adjusted Total" to give the "Total Percent". Example: Counts: N/A = 4 Not in Compliance = 3 D Total Possible 114 Total Possible 114 Not Applicable -4 Not Applicable -7 Adjusted Total 110 Adjusted Total 107 Not in Compliance " Not in Compliance 0 - .) Total in Compliance 107 Total in Compliance 107 Total % 97.3% Total % 100% (107/110) ~ n n n n....i ~.._ ,I i rl.. t. I t.. n r ; ! f n ~ ~ .; Attachment F fl LJ DMR/MRO/CSO o ~ r: U n n n n n I I r""'\ r":, Name of Facility Permit Number o~ ~ Monthly Report of Operation City of Jeffersonville WWTP IN0023302 Activated Sludge Type Month Year Plant Design Flow Telephone Number ~,. Wastewater Treatment Plant November 2004 5.2 mgd 812-285-6451 '''' Facility's e-mail address (if available): tlc@emcstl.com State Form 10829 (R/1-2004) Certified Operator: Name Class Certificat.e NUmber Expiration Date Page 1 of4 Timothy L. Crawford I IV I 13156 I 6/30/2005 >: ~ Total= == CHEMICALS RAW SEWAGE c Cii -E.- 0 USED 0 c. 'E 0 .2 Q. tJl > <Ii " 2- 2 0 ,Q _::2: ..c: U5 E :::: 0 I Ol tIl :::: C..-I ~ oS cB 2'5 , rn E ,Q Ol ..!l!c c:: E :::: ..c: a.ro :l , ro ~~ tJl "0 ~ . I Ol "E ~ _.t:: rn - .... .c 'x == tIl . E c a.. .... CfJ .... tJl tIl Q) ro"'" Qj .2 :l ::J -J 0 0 E ,Q :g :g tIl 0 ~ en en -0 c u is ro :l . :2 .... tIl 0. 19 ~ 0 o U I G: I I (5 (5 (; ro ::l <l> c.? 0-- E tJlO +::0 Q) .... "E~ to to CfJ CfJ ..c: '2 <5 - J:.l!! ~ '0. tJl_ u._ c Q) (; 0 0 a. 0 0 .;:: ..c: <1>0 ci. ci. ' c 'CJ ro- ..!!:!- 0 a. 0 0 tIl E >0 >0 C ro Q) a.. (5.x tIl .2c.? tJl tIl 0 ro ro ro- .... >Ox :c :; OJ OJ E , ::2:!?;. <( a: .c 'E~ ::c :l :l ..c: 0 0 OJ :L {)~ {) CfJ -J a. U U CfJ CfJ a.. <( 1 '. 0.6 27 64 8.83 7.4 165 12151 240 17674.1 Mon 12.4 2 Tue 1.1 35 101 14.64 7.3 180 21977.6 255 31134.9 8.5 3 Wed 0.25 29 89 7.53 7.4 265 16642.1 165 10362 ..6.4 4 . 0 31 89 6.67 7.5 110 6119.06 8622.31 Thu 155 8.9 . 5 Fri 0 32 94 5.3 7.5 113 4994.83 ..150 6630.3 10.4 6 Sat '. .. 0 25 95 5.13 7.5 135 5775.87 218 9326.96 14.5 7 Sun 0 25 . 82 4.838 7.4 103 415.5.94 215 8675.02 14.9 8 Man 0 35 92 4.48 7.8 240 8967.17 170 6351.74 14.4 9 Tue 0 29 80 4.404 7.7 343 12598.2 330 12120.7 16.3 . 10 Wed 0 39 76 4.575 7.6 245 9348.1 300 11446.7 .17.5 ,. 11 Thu 2.5 89 99 19.172 7.9 . 340 54364.1 255 40773.1 .' 16.9 12 Fri 0 42 86 9.621 7.3 ." ".120 9628.7 175 14041.8 3.3 c.' 13 Sat 0 41 83 5.874 7\2 110 5388.81 125 6123.65 . 7.3 14 Sun 0 35 79 5.362 7.3 110 4919.1 168 7512.81 8.5 . 15 0 38 82 5.307 7.4 ." . .130 5753.85 6639.06 10.8 Mon 150 16 Tue 0 . 26 84 5.113 7.6 210 8954.91 273 11641.4 15.1 17 Wed 0 25 . 82 5.018 8.1 .. 163 6821.57 250 10462.5 10.1 18 Thu 1.35 28 82 10.384 7.5 ..' 320 27712.8 273 23642.5 .... 17.3 19 - 0.3 29 83 13.16 7.6 170 18658.2 250 27438.6 11 Fri 20 Sat 0 19 48 7.047 7.5 105 6171.06 105 6171.06 .' 5.6 .... 21 Sun 0 38 36 5.858 7.4 128 6253.53 210 10259.7 .6.3 22 Man 0.1 23 47 5:868 7.3 175 8564.35 198 9689.95 10.2 23 Tue 0.5 30 84 6.986 7.4 170 9904.75 160 .9322.12 9.6 24 Wed 0 38 93 8.839 7.3 220 16217.8 215 15849.2 . 7.8 . 25 Thu 0.1 43 . 103 5.544 7.3 165 7629.1 215 9940.95 7.8 26 Fri 0 32 92 5 7.2 160 6672 143 5963.1 11 . 27 Sat 0.45 22 78 7.288 7.6 213 12946.5 190 11548.6 '. . 14.4 28 Sun 0 33 77 5.309 7.6 210 9298.18 213 9431.01 .. 9.8 . 29 Mon 0.05 43 73 5.377 7.4 198 8879.15 200 8968.84 10.9 .. 30 Tue 0.5 28 79 8.256 7.8 255 17558 205 14115.3 '.8.8 , " '. Averaoe .. .33633 81.067 7.226 186 11834.2 206 12729.3 10.89 .'. Maximum . 2.5 89 103 19.172 8.1 343 54364.1 ' .330 40773.1 17.5 .. Minimum 19 36 "4.404 7.2 " 103 4155.94 105 5963.1 3.3 No. of Data 30 0 0 30 30 0 30 30 30 30 30 30 0 30 0 '. . /7L . J I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared .W""'~ /rW?/t;q under m~ direction or supervision in accordance with a sy.stem de.signed to. assure ~ "V"'7J 0</; j~/~ that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the Informalion submitted. (SIGNAj~ OF I OPERATOR) /d /:;E/oi Based on my inquiry of the persons who manage the system, or those persons '7fV!;:r' directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is. to the I I best of my knowledge and belief. true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there .. are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of (SIG~~EOFA~NCIPAl EXECUTIVE I (DAT~) fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. OFFICER OR A THORIZED AGENT) ..- tV @7. q ~ :1, .1' ~.... .' Monthly Report of Operation I\.i 'd P<} 1J?-~ " - ~ /,2117/~(/ A.ctivated Sludge Type ........ ";?//?"O OPERATOR'! ~ J;TE' . Wastewater Treatment Plant , Name of Facility Permit Number For Montn Of: Year / /J /3 'rJ9' City of Jeffersonville WNTP IN0023302 November 2004 (SIGNATURefF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE O*ICER OR (~TE) Page 2 of 4 State Form 10829 (R/1-2004) AUTHORIZED AGENT) " PRIMARY AERATION SECONDARY FINAL EFFLUENT EFFLUENT MIXED LIQUOR RETURN SLUDGE . EFFLUENT 0 E M ::::: .5 I ::::: I I 0 . II~ ~ en I c: en 01 Q) Q) 0 c: ::::: ! E ~?" Q) u. E E .S: c: ..... Q) 01 '" 01 .Q~ .-= >. 01 E .r::. en I :E . "C :>. . I ~ I 0 c: :>. x C!) x I 'E '" (5 (/) .E 0 Q) (/) '" .r::. c: :2 0 0 0 E ':!2 (jJ :!2 .a ~ :!2 E :!2 ~~ U 0 (/) ;j ~ I 0 Q) 0 (5 '. "0 ~ I 0 . 0 U "0 0 In .(jJ j5 '" (jJ > Q) Q) (J) In (jJ 111_ m I Q) (5 > Q) :J U ;j > .r::. 0 ci. as Q) ci. &E 0 a. E ci. 0 ci. :2~ "0_ 0 g- o. 0 Q)- 0 <Il :>. <Il =~ <Il -gg (/)- E :J <Il (/) (/) c: .~ .~ U 0 III CJ ;j Q) .- :J .!a 0, ~ 0 ;j CJ :J Q) 0 J: .!11 en .r::. 0 U (J) (jJ E (jJ wE o E > (J) U (jJ ceu a::u. ui a. o E a.. 1 530 2900 183 1.7 4.484 7400 0.01 7.6 6.0 , 2 440 3000 147 L 2.0 5.971 7040 0.01 7.3 6.7 3 480 2900 166 4.2 5.307 6160 Q.Ol 7.4 7.1 4 500 2860 175 2.2 5.854 6120 0.01 7.4 6.1 5 680 3420 199 1.4 3.697 6900 0.06 7.6 ,6.1 6 670 3240 207 1.0 3.803 5980 0.04 7.5 7.6 7 650 3180 204 2.1 3.754 5960 0.01 7.5 7.6 " 8 , 700 3160 222 2.9 3.941 6260 0.01 7.7 6.7 9 720 3320 217 3.0 3.785 5760 . " 0.01 7.6 6.1 10 710 3260 218 2.9 3.766 6200 0.01 .7.6 6.5 11 650 3280 198 3.0 4.939 6460 0.01 7.5 6.2 12 350 2020 173 1.1 5.492 5160 0.06 6.9 6.1 13 600 2760 217 1.1 3.636 8240 0.05 7.5 7.8 .. 14 610 2700 226 1.9 3.465 7940 . 0.01 7.5 7.5 15 600 2680 224 4.7 3.542 5'680 . 0.01 7.5 7.5 16 670 3040 220 3.6 3.521 5580 ..... 0.04 7.5 6.3 17 '. 680 3020 225 4.0 3.326 5560 . 0.01 8.0 6.3 . 18 680 3180 214 3.1 3.54 .6540 jlOl 7.8 .. 6.3 19 - ..... 400 1880 213 0.4 5.185 7600 0.01 7.5 7.0 .' . 20 500 2120 236 1.0 4.331 . 4080 0.06 7.7 7.2 21 500 2660 188 2.4 3 4900 0.01 7.6 7.6 22 750 3200 . 234 3.1 2.819 7620 0.01 7.7 6.9 23 800 3160 253 3.2 2.911 6600 , 0.03 7.5 6.9 . 24 580 2760 210 3.1 4.207 5720 0.01 7.4 6.8 25 780 2640 295 2.9 3.365 5820 ',/, 0.01 7.5 7.4 26 760 3200 238 1.1 2.787 6660 . 0.05 7.4 7.3 27 770 2960 260 2.4 3.536 6400 0.05 ..' 7.6 7.6 . 28 780 2920 267 2.8 4.501 6100 . 0.01 .'. 7.6 7.3 29 790 3100 255 3.5 3.594 5660 0.01 7.5 7.3 '. 30 790 3200 247 2.8 3.714 7140 0.01 7.6 6.6 , " Ava. 637 2924 218 2.5 3.9924 6308 0.0217 . 6.9 Max. 800 3420 295.45 4.7 5.971 8240 " . '. 0.06 . 8.0 7.8 Min. 350 1880 146.67 0.4 2.787 4080 , 0.01 6.9 6 Data 0 0 30 30 30 30 0 30 30 0 0 0 30 0 30 30 0 Comments for the Month (major repairs, breakdowns. process upsets and their causes,inplant treatment process bypass, etc.): : : , Monthly Report of Operation ~~~ ~/~ /dh,/d,/ Activated Sludge Type \JrsIm ~o~t) I:; ~/;ZC;/ Wastewater Treatment Plant Name of F ac;lily Permit Number For Month Of: Year City of Jeffersonville WWTP IN0023302 November 2004 (SIGNA'TURE OF PR~CIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR / (tlA TEl r Page 3 of 4 State Form 10829 (R/1-2004) AUTHORIZED AGENT) , FINAL EFFLUENT " >" Flow BOD Total Suspended,Solids Ammonia Other 0 :>. ... ro '>. Q) en en ::e :>. c ro :>'Q) '" '" ro 0 Q) Q) , , E E Q) ;g .0 Q) ::::: ::::::g, "0 Q) '0 " Ol ::::::~ ro Ol Ol - Ol 01 '" --01 U .r; ~ l:1:!. en ::e ro I I ro , I ro O1ro '" ro 'E ~ Ol.... '" '" .... '" '" .... '" <J) .... E E .... :f! .0 .... E 0 o Q) E E g! :f! .0 Q) :2 "0 Q) :2 "0 Q) I I g! , - Q) 0 - > - > '5~ '5~ I > g :2: u: 1.4. ll'l ll'l:>. (/) (/):>. (/) (/):>. '2 c :>. '2 c :>. '0 a a- 0 a- ,32 ,32 0 0- 0 0- U Q)O Cl~ o~ o~ ci. ci. E E~ E E~ .2~ ::J Cl 0 0 g.Cl g.Q) ;;; :>. rn~ co ~~ co B~ '" ~~ '" ~~ E ~~. E ~~ 0 ro It::2: :::s :::s (I) a w~ c..> u (/) (/) <( < u.. 1 7.698 2.1 '134'.9 5 321.2 0.0538 3.4561 1115 2 12.783 5 533.37 6.8 725.38 0.0536 5.7177 880 3 7.18 5.9 353.51 8.4 503.3 0.116 6.9504 6550 4 7.287 0.7 42.567 2 121.62 0.0511 3.1074 1450 5 5.289 2.1 92.687 5.6 247.17 0.0813 '.' 3.5883 1485 6 5.239 7.17057 2.4 2.9286 104.93 193.22 5.6 5 244.83 318.07 0.0529 0.0658 2.3128 3.8829 1325 7 4.878 1.7 69.202 6.2 252.38 0.0613 2.4953 . , 45 8 5.37 4.9 219.58 5.2 233.03 0.0551 2.4692 . 335 9 4.997 7.1 296.07 8.2 341.94 0.0541 .' 2.256 30 10 4.779 5.5 219.34 4.4 175A8 0.0481 . 1.9183 . 60 11 15.715 4.1 537.68 4.2 550.8 0.0569 7.462 90 12 11.069 14 1293.2 258 23832 0.618 57.085 2020 13 6.177 7.56929 5.4 6.1 278.35 416.2 11.2 42.486 577,33 3708.9 OA15 0,1869 21.392 13.583 290 14 5.367 2.5 111.97 10.4 465.79 0.0881 3.9458 70 15 5.233 4.2 183.41 5.2 227.08 ' 0.0442 1.9302 . 45 16 5.338 5.4 240.55 8.4 374;18 0.0399 1.7774 , 305 17 5.238 7.3 319.09 7 305.98 .' 0.0053 0,2317 ..' 330 18 8.429 3.7 26026 5.6 393.9 0.0559 , 3.932 . 82Q 19 11.945 6.2 618.02 .' 10.2 1016.7 0.149 14~852 1950 . "'.': 20 7.98 7.07571 4.9 4.8857 326.31 294.23 67.5429 399.56 454.75 0.218 0.0858 14.517 5.8838 , 1025 21 6.014 2.9 145.54 7.4 371.38 0.0914 .' 4.5871 445 22 5.867 . 2.8 137.09 4 195.84 0.0582 2.8495 300 .' 23 6,385 6.3 335.68 4.4 ' 234A4 0.0302 1.6091 360 24 8.014 5.8 387.89 8.4 .' 561.77 0.108 7.2227 ". . 710 25 5.979 4.1 204.57 5 249A7 0.0,9 4.4905 710 26 5.055 3.9 164.52 7.2 .' 303.72 0.0716 3.0204 5 27 . 6.45 6.252 6 4.5429 322.95 242.61 5.6 6 301.42 316.86 0.05 0.0713 2.6913 3.7815 .' .... 50 28 4 .. 3.1 . 103.48 6.4 213.63 0.0718 2.3967 50 ' , 29 5.665 3.9 184.37 3.4 . 160:13 ....... 0.067 3.1674 .' 30 30 7.581 5.9 373.25 4.4 278.36 0'.121 7.6549 150 AVg 6.9667 4.7 286.48 14,7 11:39.3 0.1 6.7029 " .: 571.2 Max 15.715 7.56929 14 6.1 1293.2 416.2 258 42.486 23832 3708.9 0',618 0.1869 57.085 13.583 ..... 2020 Min 4 6.252 0.7 2.9286 42.567 193.22 2 5 '121.62 316.86 U.d053 0.0658 0.2317 3.7815 ',. 5 Data 30 4 30 4 30 4 30 4 30 4 30 4 30 4 0 30 Percent Removal Primary Treatment Secondary Treatment Tertia Treatment Overall Treatment S.S. NA NA NA 92.9 TdtalMonthly Flow: (milHongallons) 209 Percent Capacity (actual flow/design) 134% r ! n",' t J n ',' Monthly Report of Operation ~ -1 ~;;t?It1 / t:X ~ I It'll Activated Sludge Type ~NA'~~EDD~DR) 1lZ Wastewater Treatment Plant Name of Facility Pennit Number For Month Of: Year - 1;7/109 City of Jeffersonville IN0023302 November 2004 (SIGNATUREOF:1~CIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 04 / (Date) Page 4 of 4 State Form 10829 (R/1-2004) A HORIZED AGENT) SLUDGE TO 'DIGESTER OPERATION DIGESTER Anaerobic Only c: e 0, Cl "0 g> '" "0 :: ~ e <II <Il 1'0 ro E 'E 1ii 'E u; .t; , .... U') 0 <II 0 <Il J:. <II "00 0 (,) Cl u 0) ~ \ Cl .co E is .E 0 "0 , ,1:: g u. ~~ 0- <II :::l I coo, .!: .S .5 .5 ,ell .c 0) en .Q 0 _ x 0) C "0 U-C- ~ c E ~~ '" U> "t:J :::l0 .0 e .gJ~ :5! :5! ::l 0 ,::l X .a ro-' ~ eng tio -c . _ ro .!!!z .- " .- " O~ O~ iii <(~ o- f! ro0 ro ' 0 I 0 I cn ", . CJ) OJ "C 0 C::'..... ....u.. <II e .... eM en (I) en <II ~Cl) ~Cl) Cl) <Il X 2 x 0. (,) a. :D 0 ....J: _0) _ Cl u;cn ~Z :;:: 0)' :;= 0) >- E-' III . 1Il:.o E a. . <Il"O ro"O 1'0"0 1'0"0 eIlZ <Il- - ::l - :::l <Il oc cu s:~ J: <Il :::l ~ ::l ~ ::l .... 0- 0- -::l -::l .2'0 0_ 0_ 0 0.0 a. 0U en.c eno I-en I-en >cn >cn 01- 1 0.135 18067 0.64 42.6 2 0.135 3 0.125 18433 46.4 4 0.125 22.6 " 5 0.125 , 18033 0.68 0.62 46.8 6 '" 0.125 7 0.125 8 0.125 18967 0.67 0.61 9 0.12 45.1 10 0.126 19600 0.67 0.61 23.1 11 0.131 46.5 12 0.1 17767 0.73 0.63 13 0.125 , 14 0.125 15 0.11 17633 43.8 16 0.1 23.6 17 0.096 18133 0.69 0.71 23.4 , 18 0.096 22.7 " 19 0.096 18333 0.72 0.61 23.4 20 0.085 21 0.085 22 0.085 18867 0.71 0.62 23.1 23 0.114 22.1 24 0.114 22,5 25 0.114 , 26 0.11 : , 18567 0.72 0.63 27 0.11 28 0.11 29 , 0.11 , 19100 0.68 0.63 44.2 30 0.11 Avg. 0.1131 ," 1< 18458 1 1 32.619 " Max. 0.135 19600 0.73 0.71 46.8 Min. 0.085 17633 0.64 0.61 22.1 Data 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 ' 10 9 16 0 0 Send completed forms by the 28th of the month to: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF WATER QUALITY, DATA MANAGEMENT SECTION P.O. BOX 6015 INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46206-6015 . .... ~. - . -. - - ,..,-......... .:. .., -:'L';']TTEC:,~jE/AC~~,,=jS:~:21 :~:,:,:kTIO~~:::JOlLl~:~:ll DISC~:6E Et.7~I~JTIONI~~~1EM;~;~~S) .!':!~_'!'_~~_~_~f~~~~9!.!~!~~_M..l:!~!~!gE.'-?.If___2 DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (DMR) .~~~~~~:__?Q1_Q~E.~p!~_~_'3_q~!!__________ IN0023302 DOtA .~~!.f~~~~~Y!~~.!_~':!9J~_':!~_i?.'!_~9_____________ PERMIT NUMBER DISCHARGE NUMBER .f..~~!~!Y~_}"~!f~!~~~YJ!I~_~_~~J~Jp_~~.e!.?___ .~q~E.~9_':!~_~_~f~~~~9_':!~!~~.!_!~flJ~':!~_i?.:1..~9_ .~~~~_!J!I'~~~y_~_,g~~~~!!!~,g~:.r.!l~~_q_Qg~rator PARAMETER (32-37) OXYGEN, DISSOLVED (DO) 00300 1 1 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE pH 00530 1 1 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE NITROGEN, AMMONIA TOTAL (AS N) 00610 1 1 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE CYANIDE, TOTAL (ASCN) 00720 GOO RAW SEWAGE/INFLUENT CYANIDE, TOTAL (AS CN) 00720 1 0 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE CHROMIUM, TOTAL (ASCr) 01034 GOO RAW SEWAGEIINFLUENT Mayor of Jeffersonville TYPED OR PRINTED ...*... .....*. .......*.... ........ ....... FORM APPROVED OMB NO.2040-0004 1139 (26) ......, 42 3424.8<,27.0, MO, AVG. 7 DAY MAx. I mg/L 1111I11I1I11111~ III~ II~I ~III ~III ~IIIIIIIII~ 1I1~ 11111 1m IIIIIIIIIIII~ II~ IIIIII11 , I N 0 0 23 30 2 0 0 1 All 0 4 , ,.. NO DISCHARGE Ll'" NOTE: Read instructions before completing this form. Loading Quality or Concentration (46-53) (54-61) Average I Maximum ~" '. (3.C. ard Only) Quantity or (46-53) (54-61) Average Maximum SAMPLE MEASUREMENI ,..,.., PERMIT REQUIREMEN SAMPLE MEASUREMENI ..**,** 00400 1 0 0 PERMIT EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN SOLIDS, TOTAL SUSPENDED SAMPLE MEASUREMEN PERMIT REQUIREMEN SAMPLE MEASUREMEN PERMIT REQUIREMEN SAMPLE MEASUREMEN' ,**.**, PERMlTn REQUIREMEN SAMPLE I MEASUREMEN' ,..,**, PERMIT REQUIREMEN SAMPLE MEASUREMENI ****'" PERMIT REQUIREMEN Unit (38.45) Minimum .*.t:*.. ...*.*.. 7.8 REPORT . . DAILY MAX. 6.3 ~ bAII:-a.1IN.I'< **'*'" ...t:t:.* .t:..*** 6.9 I *.*.*** N1IN~~uM'I.' ',~,,*,** 8.0 9.0. MAXIMUM (26) I 6.7 13.5 285.4 570.8 MO. A VG. 7 DAY MAX. I Ibs.lday ....... ***.*** , I catify urnkr ~nahy of law lhllllhi$ dottU\llnl and allllUachffil."n~ WaJ: prepared WKkr my , ! dir<<uon or supervision in a<:e;ordance with a system designed to llSSUrc that qll:alific< NAMElTITLE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER pen""nelpfO(><flyg.theronulev,'u"ethe;nlo.m"i""wbm;u<d. B...donmyinquUyuf R b W . . , the pt:rSOOli who manage 1m: system, or those persons'di(<<t1y reSponsible for 8athering lb.: o . alz : infOnnalio..o'einfom'''ion'Ubmitledi~I.Ib.. ~~Slofmy~wtcdgc~~c1icr.truf' , accurlllr:.nd comp....tl:. ,11U1l11w8f1:lhallha-e w-e 5lgruliclUlt penalllcs for $Ubmlltmg false 'l infonn..tion. including the possibility of fine or imprisonment fOf blowing violations' ... m .... .. ..mmmmm....m..m.ml *."...*.',; *****..' I ....... .****** ...*... **.*..* <.005 <.005 I': REPORT. REPORT .... :;:'MO;AVG.' :.DAILY MAX. I mg/L ....*.. <.005 .0.016. ; DAILY MAx. ..***** '" '-' I {. (Reference a/l attachments here) COMMENT AND EXPLANATION OFANY VIOLA nONS DISCHARGE TO OHIO RIVER NO. EX Unit 1(62.6 Frequency of analysis (64.68) (19) DAILY DAILY .' .... DAILY ..." DAILY DAILY DAILY DAILY DAILY o mg/L (12) o SU (19) (19) o mg/L (19) o TWICE/MONTH TWfcEtMONTH (19) mg/L o WEEKLY WEEKLY (19) TWICE/MONTH 24 hr. COMPo o mg/L I 'TWICE/MONTH 1;:'2411,,; COMPo . TELEPHONE DATE Clark County EPA FORM 3320-1 (REV. 08-95) Previous editions may be used. (REPLACES EPA FORM T-40 WHICH MAY NOT BE USED.) ',Ji PAGE 1 OF 3 , ..' =-1 . <n=:J" "J . PERMITTEE NAME/ADDRESS: _~_~!!I!:~_~!:f!~L~~!:l_~~~~_~~n.i~Jp-,~~~:.r~____. Address: 701 Champion Road -je-fferson-vnre~inaraii-a-4:n30------------' -----------~---------------------------------_. _~..c!~!I!!Y_~_~!:tf~!..~~n.~~!~_~~_f!LSiB~Lf!:I~___. .~~~~~!~!:l_:__~~_f!~E~_~!.l~i!~~!.l!:l!:!L~~~:!?_~~Q. .~~!.l~__"I!~~~bL~:...9E?_"Y!9!_~!...9!:r_t!~~_~_9..e.erator PARAMETER (32-37) CHROMIUM, TOTAL RECOVERABLE 01118 1 0 0 EFFLUENT.GROSS VALUE COPPER, TOTAL (AS CuI 01042 GOO RAW SEWAGEIINFLUENT ZINC, TOTAL (AS Zn) 01094 1 0 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE COPPER, TOTAL RECOVERABLE 01119 1 0 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE FLOW, WASTEWATER BY- PASSING TREATMENT 50049 1 0 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE FLOW, IN CON.DUIT OR. THRUTREATMENT PLANT 50050 1 0 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE [)< <""-'1 =""':J ~~J -"'''1 --.', NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (DMR) IN0023302 I I 001A PERMIT NUMBER DISCHARGE NUMBER . .......1 ..l-r"'] FORM APPROVED OMS NO.2040-0004 '---, IIIIIIIII~III~ III~ 1IIIIIIIIIIilll~lIlll1ll1ll1ll~ 111111111111111111 il~ 1111111111111 . IN 0 0 23 3 0 2 0 0 1 Al I 0 4 . NO. EX Unit 1(62.6 (19) mg/L (19) (19) mg/L (19) I 0 mg/L (19) I 0 mg/L ....... r ******. Frequency of analysis (64-68) o WEEKLY ... NO DIS~HARGE ,_,... NOTE: Read instructions before completing this form. EPA FORM 3320-1 (REV. 08-95) Previous editions may be used. (REPLACESEPA FORM T-40 WHICH MAY NOT BE USED.) (3 Card Only) Quantity or (46-53) (54.61) Average I Maximum Loading 1{4 Card Only) (38-45) Unit I Minimum Quality . or (46.53) Average Concentration (54-61) Maximum SAMPLE MEASUREME PERMIT REQUIREMEN SAMPLE MEASUREME PERMIT REQUIREMEN SAMPLE MEASUREME 01092 GOO PERMIT RAW SEWAGE/INFLUENT REQUIREMEN ZINC, TOTAL RECOVERABLE SAMPLE MEASUREME PERMIT REQUIREMEN SAMPLE MEASUREME PERMIT REQUIREMEN SAMPLE MEASUREME PERMIT REQUIREMEN SAMPLE MEASUREME PERMIT, REQUIREMEN .-if".,;...* ..t..*.. -**...- <.01 . .....0.25 I,DAIL YMAX. WEEKLY o TWICE/MONTH TWICE/MONTH I 24hr.COMP. 24 hr. COMPo o TWICE/MONTH Sample Type (6MO) 24 hr. COMPo .... 24'hr~ COMPo .' 24 hr. COMPo 24 hr. COMP, 24 hr. COMPo 24'hr. COMPo 24 hr. COMPo 24 hr. COMPo - . ....*** .....*. ......1lr .,tl"".*** I 111...*.* TWICE/MONTH WEEKLY WEEKLY WEEKLY WEEKLY .....*. 6,97 7.57 (03) ....... ......., 0 REPORT REPORT, '" .' ".;. ~()~ ft.y~. ..... ?Dft.X..~~~~<3D...,...::~.~~~Im~ . I certify under penally orlaw lhallhis doument and all aUathments were prepared under i NAMEfTlTLE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE I mydi'edioo",",opcrvi,iooio.ccordaocc:wilh. 'Y".n.....igO<d '0''''''' lhalqoalifi'" i Ro b Wa iz personnel properly gal her and evaluate the infonnalion. su~mjlled. B~sed on my i~uJl}' of] lhe persons who IlllInagc thc i)'SICm, orthosc persons dU\X1I)' rcsporulblc forgathennl): the! infonnalion, lhe infom1!llion 5ubmittcd is:, to lhe best of Dl)"knowlcdge and belief, triac. ; Mayor of Jeffersonville ' ",.or...and compl.... lam.war.lhallh.,,~.,ignili.anlpen.lli..ro".bmilling! SIGNATURE OF PRI CIPAL EXECUTIVE . .. 'ral5t informalion,lncludin8Jhe possibility of 'illt. or imprisonment for knowing violations.! TYPED ORPRINTED .,! OFFICER OR AU HORIZED.AGENT YEAR MODAY .....** *...... ....... 0.055 REPORT ,: MO. A VG; 0.070 REPORT DAILY MAX. I mg/L ..*.... ."...11 *.*.... I ******* *.***** *****.* ******* ******* **...** ******* ******* ****.*. ****.*. .***..*. .*..... ******* - .*..... I . (BO) *...**. ....... 0.080 REPORT .~~*.... DAILY' MAX. ***.*.* .***.*. 0.032 0.050 .: 1::.0.19 "'./.0.33../ MO. AVG. DAILY MAX. ...**** .....*.':' ..."If.** ....... <.01 <.01 0.02" '. ..0.03. ,MO. AVG; > DAILY MAX. ..**..* n/a OPTIONAL MO. TOTAL ******. ******. ******* "''''*_TnTf.'' MGAUMO. COMMENT AND EXPLANATION OF ANY VIOLATIONS DISCHARGE TO OHIO RIVER (Reference all attachments here) DAILY DAILY TELEPHONE Clark County CONTINUOUS CONTINUOUS' DATE PAGE 2 OF 3 ""'C;~.1ITT~~~ME/;':~~~SS: ....."'.:~lrIO;;--;bLLU;;;;~DISC~;KJE EL~;~A\IOrf-~~-~iEM ~;Dds) .!:'!~!!:'~~_~~f!~!~~~~i!~~}~!':!!1J~l!?~t~Tf____ DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (DMR) . .~~2!~!!~~_Xg_~_y~~!!:,p"i~~_~~?_q__________ IN0023302 I 001A Jenersonville. Indiana 47130 PERMIT NUMBER DISCHARGE NUMBER 'Faa~fy:-jeffersonvmeMliniCrparSTP"-- .--------------------------------------------- .~~~?J!~~_:__~~_f!~!~_~~yJ!I~,_!!:l~i~~~_~?~_~g_ .~t.!!1:__!!~~~~L~_~!~~P!..q~,g~r:.t!~~_qg.E~rator PARAMETER " (32-37) CHLORINE, TOTAL RESIDUAL 50060 1 1 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE COLIFORM, FECAL GENERAL 74055 1 20 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE BOD, CARBONACEOUSS- DAY, 20 C. 80082 1 2 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE BYPASS OF TREATMENT 80998 1 0 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE FLOW, TOTAL 82220 1 0 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE None None SAMPLE MEASUREMEM ....... PERMIT REQUIREMEN I ....... SAMPLE MEASUREMEN ....... PERMIT REQUIREMEN I ....... SAMPLE MEASUREMEN PERMIT REQUIREMEN SAMPLE MEASUREME n/a Pi::RMIT OPTIONAL REQUIREMEN MO. TOTAL SAMPLE MEASUREMEN ....... PERMIT REQUIREMEN I ....... SAMPLE MEASUREMENI PERMIT REQUIREMEN SAMPLE MEASUREMEN PERMIT REQUIREMEN ....... ....... Loading 1<4 Card Only) Quality or Concentration (38-45) (46-53) (54-61) Unit I Minimum I Average IMaximum It...... 0.022 0.06 0.06 0.06 ,.MO.AVG. DAILY MAX. .*.**** *.**.... 571 .2000 MO. 1\ : AVG. I (26) 5 6 ,', ... 15.0.. 23.0 MO. AVG. 7 DAY MAX, I mg/L 286 416 2854.0 4376.0 MO. AVG. 7 DAY MAX.llbs./day COMMENT AND EXPLANA TIONOF~ANY VIOLATIONS DISCHARGETO OHIO RIVER ...***. (84) ........ DAYS/MO. .~. ", ;;~, f~:';:.~**** I ft......* .,.: ........' 209 REPORT MO. TOTAL I MGAL (3R) ....... ....... ..****. .*.**** l c. ti...... . --"1 P, W'" 1- FORM APPROVED OMB NO.2040-0004 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII~ III~ 1111111111111 ill 11111 111111111 11111 ~m 11111111 ~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII . I " 0 0 Z 3 3 0 ZOO I All 04. ... NO DISCHARGE LI". . NOTE: Read instructions before completing this form. NO. EX Unit 1(62.6 Frequency of analvsis (64.68) Sample Type (69-70) (19) GRAB o DAILY mg/L DAILY I GRAB - DAILY ""1 . GRAB DAILY GRAB DAILY 24 hr. COMPo DAILY 24 hr. COMPo - (13) o 1I/100mL (19) o ******* I 0 .**...tlCE MOr BCCTOT ~'~I <<ttify wKki p:llalty uhllw thlll thi5doul1"Wnlllr~...;ff~it~~iUneiji.$. were prtparod under my 1. diredion or liupc:rvi5ion in accordance wilh a s)'5tc:m designed 10 assure lhat qualified NAMElTITLE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE! p."""""lpropc.!yg.th<r"Nl,,,,,,,,.lheu,[onn"ioo.ubmiu<ol. IhKdoumyinqu;,yof . ; the per50nS who manage the system. or those persons directly responsible for gathering the Rob Walz I infonnaliOn.lhe Infoonalion suhmiUed is. 10 the: beSt army knowledge and belief, true, aCCUfllle and iMiplt."Ie. ., am awarlillhat there are !IignilicBru penalties for aubmitling false inlhnllatltm. ill.:ludinl( 11.'L" 1)(I~liihiliIY o( tint: urilllllri!itmmClllliH" ImnwluH violalillll!l:~ OFFICER 0 AUTHORIZED AGENT AREA cope NUMB . YEAR Mayor of Jeffersonville TYPED OR PRINTED (Reference all allachmen/s here) TELEPHONE DATE Clark County EPA FORM 3320-1 (REV. 08-95) Previous editions may be used. (REPLACES EPA FORM T -40 WHICH MAY NOT BE USED.) PAGE 3 OF 3 r- i Indiana Department of Environmental Management Land Use Section - OSHWM Land Application Monthly Report - Biosolids and Industrial Waste Products >>Comp/ete and submit tit is form to IDEM eaclt report month<< Year: L.A. Permit No.IN LA: ethods of Disposal Utilized: , ~ . Indicate by an "X:" which disposal methods were utilized this month and provide volumes for eachmethbd. Only include amounts for those materials which you are PERMITTED to land apply. . o biosolids were disposed, by land application or other methods, this month ,:,;*".:t::,:,:,..~.,.:~_.,~._,.<. . .. ')';'i~:::.0~~"i.,'BlOS0l1ds were land applIed thIS month '~::';;:f;:;~')~Dewatered biosolids were used at the treatment works grounds this month iosolids were landfilled this inonth .;~t~Biosolids were disposed by the method listed below this month ethod: ;..... Dry Tons NA fthe total volume listed above, whatvolume was transported outofIndiana? It' ::2. 0 industrial waste products were disposed, by land application or other methods, this month Industrial waste products were land applied this month Industrial waste products w~re landfilled this month tf:;([;~'nt:i~T~rIndustrial waste products were disposed by the method listed below this month ethod: . . . .. Timothy L.Cra:wford Printed Name ~.~~. ","."" ,",,:".r ,'- ," ,~siJityjYlah~ger . itle DecemberJ3,2004 Date l' NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) / CSO DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (CSO DMR) IS~~[fi9rm;,~1l?4q;;(~"'B;,1J_l!1 .~:- "f!f%ififJ!i%=fJefferson~iIIe ..... _.~~ of 5 . na~J\I~ Jeffersonville POTW~~nn~~y.IIlI:l~.~ IN0023302 1111104 to 11130104 .. '~_~._t~fl1:~~1 ~_mJQl 22.5 Measured/Metered (M) 0 . e~ified.(F'leaseatic1c:h methodsused'.j;"'" ....... ........ r t ON 0.6 " 8.83 18.00 UE 1.1 14.64 25.00 WED 0.25 7.53 15.00 THU 0 6.67 9.00 FRJ 0 5.3 9.00 SAT 0 5.13 9.10 . SUN 0 4.838 &90 MON 0 4.48 8.90 TUE 0 4.404 9.00 WED 0 4.575 9.00 THU 2.5 19.172 25.00 FRI 0 9.621 14.50 SAT 0 5.874 10.10 SUN 0 5.362 10.00 MON 0 5.307 9.50 TUE 0 5;113 9.10 WED 0 5.018 9.10 THU 1.35 10.384 25.00 FRI 0.3 13.16 25.00 SAT 0 7.047 16.50 SUN 0 5.858 10.00 MON 0.1 5.868 12.50 TUE 0.5 6.986 18.50 WED 0 8.839 10.50 THU 0.1 5.544 10.10 FRI 0 5 9.10 SAT 0.45 7.288 11.50 SUN 0 5.309 9.50 MON 0.05 5.377 9.50 TUE 0.5 8.256 14.50 CSO Outfall No. 003 CSO Outfall No. 005 l; . . . .' ./ .' .. .. . -:- Ir ". - . . . . . . . . .' I,~~"."""""",:~~",, . .80 '~da,., E~""'''t''''/'''O' 'ffo:~~~,.""..th"O~" . n/a 0:00 0.00 n/a N,y"",,.u.'OI;, an !....I xecu IVe', . IceC;Oli"U 0 I{Timothv L. Crawford (812)285-6451 .'. .... ..tll.CERil~YUNDER PENALTY OF LAw THATTHIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTSWERE'PREPARE[).UNDERMY[)IRECTI6N.O~SOPERVI$lbNIN ........... ..., 7:- f 1~;~~~6~N;;:~~I:Ys;~~~~..~~~~;;~ X~~~~~1~~HTtTE~~~~~~6~f~~~~NpEir!s6~~~~~gh~~~stWN;iE31~U:~[m.f~~~~:~~~~.:~:~~~~; c'-TJ-!E INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS, TO THE BEST OF MYKNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, TRUE', ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE. .1 AM AWARETfli\Tni~RE,<\RE,' 'I SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES ,FOR" SUBMITTING F ALsEINFORMA nON,INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING\ifOLATIONs. !.I stanat~~tif~~aD~l.iEXee{!ti!il~ . .' . . J {--;~_. t;:r} 7- ~;' _/ P /~//1/d4 ,T",/' ~ tL, 0.00 0.00 1- ~City of Jeffersonville ~,.. ".,'uw<-:';" n"_,>>;" '. < '"10111''' .' l(aCl.,;)~ Jeffersonvliie POTW peimffiN'uiiili.. . ..' iN0023302 _~iilW~_~'.,*m%4\lVffii~__tm ~"!llQ\C$Ot . .... ."'ge,'oc;trjl(t~ ~"oQito ,'ng:lftr. 04~~ ,MlbOt'tjt. 0:.M'MlDoiyY}j1L~-fit./ ~ )}ti%~~~ 11/1/04 to 11/30/04 .;.ll >>' ". Measured/Metered IMl or Estimated lEI must be sl>eclfled. iPlease attach methods used.l " CSO Outfall No 006 CSO Outfall No 007 CSO Outfall No 008 CSO Outfall No 009 N TUEll ED THL FRI SA SU~ .n . N UE ED . THL FRI SA . SU~ . rr MON TUE ED THL FRI SA '.' SU~ . ON TUE ED THU FRI SA SU~ MON . TUE n1a ~., 0.00 0.00 Tlmothv L. Crawford . . 812\285.6451 I CERTIFY UNDE~ PENAL TV OF. LAW THAT nuS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS WEREPREPARE,OUNDe~,MY DIRECTiON .OR~UPEFtViStON IN ACCORDANc:EWlTH A SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIED pERSONNEL PROPERLYGATHpR ,A.ND EVALUATE 1Hp INFOR~TIONSUElMITTED.BASED 9N MY iNQUIR'(OF THE PERSONS WHO ~AGETHE SYSTEM OR THOSE PERSONS DIRECTLY R,ESPONSIBLE FORGATH,ERING THpINF6RMATI9~; THEINFORMATI(:m SUBMITTED IS; TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEUEF,TRUE, ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE. J AM AWARE THAt't'HEREARE'SIGflUF1CA.NT PENAL TIES FOR SUBMITTING FALSE . INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING VIOLATIONS. // .., /'~ ~ . V 'L/ /' I / . NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) CSO DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (CSO DMR) ADDITIONAL OVERFLOWS PAGE " 'I$RE~~"""'1 I.. ....... r-, c-; NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) eso DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (CSO DMR) ADDITIONAL OVERFLOWS PAGE t~~~1 Ii 3 of 5 C '" City of Jeffersonville , Jeffersonville POTW . j~-.IIII' IN0023302 PermRNumr:. '.'" .' .... ,,,,w', ......, ".',t .." ...;,.!t,,~oc . ,..'c'", !'$\-:lf_\__~k~~ ....~~t"~__1'1I111/1/04 to 11/30/04 ChecitbOX' "j 'cs <~ffil ei!!C .. ilO~.m8jmoniiL, .', ' ., " Measured/Metered IMl or Estimated E must besDsclfled. IPlease attach methods used.l .. eso Outfall No 010 Outfall No 011 CSO Outfall No 013 :30am E 1.00 E 0.01 E 8:30am E 1.00 E 0.01 8:30am E 1.00 E 0.Q1 E TUE 1 0:30am E 3.00 E 0:03 E 1 0:30am E 3.00 E 0.Q3 1 0:30am E 3.00 E 0.03 E ED THU FRI SAT SUII ON TUEll ED THU 12:30om E 10.50 E 0.11 E 12:30om E 10.50 E 0.11 E 12:30om E 10.50 E 0.11 E FRI SAT SUN TT N TUE 0 THU FRI 12:00am E 4.00 E 0.04 E SA . ,. SU~ I ON TUE ED THL FRI SAT '" SUII ON n1a 14.00 0.15 n1a 1 0,15 0.00 0.00 n1a ~.. i. . Tlmothv L. Crawford 812)285-6451 r I CERTIFY UNOER PENA,LTY OF LAW THAT THIS, OOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS WERE PREPARED UNOERMY OIRECTIONOR SUPERVISION IN ACCOROANce"""TH A , SYSTEM OESIGNEO TO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIEO PERSONNEL PROPERLY GATHER AND EVALUATE THE INFORMATION SUBMiTTEO. BASEO ON ' . "~r ~ ~ - V" ...~ / I / 1- r; \ I NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) CSO DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (CSO DMR) ADDITIONAL OVERFLOWS PAGE r~1 .ICity of Jeffersonville . .. ....Whm'WM 4 of 5 . ... Jeffersonville POTW ~023302 i~l'~~ 1111f04 to 11f30104 1'If'lflnoi, . ll\:~r:uI'1'\iQ'r~1 .... .. MeasuredfMetered 1M) or Estimated IEl must be soeclfled. IPlease attach methods used.l " CSO Outfall No 014 " CSO Outfall No 015 CSO Outfall No 016 CSO Outfall No 017 MON TUEll ED THL FRI SA SU~ MON ... .. TUE ED . THU FRI SAT SUN r ON TUEll ED THL FRI SA SU~ MON TUEll ED THU FRI SAT SUN N TUEll . . ~ nfa 0.00 0.00 . Timothy L. Crawford B12\2B5~451 . I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS WERE PREPARED UNDER MY D.IRECnON OR SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A ... SYSTEM DESIC:;NED TO ASSURE.THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNELPROPERL Y GATHER AND EVALUATE.THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED. BASED ON .~ ~ .......... t/ / J .. 1:.- n t } NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) CSODISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (CSO DMR) ADDITIONAL OVERFLOWS PAGE I~~I .~~I , 'v_",,- '''--~.. -~"" ~'". " cItY' City of Jeffersonville 5 of 5 Faa Jeffersonville POTW. ~.. . . . .Il.... . .. . IN0023302 , ',PI 'Ill ,p ~ MlDD 0; MlOD,' 11/1/041011/30/04 ~.,,~ '. .. "., Measured/Metered IMl or Estimated lEI mu"'. h" '''eclfled. 'Please attach methods used.l , . MON TUE1110:30am M 3.00 M 0.06 E WED THL FRI SAT SUf\ MON ..' .c., TUEll . ED ITHL 12:30om M 10.50 M 0.21 E FRI SAT SUf\ r MON TUell ED THL FRI 12:00am M 4.00 M 0.08 E SAT , SUf\ .. MON Tuell ED .. THU FRI SA SU~ MON i : nia 17.50 0.35 nia 0.00 nia 0.00 0.00 nia 0.00 0.00 Tlmolhv L. Crawford 8121285-6451 . I CE~TIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS WERE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION OR.SUPERVISION IN. ACCORDANCE WITH A i' SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PRO PERL Y GATHER AND EVALUATE THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED. BASED ON . ..: ~ .<"~ sriiil',;'o' ,. __ --/ ~ c:.. L.7 ./ / "/ .~ , L.,cu..,.1 n 'I ';.,.1 l.: Attachment G Locations of Footage Cleaned o n ~ ;n n n o IT uJ rr~ [ r~