HomeMy WebLinkAbout09) September
Ww l'
JEFFERSONVILLE
WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILI
Monthly Operations ReI
September, 2005
Prepared for:
Peggy Wilder
November 7, 2005
..
DATE: NOVEMBER 7, 2005
JEFFERSONVILLE SANITARY SEWER BOARD
JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)
DOWNTOWN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
I. INTRODUCTION
The Sanitary Sewer Board of the City of Jeffersonville, Indiana, will accept Statements of
Qualifications for Professional Engineering Services related to the design, permitting,
preparation of construction documents, assistance in bidding, and resident inspection
services of an expansion to its Wastewater Treatment Facility, located at 701 Champion
Road.
The downtown WWTP is currently being expanded to a dry weather capacity of 6.0 mgd, and
has an ultimate potential expansion capability of 12.0 mgd (dry weather flow).
The project includes an expansion of the existing treatment plant from 6 mgd ADF to 9 mgd
ADF and 25 mgd PHF to 34 mgd PHF. Expansion envisions improvements to mechanical
screening, grit removal, final clarifiers, RAS pumping, UV disinfection and post aeration.
facilities, and a new effluent sewer. The proj ect also will address minor modifications to the
existing facilities including odor control, equipment upgrade and administration facilities
expansion.
Questions regarding this project and the RFQ shall be directed to Robert E. Miller, City
Engineer, at 812-285-6476. The WWTP is operated by EMC , Timothy L. Crawford,
Regional Manager, 812-285-6451, who can be contacted to schedule visits to the facility.
Unscheduled site visits will not be allowed.
SOQ's will be evaluated solely by the Jeffersonville Sewer Board and ranked on the basis of
written materials only. The city may select an engineer on the basis of written materials only,
or may choose to conduct interviews of the two to three highest ranking firms. Once the
evaluation process has been completed, the City will enter into negotiations with the highest
ranked firm. Ifthe parties are unable to negotiate a satisfactory agreement, the second ranked
firm will then be contacted. Once a firm has been selected, all unsuccessful :firms will be
promptly notified.
5,'-5~dne~"WFDOC5\p,opo5aI5"wwtp ..t9-doc
,~ to<
IT. REQUIREMENTS
No prospective individual, firm, or group is permitted to contact any of the Sewer Board
members or any of the elected officials in regard to this proposal. Any inadvertent or
scheduled meeting must not contain any discussion of this proposal. Any questions
regarding the proposal shall be directed to the City Engineer.
Respondents shall comply with all requirements identified in this Request for Qualifications.
Noncompliance with all requirements may be grounds for disqualification.
ITI. SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of services to be provided by the Consultant shall include the following:
1. Design of the wastewater treatment plant expansion.
2. Preparation of any and all required regulatory agency applications, and approvals for
construction.
3. Preparation of construction plans, specifications and contract documents.
4. Assist during bidding, evaluate bids, make recommendations for award, prebid
conference. .
5. Construction observation (inspection) services (general & resident).
IV. STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS
Statements of Qualifications are limited to 25 pages, not including appendix material, and
shall include the following information in the following format:
· COVER SHEET ( Not included in Page Count)
· COVER LETTER - addressed to Mayor Robert L. Waiz, Jr., President, Jeffersonville
Sewer Board (not included in the page count).
. TABLE OF CONTENTS - inCluding page numbering.
. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
. EXPERIENCE - list only relevant experience.
· PROJECT TEAM AND QUALlFICATIONS - include an organization chart with
proposed roles, relevant experience, education, and other qualifications.
· MBEIWBE UTILIZATION - attach firms AAP and a statement of local office's.
diversity.
· PROJECT UNDERSTANDING - brief description of firms' degree of familiarity
with the project and proposed treatment process.
· REFERENCES - include for similar projects only, phone number, address, contact
name.
· APPENDIX - a briefprofile of the firm, resumes for proposed project personnel, and
other information which is pertinent to this proj ect. Inclusion of extraneous material
is discouraged, and such material will not be considered. (Appendix material is not
included in the page count).
Eight (8) copies of the RFQ shall be submitted.
S'5~dne~,.wf'DOC5'f>"'po5aI5"wwtp "'9.doc
..
v. ANTICIPATED TIME LINE
The anticipated consultant selection time line is as follows:
Date
Action
December 12, 2005
Proposals due to Sewer Board, copies will be distributed.
January 9, 2006
Proposals discussed at Sewer Board meeting. Recommendation
for selection of firm or short list for interviews.
(All submitting firms will be notified of selected firm or short-
listed firms.)
January 23,2006
futerview before the Sewer Board, times to be announced. (As
necessary).
February 13, 2006
Contracting with selected firm.
February 27,2006
illitiation of consultant services.
VI. RATING OF QUALIFICATIONS
Responses will be rated in accordance with the following criteria with total maximum points
of 11 0:
Experience (30 points)
Experience with the City of Jeffersonville (10 points)
Similar proj ects completed by firm (10 points)
Similar projects completed by Project Manager with firm (10 points)
Project Team (40 points)
Experience of Project Manager (15 points)
Experience of proposed team members (10 points)
MBE/WBE Utilization (10 points)
Firm AAPILocal Diversity (5 points)
Project Approach (40 points)
The City of Jeffersonville reserves the right to reject any and all responses, to waive any
technicalities, and to negotiate with the respondent of its choosing. The City will not be responsible
or liable for any cost incurred by Consultants in replying to this RFQ.
S'5~dne~"WfDOCS"Pmpo5aI5,wwtp rf9.doc
~
STRAND
ASSOCIATES.INC. "
F. f...1 G'!'N!.; E ~ S
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Rob Waiz, Mayor and Jeffersonville Sewer Board
Mark Sneve, P.E. ~.
November 6, 2005
Review of EMC WWTP Operations - September 2005
We have completed our monthly review of EMC's operations. The following items summarize the attached
memo:
The WWTP received the following percentage of design flows and loadings during September and the previous
12 months:
Se tember
107%
121%
70%
92%
100%
12-month roUin
105%
125%
70%
95%
120%
No permit limit violations occurred during September. Rainfall in the month of September was 1.6-inches, which
is lower than the typical September rainfall of 2.8-inches. The activated sludge process is operating well and
settling has remained good. Process parameters are within acceptable ranges.
Summary of EMC's Activities:
Plant
· Rehabilitation work was completed on plant bar screens.
· The Ennix program used in the digesters performed well during the month.
· RAS pump #3 and Rails were removed from the RAS station for repair.
Pretreatment
· Annual samples were taken at Brinly Hardy.
· Annual inspections were made at Cargo Clean and Brinly Hardy.
Lift Stations and Collection System
· EMC cleaned 8,136 feet of sanitary sewer and 6,252 feet of stormlCSO sewer.
· EMC televised 1,066 feet of sanitary sewer lines.
· All 23 Trouble Spots were cleaned and checked.
· A total of 15 service calls were made in September (all 15 were residence service line back-ups).
· Televising was performed to locate taps and check for damage or root problems.
· EMC vactored out twelve wet wells due to solids and grease buildup.
· Minor repairs were made at five Lift Stations.
· Maintenance was performed on one Vactor truck and one sludge truck.
. All Lift Station major components were cleaned, exercised, and inspected for proper operation in
accordance with the PM schedule.
· There was one CSO event in September.
· CSO gates were greased and exercised.
S:\05\901--950\944\024\WrdIReview ofEMC\2005lReview ofEMC Operations - September 2005 exec sum.doc
-'
sa.......
STRAND
ASSOCIATES INC,'
E ~l (3 I NF." E R S
o Information Only
IZI Project Specific 5-944-024
o Policy Memo - File With
MEMORANDUM
,.. .'
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Rob Waiz, Mayor and Jeffersonville Sewer Board
Mark Sneve, P.E.~'
November 6, 2005
Review of EMC WWTP Operations - September 2005
We have completed our monthly review of EMC's operations. The purpose of our review was to
evaluate plant data and operation strategies to verify that EMC is operating the wastewater treatment
plant in the best interest of the City of Jeffersonville.
We reviewed the following to complete our review of operations for the month of September:
II Current contract between EMC and the City of Jeffersonville.
. EMC's D.MR and MaR for September 2005 (received by e~maillO/17/05).
Strand Associates, Inc. discussed operating conditions with EMC and visited the plant during the month.
Our review focused on EMC's monthly operation report (MaR). We have produced five pages of
graphs from the monthly data provided (consistent with past monthly reviews).
WWTP Loadings
The first page of graphs presents influent mass loadings and influent flows compared to design values.
We have also included a historical trend chart showing the monthly average and 12-month rolling
average.
. Influent BOD loading averaged 107% of the design loading (10,581 lbs/d). The highest peak
loading event of 22,255 lbs/day was observed on September 9th, which coincided with a O.4-inch
rain event on the September 8th. There were no violations of effluent BOD limits during September.
The 12-month rolling average loading for BOD is at 105% of design. The influent BOD graph
shows daily, 7-day, and 28-day moving average mass loadings for the month.
. The TSS loading averaged 121% of design loading (10,105 lbs/d). The highest peak loading event
of 23,0031bs/day was observed on September 23rd. The 12-month rolling average loading for TSS is
at 125% of design. The influent TSS graph shows daily, 7-day, and 28-day moving average mass
loadings for the month. No violations of effluent limits occurred during September.
. The NH3-N loading averaged 70% of the design loading (867 lbs/d). The highest peak loading
event of 983 lbs/day was observed on September 25th. There were no violations of effluent limits
S:\05\901--950\944\024\Wrd\Review ofEMC\2005\Review ofEMC Operations - September 2005 memo,doc
~,.
Review of EMC WWTP Operations - September 2005
Page 2
November 6, 2005
..
during September. The 12-month rolling average loading for ammonia is at 70% of design. The
influent ammonia graph shows daily, 7-day, and 28-day moving average mass loadings for the
month.
· The influent flume data has been reported to IDEM as the plant flow since April 1, 2001. The peak
flow capacity of the WWTP is 22.8 mgd and the peak sustained flow capacity is 16 mgd. The
average flow during dry weather days in September was 4.8 mgd or 92% of the plant capacity (5.2
mgd). The average flow during the entire month of September was measured to be 5.2 mgd or 100%
of the plant capacity (5.2mgd). The peak daily flow reached 7.6 mgd on September 25th, which was
below the "rated" capacity of 16 mgd. This coincided with a O.2-inch rain event that occurred the
same day and contributed to the total September rainfall of 1.6-inches. The 12-month rolling
average dry-weather flow is at 95% of design. The 12-month rolling average of all-weather flow is
at 120% of design. The influent flow graph shows daily, 7-day, and 28-day moving average influent
flows for the month.
When the anoxic zone project is completed, the rated capacity of the treatment plant will be increased.
TheJollowing table, reflects the increase'in capacity. " , , , "
Current Design Design With Anoxic Zone Project'
Capacity 12 Month MV A,as %: Capacity 12 Month MV A as %
of Capacity of Capacity
Average Flow, mgd 5.2 , 95 (dry) 6.0 82 (dry)
120 (all) , " 104 (all)
Peak Hourly Flow, mgd 22.8 NA 25.0 NA
CBOD, Ibid 10,581 105 10,800 103
TSS, Ibid 10,105 125 11,700 108
NH3-N, Ibid 867 70 790 77
Effluent Quality
The next page of graphs presents the plant performance for effluent CBOD, TSS, and ammonia
compared to the weekly average and monthly average effluent limits. The 7-day moving average
(MV A) effluent concentration is used to compare to the weekly permit limit, and the 28-day moving
average effluent limit is used to compare to the monthly average effluent limit. September is within the
window for 'more stringent' summer effluent limits.
.
Effluent CBOD concentrations were below permit limits during September.
Effluent TSS concentrations remained below permit limits during September.
Effluent NH3-N concentrations were continuously below the permit limits during September.
Concentrations did increase slightly at the end of the month. This is believed to be related to
changes in the plant flow scheme required by construction activates. EMC should closely monitor
effluent NH3-N concentrations and MLSS levels to control nitrification.
.
.
[Initials]S:\05\901--950\944\024\WrdIReview ofEMC\2005\Review ofEMC Operations - September 2005 memo.doc\110605
sa.
STRANO
ASSOCIATES,INC,"
ENGINEEriS
-'
Review of EMC WWTP Operations - September 2005
Page 3
November 6,2005
Activated Sludge Process
The fourth page of graphs presents typical activated sludge parameters.
. The first graph shows the food to mass of volatile organisms (F:Mv) ratio. For extended aeration
activated sludge wastewater treatment plants, the target F:Mv is typically between 0.08 and 0.1. The
activated sludge plant averaged 0.14 for the month. This is slightly higher than the process was
designed for, however, operations were stable at this higher loading.
. The next graph shows the sludge volume index (SVI). SVI is an indicator of settleability of the
mixed liquor. SVIs below 150 are not cause for concern. SVI above 150 suggests poor settling
characteristics. SVI levels for the month averaged 76. The SVI remained low throughout the
month.
. The next graph shows the organic loading rate for the oxidation ditch activated sludge process. Your
activated sludge process was designed with an OLR of 15-lb BOD/day/WOO fe. The 28-day running
average OLR varied between 15 and 18 throughout the month. The.maximum day OLR of 31 lb
BOD/day/lOOO ft3 occurred on September 9th and was the result of a O.4-inch rain event that
occurred September 8th. The average OLR was 15.91b BOD/day/lOOOcuft, which is slightly higher
than the design rate.',
. The next graph includes 'the solids loading rate (SLR), a measure of'the mass of solids in the influent
to the clarifiers. "Ten States Standards" :limits. the solids loadIng rate to less than 35 lb/d/sf of
clari~ier surface area. The chart shows the daily, 7-dayMV A and 28-day MV A SLR.. The SLR
averaged :approximately 22-lb/d/sf with a daily peak of 36-lb/d/sf during the month. We, have
included a chart that shows the daily SVI and SLR data versus the curve from WEF MOP 8 and a
curve specific to the Jeffersonville plant. This Jeffersonville curve was created by reviewing data
from peak wet weather events over a three-year period as part of the CSOP update. Operation above
this curve has previously resulted in effluent TSS violations. The chart demonstrates that the plant is
operating below the "textbook" and Jeffersonville curves.
. The next plot is for mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS in mg/L). The MLSS concentration of the
activated sludge plant varied between 900 and 5,400 mg/L averaging about 3,300 mg/L. Typically,
MLSS ranges from 2,500 to 4,500 mg/L for the extended aeration process. EMC no longer targets a
MLSS concentration to control the process; they now target a constant sludge age. In the past, the
nitrification process was affected when the MLSS concentration dipped below 2,000 mg/L. MLSS
dropped below 2000 mg/L for two days and effluent ammonia levels were slightly affected but not
violated.
. The next graph shows the mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (ML VSS in mg/L). The ML VSS
concentration of the activated sludge plant varied between 550 mg/L and 3,300 mg/L averaging
about 2,000 mg/L. The ML VSS shows the same trending as the MLSS graph. The historical
minimum ML VSS to sustain complete nitrification appears to be 1,800 mg/L based on previous
operational data. The ML VSS was slightly below 1,800 mg/L for several days during the month and
nitrification was slightly affected but did not result in effluent limit violations.
[Initials]S:\05\901--950\944\024\Wrd\Review ofEMC\2005\Review ofEMC Operations. September 2005 rnemo.doc\1l0605
sa.
STRAND
ASSOCIATES,INC.'"
ENGINEERS
..
Review of EMC WWTP Operations - September 2005
Page 4
November 6,2005
· The next graph shows the yield of solids from the activated sludge process. The yield is defined as
the pounds of TSS produced per pound of BOD removed. For an extended aeration activated sludge
plant, a yield between 0.8 and 1.1 is reasonable. Your plant had the 28-day moving average yield of
0.5, lower than typical.
· The last graph shows the Sludge Age, a measure of the average time a microorganism spends in the
activated sludge system. We recommended that the activated sludge process be operated to maintain
a constant sludge age rather than a constant MLSS. The average sludge age during the month was
28 days with the targeted sludge age range of 22 days. Sludge age decreased throughout the month,
and was close to the targeted age at the end of the month.
In summary, the activated sludge process is performing well (BOD, TSS and NH3-N removal). SVI
levels remained low throughout September.
EMC's Monthly Project Status Report (According to EMC's September Executive Summary)
Plant. ,.
· Rehabilitation work was completed on plant bar screens.
· .The Ennix 'program used in the digesters performed well during the month.
· RAS pump #3 and Rails were removed from the RAS station for repair.
· Checking & tagging all electrical devices. & breakers was started.
· RASPump.#4 is off line, in anticipation of check valve replacement.
Pretreatment ... .
· Annual samples were taken at Brinly Hardy. This completes permitted industry sampling for the
year.
· Annual inspections were made at Cargo Clean and Brinly Hardy.
.
Lift stations and Collection System
· EMC cleaned 8,136 feet of sanitary sewer and 6,252 feet of storm/CSO sewer.
· EMC televised 1,066 feet of sanitary sewer lines.
· EMC vactor-cleaned 2 catch basins.
· All 23 Trouble Spots were cleaned and checked.
· A total of 15 service calls were made in September (no main back-ups and 15 residence service line
back-ups).
Televising was performed to locate taps and to check for damage or root problems.
EMC vactored out twelve wet wells due to solids and grease buildup.
There was one CSO event in September.
All Lift Stations major components were cleaned, exercised, and inspected for proper operation in
accordance with the PM schedule.
Bar Screens were cleaned as needed.
Generators were inspected, operated, and exercised for proper operation at 10th St., Spring St., and
Mill Creek Lift Stations.
.
.
.
.
.
[Initials]S:\05\901--950\944\024\Wrd\Review ofEMC\2005\Review ofEMC Operations. September 2005 memo.doc\110605
Sil
STRANO
ASSOCIATES.INC,"
ENGINSS~S
Review of EMC WWTP Operations - September 2005
Page 5
November 6, 2005
. Repairs were made to pump #1 at Crums Ln. #2 and pump #2 at Crums Ln. #1.
. Other minor maintenance was performed at three pump stations.
. Exterior painting was completed at four cantex stations.
. Repairs were made on sludge truck #4306.
. Mac vactor truck had minQr repairs done by vehicle maintenance.
. EMC crews worked with various departments of the city to clean lines and drainage ditches.
· CSO gates were greased and exercised.
cc: John Toombs / Jorge Lanz, JTL
Tim Crawford, EMC
Doug Ralston, Sewer Board
Jeffery Caldwell, Sewer Board
Attachments
[Initials]S:\05\901--950\944\024\Wrd\Review ofEMC\2005\Review ofEMC Operations - September 2005 memo.doc\110605
sa.
STRAND
ASSOC\ATES.INC.~
Ef"G1NEE!"IS
Jeffersonville WWTP
Influent BOD, Ibid vs. Design Loading
-Daily -7 d MVA -28 d MVA ... "" Design Loading
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
o
r;;::,~<O r;;::,~<O r;;::,~<O r;;::,~<O r;;::,~<O r;;::,~'o r;;::,~<O r;;::,~'o r;;::,~'o r;;::,~<O r;;::,~'o ~~'o r;;::,~'o r;;::,~<O r;;::,~<O
~'); ~'); ~'); (\ ~ ~'); ~'); ~'); 0-'); ~ \II O}'); ~'); ~'); ~'); (\ ~ ~');
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o}" o}" o}" o}" O}" o}"v o}'l; O}'); o}"v o}"C
Influent TSS, Ibid vs. Design Loading
Daily -7 d MVA -"''''''''''''''''28 d MVA '"" .. Design Loading
20000
15000
10000
5000
o
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~#~##~##~~~~~#~~~~~
~~~~~~o}~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Influent NH3-N, Ibid vs. Design Loading
-Daily -7 d MVA -28 d MVA'" ... Design Loading
1000
750
500
250
o
r;;::,~'o r;;::,~<O r;;::,~<O r;;::,~<O r;;::,~<O ~~'o r;;::,~'o r;;::,~'o r;;::,~'o r;;::,~'o ~~'o r;;::,~'o r;;::,~'o r;;::,~<O r;;::,~'o
,,\II ~'); B-'); (\ \II ~'); ~'); ~'); 0-'); '\ ~ Qj\ll ~'); ~'); B-'); (\ \II ~');
~ ~ ~ 0} ~ O}" Qj\" O}" O}" O}" o}"v o}'l; O}'); o}"v o}"C
...
...
III
...
Influent Flow, mgd vs. Design Flow (all data)
1- Daily -7 d MVA -28 d MVA ... ... Design Flow I
8
6
4
2
r;;::,~'o r;;::,~<O r;;::,~<O r;;::,~'o r;;::,~'o r;;::,~'o r;;::,~'o r;;::,~<O r;;::,~'o r;;::,~<O r;;::,~'o r;;::,~'o r;;::,~'o (;:)~<o ~~'o
~'); ~'); ~\II (\ \II ~'); ~'); ~'); 0-'); ~ \II O}'); ~'); ~'); ~'); (\ \II ~');
Qj\ Qj\ ~ 0} ~ o}" o}" o}" o}" O}" o}"v o}'l; O}'); o}"v O}');
JeffpJantdata-0905.xls
Strand Associates
10/24/2005
"
Jeffersonville WWTP
Strand Associates
Jeffersonville Influent Flow - ALL FLOW
Percent of Design (5.2 mgd)
c
Cl
'm
c
'0
-
c
B
...
41
ll..
---All days ~ Monthly Average
-12 month MVA-all
""'l
160%
130% ! '
1~:: \-.~~ ~~ ~
/~~.' <~~~ ~y~~Ad-f:: 9
~~~ft~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~rFrp~~~~~~~Pft~~
###~~~#~########~###~~~~#~~~~##~~~~
Month
Jeffersonville Influent Flow. DRY DATA ONLY
Percent of Design (5.2 mgd)
c
Cl
om
c
'0
-
c
Cll
\>
...
Cll
ll..
120%
Dry Days - Monthly Average
12 month MVA - DIY
100%
80%
60%
~~~ft~~~~~$~~?~?PP??7~Frp~~ft~~~~~~~~
###~#####~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~##~~~
Month
Jeffersonville Influent BOD
Percent of Design (10,581 Ibs/day)
f 140% L -~~,-~ -,,_~W^ ~
J ~~~~~,~~~'~~/0~~~{..t'j
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
######~####~################~~#####
Month
-,
"
Jeffersonville Influent T55
Percent of Design (10,105Ibs/day)
-- Monthly Average
-12 month MVA
c
Cl
.~
Q
'l5
1::
CIl
~
CIl
no
~ "/ ~'~'~"~":
~v~? -~~~'7.: ~~L~{~J\=.~
180%
m~~
100% -'----
80%
60% '
,,'" ,,'" ,,'"
~",<< ~,,<: ~,,-';
~~ft~~~~~~~~~p~~~~~~~ft~~~~~~~~~P~
,-> ":>,,,<1 ~o ,,,,<' ~'" ~'" ~-> ":>,,,<1 ~o ~,,<' ~",<: ~"'-'; ,-> ":>,,,<1 ~o->: ,,,<' ~" ~" ,-'if 4:/ ~o ,,,,<< ~,,<: ~-'; ~-s ":>,,,<1 ~o ,,,<' ~",<: ~,,-'; ~-s ":>,,,<1
Month
Jeffersonville Influent NH3-N
Percent of Design (867 Ibs/day)
-- Monthly Average
12 month WA
c
Cl
'm
c
'0
-
C
41
l:
41
ll..
100% d
:P~~~~'~.~'~~~~'~~~~.~~~I
I
?~?ft~~~~~$~~~~~P~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~####~~~##~~~~####~###~#~######
Month
1012412005
Jeffplanldata % 01 deslgn.xls
Jeffersonville WWTP
Weekly Effluent ceoe vs. Permit Limit
I . 7 d MVA Effluent IIil ... Wk. Ave. limit I
30
... II .. ... ... ... .. .. lIE ... ... .. .. ... ... ... .
~ . ~ ~~ ~ ~ ....
~ '" ....
..J
C,
E 20
c'
g 10
()
o
9/1/2005
9/8/2005
9/15/2005
Date
9/22/2005
9/29/2005
30
Weekly Effluent TSS vs. Permit Limit
I · 7 d MVA Effluent.. ... Wk. Ave. limit I
..J
C, 20
E
ui
C/) 10
I-
- · · - - - · . - - - m _ _ _ _ m
o
9/1/2005
I
!
9/8/2005
9/15/2005
9/22/2005
9/29/2005
Date
Weekly Effluent NH3-N vs. Permit Limit
I · 7 d MVA Effluent III ... Wk. Ave. limit I
4.0
..J 3.0
C,
E 2.0
z'
cJ, 1.0
:x:
z
~
1
.
j
0.0
9/1/2005
9/8/2005
9/15/2005
Date
9/22/2005
9/29/2005
S:\05\901--950\944\024\Spr\Plant data\2005\Jeffplantdata-0905.xlsReport Effluent
Monthly Effluent ceoe vs. Permit Limit
1-+--28 d MVA Effluent... ... Mo. Ave. limit I
20
..J
C, 15
E
ci 10
o
m
()
o
9/1/2005
9/8/2005
9/15/2005
Date
9/22/2005
9/29/2005
Monthly Effluent TSS vs. Permit Limit
1-+--28 d MVA Effluent... ... Mo. Ave. limit I
21
..J
1>> 14
E
en
C/)
I-
OIl III .. III ... III .. . .. ... ... .. . .. ... ... I
~ ~....
~~ T
o
9/1/2005
9/8/2005
9/15/2005
Date
9/22/2005
9/29/2005
Monthly Effluent NH3-N vs. Permit Limit
1-+--28 d MVA Effluent... OIl Mo. Ave. limit I
2.0
..J
C, 1.5
E
z' 1.0
M
~ 0.5
0.0
9/1/2005
9/8/2005
9/15/2005
Date
9/22/2005
......
9/29/2005
.............
Strand Associates
10/24/2005
r
Jeffersonville WWTP
F:Mv
I -Daily -7dMVA """""""28dMVA I
~H~,~~~~/~~
~~~ ~~<o ~~<o ~~<o py.f;)":. >0(;)'0 ~f;><O iJ."'<O ,\0><0 ~~<o ..:f''o iY",0. i:i-"'<' ~~<o PJ~<O
~ ~ ~ qj ~~""'~"~"~\""q;.....~r-vOJ<VC'J{(i~'J..O;{V
SVI
1 -Daily -7d MVA ........28d MVA 1
150
100
50
o
'f'''
",,'
~(;)<o r-j,(;)'o ~'f><O f.>~<O ~~<o ~fV<O ~"'<.;, '\~<o OJ~<O ....~<o ~~<o ~(;)<o ~fl<O ~<::J'o
~ ~ ~ ~ ~.... ,*," q.\o.,; o}.... OJ\" ~"v ~,:v ~rv OJ"'" ,*,fl;
OLR, Ib BOD/d/1000 cf
1 -Daily -7dMVA -28dMVA I
40
30
20
10
o
~~":l<O c?J.~"'<O
ciJ.<O~<O
# ~ ~ # # # # # # # # #
'*' qj ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~
SLR, Ib MLSS/d/sf
I -Daily -7dMVA -28dMVA I
~ltv~~, ~-:I
# # # $ # # # # # # ~ # # # #
~ ~ ~ 0;\' ~ ~.... ~.... ~" ~" ,*," C'J~ ~'l,; c?J.'V OJ'EJ.- OJ~
S:\05\901-950\944\024\Spr\Plant data\2005\Jeffplantdata-0905.xlsReport AS
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
MLSS, mg/L
1- Daily -7 d MVA ........28 d MV A I
^
/\ ^
I / "
\ / -
\./ I
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
o}....~ ~~rr; O)?-'V O;~fP ~0;'(1I ~.....~'V ~....")fP ,*,~fP ~.::.fP '*'....O:J~ dJ"v....-w C'J<?fP ~<t>fY ~rVo!J o;#r>O
ML VSS, mQ/L
I-Daily -7dMVA .......28dMVAI
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
!
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
'*....fJ OJ~ry ~<o'(1l Q;~:lp O;~:v ~........fY ~....4'l; '*'....~'V Qj\~.fJ' ~....'*''V 0).f1.,~'V OJ~:(!; 0;,rf'V ~rV'\Y OJ~<Y
Yield, Ib TSS/lb BODrem
1-7dMVA .......28dMVAI
1.00
0.80
0.60 f ' ':: -""'--, ""'-- --- ----L.
0.40 -
0.20
0.00
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
C'J\....~ O;~'V crr~'1; OJ'0"Y 0;$''lJ ~....0.n,; ~.....'b{y '*'....~rv O}~:{I) ~....OJfY 0;~0.'V ,*,~<J; O;~{t) 0;0/-0; OJ<p'<V
Sludge Age, days
1-7dMVA """""'28dMVA I
~j;--'~-~~-~I
<>" <l> <>"
""....":>& ~~ ~~~
~ ~ ~\
~~~ I;::.~*' f6>~fo ~~<t;J ~f:::I't:, ~f:J~
o}."~ o}.":J<Y o}.~ ~\ o,,~fP o}.........fP
~~~ ~()<o ~~<o ~()~ ~()<o ~()<o
o}"o,,'fJI o}.'V....(V o}.,,?(O o,,#'t'i.; o}.rVfJI o}.tyo}.'V
';...
Strand Associates
10/24/2005
SLR vs SVI for September 2005
Daily data shown as scatter vs. two curves
one from MOP 8 (typical relationship) and
one for Jeffersonville (specific relationship based on plant data at peak flow)
Data points above curves represent excessive solids loading
· Daily Data -MOP 8 Curve ......Jeffersonville Curve
500 -...... l
!
400 -I ~ Zone of excessive
~
solids loading
---
......""".
I
300
:>
t/)
200
.
100 . ~.,....:# .
.
!
0 30 40 50 60
0 10 20
SLR, Ibldlsf
I
r I
f
City of Jeffersonville
Summary of Ongoing Public Works Projects
Strand Associates, Inc.
November 7, 2005
1. Monthly Review ofWWTP Operations
· WWTP is operating well.
. Shut-off valves in the chlorine contact tank scum pipes will be installed by city crew.
· September review complete.
2. Long Term CSO Control Plan
. Next CAC meeting will be scheduled to discuss IDEM comments (when received).
. The CSO Public Notification program is being fully implemented as required.
. LTCP was submitted to IDEM in 2004. In Late 2004, IDEM reviewed the plan for
completeness and did not identify any deficiencies. IDEM and EP A will jointly review the
plan.
. EPA inspection was held on March 15. Inspection report has been prepared and reviewed.
Minor comments sent to EP A by letter.EP A will pursue Consent Decree based on interstate
river impact and the greater than 5 year implementation schedule.
II! ITR process is complete. IDEM and ITR consultants recommend early action projects. Work
should proceed now that funding isin place.
. TSPS - Flap gate hoist & controls implementation should proceed - by City Crew.
3. Preliminary Engineering Report (with JTL)
· Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) must be prepared to be eligible for SRF funding.
Strand and JTL are drafting the PER.
4. Construction of Improvements to WWTP
· Construction is progressing.
. Reviewing shop drawings as construction ramps up.
. Payment Application No.2 in amount of $104,625 is recommended.
5. CMC Pump Station Final Design
. Final design is complete and ready for Local permiUo be issued.
. Permit application is ready for signature.
. Bid date can be scheduled for next few months.
Respectfully Submitted,
STRAND ASSOCIA T"", INC.
~~
Mark A. Sneve, P.E.
sa.
STRAND
ASSOCiATES. iNS'.~
"',,:G,NEEC'lS
MAS :daslS :\05\90 1--950\944\024\ Wrd\Sewer Bd Exec Sum\2005\JeffSewerBdExecSumll 0705.docIl1l06/05
r-
1 j
....-
I
,
t
EM C ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENTCORPOM1JON
A BOC GROUP COMPANY 701 CHAMPION ROAD
MfJNICtPAi.SER'IICES' JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA 47130
www.emcinc.com TEL: (812) 285-6451
FAX: (812) 285-6454
...-'
~ . Executive Summary
Monthly Operation and Maintenance Report
September 2005
Following are summaries for operation and maintenance at the wastewater treatment
plant, and maintenance of the collection system and lift stations for the month of
September, 2005
Plant
~
~
~
,
~
~
~
~
~ Effluent quality was within NPDES permit limits.
~ Settleable solids averaged 246 for the month, good shape.
~ There were 14 wet days (defined asa day having at ieastO.l inch of rainfall and
three days afterward) resulting in an average plant flow of5.53 MGD, ~md 16 dry
days with an average flow of 4.89 MOD. The percentages of design flow for the
plant were 106.3% wet weather and 94% dry weather average. The total average
influent flow for the month was5.18 MOD, which is 99.6% of design.
The facility received an average influent BOD loading of 11 ,280.9 this is 111.6%
of the design.
The facility received an average influent TSS of 12,182.8 lbs/day; this is 115.1 %
of the design.
The facility received an average influent Ammonia of 607.8 lbs/day, this is 70.1 ~
of the design !
The maximum rainfall event during the month was on September 19 at .80".
The Herrick Company completed work on the influent bar screens: '
The Ennix program continued to perform well during the month.
Pretreatment
~ Yearly inspections were made at Cargo Clean and BIirily Hardy this month.
;.. Yearly samples were taken at Brinly Hardy.
;.. All permitted industries have now sampled for the year.
Lift stations and Collection System
Il,
Lift stations and collection systems
. Crews cleaned 8, 136ft. of sanitary sewers (28,383 feet contract YTD).
. Crews cleaned 6,252 ft. of storm I CSO sewers {45,445 feet contract
YTD).
. Crews televised 1,066 ft. of sewer lines (8,593 feet contract YTD).
. Crews hand cleaned 0 and vactor- cleaned 2, CIB.
~. ~i
r->
i
. All 23 trouble spots were cleaned and or checked during the month.
In the month of September collection crews made 15 sewer calls 15 being
residents or other problems anci 0 peing city's lines.
. 910 Poppy Place Crew cleaned and vactored 130~ to try and help
residents, they needed a plumber.
Collection crews worked with different departments of the city on various city
projects
. Crew t~levised a C/O at 1133 Holmans Ln. for Mike L. to see if it caused
the feeder beside it. A storm drainage line was do\\tTI that went under the
road.
. Crew vactored out ditch on ;Holmans Ln. for Bob G. crew repairing line.
. Crew vactored out M/H for Mike L. at Main St. and Charlesto\Vl1 Ave for
slip lining.
. Crew cleaned and vactored 200' and televised 184' at 1126 Cedarview
Dr. to check for damaged line for Mike L.
. Crew cleaned 201' and televised 175' at Warner Park for Bob M.
. Crew cleaned and vactored 175' of storm ditch on Woodland Ct. for Bob
G. crew.
. Crew cleaned and vactored 60' ofstoTI":1 sewer on Wall St. to ditch line
by rail road tracks for Mike L.
. Crew cleaned and vactored 1 C/B 30' at 2410 Cornwell Dr. for Jim Ham
in drainage.
. Crew worked all of I day and several others on lO"Lh St. between Rhonda
Dr. and Avondale Ct. for Bob M. and Mike L.
. Crew located force main at Camp Powers station for Jerry C. gas
company needed to dig.
. Crew cleaned and vactored 101' and televised 101' in the Lenzier Trace
neighborhood for Jerry C. to try and map out sewers line was a dead end.
Collection crews street pre-maintenance schedule
. A crew cleaned and vactored 1,455' on Riverside Dr. from Rockys to
Kingfish and down Riverpointe Dr.
. A crew cleaned and vactored 1,370' on 10th St. from Rhonda Dr. to
Kehoe Ln.
. A crew cleaned and vactored 130' at 1518 Nole Dr. water company
broke our line while fixing there line.
. Trouble spot list was completed 7,452' of sewers cleaned and vactored.
. Crews televised 600' to locate 2 taps and damage to residence laterals.
. Crews cleaned and vactored out 1 C/B.
. Crew vactored out 12 wet wells due to solids and the build up of grease.
. CSO gates were exercised and greased.
. A crew cleaned and vactored an additional 3,677' of sewer lines through
out the city.
Collection crews lift station pre-maintenance schedule
. All lift stations floats, switches, pumps, alarms, electrical and
mechanical components were cleaned, exercised, and inspected for
proper operations.
. Stations grass was mowed as needed.
. Generators at 10th St., Spring St. and Mill Creek stations were operated.'E..C
inspected, and exercised for proper operations. .".
" A BOC GROUP COMPANY
r-
r-
::
,.-.
r
,
"'
r-,
r-
r
.
,
. Bar screens were cleaned as needed.
. Crew pulled pump #1 at Crums Ln. #2 to remove rags out of pump put
back on line.
. Crews painted the out side of 4 cantex stations.
. Crews cleaned transducer and Stillwell out at 10th St. station.
. Crews cleaned transducer and Stillwell out at Crums Ln. #1.
. Crews pulled pump #3 out of RAS station.
. Crews checking and tagging all electrical devises, outlets and breakers
in the plant.
. Crews replaced control cord on pump #2 at Crums Ln. #1.
. Crews put a clamp on the hate in discharge pipe at Golfviewstation.
Repairs in the collection system
. Crews pulled pump rails out ofRAS station for repair.
. Crews repaired check valve on pump #5 at 10th St.
. Crew took sludge truck #4306 for repairs.
. Crew took mac vactor truck to vehicle maintenance to repair air line
under seat and a turn signal.
. Crews took check valve to pump #4 off line we are getting a new one.
.' ... ',... ",,",,,'''<"-'. ..~-.
r
r
Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility
Monthly Operations Report
1.0 EFFLUENT QUALITY
r--
During September, effluent quality was within NPDES permit limits for CBOD, TSS and NH-3.
Table 1.1 summarizes the effluent quality data. Attachment A contains Time Series Plots of
Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) values.
Attachment B contains Time Series Plots of Aeration Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS) and
Sludge Volume Index (SVI).
;'
,
Carbonaceous Biochemical 15 mg/l 5.8 mg/l
Oxygen Demand (CBOD)
Total Suspended Solids 18 mg/l 7.0 mg/l
(TSS
Fecal Coliform MPN 235 colonies/100ml 34 colonies/1 OOml
Chlorine Residual 0.06 mg/l .04 mg/l
Ammonia 4.5 mg/l .12 mg/l
Average Flow 5.2 design 5.2 MOD
r
r
Table 1.2
Wet Weather vs. D
r'
t
t
Average Flow of Wet Days
Number of Dry Days
Average Flow of Dry Days
*Wet Day = Rain (>0.1 in) and three days after
5.53 MOD
16
4.89 MOD
2.0 DESIGN LOADINGS LIMITS
t ::
The Flows and Loadings report for May 1994 through September 2005 can be found III
Attachment C.
3.0 FACILITY OPERATIONS
r--
During September, the treatment processes performed very well. All parameters were will within
IDEM limits. Average influent flow was 92% of plant design capacity. Plant efficiency was;
BOD remova1- 97.8%, TSS removal- 97.5%, Ammonia removal- 99.2%. Contractors are still
proceeding with the plant expansion project. The refurbishing of the Aqua Ouard Screens on the
1
r-
I
Ie
Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility
Monthly Operations Report
,.....
~
plant influent has been completed and is in operation. The Ennix system for the digestor operation
is still giving favorable results. Due to the construction project, the oxidation ditches are being run
in a series, instead ofpara1lel. At this time, we are not experiencing any operational problems.
3.1 PRETREATMENT
Pretreatment activities for the month included the following:
,.....
l
F
I
. Yearly inspections were made at Cargo Clean and Brinley Hardy.
. Yearly samples were taken at Brinley Hardy
. All permitted industries have now been inspected and sampled for the year.
4.0 SEWER MAINTENANCE CALLS
Table 4.1 represents all sewer maintenance calls for the month.
634 Ohio - main ok
.' 1202 E. Court - main ok
824 Marigold Backu - main ok
09/17/05 Precision 300 William St Blockage - plumber had opened N
by the time on call got there
r- 1015 Hwy 62- Backup - main ok - may need to
r
09/16/05 R. Howes Youngstown locate to see if lines are tied N
Sho ping Center together
n 09/14/05 Stemlers 1002 E. Maple Backup - sewage in bsmt - main Y
line is ok
09/13/05 Stemlers 1120 Windsor Backup - main line ok Y
Drive
09/12/05 Stemlers 1043 Rhonda Backu - main ok N
09/08/05 Stemlers 827 Sharon Backu into home - main line ok Y
09/07/05 Precision 1416 N/A-Ctown Backu - main line ok N
09/07/05 Stemlers 205 Mulberry Backu - main line ok Y
09/06/05 R. Broy 311 N. Front Backup - main line ok - also N
Street tved to locate tap
09/06/05 1. Thompson 910 Poppy Place Backup - into bsmt drain - main N
ok but shot to assist
,.....
".-.
2
r
r-"'
1<_. ,
!
,.-.
Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility
Monthly Operations Report
09/12/05 Bob Goldman
1518 No1e
Storm grating collapse
- main stopped up -
flushed out - water
company dug and may
have hit line - had to
dig because line was
down
r-
I
r-.
,
~,
r-
t
4.1 ELECTRICAL EXPENDITURES
,-
Table 4.6 represents the facility electrical expenditures for the month as well as providing a year to
date total. During July, the amount paid did not reflect $4,463.48 in credits due for the summer
power share program. The amount reported, $16,966.98, should have been $12,503.50. The
credits were taken during the September billing cycle, with a paid amount of $5,381.26. The total
amount paid for the July-September period was $22,798.24, or July - $$12,503.50 and September-
$10,294.74.
r-
r
f
r,
,
,
.
September
$10,177.56
$ 13,805.28
$3,627.72
Year-To-Date
$64,239.36
$69,026.40
$4,787.04
5.0 FACILITY SAFETY & TRAINING
r
A safety inspection was conducted on October 03, 2005. The rating was 100%. There were no
deficiencies reported. Our plant is still in excellent shape.
A copy of the Safety Inspection Report is included as Attachment E.
r
3
,..-
!:
Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility
Monthly Operations Report
6.0
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM AND PREVENT A TIVE MAINTENANCE
t it
Lift stations and collection systems
. Crews cleaned 8,136 ft. of sanitary sewers.
. Crews cleaned 6,252 ft. of storm I CSO sewers.
. Crews televised 1,066 ft. of sewer lines.
. Crews hand cleaned 0 and vactor- cleaned 2 C/B.
. All 23 trouble spots were cleaned and or checked during the month.
In the month of September collection crews made 15 sewer calls 15 being residents or
other problems and 0 being city's lines.
. 910 Poppy Place crew cleaned and vactored 130' to try and help residents, they
needed a plumber.
Collection crews worked with different departments of the city on various city projects
. Crew televised a cia at 1133 Holmans Ln. for Mike L. to see if it caused the
feeder beside it. A storm drainage line was down that went under the road.
. Crew vactored out ditch on Holmans Ln. for Bob G. crew repairing line.
. Crew vactored out M/H for Mike L. at Main St. and Charlestown Ave for slip
lining.
. Crew cleaned and vactored 200' and televised 184' at 1126 Cedarview Dr. to
check for damaged line for Mike L.
. Crew cleaned 207' and televised 175' at Warner Park for Bob M.
. Crew cleaned and vactored 175' of storm ditch on Woodland Ct. for Bob G. crew.
. Crew cleaned and vactored 60' of storm sewer on Wall St. to ditch line by rail
road tracks for Mike L.
. Crew cleaned and vactored 1 C/B 30' at 2410 Cornwell Dr. for Jim Ham in
drainage.
. Crew worked all of 1 day and several others on 10th St. between Rhonda Dr. and
Avondale Ct. for Bob M. and Mike L.
. Crew located force main at Camp Powers station for Jerry C. gas company needed
to dig.
. Crew cleaned and vactored 107' and televised 107' in the Lenzier Trace
neighborhood for Jerry C. to try and map out sewers line was a dead end.
Collection crews street pre-maintenance schedule
. A crew cleaned and vactored 1,455' on Riverside Dr. from Rockys to Kingfish
and down Riverpointe Dr.
. A crew cleaned and vactored 1,370' on 10th St. from Rhonda Dr. to Kehoe Ln.
. A crew cleaned and vactored 130' at 1518 Nole Dr. water company broke our
line while fixing there line.
. Trouble spot list was completed 7,452' of sewers cleaned and vactored.
. Crews televised 600' to locate 2 taps and damage to residence laterals.
. Crews cleaned and vactored out 1 C/B.
. Crew vactored out 12 wetwells due to solids and the build up of grease.
. CSO gates were exercised and greased.
. A crew cleaned and vactored an additional 3,677' of sewer lines through out the
city.
Collection crews lift station pre-maintenance schedule
4
~
.
,..-,
r-
r-
r,
Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility
Monthly Operations Report
r-
t
. All lift stations floats, switches, pumps, alarms, electrical and mechanical
components were cleaned, exercised, and inspected for proper operations.
. Stations grass was mowed as needed.
. Generators at 10th St., Spring St. and Mill Creek stations were operated,
inspected, and exercised for proper operations.
. Bar screens were cleaned as needed.
. Crew pulled pump #1 at Crurns Ln. #2 to remove rags out of pump put back on
line.
. Crews painted the out side of 4 cantex stations.
. Crews cleaned transducer and Stillwell out at 10th St. station.
. Crews cleaned transducer and Stillwell out at Crurns Ln. #1.
. Crews pulled pump #3 out of RAS station.
. Crews checking and tagging all electrical devises, outlets and breakers in the
plant.
. Crews replaced control cord on pump #2 at Crums Ln. #1.
. Crews put a clamp on the hole in discharge pipe at Golfview station.
Repairs in the collection system
I . Crews pulled pump rails out ofRAS station for repair.
. Crews repaired check valve on pump #5 at 10th St.
. Crew took sludge truck #4306 for repairs.
. Crew took mac vactor truck to vehicle maintenance to repair air line under seat
and a turn signal.
. Crews took check valve to pump #4 off line we are getting a new one.
r-
~
. ,
.,.. I
,..-.
r,
5
r-:.
r
Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility
Monthly Operations Report
r-
Feet of Sanitary Sewer 8,136 4,545
Cleaned
,.- Feet of Storm Sewer
Cleaned 6,252 4,969
Catchbasins Cleaned & 2 5
...- Vactored
Catchbasin Tops Cleaned 0 48
...- Feet of Sanitary Sewer 1,066
Televised
Dye Tests
,.-
,
o
o
1
13
ATTACHMENTS
A. Time Series Plots - CBOD & TSS
B. Time Series Plots - MLSS & SVI
C. Flows & Loadings Report
D. Safety Inspection Report
E. DMR/MRO
F. List of Footage Cleaned
,....,
r
f-if
6
r-
f
,
!
Attachment A
Time Series Plots
CBOD & TSS
, r:
,
,
r
,
i
n
, t I
, J
r-
f i
i !
n
I f!
f- i
r;
f t
~" r
"] ". ] "') ::J """1 '"~'l 'F"") TJ '~"'l "] ".." J "'~- ) ."",J 1 ' "'''1 "]
J effersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility
Effluent CBOD /TSS
CBOD - .. TSS - - Permit CBOD - - - - Permit TSS
40
35
30
25
20
.. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - ... _. _... .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. -.. .. -..... -.. .. -.. .. -.. .. -.. _. -.. .. - .. .. - ~ .. - ..... - .... - .... - -... - .... -..... - ... - - -... - .. .. - .. -. - .. .. - .. ..
10
/ ... - ..... ......
15
--- ---. --- --- ---. --- ---------
......... I
...
5
o
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
r
~
Attachment B
Time Series Plots
MLSS & SVI
.--
~
r
l
rl
~
!
n
f i
::J
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
~'-'l
,..-."..,
., "H'J
Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility
Aeration Mixed Liquor
Suspended Solids (MLSS) mg/l
- .. MLSSmg/l
Desing Limit MLSS
t
,
,
,
, I,
I \
I
, ,
, I
.
, '.... , I \
I " I , ....,
" "" ,'- ... / ..
.. I r .. ..
\ I " .. .."
.. ......' " I ; , .. . ,_.-----
I
. ...., .
, I
,
,
\ ,
. , .-
, I
\ ,
,
',,/
, , I
I ,
o
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Operated and Maintained by:
Environmental Management Corporation
"""J
~--]
1
Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility
Aeration Mixed Liquor
Sludge Volume Index (SVI) mVgm
- .. SVlml/gm
Design Limit SVI
160
,\
, ,
I ,
\
, I'
, ,
, "\
) " I ..
\. , \ , " /..
-," ..
.. ,J , " ". "'-
; ;- "
".. , " .. ,
\. .., / ; / "- ,/ .. ..
.. . - \,
..... "
. .. .. ;
... ./ , ,\; ;
"r
--
, , ,
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
o
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Operated and Maintained by:
Environmental Management Corporation
r
!
t
Attachment C
Flows & Loadings Report
~, ,
" f
f i
""1
r~-)
n'l
. --1
-~Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility~
Flows Loadings Summary
4.50 5.2 6,042 10,105 3,490 10,581 2.35
3.84 5.2 8,038 10,105 3,843 10,581 3.70
3.68 5.2 8,311 10,105 3,913 10,581 2.25
3.55 5.2 7,668 10,105 3,819 10,581 2.40
3.81 5.2 8,726 10,105 4,798 10,581 3.65
3.71 5.2 8,493 10,105 4,356 10,581 2.20
4.09 5.2 9,483 10,105 4,025 10,581 3.85
4.19 5.2 10,434 10,1 05 3,886 10,581 4.45
3.81 5.2 9,231 10,105 3,864 10,581 3.75
2.92 5.2 6,393 10,105 2,710 10,581 1.60
2.87 5.2 5,572 10,105 2,480 10,581 2.05
2.63 5.2 4,211 10,105 2,178 10,581 2.80
3.46 5.2 3,593 10,105 1,622 10,581 10.25
2.79 5.2 4,824 10,105 2,683 10,581 3.35
2.31 5.2 4,244 10,105 1,809 10,581 2.50
3.22 5.2 6,338 10,105 3,491 10,581 3.45
2.33 5.2 5,962 10,105 3,022 10,581 1.60
2.87 5.2 6,235 10,105 3,124 10,581 5.25
2.64 5.2 7,449 10,105 2,519 10,581 2.75
3.22 5.2 9,211 10,105 3,620 10,581 5.85
4.29 5.2 8,229 10,105 7,084 10,581 5.00
3.28 5.2 8,480 10,105 6,620 10,581 2.63
5.45 5.2 11,091 10,105 9,045 10,581 5.98
5.85 5.2 12,148 10,105 9,075 10,581 6.50
8.17 5.2 14,513 10,105 10,902 10,581 7.30
5.74 5.2 12,447 10,105 10,149 10,581 3.72
4.36 5.2 11,672 10,105 9,345 10,581 3.40
3.83 5.2 11,148 10,105 10,312 10,581 1.90
4.96 5.2 12,865 10,105 9,928 10,581 9.02
4.25 5.2 11,059 10,105 8,471 10,581 2.60
4.80 5.2 13,771 10,105 11,689 10,581 4.10
5.77 5.2 14,725 10,105 11,020 10,581 4.90
5.59 5.2 19,581 10,105 16,597 10,581 3.85
5.84 5.2 22,892 10,105 15,732 10,581 12.25
1 of 4 Operated and Maintained by:
EnvirOllmental Management Corporation
.-~l
~ ~r' 1
~-~-l
--Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility-
Flows Loadings Summary
10.62 5.2 22,586 10,105 13,197 10,581 6.30
5.63 5.2 17,584 10,105 10,330 10,581 2.31
6.27 5.2 18,145 10,105 9,726 10,581 7.15
7.05 5.2 13,347 10,105 8,937 10,581 5.05
4.32 5.2 13,979 10,105 12,862 10,581 0.55
4.43 5.2 11,925 10,105 11,817 10,581 3.95
3.84 5.2 9,166 10,105 10,160 10,581 1.47
3.60 5.2 12,539 10,105 10,439 10,581 1.47
3.81 5.2 8,516 10,105 10,359 10,581 3.35
4.23 5.2 9,208 10,105 8,290 10,581 4.30
4.71 5.2 10,920 10,105 8,838 10,581 4.15
5.31 5.2 7,661 10,105 8,636 10,581 1.65
4.77 5.2 9,309 10,105 11,656 10,581 5.85
5.62 5.2 9,187 10,105 8,812 10,581 7.60
5.57 5.2 8,640 10,105 10,917 10,581 4.71
5.83 5.2 10,016 10,105 10,794 10,581 7.46
4.90 5.2 8,418 10,105 6,661 10,581 7.90
5.04 5.2 8,112 10,105 7,356 10,581 4.22
4.03 5.2 8,302 10,105 8,100 10,581 0.05
3.62 5.2 7,216 10,105 6,612 10,581 2.40
4.01 5.2 7,525 10,105 7,659 10,581 2.60
4.67 5.2 10,399 10,105 8,919 10,581 3.35
6.63 5.2 13,381 10,105 10,064 10,581 11.40
5.36 5.2 9,566 10,105 7,868 10,581 2.50
6.00 5.2 9,508 10,105 7,756 10,581 3.40
5.70 5.2 12,360 10,105 10,126 10,581 3.32
5.35 5.2 10,976 10,105 9,281 10,581 2.10
6.45 5.2 11,404 10,105 10,759 10,581 6.30
5.57 5.2 8,362 10,105 9,523 10,581 0.70
5.49 5.2 7,921 10,105 9,569 10,581 0.95
3.96 5.2 5,945 10,105 6,209 10,581 0.70
3.77 5.2 6,949 10,105 7,703 10,581 2.70
3.80 5.2 8,050 10,105 7,796 10,581 2.70
4.49 5.2 9,287 10,105 7,564 10,581 6.17
4.51 5.2 8,839 10,105 6,883 10,581 4.65
7.26 5.2 10,354 10,105 9,324 10,581 6.10
2of4 Operated and Maintained by:
Environmental Management Corpora/ion
-T"'"l
~""""l
"~'} ."'. ]
'-''']
..... ~..l
-~Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility
Flows Loadings Summary
5.45 5.2 8,727 10,105 8,045 10,581 2.75
5.49 5.2 8,608 10,105 6,227 10,581 3.70
4.03 5.2 7,932 10,105 7,293 10,581 1.00
4.17 5.2 8,347 10,105 7,512 10,581 4.11
3.67 5.2 8,172 10,105 6,183 10,581 4.11
3.92 5.2 6,800 10,105 6,310 10,581 4.11
4.03 5.2 6,756 10,105 5,478 10,581 4.11
3.85 5.2 7,000 10,105 5,683 10,581 0.40
4.50 5.2 7,769 10,105 7,619 10,581 3.15
4.64 5.2 7,894 10,105 8,320 10,581 3.15
4.64 5.2 7,894 10,105 8,320 10,581 3.15
5.13 5.2 8,001 10,105 7,787 10,581 2.20
4.60 5.2 6,867 10,105 7,711 10,581 2.35
4.22 5.2 7,321 10,105 7,391 10,581 1.65
4.49 5.2 9,362 10,105 8,201 10,581 3.80
4.20 5.2 7,286 10,105 8,056 10,581 4.20
4.36 5.2 8,072 10,105 7,818 10,581 4.50
3.95 5.2 7,379 10,105 7,116 10,581 4.50
4.30 5.2 7,926 10,105 7,674 10,581 3.85
5.52 5.2 9,852 10,105 9,576 10,581 1.60
5.31 5.2 9,477 10,105 8,990 10,581 1.50
6.27 5.2 8,576 10,105 6,955 10,581 4.65
5.48 5.2 8,821 10,105 8,044 10,581 2.25
4.97 5.2 6,922 10,105 5,886 10,581 3.85
6.92 5.2 9,465 10,105 8,541 10,581 2.15
6.88 5.2 9,980 10,105 8,488 10,581 6.05
7.20 5.2 11,109 10,105 9,187 10,581 4.45
6.25 5.2 11,415 10,105 9,435 10,581 6.45
4.60 5.2 7,404 10,105 9,207 10,581 1.05
4.36 5.2 9,491 10,105 6,909 10,581 1.85
4.90 5.2 8,790 10,105 7,563 10,581 9.25
5.12 5.2 10,462 10,105 7,900 10,581 4.25
5.09 5.2 15,592 10,105 11,090 10,581 3.45
6.14 5.2 9,444 10,105 9,068 10,581 7.30
4.77 5.2 6,992 10,105 6,517 10,581 0.70
6.44 5.2 9,190 10,105 10,617 10,581 4.19
3of4 Operated and Maintained by:
Environmental Management Corporation
- ]
--'-l~W-l
---,
1
--Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility-
Flows Loadings Summary
4.92 5.2 8,742 10,105 9,173 10,581 2.30
5.59 5.2 8,969 10,105 9,636 10,581 5.50
7.37 5.2 9,800 10,105 9,580 10,581 10.58
5.00 5.2 8,402 10,105 8,604 10,581 2.60
4.69 5.2 9,613 10,105 7,807 10,581 3.75
5.26 5.2 9,615 10,105 9,711 10,581 5.95
5.80 5.2 10,236 10,105 8,942 10,581 7.00
4.79 5.2 9,646 10,105 9,445 10,581 2.15
6.00 5.2 10,559 10,105 12,227 10,581 5.55
5.90 5.2 9,603 10,105 12,482 10,581 3.25
7.06 5.2 10,603 10,105 12,521 10,581 4.80
6.28 5.2 12,484 10,105 12,781 10,581 1.85
5.76 5.2 11,336 10,105 11,948 10,581 4.15
6.21 5.2 11,142 10,105 12,315 10,581 6.10
8.58 5.2 14,613 10,105 14,553 10,581 9.30
5.79 5.2 9,791 10,105 10,586 10,581 2.50
5.44 5.2 9,749 10,105 10,301 10,581 5.20
4.82 5.2 10,063 10,105 9,643 10,581 2.85
4.18 5.2 8,581 10,105 7,811 10,581 0.25
5.41 5.2 11,696 10,105 8,608 10,581 7.75
7.22 5.2 12,729 10,105 11,834 10,581 7.80
6.35 5.2 11,478 10,105 10,285 10,581 4.50
9.16 5.2 17,735 10,105 11,637 10,581 4.95
6.61 5.2 10,901 10,105 10,897 10,581 2.35
6.41 5.2 13,009 10,105 12,223 10,581 4.50
6.20 5.2 12,621 10,105 10,171 10,581 2.68
5.75 5.2 10,559 10,105 11,812 10,581 5.00
5.53 5.2 11,606 10,105 10,963 10,581 3.80
5.84 5.2 12,438 10,105 11,108 10,581 5.10
5.52 5.2 14,459 10,105 13,252 10,581 5.85
5.18 5.2 12,183 10,105 11,281 10,581 1.60
6.26 5.2 12618 10,105 11173 10,581 4.66
4of4
Operated and Maintained by:
Environmental Management Corporation
r-
.
t
Attachment D
r,
f
1--_
Safety Inspection Report
r-.
EMC
Monthly
SAFETY INSPECTION CHECKLIST
*Mark only if NOT in compliance
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES -18
Written Site Emergency Plan/training.
Updated OSHA 200 log
Written Chlorine/Sulfur Dioxide program, copy of actual standard, training
Written Fire Extinguisher program, copy of actual standard, training
Written Hazardous Communication program, copy of actual standard, training
Confined Space program, copy of actual standard, training
Written Emergency Action Plan program, copy of actual standard, training
Written Lockout/Tag Out program, copy of actual standard, training
Blood borne Pathogen program, copy of actual standard, training
Personal Protection Equipment program, copy of actual standard, training
All employees trained and understand Risk Management Plan
Personal Protection Equipment available for visitors
Safety Committee with both employee and management participation
Written "Right to Know" Program
MSDS sheets available to employees
Process Safety Management Plan (for plants mandated to have)
Housekeeping
Hearing disciples - documentation
r-.
PREMLIMINARY TREATMENT - 4
...-
i'
4-"",1
Wet or oil on floors
No or bad ventilation
Bar screenings on floor
Housekeeping
r-
~
PRIMARY TREATMENT - 1
Housekeeping
LABORATORY - 11
r-
i
, ~,
Proper chemical storage (containers labeled)
Emergency shower and eyewash
Inspection of emergency shower and eyewash
Acid spill kit
,....,
Sample refrigerators marked "Hio Hazard"
Signs of food or drink in lab
Fume hoods in proper working order or inspected
Proper sharps/broken glass container
Personal Protective Equipment available and used
Tongs or special gloves for moving hot items available and used
Housekeeping
I
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT - 2
N/A
Safeguards in the pure oxygen system
Housekeeping
..-
ADVANCED TREATMENT-l
Housekeeping
DISINFECTION - 14
Housekeeping
CHLORINE:
Working exhaust fans at floor level
Leak detection alarm system Alarm bad on S02
Ammonia hydroxide available to test for chlorine leaks
SCBAlIO minute escape packs are properly inspected and full
Proper chlorine wrench readily available
Chlorine cylinders properly chained to wall and tons secure
New washers readily available
Windsock and lor other wind directional apparatus exist
Warning signs in place
Chlorine stored separately from other chemicals
Risk Management Plan
UV:
N/A
N/A
Warning signs in place
Proper Personal Protective Equipment in place
BIO SOLDIS HANDLING - 2
Combustible gas detection system in place and calibrated
Housekeeping
MAINTENANCE/GARAGE - 13
,.....
Proper guarding of grinders, etc.
Lockout/Tag Out equipment available
Vehicle Safety Checklist in place
Sharps container for glass, cutting blades, etc.
Hand tools in proper working order
Eye protection provided for bench, free standing, and hand tools
Lighting of work bench adequate
Hoist, lift, jack, chains, pulleys available for lifting and moving heavy objects
Metal waste can marked for oily and/or paint soaked waste only and lit secured
Piping, hoses, etc. Stored properly
Heavy duty extension cords used when appropriate
Personal Protective Equipment signs posted
Housekeeping
r
I^
t
~
~
I
BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS - 34
N/A
N/A
Chemical storage tanks are labeled
Containers labeled
Stairways are unobstructed
Area below stairway are unobstructed
Work areas are adequately lighted
No Trip Hazards visible
Exits clearly marked
Emergency lighting adequate and functioning
Fire extinguishers inspected
All electrical wires in proper repair
Electrical control boxes are not used for storage above or below, or otherwise
blocked
Electrical boxes doors secured
Lockout/Tag Out in use where needed
Outlets not overloaded
Extension cords are not passing through openings without proper protection
Handrails in good condition
Chain guards in place where possible danger exists
Guards over drive chains and gears are in proper working order
"T" valves in walkways are adequately marked
Automatic start signs properly displayed on machinery where needed
Piping is color coded (legend available) or marked with content name
Potable and non-potable water lines are clearly marked and distinguishable from
each other
Hatch covers in place
Levee around pond or lagoon in good condition
Life rings, jackets, hooks, etc. available around open tanks or ponds
r-
t ~
~ ^
n
r,
~
!
r
t '
Sampling equipment is sufficient to prevent climbing over handrails or other
hazards to get samples
Flammables are stored in appropriate cabinets or buildings and marked as such
No Smoking signs posted near flammable areas
Exit lights are in proper working order
Housekeeping
MISCELLANEOUS - 14
Man lifts inspected yearly
Ladders in proper repair and working condition
Personal Protective Equipment is provided
First aid kits are available in all work areas and properly stocked
Emergency Response Team (in plant or local) is available and aware of
emergency plan
Overhead crane inspected annually by qualified personnel
Weight limits displayed on both sides of overhead crane
N/A Forklift operation training is provided
Air gap and/or back flow prevention device on water line inspected and recorded
annually
N/A Heat exchangers and/or boilers inspected annually
Lockout/Tag Out Program audit documented
Lockout/Tag Out training of "affected, authorized and others" conducted
OSHA signs posted
Facility: Jeffersonville
Inspector: Jason Reister
Date: 10/03/05
r-:
!
L..:
Scoring:
If the plant is not in compliance with the item listed put a checkmark on the line
next to the item listed. Feel free to write comments next to or near the item. Ifin
compliance, leave blank. Ifnot applicable to the plant (some items may not be),
write N/A ("Not Applicable") on the line. Count up the total number of "Not
Applicable" items. Subtract the "Not Applicable" from the "Total Possible"
points. This will give you the "Adjusted Total". Subtract the number of "Not in
Compliance" from the "Adjusted Total". This gives you the total "In
Compliance". Divide the number of "In Compliance" by the "Adjusted Total" to
give the "Total Percent".
Example: Counts: N/ A = 4 Not in Compliance = 3
Total Possible
Not Applicable
Adjusted Total
114
-4
110
Total Possible
Not Applicable
Adjusted Total
114
-7
107
Not in Compliance
Totalin Compliance
- 3
107
Not in Compliance
Total in Compliance
o
107
Total %
(107/110)
97.3%
Total %
100%
n
, i
r:
!
r
l'
Attachment E
DMR/MRO/CSO
T
Name of Facility Permit Number
~--~ Monthly Report of Operation City of Jeffersonville IN0023302
~ 'j
Activated Sludge Type Month Year Planl Design Flow Teiephone Number
/lIo
.'~,:~ Wastewater Treatment Plant September 2005 5.2 mgd 812-285-6451
Facility's e-mail address (if available): TLC@emcstl.com ", "
,
State Form 10829 (R/1-2005) G.ertifiedOperator: Name Class Certificate Number ExpiratIon Date
Page 1 of 4 Timothy L Crawford , IV I 13156 i 6/30/2007
i ;
>; ~ Tota:= 3 CHEMICALS RAW SEWAGE
-ro 0 USED
c 1.6 'E
c c -
0 .2 Q)
15.. <Il > ui
0 2- Q) ..m 0 :B
~ .I::. UJ E Q) ~ -=::
c..- () , Cii <Il 01
.!ll to Q) E c:O- .8 '0. CJ E :B E
.I::. a. Ol :; , ~ ~ <Il Q) <Il "tJ C!:: 'a, , , 0, (/)
c -'" _.L: Cii >- t:) . .0 'x 3 (/) (/) (/) , E :B
c 0.. ~
al ro- u; .Q ::J UJ ::J -l 0 0 E :B :E :E IJI , ,
0 ~ (/) (/) - () c u is m ::J
2 ~ (/) 0- 2 <( () o u , u: , , 0 0 ~ ro to
::l <Il <lJ CD 0
.... 0- E (/)0 '.;::0 Qj - to lO UJ UJ .!:: 'c 'c
0 '0 r$ Q) '0. IJI.... u'- C 0 C ~ 0 '0 0- 0 0
'g .!:: alO " ci. ci.
, c f- '0. ro- ~- .g- O 0 IJI E E
>- >- c ro 0.= <5 =x IJI ::l(9 (/) (/) 0
ro to ro- '- e >.x :c .:E 6 J: CD CD ::l ::l .!:: E E
~ o. :;;: cil .0
0 0 0.. CDL- U = U -l Q. U U UJ UJ 0..' <( <(
1 Thu 0 114 47 5.9Q7 7.8 183 9015.38 95 4680.12 8.5 418.7
2 Fri 0 60 70 5.238 7.8 210 9173.83 65 2839.52 6.8 297.1
3 Sat 0 79 134 4.459 7.7 185 6879.79 165 6136.03 14.1 524.4
4 Sun 0 73 120 4.777 7.7 215 8565.64 173 6892.35 14 557.8
5 Mon 0 29 125 4.613 7.6 205 7886.85 165 6347.95 14.5 557.9
6 Tue 0 50 160 5.008 7.8 290 12112.3 185 7726.84 14 584.7
7 Wed 0 90 130 4.801 7.9 245 9809.88 200 8008.07 14.2 568.6
8 Thu 0.4 80 120 4.801' 7.8 185 7407.46 265 10610.7 15.2 608.6
9 Fri 0 81 115 6.43 7.5 415 22254.9 335 17964.8 17.1 917
10 Sat 0 40 163 4.879 7.6 295 12003.8 385 15666 13.3 541.2
11 Sun 0 58 1051 4.733 7.5 300 11842 230 9078.84 12.5 493.4
12 Men , 0 55 108 5.429 :7.8 195 8829.18 ,225 r0187.5 15 679.2
13 Tue 0 94 114 4.833 7.6 250 10076.8 '245 9875.27 12.8 515.9
14 Wed 0 90 120 4.866 7.8 255 10348.5 213 8644.06 13.8 560
15 Thu 0 71, 133 4.902 7.9 237 9689.2 240 9811.84 " 16 654.1
16 Fri 0 80 110 4.565 7.7 350 13325.2 285 10850.5 , 17.4 662.5
17 Sat 0 85 120 4:56 '7.5 240 9127.3 395 15022 16 608.5
18 Sun 0 84 107 4.6,15 7.8 145 5580.92 250 9622.28 15 577.3
19 ' Mon . , 0.8 86 119 , 6;587 7.8 .348 19117.6 250 13733.9 14.2 780.1
20 Tue 0 80 115 5.682 7.5 285 13505.5 330 15638 13.5 639.7
21 Wed 0 85 115 5.682 8.0 320 15164.1 250 11847 12.7 601.8
22 Thu 0 57 78 4.838 7.5 185 7464.55 305 12306.4 13.8 556.8
23 F.-I 0 80 120 4.597 7.6 265 10159.8 600 23003.4 15.6 598.1
24 Sat 0 57 1221 4.887 7.7 225 9170046 518 21112.4 15.1 615.4
25 Sun 0.2 70 104 7.606 7.9 205 13004 240 15224.2 15.5 9.83.2
26 Men 0.05 95 125 5.797 7.3 160 7735.52 255 12328.5 14.5 701
27 Tue 0 70 110 5.156 8.1 '" 323 13889.3 400 17200A 13 559
28 Wed I 0.15 80 125 5.383 7.5 305 13692.7 383 17194.5 14.9 668.9
29 Thu 0 751 125 4.933' 7.4 445 18307.8 480 19747.8 " 13.5 555.4
30 Fri 0 71 88 4.756' 7.7 335 13287.8, 408 16183.3 16.3 646.5
'"
Average j .73967 114.9 5.1f73}~ 260 11280.9 285 12182.8 , 14.09 607.8
Maximum 0.8 114 163 ., ,7.606 8.1 445 22254.9 600 23003.4 17.4 983.2
Minimum 29 47 ' '44;;01 7.3 145 5580.92 65 2839.52 6.8 297.1
, . o~
No. of Data 30 0 0 30 30 0 30 30 30 30 . 30 30 0 30 30
: certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepaied dL2?)rfl /Z/~ /tJ//'6/dS--'
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed te, assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaiuate the information submitted.' (stN~J!i~J~.1'7RATOR) (DATE)
Based on my inquiry of the persons who manage the system, or those persons'
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the 10 \2.1\0)
best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of / (DATE)
(SIGNATURE ~j:7RINCiPAl EXECUTIVE
fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. OFFICER OR UTHORIZED AGENT)
I
r--.
I
{
r
r
d A
I ~. A -/ ~/P: /~/c?#(-
Monthly Report of Operation /0---~~';/
Activated Sludge Type . ( ~FCrlEDOPERATORJ . ~
(DATE)
W~stewater Treatment Plant \o\'-~\oS
Name of Facility Permit Number For Month Of: Year
City of Jeffersonville IN0023302 September 2005 - (SIGNAl-PRE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR (Dc>. TE)
Page 2 of4 State Form 10829 (R/1-Z005) AUTHORIZED AGENT)
. PRIMA~Y AERATION SECONDARY FINAL EFFLUENT
EFFLUENT MIXED LIQUOR RETURN SLUDGE EFFLUENT .
0 E
M
.S I , . . 0 .
~ ~ 'a, , c OJ ~ Cll Cll 0 C 'a,
<lJ ..- Q)
E 0 E u.. wE E .S c -.
x OJ 'C OJ E
CIl <1J ..Q~ >-
..c 01 . 32 I "0 >- I . 0, I 0 C >- .
x <.9 x
C tIl 0 tIl E 0 ~ - "!Il tIl ..c c ::c 0 0 tIl
0 E :!2 CI) :!2 ::J :2 :!2 E :!2 () Cll U 0 ::l
:2 . 0 <IJ 0 ~ '0 ro I 0 . 0 -I- u '0 (;
<lJ Cll_ ro , <lJ
<5 LO (/) :0 I/) (/) > <u <lJ (/) LO (/) ::l U ::l > ..c
0 ci rn <1J ci ~E 0 a. E ci 0 ci :-2!9 '0_ 0 0 . a.
0 <IJ- til- E ::l 0 .~ .~ U (/J - tIl
>- tIl - ::J <Il "OOl <Il <Il (/J C 0
ro OJ ::J ~ .s ::l ::J- .~~ <lJ 0 ::l OJ ::l <lJ 0 u.i :r: .~ en ..c
0 U (/) CI) E (/) 1ii E o E I- > CJ) U CJ) D::U D::u.. a. o E a.
1 250 3480 72 3.0 4.69 6940 0.04 19 7.8 7.3
2 300 5360 56 4.094 9450 0.05 6 7.8 7.3
3 270 4080 66 3.2 4.014 7680 0.06 18 7.8 8.2
4 270 3760 72 3.0 4.057 6160 0.02 . 30 7.8 8.1
5 250 4020 62 3.4 4.121 6560 . 0.04 11 7.7 8.2
6 250 3320 75 3.2 4.113 6100 0.02 9 7.8 8.2
7 150 1760 85 3.5 4.243 2540 . 0.05 94 7.8 8.2
8 120 940 128 2.9 4.234 1680 0.04 37 8.0 8.0
9 250 2780 90 2.5 4.068 8440 '. 0.02 '99 7.7 7.9
-
10 250 3460 72 2.0 3.924, 5980 ... 0.01 58 8.2 7.2 .'
11 250 . 3300 76 2.1 3.714 6680 0.01 39 7.8 7.1
12 300 2980 101 2.5 4.103 5780 0.04 38 7.9 7.5 .
13 250 3500 71 2.6 4.562 1180 0.03 24 8.0 7.0
14 200 2880 69 3.0 4.794 5200 0.02 24 8.2 7.2 .
15 300 3840 78 2.0 4.813 6140 .. 0.05 138 7.9 7.1
.' ,
16 1360 4660 77 0.3 4.475 7860 0.04 .' 69 7.8 7.1
17 200 3420 58 1.8 4.362 4880 0.05 31 7.8 6.9
18 200 2960 68 1.5 4.356 5800 0.03 52 7.4 7.3
19 300 3300 91 1.3 4.356 6440 0.02 28 7.7 7.0
20 250 3360 74 2.0 4.924 7560 0.01 115 7.7 7.3
21 200 3120 64 2.8 4.924 5500 0.05 38 7.7 7.1
22 230 3160 73 3.0 4.281 7340 . 0.04 63 8.0 7.2
23 250 3540 71 3.2 4.294 5520 0.04 17 7.8 7.3
24 260 3620 72 . 4.19 5960 0.04 53 7.81 . 7.0
25 250 3300 76 3.5 4.291 6120 0.04 7 7.4 7.3
26 250 2980 84 3.2 4.292 6560 0.04 55 7.7 7.0
27 200 3000 67 3.7 4.268 6160 '. 0.03 35 7.8 7.4
28 270 3060 88 2.5 4.23 5760 0.03 92 8.0 7.2
29 250 3100 81 2.5 4.225 4440 0.05 34 8.0 7.2
30 250 3240 77 2.0 4.181 4960 . '0.05 22 7.9 7.6
,
Avg. 246 3309 76 2.6 4.3064 5912 0.0353 34 7.4
Max. 360 5360 127.66 3.7 4.924 9450 0.06 138 8.2 8.2
Min. 120 940 55.97 0.26 3.714 1180 . 0.01 6 7.4 6.9
Data 0 0 30 30 30 28 0 30 30 0 0 0 30 30 30 30 0
Comments for the Month (major repairs, breakdowns, process upsets and their causes,inplant treatment process bypass, etc.): ..'
Monthly Report of Operation
Activated Sludge Type
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Name of Facility Permit Number
City of Jeffersonviile IN0023302
Page 3 of 4 State Form 10829 (R/1.2005)
,.....
,--.
.c
C
o
~
o
>-
co
o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
I 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Flow
ell
ro
a:
~,
u:~
.....
c ~
ell 0
.20
:t:::;.;:
LlJ ~
5.935
4.933
4.321
4.61
4.329
4.735
4.676
4.676
5.388
4.551
4.479
4.566
4.119
4.865
4.893
.4.36
4.26 4.506
4.173
5.382
5.713
5.713
4.492
4.315
4.892 4.95429
6.867
5.1731
ell
OJ
3: ~
o ell
- >
u..<
c.2:-
ell~
:::l ell
E <D
LlJS
4.70929
4.542
4.757
4.271
4.068 4.94633
Avg
Max
Min
Data
4.8018
6.867 4.95429
4.068 4.506
30 4
Percent Removal
Primary Treatment
Secondary TreatmEmt
Tertiary Treatment
Overall Treatment
~
E
For Month Of:
September
BOD
ell
_OJ
__ co
OJ'-
E ~'
~~
0-
O~
m Cll
us
Year
2005
'if ff~~~~d
(SIGNA trl7"RATORI
(SIGNATURE OF PRi!JCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR
AUTHORIZED AGENT)
c
FINAL EFFLUENT
Total Suspended Solids
U'l
,Q
I
>-ell
ro OJ
:!2 ro
:9 ~
.<(
U') >-
0-
O~
B~
U")
o
o
co
u
302.12
201 ,71
151.45
111.56
256.49
276.6
159.99
105,36
422.65
5.8429 292.43 232.15
287.8
194.33
164,99
154.27
183.74
200.11
U"l
o
o
m
u
6.1
4.9
4.2
2.9
7.1
7
4.1
2.7
9.4
7.7
7.7
5.1
4.8
3,8
4.5
5.5
5.2
2.4
7.9
5.6
7.2
1.3
7.9
6
4
3.8
7.5
52
6.2
15.6
5.2286 184.86 195.73
83.577
354.81
266,98
343.26
48.731
284.47
5.4714 244.94 232.4
229.22
164.04
284.27
206.43
220.98
7.05 529.58 272.42
5.8
15.6
1.3
30
230.39
7.05 529,58 272.42
5.2286 48.731 195.73
4 30 4
:
SODS
NA
N.A.
NA
97.8
~
E
~
E QJ
OJ
, ro
U'l '-
'0 ell
.- >
0<
U)>-
,::;Z
o..QJ
~..~
>-
co
:!2
I/)
.0 QJ
- 01
. co
I/) '-
'U QJ
.- >
0<
w>-
.::;z
o..<lJ
I/) <lJ
J5s
/ tJ//ff/&9)---.
/ /(DATE)
(0\ 2-lf\O!>--
(DATE)
__ Cll
0> o,"~ en
E E'- ,Q
l I ~ I
co .~ < co
.~ 5 ~ .~
E E~ E
E 5 ~ E
< ...... > c:(
0.0552 2.7339
0.0101 0.4158
0.0839 3.0253
0.0602 2.3159
0.05 1.8063
0.0481 .. 1;9006
0.0494 1.9276
0.212 8.2725
0.382 17.176
0.0431 0.1207 1.6369 5.0051
0.0556 2.0782
0.046 1.7528
0.055 r1.8905
0.0319 1.2951
0.061 2.4908
0.0946 3.4419
0.0724 0,0595 2.5738 2.2176 ..
0.0414 1.4417
0.0411 1.8459
0.0581 2.7699
0,0627 .. 2.9892
0.0531 1.9905
0.277 9,9744
0.0534 0.0838 2.18 3.3131
0.557 31.919
0.613 . 26.462
0.069 2.6153
0.0935 3.7117
0.0858 3.058
0.175 0.2656 5.9408 12.285
Ammonia
>-
ell
'0 <lJ
- 01
U'l co
.0 '-
- <lJ.
. >
,~ c:(
c >-
0-
E-al
~~
Otl
01
E.
I
<lJ
U'l
co
(])
(5
0($.
o
.
1 ~:
4.416.3667 167.65 260.85 0.0101 0.0595 0.4158 2.2176
30 .... 4 30 -;c 4 30 4 30 4
." ..
U'l
:Q
o
U)
ci.
U'l
:::l
U)
U'l
,Q
I
U'l
:Q
o
U)
ci.
U'l
:::l
U)
S.S.
NA
NA
NA
97.5
257.54
214.06
245.2
200,05
238.43
252,89
202.91
327.78
503.58
6.9429 212.6.8 276.9
, 373.77
_~J.?7.65
219.99
227.35
391.99
320.18 ..
327.06 289.71
292.52 '
323.37
362.33, .
371.86
269.91
223.25
7.3714 293,93 305.31
309.45
345.35
189.51
254.06
249.49
6.3667 217.26 260,85
5.2
5.2
6.8
5.2
6.6
6.4
5.2
8.4
11.2
5.6
10
4.4
6.4
5.6
9.6
8.8'
9.2 7.7143
8.4
7.2
7.6 ',.
7.8i
7.2
6,2
7.2
5.4
8
5
6.4
7
6.4
Total Monthly Flow:
(million gallons) 144.05
PercentCapacity
(actual flowfdesign) 92%
,
~
r-
,.....
~
~
I,
Monthly Report of Operation
Activated Sludge Type
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Name of Facility
Permit Number
For Month Or:
City of Jeffersonville IN0023302 September
Page 4 of 4 State Form 10829 (R/1-2005)
SLUDGE TO
DIGESTER Anaerobic Only
QJ
S .g
C, :J 0
~ ii58
o ~';
>- ,s; Cii
8 0.: c.?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 .
21
22
23
24
25
· 26
27
28
29
30
Avq.
Max.
Min.
Data
QJ
OJ
"0
:J
ii5
.0
tlO
<~
Gl X
C;; .
ctl-
5:c9
0.095
0.122
0.122
0.122
0.122
0.122
0.109
0.109
0.094
0.094
0.094
0.094
0.094
0.089
0.09
0.107
0.124
0.124
0.125
0.135
0.135
0.135
0.135
0.135
0.129
0.13
0.13
0.129
0.13
0.13
0.1168
0.135
0.089
o 30
cO
.Q 8
'.' )"U',,":
~-5 ><:
,e it
c.. u
'</l :.a
:r: ctl. :J
a. c.? 0
o
o
J
p'J 6<r:4&~
7 ("GNATURE ?~WRI
2005 (SIGNATURE OFPRINCIPAL,t:XECUTIVE OFFICER OR
AUTHORIZgD-AGENT)
DIGESTER OPERATION
Year
LL.
c
~
ctl
-00
.co
~~
_ X
C .
ctl-
_ ctl
ctlc.?
C ....
Q; 0
a. .
:J <Il
U)..c:
<:::::
OJ
E
LO
o
0_
coo,
'E E
~z
ctl 1
cC'1
....:r:
~z
:J '-
U) ~o
.
OJ
c
'E
o
u
c
"0
(IJ.
C;;
(IJ
OJ
o
.~
~:.~
0'
U) (IJ
-'- 0>
ctl"O
152
r-U)
'.
OJ
c
'E
o
l.l
of
.5
III
32
o~
C/) -0.
~<ll
:;:; OJ
"'''0
o..:!
> (f)
0.61
0.61
"0
<ll
in
Q)
Ol
a
.5
</l
32
o~
(f) o.
~Q)
:;:: OJ
"''0
0.=1
>IJJ
.
0.6 43900
0.59
45640
93920
0.61 48140
94160
0.6 48750
45620
0.61 51900
../. 1
0.61
'. 0.59
o 0 0 7
o
.S:
~.~
0'
(f) QJ
_ OJ
11l"O
- :J
0_
r-U)
.
.QJ
~
ro
Q;
a.
E
~
o
Send completed forms by the 28th of the month to:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
OFFICE OF WATER QUALITY, DATA MANAGEMENT SECTION
P.O. BOX 6015
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46206-6015
65423
94160
43900
o 10
/C///7/o r--
/ / (Date)
\ D \ L~\05
(Date)
c:
;:
e
"0
.<:
~
Q)
Ol
"C
:J
US
"C
Q)
u; ^
.~gs
Cl...J
91740
90460
.
o
o
-<;~~JvlITT~~':~ME/;U~~JsS: ~LATI~N';LlpOL~~~;JT DI;~~~~GE L=:I~JATlO~';~JTEM?"(;;hES) '1
.~9_1!l_~:._~_~!~~~~9_~Yi~~_M_~~i~ie31_2.TP-____ DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (DM!?)
.~~~~~~E__?Q1_~b,?.':~~!?i?_~_I3_q95!__________ I N0023302 001 A
.~~!.f!:~~?_~~!I!~.!_~~9J?_~9_~?~_~9_____________ PERMIT NUMBER DISCHARGE NUMBER
E~~J~!}:'.:_..-!.~!!~E?~~YJ!I!:_~_~!:lJ~Jp_~U~:!J:___
.~_q~3~9_~:._}_~!~~~~9_~Yi~~.!_!1]9J31]51_:!.?3_~9_
.~~t~:__:!J~~~~Y_~_~~9~!9!5!._~~!!!~~_~_Qf?~rator
11"1
FORM APPROVED
OMB No.2040-0004 "
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111:"
.IN0023302001A0905.
... NO DISCHARGE I_I ...
NOTE: Read instructions before completing this form<
PARAMETER >< (3 Card Only) Quantity or Loading Quality or Concentration NO< Frequency of Sample
(32-37) (46-53) (54-61) (38-45) (46-53) (54-61) EX analysis Type
Average Maximum Unit Minimum Average Maximum Unit (62-6 (64-68) (69-70)
OXYGEN. DISSOLVED (DO) SAMPLE .
MEASUREMEN .....**** ******* .*..*-** 6.9 *.".... 82 (19) 0 DAILY GRAB-3
00300 1 1 0 PERMIT .'.' 6.0" REPORT
EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN ******* ..*...* ..>1:**** DAILY MIN. I "-. ,-' ~*.*.**. DAILY MAX. mg/L DAILY GRAB~3
pH SAMPLE ..'\~'"
MEASUREMEN ******* ******* *...... 7.4 ..***.... 8.2 (12) 0 DAILY' GRAB
00400 1 0 0 PERMIT ,.6.0,." l'" ..': ,9.0. .
EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REOUIREMEN . .......'" *....... ........ MINIMUM. I .... -; ww..... MAXIMUM. SU DAILY GRAB .
SOLIDS, TOTAL SUSPENDED SAMPLE
MEASUREMEN 280 305 (26) ..**.** 7 8 (19) 0 DAILY 24 hr. COMPo
00530 1 1 0 . PERMIT 3424.8 5137.2 .i,".: I:.";, <. ........* 27.0
EFFLUENT'GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN MO. AVG. 7 DAY MAx. ",s"" If>> .. '. 7 DAY MAX. DAILY 24 hr. CaMP,
Ibs.lday ......... .; mg/L
NITROGEN, AMMONIA SAMPLE
TOTAL (AS N) MEASUREMEN 5.1 12.2 (26) ...**.. 0.120 0.265 (19) 0 DAILY 24 hr. COMP<
00610 1 1 0 PERMIT 285.4 570.8 . ........:; . :.1.5.......... .' 3.0 c
EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN MO. AVG. 7 DAY MAX; Ibs.lday <MO'AVG.. '7dAYIVIAX. mg/L i 'nAIL Y 24 hr. 'COMP.:"
, CYANIDE, TOTAL (AS CN) SAMPLE
MEASUREMEN ...**.* .**.*.. ...,...* ....... 0.013 0.020 (19) 0 TWICE/MONTH GRAB
00720 GOO PERMIT .i~.l~i;:;' ) ~EPORT, . REPORT .
TWICE/MONTH . .
RAW SEWAGE/INFLUENT REQUIREMEN ........ ....... *...... : MO. AVG'. '. DAILY MAX. mg/L GRAB
CYANIDE, TOTAL (ASCN) SAMPLE
MEASUREMEN ......* *....** ."..... *......* <'005 <.005 (19) 0 WEEKLY GRAB
00720 1 0 0 PERMIT :) ,',:,0.016,.,'" ..'......,.0.01.6,
';'0' (M6;'AVG;' . .
EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN *.***.11 ******11 j *...... DAILY; MAX: mg/L WEEKLY GRAB
CHROMIUM, TOTAL (AS Cr) SAMPLE
MEASUREMEN *.**... .,,*..... ....... .*"...* <.01 ___M1.Q (19) 0 TWICE/MONTH 24 hL COMPo
01034 GOO PERMIT ,";" ," X~jASd:J mB~,~j?~4
- .' .', .'.- :.'
RAW SEWAGEIlNFLUENT REQUIREMEN *'*...** *-"*.***' I ****.*. ,.' ';'lVId'AVG;; mg/L TWICE/MONTH 24 hr. CaMP.:
,.
, """C"",",,"""""'''_'.'';''''.''___...I C
. : direction or supervision in accordance willi a syslem designed to assure that qualified ... TELEPHONE DATE
NAMEfTlTLE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER ~-.,--~""..~_.~,~ ~.."."," I I. '
R b W . the 1'1:1:;0":0 who lIuliIllge the :.1'sh:m, or thuse !l"rsons djr~-ctl.y rl:SI)QlIsible for g~lht'riflg the I ,
o 31Z infonnalion,lhc iufonllalioll subruiUed is, to the best army knowledge and belief, trub.
IIccurah: urn.1 cmupl<;:h:. f 1111111\\0'111"":: 1IIIIIIh.:r.: lln: significant p'-"Jll!.ltic!I for lluhmilling (hlse i "- (812) 285-645105" /0 oZ,<!
M a yo r of j eft e rs onv i II e _ ~ illfollllalioll, including the possibility of fine or imprisollment for knowing V.::I.at~.~~~j /
TYPED OR PRINTED , AREA CODE NUMElE YEAR . MO DAY
COMMENT AND EXPLANATION OF ANY VIOLATIONS
DISCHARGE TO OHIO RIVER
(Reference al/ attachments here)
Clark County
EPA FORM 3320-1 (REV. 08-95) Previous editions maybe used.
(REPLACES EPA FORM T-40 WHICH MAY NOT BE USED.)
PAGE 1 OF 3
_ '''~"1'':~~'1 '~'i ~~') 'n 1""':1"""11"'1 ~., "'~l
PERMITTEE NAME/ADDRESS: NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES).
.~_~!:l]~:__~~_f!~L~C!!.1_~~~~_~~~i~Jp-,~~~!..~___~.
Address: 701 Champion Road
"Jetfe-rsonvnre:lil-aian-a--,fTf30------------.
----------------------------------------------.
"~_~~ili!l~_~~f!~!_~~~~~~~_~~D.~~iP..?~_~I~___.
.~9..~~!iC!!1:__~~_f!~!~_~~y.i!~~~~~_q~~~_~_~?_~~.9..,
_~t!~~_ _-ri~~!~11_~:._~!?_'::'!9Lq!.f~~ti~~_q_9..e,era tor
--1
FORM APPROVED
OMB NO.2040.0004
DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (DMR)
IN0023302 I 001A________
PERMIT NUMBER DISCHARGE NUMBER
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIII~ 111I1 illll 1111 11111 1111111111 11111111
. 1 N 0 0 2 3 3 0 2 0 0 1 A 0 9 0 5 .
... NO DISCHARGE 1_1***
NOTE: Read instructions before completing this form.
PARAMETER X (3 Card Only) Quantity 01 loadirig (4 Card Only) Quality or Concentration NO. Frequency of Sample
(32-37) (46-53) (54-61) (38-45) (46-53) (54-61) EX analysis Type
Average Maximum Unit Minimum Average Maximum Unit (62-6 (64-68) (69-70)
CHROMIUM, TOTAL SAMPLE
RECOVERABLE MEASUREME ******* ******* ******* ******* *...*** <.01 (19) 0 WEEKL Y 24 hr. COMPo
01118 1 0 0 PERMIT I. <. 0.25 I' I
EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN I .>. "i", .' DAILY MAX. 24 hr. CoM~: '
......** ....."'. ; *....*. : mg/L WEEKLY
'i
COPPER, TOTAL (AS Cu) SAMPLE . . '"
MEASUREME ******1'1 ****'Ir.Jt ..*.*.. ******* 0.110 0.140 (19) 0 TWICE/MONTH 24 hr. COMPo
01042 GOO PERMIT ....,... :.REPORT, REPORT . :
RAW SEWAGEIINFLUENT REQUIREMEN < .' < ....."'. ....."'.:, i ******* I ..' MO.,AVG; DAILY MAX. mg/L TWICE/MONTH . 24 hr. COMPo :
ZINC, TOTAL (AS Zh) SAMPLE
MEASUREME .*...*. ******* *....*. ******* 0.135 0.170 (19) 0 TWICE/MONTH 24 hr. COMPo
01092 GOO PERMIT REPORT REPORT 24 hr. COM~. i
RAW SEWAGE/INFLUENT REQUIREMEN ...."... ....... .*.*... ." Mo. AVG. DAILY MAX; mg/L TWICE/MONTH
ZINC, TOTAL RECOVERABLE SAMPLE
MEASUREME ******. .**..** ******* *****.* 0.030 0.050 (19) 0 ( .( WEEKLY 24 hr. COMPo
01094 1 0 0 PERMIT' . .'. ...f..~2\i "'<<0:19, ..,'.' .....,0.33
EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN *****'Ir* ******* ..-.... MO. AVG. DAILY MAx. mg/L WEEKLY 24hf.COIIJIP. .
.
. COPPER, TOTAL SAMPLE
RECOVERABLE MEASUREME ******* ******* ***..*** ******* 0.010 0.010 (19) 0 WEEKL Y 24 hr. COMPo
01119 1 0 0 PERMIT . .....,...'. i 0.02 .(v;O.O~,.' '.' 24hf.iCOM~;'
EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN .."....",. .*....* ******'it .......... . 'MO~.AVG; · ,'DAILY MAX: mg/L WEEKLY
FLOW, WASTEWATER BY- SAMPLE
PASSING TREATMENT MEASUREME n/a ******* (80) ******* ..*.... ******. *...k.. 0
50049 1 0 0 PERMIT OPTIONAL . I,'",..... ,.,iD: };
EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN MO. TOTAL ....... MGALlMO. ' ~~~~~n ***.*.* ". ****... 1,'If***** .::. ,!'
FLOW, IN CONDUIT OR SAMPLE ~
THRU TREATMENT PLANT MEASUREME 4.80 4.95 (03) ....*** ******* * ****** 0 DAILY CONTINUOUS
.
50050 1 0 0 PERMIT REPORT. REPORT. . .......,'.~J Ie', .~; ,,';{hv1.~~ '~',':'-':' '-'-': ',:) ~/-:~;
EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN MO. AVG. 7 DAY MAX. MGD i.*....... I'...mnp"; ,,,'/./ ....... : 'DAILY . CONT'NUdUS"
"j"ccni(y 'u;lder"re;u'lj"iY"OI;'i;I~~'ih~'i"jj""is'd;);i~;;'~iit' a;;j-'~iil: all.a;;_hii'ie~.lls..w.e~e'p~cpare(fui;der... : IY"jJ TELEPHONE DATE
NAMEITITLE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICEI ony di''''lion or snp."vision in ,,,,ordm",c wirh , syslcmd"i~ncdro",so'crl,"lq'mlificd i
Rob Waiz personnel properly gather and C\',lIuulc Ihe jnformaliollsubmiued. Based Oil my inquiry of!
:lhe persons who manage the system, or those persollS directl~ responsible for,gathering thc1
informalion, the iufonnalion submitted is. to the beslo(t'ny kno'wlCdge and belief., ime, : SIGNATURE~tINCIPALEXECUTIVE (812)285-6451 O{I& ;<<f
Mavor of Jeffersonville accuraleand complete. I am aware Ihat there are signilicant penalties: forsubmiuing ~
. false information, including the possibility of fine 01 imprisonmenl for knowing violations. i'
TYPED OR PRINTED . .. OFFICER 0 AUTHORIZED AGENT AREACODE NUMBE YEAR MO DAY
COMMENT AND EXPLANATION OF ANY VIOLATIONS
DISCHARGE TO OHIO RIVER
(Reference all attachments here)
Clark County
(REPLACES EPA FORM T-40 WHICH MAY NOT BE USED.)
EPA FORM 3320-1 (REV. 08-95) Previous editions may be used.
PAGE 2 OF 3
., "" 1
--~ '1
q,.,_. ~"'. """'] ",",r" J --~l'l ""1 ,-" 1" "~'l~"~l ~"-'l
",.lRMr. .,,,'-'kAML.....u RES~: ". ". NA Th-lI'lAL POLLu 1 AI'lT DI::;C;HARGE I::L1M1NA TION ::;YSTEM (NPDES)
Name: Jeffersonville Municipal STP DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (DMR}
-:~~~!~~;~~~i9T~li~~Ei26~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~: IN0023302 I 001A m .____
Jeffersonville, Indiana 47130 PERMIT NUMBER lDlSCHARGE f\JUMBER
'raCifify:'JeffersonvnTe'tVlu'nlclparSTP---
----------------------------------------------
.~,~~?_tlc:~,:,_~~!!~!.?_~~yJ!I,~,_!~.9.iE.~?_~?~_~9_
.~t.!!l.:,,"Il ~c:~~L~_9!~\Y!9..C~~.f~_r:.t!~~_<:!gR~rator
, .,,", '-'-""1-
FORM APPROVED
OMS NO.2040-0004
1
1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~lllillli~IIIIII~11111111111I111mlllllllll 11111 11111 11111111
. I N 0 0 2 3 3 0 2 0 0 I A 0 9 0 5 .
*** NO DISCHARGE I_I ***
NOTE: Read instructions before completing this form.
PARAMETER X (3 Card Only) Quantity or Loading (4 Card Only) Quality or Concentration NO. Frequency of Sample
(32-37) (46-53) (54-61) (38-45) (46-53) (54-61) EX analvsis Type
Average Maximum Unit Minimum Average Maximum Unit (62-6 (64-68) (69-70)
CHLORINE. TOTAL SAMPLE
RESIDUAL MEASUREMEN ******* ***11**-1,; ******* *****.* 0.0353 0.06 (19) 0 DAILY GRAB
50060 1 1 0 PERMIT ,'.,\. ::.,0.06 ., 0.06
EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN *****.. ***.... *.**.** . ~'''~''. < ": MO. Ava.. DAILY MAX. mg/L DAILY GRAB '.
E-COLl ' COLlSCAN MF SAMPLE
MEASUREMEN ******* ******* ***~*** .***1l;.* 34 138 (13) 0 DAILy......'" GRAB
51041 100 PERMIT 125 MO. 235 DAILY
EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN *.***** *****11* ******* ., MAX., DAILY GRAB
" . AVG. #/j OOmL .,
BOD. CARBONACEOUS 5- SAMPLE.,
DAY. 20 C. MEASUREMEN 230 272 (26) ******* 6 7 (19) .0 DAILY 24 hr. COMPo
80082 1 2 0 PERMIT 2854.0 4376.0 , , 15.0 . 23.0
EFFLUENT.GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN MO. AVG. 7 DAY MAX. Ibs.lday . MO;AVG. :7 DAy MAX. mg/L DAILY 24 hr; COMPo
BYPASS OF TREATMENT SAMPLE
MEASUREMEN n/a .***-** (84) ******* ******* ******* **t**** 0
80998 1 0 0 PERMIT OPTIONAL '. L' "I . .
<< <<
EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN MO. TOTAL .,.****** DAYS/MO. ******* . .
.
FLOW, TOTAL SAMPLE .'
MEASUREMEN ***1l*** 144.05 (3R) ******* ******* *******
82220 1 o 0 PERMIT REPORT .'
EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE REQUIREMEN *****"'. MO. TOTAL MGAL ~ '.,' -k****** ....*.. .*.... NCE MO/.BeCTOT
SAMPLE
MEASUREMEN
None PERMIT , " Ii..
REQUIREMEN . " ". > "
SAMPLE -
MEASUREMEN ./-- ') ;I
None PERMIT , /,: I:',.b
REQUIREMEN ,
! I ~;tify 1I1l~1~~'I~;jt;;:;f 1~;lj;llllhi:l-~.11~~~"I:;t-;ld 1l1l.11lllldum:nIS w;;P;~;d uilder my ,'{7/,
I. direction or slIllCrvision in al"conlancc wilh a. syslem desillll:d 10 assurt,: thai qualified TELEPHONE DATE
NAMEITITLE. PRINCIPAL .EXECUTIVE. OFFICE! pc:rsonnd prorlCf1y Blllhcrltnd Cl'llhllllc Ihe infommlioll submilted.i~ase<t 011 my illquiryof
. . tl~ p.:rsom. who mal1l1g~ Ih", sysh:m, or IhIlS'" pcn>OIlS dire<:i1y respomihlc for Slithering Ih~
Rob Wa I Z infoml:llion. Ihe ;nf(lnnalion suhmilled is. 10 lh~ bes! ot' myknowledgc and belier, lruc,
It"urih: IInd4:0Illplelc. 111m Ilwurc Ihllllhcrc lire sigiii'liclIllllJC::llllllic::!' lOr subrlliltiug rube (812) 285,6451 0,(10 rJ'f
Mayor of Jeffersonville inlllllTl:uion, inchRling the JlOssihililY of line or imprisonmenl for knowing violalil:IRs. SIGNATURE OF pf'NCIPAL EXECUTIVE
I ,
TYPED OR PRINTED OFFICER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AREA CODE NUMB. YE.AR MO DAY
COMMENT AND EXPLANATION OF ANY VIOLATIONS
DISCHARGE TO OHIO RIVER
(Reference all attachments here)
Clark County
EPA FORM 3320-1 (REV. 08-95) Previous editions may be used.
(REPLACES EPA FORM T-40 WHICH MAY NOT BE USED.)
PAGE 3 OF 3
'}
o biosolids were disposed, by land application or other methods; this month
were land applied this month
biosolids were used at the treatment works grounds this month
were landfilled this month
r'll. ';';~:;<~j:::1;t?:Biosol~ds were disposed by the method listed below this month
L &Method: ~{:gM;0;\:
r
,-"
I ~Ofthe total volume listed above, what volume was transported out ofIndiana?
"t. y - - - - - - - ''--.'.
n
~',
r'INDUSTRIAL \VASTE PRODUCTS:
r J.fKF~..~;;.;;'t~t;'/No industrial waste products were disposed, by land application or other methods, this month
~; . _:~::.:'~',:;~.:::,;.:"- :_::;~::;<
wI )'i~;~yJ!,,;;7i;:;,'Industrial waste products were land applied this month
_-.-0' ,. ._.........,
Industrial waste products were landfilled this month
Industrial waste products were disposed by the method listed below this month
Indiana Department of Environmental 1\lanagement
Land Use Section - OSH\VM
Land Application Monthly Report -Biosolids and Industrial\'lasteProducts
>>Complete and submit this form to IDEM each report month<<
Year:
L.A. Permit No. IN LA:
lethods of Disposal Utilized: .. '
.. "/
ndicate by an "X" which disposal metho'tls \vere utilized this month and provide volumes for each method,
'~NOTE: Only include amounts for those materials which you are PERMITTED to land apply.
Dry Tons
I NA
Jpfthe total volume listed above, whatvolume was transported out ofIndiana?
t ~':::' ::.,.'.- -"'_'__,<'~'--'___ .:".,_,;:".,~,;::'>s~,;,:~~-,"':'}';::,-;...-,:.,:,;-.";;;-',F: _<,_,_., ,'.::-'_.-':....' ". '.~'. <:', ',:,,>;0< uH,:V . ",:.',~":~>,,,;,:,;,;,,;,<...; .,;;,.:,..,',~.;;"'"",,-'~ ,:,-:.', -:-:"": J_. :,,-,,;-""-:'.:,'.:> '" ".::.,_,.,.;..... ,......" ,:. '..'" :',:..... :"c":': -;;:",;", .,:.';::;., '., "':-:" <{<, ~.:_:,:.-::_.:-. :::,.;;:".'. :":/"':.:'-..'.:':""'-, -, '- ".','i,"...":,, '-;,:.< :,<:<..:-::...,.- :.~',<
L:II he;eby certify that to thebest~f my k.'1owledge and understa~ding this rep~rtis complete and accurate.
~ . '.
_l c7 Timothy LCra\vford
Printed Name
October 18,2005
Date
r--
r
~
~ "'-^ ,.''''''':
of Jeffersonville 1 of 5
Jeffersonville POTW IN0023302
811/05 to 8/30/05 ,0,
22.5 Measured/Metered (M) or Estimated (E) must be specified. {Please attach methods used.}
, ,
eso Outfall No. 003 CSO Outfall No; 004 - CSO OutfaU No, 0.05
TH 0.00 I 5.91 9.00
)
FR 0.00 5.24 9.10 >
SA 0.00 4.46 9.00
SU 0.00 4.78 9.00 ,
MO 0.00 4.61 9.00 ..
TU 0.00 5.01 9.10
WE 0.00 4.80 9.50
TH 0.40 4.80 25.00
, FR 0.00 6.43 17.00
,
i .
, SA 0.00 4.88 9.50
SU 0.00 4.73 9.00
MO 0.00 5.43 9.40
TU 0.00 4.83 10.00
WE 0.00 4.87 10.00 ..
-
TH 0.00 4.90 10.00 r '.' '.
-
FR 0.00 4.57 10.00
SA 0.00 4.56 10.00 ,
SU 0.00 4.62 10.50
MO 0.80 6.59 18.00
TU 0.00 5.68 10.50
WE 0.00 5.68 10.00
TH 0.00 4.84 10.00
FR 0.00 4.60 10.00
, SA 0.00 4.89 10.00
SU 0.20 7.61 16.00 .
, MO 0.05 5.80 10.00
, TU 0.00 5.16 10.00
WE 0.15 5.38 10.00
f TH 0.00 4.93 10.00 ',.".
FR 0.00 4.76 10.00 ,
i.60 n/a n/a n/a 0.00 0.00 n/a 0.00 0.00 n/a 0.00 0.00
NairlecanaTiUe?of.Pl'i eilephb
ITimothY L. ,
Crawford (812)285-6451
r'l. CERTIFY UND.ERPENAL TYOF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT ANDALkATl'ACHMEl'fJ"~W~R~P~EFAR~eHN[lfflMy:[)jR~c;T10N()~SUPER"l$rO~I~.. .."..
~.ACCORDANCE WITH A SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PROPERLY GA-THERA'ND EVALUJ\TETHE INFbkMATIONSUBMlTTEO:
jBASEdON MY INQUIRY OF THE PERSONS WHO MANAGE THE SYSTEM OR THOSE PERSONS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR GATHERING THE INFORMATION;
THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, TRUE, ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE. .1 AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE .
~"::~0IF,I:C~j~~~i~i~~;~?P,:~~~il~.i.~~i~.E,~~~~iMATl9N, INCLUDING THE POSSI81L1TYOF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING VIOLATIONS.
i: ,. I nature .rmcl a xecu lve ror u ooze e
~ I ~/ -~ / J -;7 /:-~~~ ~ /C. )//8; '&1'
// v ~y 'n"
r: t/ / I
j
If
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)
CSO DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (CSO DMR)
ADDITIONAL OVERFLOWS PAGE
~Of51
IN0023302
a/1/05 to 8/30/05, . . .. .,. ... ... ,., . . ... .... . . . ...... . . .
Measured/Metered 1M) or Estimated lEI must be.soecifled. iPlease.atta~h methods used.l
City of Jeffersonville
Jeffersonville POTW
eso Outfall No 006
CSO Outfall No 008
Outfall No 007
09
TH
FR . ~.
SA
SV
MO
TV
WE
TH
FR
SA
SV
MO
TV
r
i TH
FR
SA
11)5 SV
MO
TV
WE
I"~ TH
I<~ FR
~~a
.
.0.00
0.00
rJa
0.00
n/a
0.00
0.00 0.00
n/a
0.00
'01 ..r ncmal
Timothy L. Crawford 8121285.6451
I CERTIFY liNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATT ACHMENTSWERE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION OR SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
SYSTEM DESIGNED TOASSURE THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PROPERLY GATHER. AND,EYALUATE THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED. BASED ON MY INQUIRY OF THE
PERSONS WHO MANAGE THE SYSTEM OR THOSE PERSONS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FO~ GATHERING .THE INFORMATION; THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED !S, TO THE
BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, TRUE, ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE. I AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SiGNIFICANT PENAL1'IES FOR SUBMITTING FALSE
INFORMATION,INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING VIOLATIONS.
""'../
1.../
/,17 d..--. j/
/
.C'.......
T /07/0/0')
/ '
r
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELlMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)
CSO DISCHARGE MONITORlNG REPORT (CSO DMR)
ADDITIONAL OVERFLOWS PAGE
City of Jeffersonville ~ 3 of 5
JefferSOnVille~
8/1/05 to 8/30/05
Measured/Metered (M) or Estimated rEI must' h methods used.l
, eso Outfall No 010 eso Outfall No 011 CSO Outfa II No 012 o Outfall No
013
'.
FR
SA
SU .
1.10
TU
WE I
TH
FR
SA
SU I
1.10
TU
WE , .
TH .
FR
SA
SU
1.10 2:00am E 2.00 E 0.02 E 2:00am E 2.00 E 0.02 E
TU I
WE I
TH I
FR I I
SA
SU .
Mol
TUI I
WE I .
TH
FR I
I
n/a 0.00 0.00 n/a 2.00 0.02 0.00 n1a 2.00 0.02 ;
T e or nnte
Timothv L. Crawford 8121285.6451 .'
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS WEREPREF'ARED UNDER MYDIRECTlONOR SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCEWITH A
SYSTEM DES.IGNED TO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PROPERLY GATHER AND EVALUATE THE INFORMATION' SUBMITTE'p.BASED ON
:A'<;.,:)~ ."....
Sionalur .6".i............. :>
// /~// /:,,.,7 J( 7c;//S/OT
~ j'-' / / /
-<"- --~.;.~
City of Jeffersonville
Jeffersonville POTW
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)
CSO DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (CSO DMR)
ADDITIONAL OVERFLOWS PAGE
."'"''"~-' 1Iiii~~"'~
MeasuredlMetered IMlor E;timaled iElmustbe specified: fPleaseattach methodsuseCiS ..
."
CSO Outfall No 014
CSO Outfall No 015
CSO Outfall No 015
CSO Outfall No 017
TH
FR
SA
SU
MO
TU
WE
TH
FR
SA
SU
1'.10
TU
WE
TH
FR
SA
SU
MO
TU
11![zj WE
Itri~2 TH
IL}~~
FR
SA
SU
MO
TU
WE
TH
FR
~ nla 0.00
Timothy L. Crawford
.
.
.
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
n/a
0.00
0.00 nla
~812\285~451
0.00
n/a
!7"
'utl,,;;
I Aaent.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHM.ENTS WERE PREPARED pNOER MYOIRECTlONOR SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PROPERLY G.G.THER AND EVALUATE THE INFORMATION SUBMITTE!'. BASED ON .
/1.
(7
.......L"~ ~/
J
~d
/
"i '. "
._y
'--......-
.
/,/) /'//rM . T
/ 7
H
FR
,.-. SA
SU
MO
TU
WE
TH
FR
SA
SU
MO
TU
WE
TH
FR
SA
SU
MO 2:00am M 2.00 M 0.04 E
TU
WE
TH
FR
SA
SU
MO
TU
WE
TH
FR
nla ~~o 0.04
Timothv L. Crawford
r-
NATIONAL POLLUTANT PISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)
CSO DISCHARGE MONITORINGREPQFH (CSO DMR)
ADDITIONAL OVERFLOWS PAGE
~.,",...,,'" . ~ ..
Measured/Metered (M) ~(Estim~ted IE) must be soecifled.1Please attach meth~ds used'.}
C
I I
I
I
,
.'.
nla 0.00 0.00 nla 0,00 0.00 n/a 0.00 0,00
3121285.6451
.' .. ".
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS WERE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION OR SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A
SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PROPERLY GATHER AND EVALUATE THE INFORMATION SUBMITTEp. BASED ON
". .:' " ',' . ".i. ':.
/f.) / //f/() \
,/
//
{7
//1~ A
)7
~
-c..:...-:-
r
r
( ~
Attachment F
Locations of Footage Cleaned
FLUSH PROGRAM SUMMARY SHEET
STREET FOOTAGE SANITARY/CSO Catch basins Cleaned I
WALL STREET 60 CSO
WARDER PARK 207 CSO Catchbasin Tops Cleaned I
RIVERSIDE DRIVE FROM ROCKY'S TO KINGFISH 1455 CSO
6TH & OHIO 800 CSO Total Footage TV'ed I
LOCUST 120 - ALLEY TO WANLUT 240 CSO
15TH & LOCUST 400 CSO Total Footage Cleaned I
10TH & WALL 550 CSO
15TH & DUNCAN 200 CSO
FULTON 412 216 CSO
MORRIS 801 506 CSO
MORRIS 1026 131 CSO
PLANK ROAD TO 1043 NACHAND LANE TO CLARVIEW 600 CSO
ELLWANGER & NACHAND 530 CSO
PARK PLACE & CHIPPEWA 500 CSO
CHERRY STREET BETWEEN 9TH & 10TH) 145 CSO 7040 I
.... ... .. . .
10TH FROM CLARVIEW TO YOU-A-CARRY-OUT-A 500 SANITARY
.
STRAWBERRY LANE 500 SANITARY
8TH & STRAWVERRY 450 SANITARY
POppy PLACE 910 130 SANITARY
CEDARVIEW 1126 200 SANITARY
CEDARVIEW 1126 200 SANITARY
NA-CHARLESTOWN PIKE 225 SANITARY
NOLE DRIVE 1518 130 SANITARY
CRUMS LANE WET WELL 400 SANITARY
10TH STREET FROM RHONDA TO AVONDALE 1370 SANITARY
FULTON 922 100 SANITARY
BRISCOE & HERBY (CHECK MANHOLE) 357 SANITARY
MOCKINGBIRD 609 520 SAN IT ARY
ROMA & CARMAN (CHECK MANHOLE) 500 SANITARY
.. .. .. ..
SPRINGDALE (BETWEEN 9TH & 10TH - BI-MONTH 400 SANITARY
FALLOW DRIVE 250 SANITARY
1524 NORTHAVEN TO SPORTSMAN 400 SANITARY
. ....
3011 PERIMETER 340 SANITARY
BLUEBIRD & HOPKINS MANHOLE 317 SANITARY
..
ALLEY BETWEEN 8TH & BRIGMAN 250 SANITARY
LENTZIER TRACE 107 SANITARY
SPORTING PRINT 3217 202 SANITARY 7348 I
;:-
r-.
r-
21
01
10661
14388\