The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05) May JEFFERSONVILLE WAST'EWATER TiREA T'MENTJ FACILl Monthly Operations Re} May, 2006 Prepared for: Peggy Wilder July 10, 2006 SERVICE AGREEMENT TO PREPARE CHAPTER UPDATES TO THE COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW LONG TERM CONTROL PLAN AND COORDINATE NEGOTATIONS WITH U.S. EPA AND IDEM THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the City of Jeffersonville, Indiana, acting by and through the SewerBoard (hereinafter referred to as the "Board") and Bernardin Lochmueller & Associates, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT'). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. Scope of Service The services to be provided by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement are as set out in EXHIBIT "A", attached to this Agreement, and made an integral part hereof. Section 2. Information and Services to be Furnished by Board 2.1 The contact person for the Board shall be Robert L. Waiz, Mayor 2.2 The authorized representative for the Board shall be Robert L. Waiz, Mayor Section 3. Compensation The CONSULTANT shall receive payment for the work performed under this Agreement as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. The CONSULTANT acknowledges that payment for services is typically done within 45 days of submission of proper claim forms as required by the City. There shall be no late payment penalties or interest on payments not made within said 45 days. There shall be no "extra work", "extra charges", or travel expenses incurred without the written consent of the Board or its authorized representative. (SEE SECTION 5.5). Section 4. Notice to Proceed and Schedule The CONSULTANT shall begin the work to be performed under this Agreement on or before , and have the work completed on or before , except for on-going coordination of negotiations with US EPA and IDEM, until services are terminated by the Board. Page 1 of 15 Service agreement 09.11.06.doc Section 5. General Provisions 5.1 Emplovment During the period of this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall not engage, on this project on a full or part time or other basis any professional technical personnel who are or have been at any time during the period of this Agreement in the employment of the City except regularly retired employees. 5.2 Own~smpofDoclliTIems All documents, including tracings, drawings, reports, estimates, specifications, field notes, investigation, studies, etc., as instruments of service, are to be the property of the Board. During the performance of the services, herein provided for, the CONSULTANT shall be responsible for any loss or damage to the documents, herein enumerated, while they are in ms possession and any such loss or damage shall be restored at ms expense. Full access to the work during the progress of the work shall be available to the Board. 5.3 Compliance with State and Other Laws The CONSTULTANT specifically agrees that in performance of the services herein enumerated by him or by a subcontractor or anyone acting in behalf of either, that he or they will comply with any and all State, Federal, and Local Statutes, ordinances, and regulations and obtain all permits that are applicable to the entry into and the performance of this Agreement. 5.4 Workmen's Compensation and Liability Insurance The CONSULTANT shall maintain the following insurance during the life of the Agreement: 1. Comprehensive General Liability insurance covering all operations to include: . Premises operations (including Explosion, Collapse and Underground coverage as applicable) . Independent contractors . Contractual liability (broad form) . Completed operations . Broad form property damage . Products and completed operations . Personal injury with employment exclusion deleted . Limited: Bodily Injury and Property Damage combined single limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence- $2, 000,000 aggregate 2. Automobile Liability . Covering all owned, non-owned and mred automobiles Page 2 ofl5 Service agreement 09.1 I.06.doc . Limits: Bodily Injury and Property Damage combined single limit of $1,000,000. 3. Professional Liability . Limits: $1,000,000 each claim 4. Workers Compensation . Limits: Coverage A: Statutory Coverage B: Employers Liability $100,000 each accident $5000,000 disease- policy limit $100,000 disease- each employee . CONSULTANT shall maintain and pay premiums for such public liability insurance, property damage insurance and Workers' Compensation as will fully protect it from claims under the Indiana Workers Compensation Act and from any other claims for damages to persons not covered by said Act because of bodily injury, including death, which may arise from or during the performance of the work described in this contract, and CONSULTANT shall furnish proof unto the Board that it has in force said insurance by submitting to the Board, or agent thereof, a memorandum copy of insurance coverage. CONSULTANT further shall keep Board indemnified from any loss, damage, liability, costs or expenses incurred by reason of failure of CONSULTANT or of any agent, employee, or subcontractor to comply with any of the provisions of said Workers Compensation Insurance shall be satisfied by providing a certificate from the Industrial Board before the work commences. 5. Umbrella Liability . Limits: $1,000,000 per occurrence and aggregate applying to all bodily injury, personal injury, property damage and errors or omissions. 6. If the General Liability or Professional Liability coverages are provided by a policy on a claims made basis, the policy date or RetroactiveDate shall predate the Contract, the termination date of the policy or the applicable extended reporting period shall be no earlier than two (2) years after completion of this contract. 7. All coverage shall be placed with an insurance company that is "A" rated and duly admitted in the State ofIndiana and shall be reasonably acceptable to the Board. Coverage shall be afforded to the additional insured regardless of whether or not - claim is in litigation. 8. For each type of insurance, which CONSULTANT is required to maintain under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall furnish to the Board a Certification or Certificates of Insurance showing that each such type of insurance is in full force and effect, naming the City of Jeffersonville, and Sewer Board as an additional Page 3 of]5 Service agreement 09.11.06.doc insureds and providing that such insurance cannot be amended or cancelled without at least thirty (30) days' written notice to the Board's authorized representative: Robert L. Waiz, Mayor 9. Waiver of Subrogation: CONSULTANT shall obtain from each of its insurers a waiver of subrogation on Commercial General Liability in favor of the Board with respect to Losses arising out of or in connection with the work performed or materials provided by CONSULTANT. 10. If it becomes customary for other similar contracts with the Board to carry higher limits of liability coverage, CONSULTANT shall, if requested by Board, increase the foregoing coverage to such customary limits. 5.5 Changes in Work In the event the Board requires a change in scope, character, or complexity of the work after the work has progressed as directed by the Board, adjustments in compensation to the CONSULTANT and in time for performance of the work as modified, shall be determined by the Board and the CONSULTANT in the exercise of their honest and reasonable judgment. The CONSULTANT shall not commence the additional change of the scope of the work until a supplemental agreement is executed and the CONSULTANT is authorized in writing by the Board. 5.6 Termination of Services This Agreement may be terminated by the Board or the CONSULTANT should the other party fail to perform its obligations hereunder. In the event of termination, the Board shall pay the CONSULTANT for all services rendered to the date of termination, all reimbursable expenses and reimbursable termination expenses, less any amount owed by CONSULTANT to the Board. 5.7 Successors and Assignees The Board, insofar as authorized by law, binds itself and its successors, and the CONSULTANT binds his successors, executors, administrators and other party of this Agreement and to the successors, executors, administrators and assignees of such other party, as the case may be insofar as authorized by law, in respect to all covenants of this Agreement. EXCEPT as above set forth, neither the Board not the CONSULTANT shall assign, sublet or transfer its or his interest in this Agreement without the consent ofthe other. 5.8 Supplements This Agreement may only be amended, supplemented or modified only by a written document executed in the same manner as this Agreement. Page 4 of 15 Service agreement 09.1 I.06.doc Section 6. General Indemnification The City of Jeffersonville, the Sewer Board, and their officials and employees shall be indemnified, held harmless and a legal defense provided, from any and all liability whatsoever growing out of any injury or death to any person or damage to property because of any negligence or fault to the CONSULTANT or its subcontractors. The indemnification shall not apply to acts of negligence or omission of the Sewer Board, City or any of its officials or employees. The CONSULTANT's and all Subcontractor's duty and obligation to provide a legal defense, indemnify hold harmless the City of Jeffersonville, the Sewer Board, and their officials and employees exists independent of the duty and obligation to provide liability insurance herein and without regard to any denial of coverage by the insurance carrier. Any failure to provide a legal defense, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Jeffersonville, the Sewer Board, and their officials and employees within the (10) days after written tender to the CONSULTANT and/or any Subcontractor of CONSULTANT shall constitute a default and shall entitle the City of Jeffersonville, the Sewer Board, and their officials and employees to recover all damages, costs, and attorney's fees related thereto. Section 7. NON-DISCRIMINATION. The CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any person in its hiring or employment practices due to Race, Color, Religion, National Origin, Sex, Age or Physical or Mental Handicap that does not impede that person's ability to perform the work. A violation of this provision shall be deemed a material violation of this agreement. Section 8. Notice and Full Agreement 8.1 Any notices to be sent under this Agreement shall be sent as follows: IF TO SEWER BOARD: IF TO CONSULTANT: Robert L. Waiz, Mayor 500 Quartermaster Court Jeffersonville, Indiana 47130 Bernardin Lochmueller & Associates, Inc. 7830 Rockville Road Indianapolis, Indiana 46214 8.2 The parties agree that this instrument represents the full agreement of the parties, and there are no promises, terms or conditions excepts as stated herein. Page 5 of 15 Service agreement 09.11.06.doc The parties have approved this agreement by their duty authorized representatives on the date(s) shown below. JEFFERSONVILLE SEWER BOARD THE CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA BY: DATE APPROVED Attest: CONSULTANT: Bernardin Lochmueller & Associates, Inc. BY: Keith Lochmueller, President DATE APPROVED Attest: Matt Wannemuehler, Secretary Page 6of15 Service agreement 09. I I.06.doc EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES This is EXHIBIT A referred to in and part of the Agreement between Board and CONSULTANT for Professional Services. A. Project Description The City of Jeffersonville and Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates, Inc., have existing agreements included under contract numbers 206-0022, which includes: reviewing the existing Long-Term Control Plan (L TCP); assisting the Sewer Board in the negotiations with IDEM, U.S. EPA and the Department of Justice; and miscellaneous assistance on regulatory permitting and compliance issues. This new agreement is resulting from the US EPA's review of Jeffersonville's LTCP, which noted a number of modifications that will require a fairly substantial update and change in approach to the original L TCP. This agreement is intended to address the revisions needed outside the scope of the previously mentioned contract, and the additional work needed for the revisions. To develop a LTCP to address EPA's preliminary comments, the following major tasks based on the Draft Gantt Chart submitted to EP A will need to be completed: . Conducting additional public participation. . Re-visiting the determination of sensitive/priority areas. . Additional Monitoring efforts including implementation of the Supplemental SRCER Report and a revised L TCP Post Construction Monitoring Plan . Collection System Characterization and Modeling revisions with EP A modeling review consultant (SAlC), which may include additional flow model calibration/validation efforts. . Potential revisions to the Receiving Stream modeling in response to EPA's review. . CSO Operational Plan (CSOOP) Revisions . A revised approach to the evaluation of alternatives both considered and chosen. . A revised Implementation schedule and financial capability analysis following EPA's 'LTCP Guidance documents. . Preparation of a revised L TCP document. . On-going coordination and Consent Degree negotiations with EP A and IDEM. The above tasks may change based on further negotiations with EP A on the modifications to the EP A approved Gantt Chart and associated activities and tasks. The tasks are divided into two phases; Phase A includes tasks involved in the L TCP Revision, and Phase B are the tasks related to EP AlIDEM Consent Decree negotiations. The development of an approvable LTCP will be ajoint effort between Bernardin, Lochmueller & bssociates, Inc, Strand Associates, and Jeffersonville Sewer Board. In addition Shrewsberry and Associates, and JTL will also be involved in the development as sub-consultants to Bernardin Lochmueller & Associates. The following table summarizes the lead and support roles in completing the LTCP, organized by the anticipated revisions to sections ofthe LTCP: Page 7 of 15 Service agreement 09.11.06.doc Public Partici ation . 0 0 Sensitive Areas . 0 0 Monitorin (SRCER, Post-Construction) . 0 0 Collection System Characterization & Modelin 0 . 0 Receivin Stream Modelin . 0 CSO 0 erational Plan Revisions . 0 0 Evaluation of Alternatives . 0 0 Financial Capability and Implementation Schedule . 0 0 Draft and Final LICP Revisions . 0 0 . = Lead o = Support o o This Contract includes the Scope of Services for Bernardin, Lochmueller & Associates, Inc.'s portion of the development of an approvable L TCP. The Scope of Services for Strand Associates' portion of the development of an approvable LTCP is included in a separate agreement between Strand and the Board. However, under each task the interaction amongst BLA and Strand will be generally described and the two will work as a cooperative team regardless of the leads to produce an approvable LTCP. B. Scope Phase A - L TCP Revisions 1.0 Public Participation The EPA CSO Policy requires and encourages public participation as an integral LTCP component, especially in the determination of sensitive areas and evaluation of alternatives. Items such as water quality goals, sensitive area determination, types of ~ontrol alternatives available, and the process of evaluating and comparing CSO control alternatives are included in EP A guidance documents. BLA will serve as the lead in revision and enhancement to the public participation segment. Strand and Shrewsberry and Associates will serve as a review/supporting role. The BLA scope includes the following tasks: I .1 Revise and Supplement Public Participation 1.2 Develop and implement Public Participation Work Plan. 1.3 Formation and Meetings of new CAe Page 8 of 15 Service agreement 09.II.06.doc ....-:,,',.... '.-',\' '-." 1.4 Prepare and conduct 2-3 Public Meetings on CSO control alternatives and other technical information for presentation to the general public and also to Neighborhood and Interest groups. 1.5 Prepare presentation materials and follow up documentation for the Public Participation process. 2.0 Sensitive/Priority Area Evaluation In accordance with the CSO Policy, the highest priority is to be given to receiving waters considered as sensitive. The sensitive area evaluation is integral to the alternatives chosen and phasing of projects in the LTCP. The BLA scope includes the following tasks: 2.1 Consideration of Sensitive Areas 2.2 Revisit sensitive area determination and compile SensitiveIPriority area map for inclusion in the L TCP. 2.3 Attend up to (3) public meetings at which existing uses and potential Sensitive/Priority areas are discussed. 2.4 Submit Preliminary Sensitive Area Report. 3.0 Monitoring Program Flow monitoring was conducted previously in the trunk sewers. EP A/IDEM had several questions about how flow was measured in the L TCP. In order to address these issues a Stream Reach Characterization and Evaluation Report (SRCER) Supplement Protocol was developed and submitted to EPA. The implementation of this Protocol, and the revisions to the L TCP Post Construction Monitoring Plan, are included in this task. EMC will be conducting the actual sampling involved in the Protocol. The BLA scope includes the following tasks: 3.1 Implementation of the revised SRCER Protocol 3.2 Submission of the Supplemental SRCER Protocol 3.3 Revision to the LTCP Post-Construction Monitoring Plan 4.0 System Characterization, Monitoring and Modeling Hydraulic flow modeling was preformed previously by Strand. It is anticipated U.S. EPA's modeling consultant (SAle) will have comments on the model and may require additional model calibration and validation. Strand will be the lead on this task. The BLA scope includes the following tasks: 4.1 Review the supplemental collection system model update plan. Page 9 of 15 Service agreement 09.11.06.doc 4.2 Review updates to the collection system model. 4.3 Review the model prior to submittal to EP AlIDEM. 5.0 Receiving Stream Monitoring and Modeling (if necessary) A receiving stream model was conducted by ORSANCO and submitted by the City in its prior LTCP. U.S. EPA's modeling consultant (SAle) appears to have comments on the model thus far; however the City may be able to use the SRCER data and better monitoring data as a substitute for this task. If necessary, BLA and Strand will work jointly on this task, if EP A requires a model update. The BLA scope includes the following tasks: 5.1 Design and construct modifications to CSO outfalls for flow monitoring. 5.2 Conduct additional flow monitoring. 5.3 Revisions to WQ model based on flow and sampling data. 5.4 Model calibration/validation. 5.5 Submission of the model (if necessary) to EPAIIDEM. 6.0 CSO Operational Plan Updates This task will involve compiling the results of the chosen LTCP into revisions needed to document changes, and new programs needed for the operation and maintenance of components of their CSS and WWTP. In addition, this task will recognize the NPDES Permit requirements for annual CSO Operational Plan revisions. BLA will serve as the lead in the revision to the CSO Operational Plan revisions. The BLA scope includes the following tasks: 6.1 Research and document operational and maintenance plans needed for all the proposed components and items selected in the L TCP. 6.2 Compile and complete a document including the CSO Operational Plan Revisions. 6.3 Incorporate the CSO Operational Plan Revisions into the draft and final LTCP document. 7.0- Evaluation of Alternatives Based on review comments from EP A, it is anticipated that a more comprehensive review of CSO control alternatives will need to be evaluated and a different end point chosen. BLA will serve as the lead in the evaluation of alternatives. This item is the culmination of the other LTCP tasks. Strand will be serving in a support role, and Page 10 of 15 Service agreement 09.11.06.doc Shrewsberry and Associates will be working as a sub-consultant on this task. The BLA scope includes the following tasks: 7.1 Update the existing L TCP alternatives based on comments from EP AlIDEM. 7.2 Revise sizing of alternatives based on new flow monitoring results. 7.3 Develop and review additional alternatives. 7.4 Alternative development for each CSO outfall. 7.5 Development of ranking system for control prioritization. 7.6 Ranking and selection ofCSO controls. 7.7 Revise and submit L TCP alternatives. 8.0 Implementation SchedulelFinancial Capability Analysis The LTCP must include an assessment of the financial resources available to implement CSO controls, including the total cost of the various alternatives and the City's ability to absorb the costs. This task will involve updating the cost per household, socio- economic indicators, and financial capability and implementation schedule contained in the original L TCP. BLA will serve as the lead in the revision to the financial capability and implementation schedule. The BLA scope includes the following tasks: 8.1 Revise financial capability assessment based on new bond rating. 8.2 Revise financial capability assessment. 8.3 Revise implementation schedule. 9.0 LTCP Revisions This task will involve compiling the results of the previous tasks into a comprehensive L TCP document with supporting figures, tables, and appendices. This effort will utilize information from the prior L TCP to the extent possible, but will include significant updates to several chapters. The BLA scope includes the following tasks: ~.1 Prepare the draft narrative, figures, tables for the following anticipated L TCP chapters appropriately: . Introduction . Sensitive/Priority Area Considerations . Public Participation Process . System Characterization, Monitoring, and Modeling . Evaluation of CSO Control Alternatives . Cost/Performance Evaluation . Financial Capability and Implementation Schedule Page 11 of 15 Service agreement 09.11.06.doc . Post-Construction Monitoring Plan . CSO Operational Plan Revisions . Recommended Plan Summary 9.2 Assemble and distribute up to 20 copies of the draft report. 9.3 Conduct a review meeting with the project team to obtain comments on and changes to the draft report. 9.4 Revise the pertinent sections of the L TCP report to incorporate review comments and changes from the project team. 9.5 Assist in the assembly and distribution of up to 20 copies of the final LTCP report. 10.0 Project Management 10.1 Internal team meetings with Strand, JTL, Board, and Shrewsberry (when needed) twice monthly for 12 months. 10.2 Sewer Board meetings and Updates twice monthly for 12 months. 10.3 Meetings with legal staff during CD negotiations. Page 12 of 15 Service agreement 09.11.06.doc Phase B - Consent Decree Nee:otiations Task] ] outlined below will fall under Phase B, Consent Decree Negotiations. BLA will be the lead in all Consent Decree Negotiations with EP AlIDEM. Strand, JTL, legal council, and Shrewsberry, will also serve as a support in certain negotiation/discussion segments. 11.0 Coordination/Negotiation Meetings with EP A Periodic meetings with EPA (and IDEM) are anticipated during the course ofLTCP development and negotiations. A total of eight meetings are anticipated. ] 1. ] Quarterly technical review meetings. ] 1.2 Draft Technical ResponseslUpdates. ] ].3 Finalizing Technical Responses/ Updates. ] 1.4 Reviewing the drafts of legal responses/updates. 11.5 Reviewing the finalization of legal responses/updates. 1].6 Evaluation of Potential SEP Projects. 11.7 Development and submittal of SEP Proj ect Proposals. 11.8 Finalization of Consent Decree. Page 13 ofl5 Service agreement 09.11.06.doc EXHIBIT B COMPENSATION FEES: Consultant will provide the services contained in EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF SERVICES for the following compensation and fees: Fee Arrangement: The cost of services for the items 1-10 (Phase A) in EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF SERVICES will be a cost plus for time and material at the rates on the attached Fee Schedule not to exceed $162,100.00 without prior written approval of the Jeffersonville Sewer Board. Item 11 (Phase B) in EXHIBIT A - SCOPE OF SERVICES shall be at a cost plus for time and material at the rates on the attached Fee Schedule not to exceed $45,600 without prior approval of the Jeffersonville Sewer Board.. Page 14 of 15 Service agreement 09.1l.06.doc HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE FOR WATER/WASTEWATER SERVICES Classification Hourly Ratel Individual Rates: Principal Manager Water/Wastewater Operations Diagnostics Manager, Water jWastewater Engineering Environmental Engineer Environmental Planner Engineer Technician I Administrative Assistant $145 $135 $135 $85 $75 $55 $55 1 - The rates will be reviewed January 1st each year and an increase of up to a maximum of 5% may be required. DIRECT EXPENSES will be charged to the client in addition to the above quoted rates. Direct expenses include but are not limited to: testing, express mail costs, lodging and meals, provided that they are reasonable and necessary for the accomplishment of the work. lodging and meals will be billed at the cost i ncu rred by BLA. Page 15 ofl5 Service agreement 09. I I.06.doc r EMC RIVER to RIVE A BOC GROUP COMPANY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATII 701Champion Road, Jeffersonville, IN 47J Tel: 812-285-6451' Fax: 812-285-64 www.emcinc.c' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MONTHLY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REPORT May 2006 r- Following are summaries for operation and maintenance at the wastewater treatment plant, and maintenance of the collection system and lift stations for the month of May 2006 Plant ~ Effluent quality was within NPDES permit limits. ~ Removal percentages for the month, BOD 97.8%, TSS 96.2%, and NH3 99.5%. ~ Settleable solids averaged 362 for the month, stability of Settleable solids very good! ~ There were 24 wet days (defined as a day having at least 0.1 inch of rainfall and three days afterward) resulting in an average plant flow of 5.8 MGD, and 7 dry days with an average flow of 4.86 MGD. The percentages of design flow for the plant were 96.6% wet weather and 81 % dry weather average. The total average influent flow for the month was 5.58 MGD, which is 93% of design. ~ The facility received an average influent BOD loading of 10,656.4 this is 99.8% of the design. ~ The facility received an average influent TSS of 8167.02 lbs/day; this is 80.8% of the design. ~ The facility received an average influent Ammonia of 575.2 lbs/day, this is 66.3% of the design ~ The maximum rainfall event during the month was on May 24 at 1.2". ~ Contractor has achieved substantial completion of construction project. ~ Clean up of construction areas have been initiated and continue. ~ Currently we are experiencing some problems with the Trojan UV unit, recirculation pump in the number two ditch. ADM is addressing these issues at this time. n Pretreatment ~ AnIlUa124-hour sampling analyses were conducted on the DallasGroup and Brinley Hardy during the month. ~ A W Goodman conducted bio-monitoring test on our effluent and the ef:Qllent from the Dallas Group's new lamella clarifier. They continue to pursue the id~~. of pumping their effluent into the storm .. r-- . Page 2 Lift stations and Collection System Lift stations and collection systems . Crews cleaned 5,360 ft. of sanitary sewers (16,180' contract YTD). . Crews cleaned 4,793 ft. of storm / CSO sewers (9,488' contract YTD). . Crews televised 849 ft. of sewer lines (1,995' contract YTD). . All 23 trouble spots were cleaned and or checked during the month. . Crews conducted two dye tests in the collection system. In the month of May crews made 20 sewer calls 18 being residents or other problems and 2 being city's lines. . 107 Fairview Dr. crew cleaned 35' from C/O out to main line to remove build up of solids. . 2007 Hamburg Pike crews cleaned 400' to remove the build up of solids. . 2505 Marietta Ct. crew cleaned 150' to try to help resident. . 843 W. Larkspur Dr. crews cleaned 360' to try to help resident. . 403 Gilmore Ave. crews cleaned 405' to try to help resident. Collection crews worked with different departments of the city on various projects and a few businesses jobs around town. . Crews televised storm line at River Valley School for Jim S. . Crews located force main and monitored Silver Creek station while the digging crew made repairs, for Jim S. . Crews cleaned 288' of storm line on Hopkins Lane. for Bob G. . Crews televised 125' of storm line on Nachand Lane. for Jim S. . Crews stuck camera in M/H at Mechanic and Court line were blanked off, for Mike L. . Crews went to Golfview station to help J.T.L. with a draw down of the pumps. . Crews worked at 10th St. station so Bill Straeffer could take some measurement for pump. . Crews worked several days and cleaned 1,125' of combined sewers so crews could televise on Knobloch Ave. . Crews worked several days and televised 570' of combined sewers to locate a tap at 308 knobloch Ave. city installing a C/O, for Mike L. . Crews televised line 64' the city repaired at Kehoe Lane. and 10th St. camera broke down for Bob M. . Crews cleaned and vactored 2 C/B on Center St. for Bob G. Collection crews street pre-maintenance schedule. Page 3 ...... . Crews put up three more CSO. signs in designated areas signs keep getting tore down. . Trouble spots list was completed 6,640' of sewer line cleaned and vactored. . A crew vactored out eight wet wells due to solids and the build up of grease. . CSO gates were exercised and greased. . Two dye tests were done to check for feeders. . EMC sent two employee's to a vactor truck seminar for training. . Crews put deodorant into C/B on Crestview Ave. due to odor. . Grass at lift stations were cut as needed. ,.--. Collection crews lift station pre-maintenance schedule. . All lift stations floats, switches, pumps, alarms, electrical and mechanical components were cleaned, exercised, and inspected for proper operations. . Generators at 10th St, Mill Creek, and Spring St. were operated, inspected and exercised for proper operations. . Bar screens were cleaned as needed. . Crews pulled pump #1 two different times at Crums Lane. #2 to remove debris and put back on line. . Crews back flushed pump #1 at Ewing Lane. . Crews worked on both pumps at Power House station putting key stock back in key way. . Crews put new light in at Spring St. station. . Crews replaced blown fuse on pump #1 at Mill Creek station. Repairs made in the collection system. . Sludge truck was taken to Tow Zone to repair tarp system. . Crews replaced motor disconnect on pump #1 at Mill Creek station. . Crews cleaned water solenoids for pumps at Mill Creek. . Crew took TV van to MT. Sterling for repairs. . Crew took ford vactor truck to vehicle maintenance to repair jet hose and a hydraulic hose. r- r-, Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Monthly Operations Report 1.0 EFFLUENT QUALITY During May, effluent quality was within NPDES permit limits for CBOD, TSS and NH-3. Table 1.1 summarizes the effluent quality data. Attachment A contains Time Series Plots of Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) values. Attachment B contains Time Series Plots of Aeration Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS) and Sludge Volume Index (SVI). Carbonaceous Biochemical 25 mg/l 5.1 mg!l Oxygen Demand (CBOD) Total Suspended Solids 30 mg!l 6.7 mg!l (TSS) Fecal Coliform MPN 2000 colonies!100ml 13 coloniesll OOml Chlorine Residual 0.06 mg!l 0.0 mg!l Ammonia 3.0 mg/l .07 mg/l Average Flow 5.2 design 5.8 MGD Table 1.2 Wet Weather vs. D Average Flow of Wet Days Number of Dry Days Average Flow of Dry Days *Wet Day = Rain (>0.1 in) and three days after 5.8 MGD 7 4.86 MGD 2.0 DESIGN LOADINGS LIMITS The Flows and Loadings reporttor May 1994throughMay :2006 can be found in Attachment C. 3.0 FACILITY OPE:RATIONS Duril1g May, the treatment processes performed very well. All parameters were will within IDEM lim~ts. Average influent flow was 107% of plant design capacity. Removal rates for the month were BOD removal- 97.8%, TSS removal- 96.2%, Ammonia removal- 99.5%. The new UV system had very good removal rates for the month. The contractor is finishing up his final "punch list". All new equipment is installed and on-line. Some glitches remain and are being addressed 1 r- c- .- Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Monthly Operations Report by the contractor. The semi-annual biomonitoring was completed on the effluent with no excurSIOns. 3.1 PRETREATMENT Pretreatment activities for the month included the following: . Annual 24-hour sampling analyses were conducted on the Dallas Group and Brinley Hardy. . A.W. Goodman conducted biomonitoring tests on our effluent and the effluent from the Dallas Group's new lamella clarifier. They are still working on the idea of pumping their effluent into the storm sewer with our effluent discharges. 4.0 SEWER MAINTENANCE CALLS Table 4.1 represents all sewer maintenance calls for the month. r- 225 W. Park Other - No blockage but black 05/03/06 Mrs. Galligar Place water coming into toilet - main y ok 05/18/06 Mr. Lovingswatts 1005 E. 10th St Backup - Roto Rooter came out y r- and said on city - main ok Backup - plumber ran snake out 05/31/06 Mr. Witherspoon 1849 E. 8th 56' and said it was on city- y main ok 05/30/06 Mr. Rescher 403 Gilmore Backup - main ok - cleaned to N 405 assist but did not relieve roblem 05/30/06 Mr. Morrison 843 W. Larkspur Backup - cleaned to assist but N 360 did not relieve roblem OS/28/06 Ms. Bowyer 1616 E 8t St Backup - main ok y OS/27/06 Precision 814 Holley Backu - main ok N OS/26/06 Stemlers 624 Penn Blockage- main ok y OS/25/06 Ms. Kern 218 Watt #1 Backu - main ok y OS/22/06 Stemlers 201 Woodlawn Backup - main ok y Ave 05/19/06 Stemlers 1026 Rhonda Backu - main ok N t .1 05/19/06 Quality Plumbing 308 Knobloch Backu - main ok y 05/19/06 Precision 819 Foxglove Backup - main ok N 05/15/06 Stemlers 15 Center St Backup - main ok y 05/01/06 Drain Busters 2505 Marietta Dr Blockage - main ok N 05/01/06 Mr. Stinson 1308 A Ie Ln Backup - main ok y 05/01/06 Stemlers 1801 Tran uil Dr Backu - main ok N 05/01/06 Stemlers 617 E. Chestnut Backu - main ok y 2 r- Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Monthly Operations Report r-. r- , , 107 Fairview Backup - cleaned to remove blockage Backup - cleaned in cleanout to remove blockage y 400 OS/26/06 Mr. Stone 2007 Hamburg Pk OS/25/06 Precision y 35 4.1 ELECTRICAL EXPENDITURES r-- , Table 4.6 represents the facility electrical expenditures for the month as well as providing a year to date total. :-- May $21,844.68 $ 15,377.71 ($6,466.97) Year-To-Date $21,844.68 $15,377.71 ($6,466.97) 5.0 FACILITY SAFETY & TRAINING A safety inspection was conducted on June 5, 2006. The rating was 99%. There were no deficiencies reported. Our plant is still in excellent shape. A copy of the Safety Inspection Report is included as Attachment E. 6.0 SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM AND PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE Lift stations and collection systems . Crews cleaned 5,360 ft. of sanitary sewers. . Crews cleaned 4,793 ft. of storm I CSO sewers. . Crews televised 849 ft. of sewer lines. . All 23 trouble spots were cleaned and or checked during the month. . Crews conducted 2 dye tests in the collection system. In the month of May crews made 20 sewer calls 18 being residents or other problems and 2 being city's lines. 3 Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Monthly Operations Report ...- . 107 Fairview Dr. crew cleaned 35' from cia out to main line to remove build up of solids. . 2007 Hamburg Pike crews cleaned 400' to remove the build up of solids. . 2505 Marrietta Ct. crew cleaned 150' to try and help resident. . 843 W. Larkspur Dr. crews cleaned 360' to try and help resident. . 403 Gilmore Ave. crews cleaned 405' to try and help resident. Collection crews worked with different departments ofthe city on various projects and a few businesses jobs around town. . Crews televised storm line at River Valley School for Jim S. . Crews located force main and monitored Silver Creek station while the digging crew made repairs, for Jim S. . Crews cleaned 288' of storm line on Hopkins Ln. for Bob G. . Crews televised 125' of storm line on Nachand Ln. for Jim S. . Crews stuck camera in MIH at Mechanic and Court line was blanked off, for Mike L. . Crews went to Golfview station to help J.T.L. with a draw down of the pumps. . Crews worked at 10th St. station so Bill Straeffer could take some measurement for pump. . Crews worked several days and cleaned 1,125' of combined sewers so crews could televise on Knobloch Ave. . Crews worked several days and televised 570' of combined sewers to locate a tap at 308 Knobloch Ave. city installing a Cia, for Mike L. . Crews televised line 64' the city repaired at Kehoe Ln. and 10th St. camera broke down for Bob M. . Crews cleaned and vactored 2 CIB on Center St. for Bob G. ,r-.. r . t . ,...... r-: n , ,.-. r , Collection crews street pre-maintenance schedule. . Crews put up 3 more CSO signs in designated areas signs keep getting tore down. . Trouble spots list was completed 6,640' of sewer line .cleaned and vactored. . A crew vactored out 8 wet wells due to solids and the build up of grease. . CSO gates were exercised and greased. . 2 dye tests were done to check for feeders. . EMC sent 2 employee's to a vactor truck seminar for training. . Crews put deodorant into CIB on Crestview Ave. due to odor. . Grass at lift stations were cut as needed. Collection crews lift station pre-maintenance schedule. . All lift stations floats, switches, pumps, alarms, electrical and mechanical components were cleaned, exercised, and inspected for proper operations. . Generators at 10th St, Mill Creek, and Spring St. were operated, inspected and exercised for proper operations. . Bar screens were cleaned as needed. . Crews pulled pump #1 two different times at Crums Ln. #2 to remove debris and put back on line. . Crews back flushed pump #1 at Ewing Ln. . Crews worked on both pumps at Power House station putting key stock back in key way. r i r ,..... l 4 r r r-, - r- , " r- Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Monthly Operations Report . Crews put new light in at Spring St. station. . Crews replaced blown fuse on pump # 1 at Mill Creek station. Repairs made in the collection system. . Sludge truck was taken to Tow Zone to repair tarp system. . Crews replaced motor disconnect on pump #1 at Mill Creek station. . Crews cleaned water solenoids for pumps at Mill Creek. . Crew took tv van to MT. Sterling for repairs. . Crew took ford vactor truck to vehicle maintenance to repair jet hose and a hydraulic hose. 5 ,.-. r-- Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Monthly Operations Report r-- f,. r- ,,-. ~ t : 1 o 2 18 r !- ATTACHMENTS A. Time Series Plots - CBOD & TSS B. Time Series Plots - MLSS & SVI C. Flows & Loadings Report D. Safety Inspection Report E. DMR/MRO F. List of Footage Cleaned r-I f' I 6 I,j , r r r--, I Attachment A " t t Time Series Plots CBOD & TSS n 1 "") r 1 1 1 .". 1 "] ~'l" ") '1 1 ~.. ) J effersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Effluent CBOD / TSS CBOD - .. TSS - - Permit CBOD - . . - Permit TSS 40 35 .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. -.. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. -... .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. . - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. - .. .. -. .. .. - .. .. 30 25 -----------. .- --- -- - . - - . - - - - - - . 20 15 , 10 J " I I ~ ,.",. .. .. .. .. -- ","'" ./ ...~ . -' - - ~ .. . - " 51...... ... ............."" --, 'V . ~.. J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 r-- , r ,. ,.-. t , , Attachment B r- f- , Time Series Plots MLSS & SVI r , ro- , . ! , rl '..1 4500 4000 eel <~r'"'<l J effersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Aeration Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (MLSS) mg/l - - MLSSmg/l Desing Limit MLSS 3500 - - /" ,\ - . - ..... .. . I"" III ..\ ";"',, .. .. I " - ^"" ~ ~ "- , , \.. ..... .- .. .. ~ '- - .. .. ...- .. .. , .. , - ... " ... , ""'" \.' '" / \ , , \ \ , " - ~.. , " _ --;.J - - - - - 1-- 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Operated and Maintained by: Environmental Management Corporation '-1 '-'J J effersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Aeration Mixed Liquor Sludge Volume Index (SVI) mVgm - - SVlmljgm Design Limit SVI 180 .".. .. - '" \. '" \.. '- . .. '" \. '" '" .. , I .. '" \. , -"'"' .. '" , \ I I , I \. I , , ,. / \. I '" oJ .. ,/ .. " " .. .. . .. 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Operated and Maintained by: Environmental Management Corporation r r-' I f - , t.._-; Attachment C - , Flows & Loadings Report. r-. 1 .,.., "1 ,,'. ] ,....~- '1 . .,," ] "'."'-1 .. 1 . .. J "'-'1 Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility Flows Loadings Summary 4.50 5.2 6,042 10,105 3,490 10,581 2.35 3.84 5.2 8,038 10,105 3,843 10,581 3.70 3.68 5.2 8,311 10,105 3,913 10,581 2.25 3.55 5.2 7,668 10,105 3,819 10,581 2.40 3.81 5.2 8,726 10,105 4,798 10,581 3.65 3.71 5.2 8,493 10,105 4,356 10,581 2.20 4.09 5.2 9,483 10,105 4,025 10,581 3.85 4.19 5.2 10,434 10,105 3,886 10,581 4.45 3.81 5.2 9,231 10,105 3,864 10,581 3.75 2.92 5.2 6,393 10,105 2,710 10,581 1.60 2.87 5.2 5,572 10,105 2,480 10,581 2.05 2.63 5.2 4,211 10,105 2,178 10,581 2.80 3.46 5.2 3,593 10,105 1,622 10,581 10.25 2.79 5.2 4,824 10,105 2,683 10,581 3.35 2.31 5.2 4,244 10,105 1,809 10,581 2.50 3.22 5.2 6,338 10,105 3,491 10,581 3.45 2.33 5.2 5,962 10,105 3,022 10,581 1.60 2.87 5.2 6,235 10,105 3,124 10,581 5.25 2.64 5.2 7,449 10,105 2,519 10,581 2.75 3.22 5.2 9,211 10,105 3,620 10,581 5.85 4.29 5.2 8,229 10,105 7,084 10,581 5.00 3.28 5.2 8,480 10,105 6,620 10,581 2.63 5.45 5.2 11,091 10,105 9,045 10,581 5.98 5.85 5.2 12,148 10,105 9,075 10,581 6.50 8.17 5.2 14,513 10,105 10,902 10,581 7.30 5.74 5.2 12,447 10,105 10,149 10,581 3.72 4.36 5.2 11,672 10,105 9,345 10,581 3.40 3.83 5.2 11,148 10,105 10,312 10,581 1.90 4.96 5.2 12,865 10,105 9,928 10,581 9.02 4.25 5.2 11,059 10,105 8,471 10,581 2.60 4.80 5.2 13,771 10,105 11,689 10,581 4.10 5.77 5.2 14,725 10,105 11,020 10,581 4.90 5.59 5.2 19,581 10,105 16,597 10,581 3.85 5.84 5.2 22,892 10,105 15,732 10,581 12.25 10.62 5.2 22,586 10,105 13,197 10,581 6.30 5.63 5.2 17,584 10,105 10,330 10,581 2.31 6.27 5.2 18,145 10,105 9,726 10,581 7.15 7.05 5.2 13,347 10,105 8,937 10,581 5.05 4.32 5.2 13,979 10,105 12,862 10,581 0.55 4.43 5.2 11,925 10,105 11 ,817 10,581 3.95 3.84 5.2 9,166 10,105 10,160 10,581 1.47 3.60 5.2 12,539 10,105 10,439 10,581 1.47 1of4 Operated Qnd Maintained hy: Environnumtal Management Corporation '~'-'l -~'~I - '-1 --"," 1 -~l "'"1 ...----] Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment F aGility Flows Loadings Summary 3.81 5.2 8,516 10,105 10,359 10,581 3.35 4.23 5.2 9,208 10,105 8,290 10,581 4.30 4.71 5.2 10,920 10,105 8,838 10,581 4.15 5.31 5.2 7,661 10,105 8,636 10,581 1.65 4.77 5.2 9,309 10,105 11,656 10,581 5.85 5.62 5.2 9,187 10,105 8,812 10,581 7.60 5.57 5.2 8,640 10,105 10,917 10,581 4.71 5.83 5.2 10,016 10,105 10,794 10,581 7.46 4.90 5.2 8,418 10,105 6,661 10,581 7.90 5.04 5.2 8,112 10,105 7,356 10,581 4.22 4.03 5.2 8,302 10,105 8,1 00 10,581 0.05 3.62 5.2 7,216 10,105 6,612 10,581 2.40 4.01 5.2 7,525 10,105 7,659 10,581 2.60 4.67 5.2 10,399 10,105 8,919 10,581 3.35 6.63 5.2 13,381 10,105 10,064 10,581 11.40 5.36 5.2 9,566 10,105 7,868 10,581 2.50 6.00 5.2 9,508 10,105 7,756 10,581 3.40 5.70 5.2 12,360 10,105 10,126 10,581 3.32 5.35 5.2 10,976 10,105 9,281 10,581 2.10 6.45 5.2 11,404 10,105 10,759 10,581 6.30 5.57 5.2 8,362 10,105 9,523 10,581 0.70 5.49 5.2 7,921 10,105 9,569 10,581 0.95 3.96 5.2 5,945 10,105 6,209 10,581 0.70 3.77 5.2 6,949 10,105 7,703 10,581 2.70 3.80 5.2 8,050 10,105 7,796 10,581 2.70 4.49 5.2 9,287 10,105 7,564 10,581 6.17 4.51 5.2 8,839 10,105 6,883 10,581 4.65 7.26 5.2 10,354 10,105 9,324 10,581 6.10 5.45 5.2 8,727 10,105 8,045 10,581 2.75 5.49 5.2 8,608 10,105 6,227 10,581 3.70 4.03 5.2 7,932 10,105 7,293 10,581 1.00 4.17 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 4.11 3.67 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 4.11 3.92 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 4.11 4.03 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 4.11 3.85 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 0.40 4.50 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 3.15 4.64 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 3.15 4.64 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 3.15 5.13 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 2.20 4.60 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 2.35 4.22 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 1.65 4.49 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 3.80 4.20 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 4.20 20f4 Operated and Main/ained hy: Environmental Management Corpora/ion ~""""OOl ~-"~ 1 1 '.0"_] 1 - 0] Jeffersonville Wastewater TreatmentFacility Flows Loadings Summary 436 52 0 10,105 0 10,581 450 H5 52 0 10,105 0 10,581 4.50 4.30 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 H5 5.52 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 1.60 5.31 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 LSO 6.27 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 4.65 5.48 52 0 10,105 0 10,581 225 4.97 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 3.85 6.92 52 0 10,105 0 10,581 2.15 6.88 5.2 0 10,105 0 10,581 6005 7.20 52 11,109 10,105 0 10,581 4.45 6.25 52 11,415 10,105 9,435 10,581 6045 4.60 5.2 7,404 10,105 9,207 10,581 1.05 436 5.2 9,491 10,105 6,909 10,581 1.85 4.90 5.2 8,790 10,1 05 7,563 10,581 925 5.12 5.2 10,462 10,105 7,900 10,581 4.25 5.09 5.2 15,592 10,105 11,090 10,581 H5 6J4 5.2 9,444 10,105 9,068 10,581 7.30 4.77 5.2 6,992 10,105 6,517 10,581 0.70 6.44 5.2 9,190 10,105 10,617 10,581 4.19 4.92 5.2 8,742 10,105 9,173 10,581 230 559 52 8,969 10,105 9,636 10,581 5.50 737 5.2 9,800 10,105 9,580 10,581 10058 5000 52 8,402 10,105 8,604 10,581 2.60 4.69 5.2 9,613 10,105 7,807 10,581 3.75 5.26 5.2 9,615 10,105 9,711 10,581 5.95 5.80 5.2 10,236 10,105 8,942 10,581 7000 4.79 5.2 9,646 10,105 9,445 10,581 2.15 6.00 5.2 10,559 10,105 12,227 10,581 5.55 5.90 52 9,603 10,105 12,482 10,581 3.25 7.06 5.2 10,603 10,105 12,521 10,581 UO 628 5.2 12,484 10,105 12,781 10,581 1.85 5.76 5.2 11,336 10,105 11,948 10,581 4J5 6.21 52 11,142 10,105 12,315 10,581 6.10 8.58 5.2 14,613 10,105 14,553 10,581 9.30 5.79 5.2 9,791 10,105 10,586 10,581 2.50 5.44 52 9,749 10,105 10,301 10,581 520 4.82 5.2 10,063 10,105 9,643 10,581 2.85 4.18 5.2 8,581 10,1 05 7,811 10,581 0.25 5.41 5.2 11,696 10,105 8,608 10,581 7075 7.22 5.2 12,729 10,105 11,834 10,581 7.80 635 5.2 11,478 10,105 10,285 10,581 4.50 9.16 52 17,735 10,105 11,637 10,581 4.95 6.61 5.2 10,901 10,105 10,897 10,581 235 3of4 Operated and Main/ained by: Environmental Management Corporation ~:.I ] ] "] Jeffersonville Wastewater TreatmentF acility Flows Loadings Summary 6.41 5.2 13,009 10,105 12,223 10,581 4.50 6.20 5.2 12,621 10,105 10,171 10,581 2.68 5.75 5.2 10,559 10,105 11,812 10,581 5.00 5.53 5.2 11,606 10,105 10,963 10,581 3.80 5.84 5.2 12,438 10,105 11,108 10,581 5.10 5.52 5.2 14,459 10,105 13,252 10,581 5.85 5.18 5.2 12,183 10,105 11,281 10,581 1.60 4.75 5.2 12,682 10,105 11,306 10,581 1.10 6.00 5.2 18,931 10,105 14,167 10,581 3.60 5.30 5.2 17,367 10,105 13,821 10,581 2.35 7.77 5.2 13,507 10,105 13,786 10,581 6.00 5.90 5.2 10,450 10,105 10,410 10,581 1.55 6.64 5.2 14,213 10,105 12,469 10,581 4.51 7.60 5.2 11,068 10,105 12,829 10,581 5.50 6.42 11,278 11,766 4of4 Operated and Maintained by: Environmental Management Corporation - l , r--. Attachment D - ji; , I Safety Inspection Report r- .. , r--, , f , ri ;- EMC Monthly SAFETY INSPECTION CHECKLIST Ie f *Mark only if NOT in compliance --- ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES - 18 Written Site Emergency Plan/training. Updated OSHA 200 log Written Chlorine/Sulfur Dioxide program, copy of actual standard, training Written Fire Extinguisher program, copy of actual standard, training Written Hazardous Communication program, copy of actual standard, training Confined Space program, copy of actual standard, training Written Emergency Action Plan program, copy of actual standard, training Written Lockout/Tag Out program, copy of actual standard, training Blood borne Pathogen program, copy of actual standard, training Personal Protection Equipment program, copy of actual standard, training All employees trained and understand Risk Management Plan Personal Protection Equipment available for visitors Safety Committee with both employee and management participation Written "Right to Know" Program MSDS sheets available to employees Process Safety Management Plan (for plants mandated to have) Housekeeping Hearing disciples - documentation PREMLIMINARY TREATMENT - 4 r- Wet or oil on floors No or bad ventilation Bar screenings on floor Housekeeping r PRIMARY TREATMENT - 1 - ! Housekeeping ,..... LABORATORY -11 Proper chemical storage (containers labeled) Emergency shower and eyewash Inspection of emergency shower and eyewash Acid spill kit ~ Sample refrigerators marked "Bio Hazard" Signs of food or drink in lab Fume hoods in proper working order or inspected Proper sharpslbroken glass container Personal Protective Equipment available and used Tongs or special gloves for moving hot items available and used Housekeeping ,-. BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT - 2 Nt A Safeguards in the pure oxygen system Housekeeping ADVANCED TREATMENT-l Housekeeping r- DISINFECTION - 14 Housekeeping CHLORINE: Working exhaust fans at floor level Leak detection alarm system Ammonia hydroxide available to test for chlorine leaks SCBA/IO minute escape packs are properly inspected and Proper chlorine wrench readily available Chlorine cylinders properly chained to wall and tons secure New washers readily available x Windsock and lor other wind directional apparatus exist - need new wind sock Warning signs in place Chlorine stored separately from other chemicals Risk Management Plan r < I< \ UV: NtA NtA Warning signs in place Proper Personal Protective Equipment in place BIO SOLD IS HANDLING - 2 " \ ; Combustible gas detection system in place and calibrated Housekeeping r-, .. ,...-, MAINTENANCE/GARAGE - 13 N/A Proper guarding of grinders, etc. Lockout/Tag Out equipment available Vehicle Safety Checklist in place Sharps container for glass, cutting blades, etc. Hand tools in proper working order Eye protection provided for bench, free standing, and hand tools - safety glasses missing - replaced with new ones Lighting of work bench adequate Hoist, lift, jack, chains, pulleys available for lifting and moving heavy objects Metal waste can marked for oily and/or paint soaked waste only and lit secured Piping, hoses, etc. Stored properly Heavy duty extension cords used when appropriate Personal Protective Equipment signs posted Housekeeping ;- ,......, ;- BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS - 34 :-" Chemical storage tanks are labeled Containers labeled Stairways are unobstructed Area below stairway are unobstructed Work areas are adequately lighted No Trip Hazards visible Exits clearly marked Emergency lighting adequate and functioning Fire extinguishers inspected All electrical wires in proper repair Electrical control boxes are not used for storage above or below, or otherwise blocked Electrical boxes doors secured Lockout/Tag Out in use where needed Outlets not overloaded Extension cords are not passing through openings without proper protection Handrails in good condition Chain guards in place where possible danger exists Guards over drive chains and gears are in proper working order "T" valves in walkways are adequately marked Automatic start signs properly displayed on machinery where needed Piping is color coded (legend available) or marked with content name Potable and non-potable water lines are clearly marked and distinguishable from each other Hatch covers in place ;- t N/A r-- j, , N/A ,-.. r-. Levee around pond or lagoon in good condition Life rings, jackets, hooks, etc. available around open tanks or ponds Sampling equipment is sufficient to prevent climbing over handrails or other hazards to get samples Flammables are stored in appropriate cabinets or buildings and marked as such No Smoking signs posted near flammable areas Exit lights are in proper working order Housekeeping MISCELLANEOUS - 14 ,..... , N/A N/A ;--<. , , , ,-.. , r- r-, 1 ,- Man lifts inspected yearly Ladders in proper repair and working condition Personal Protective Equipment is provided First aid kits are available in all work areas and properly stocked Emergency Response Team (in plant or local) is available and aware of emergency plan Overhead crane inspected annually by qualified personnel Weight limits displayed on both sides of overhead crane Forklift operation training is provided Air gap and/or back flow prevention device on water line inspected and recorded annually Heat exchangers and/or boilers inspected annually Lockout/Tag Out Program audit documented Lockout/Tag Out training of "affected, authorized and others" conducted OSHA signs posted r-, If the plant is not in compliance with the item listed put a checkmark on the line next to the item listed. Feel free to write comments next to or near the item. Ifin. compliance, leave blank. If not applicable to the plant (some items may not be), write N/A ("Not Applicable") on the line. Count up the total number of "Not Applicable" items. Subtract the "Not Applicable" from the "Total Possible" points. This will give you the "Adjusted Total". Subtract the number of "Not in Compliance" from the "Adjusted Total". This gives you the total "In Compliance". Divide the number of "In Compliance" by the "Adjusted Total" to give the "Total Percent". ~,; . , Example: Counts: N/ A = 4 Not in Compliance = 3 Total Possible 114 Total Possible 114 Not Applicable -4 Not Applicable -8 Adjusted Total 110 Adjusted Total 106 Not in Compliance - 3 Not in Compliance -1 Total in Compliance 107 Total in Compliance 105 Total % 97.3% Total % 99% (107/110) l> .1 n ,.-.., ~ ~. r r, " . r . , r- . , . r, 1 Attachment E f' DMR/MRO/CSO Il r t r ,- .,--.. r t r r i ':""'. '..,.'. ....... . ....'... ......... . , PenM Number .." INOO23302' Plant Design.Flow T~ Nllmber Na(M of Facility ", citY rifJeffersorwille Month '. Year .. May 2X6 acs1ity'$ e-mail address [If allailable): ~ Operaloc Name ..... T1rnotl'lv Cc,a.Nford . ~ Monthly Report of Operation Activated Sludge Type Wastewater Treatment Plant 5.2 mgd 812-285-'S451 TlC@emc:stl.cOrn" ...... . . .. -Class Certificat2 Number . ~ Date I ....lV I 13156. 1~7 'RAW SEWAGE State Foon 10829 (Rt12-2005) Page 1 of4 CHEMICAlS USED TotaI= ~ ,.-.. 45 ~ c ~. 'E o 0 G o 'K Gl > · ~ 2.. ~ ! OE:9 ~ _ 0 ::; I -CllGl_ 40 ~ j";; e .E c'6B'6 G ~ E i:i D.,!.a . CIlIDCe) 40" a:: ~ .. ~ Ii c i .- e 6 C::~~~:9'~ ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :!! ~ ~ ;: !. i ~ 8 6 8' 0 1i u: .."6 '0 ,g Cll CIS (5 '0 ~ i i 1i.: 0 'fi 0 !,' 5 ~ c"-" :g' .:g fJ) fJ) ~ ... ~ >- >- r. c I- "0 s.;= ~ ;= 1i< -a 0 ! g , 0 0 i g. ~ E E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J:;:;I::. /3 c. t5 ~ :S 'E e =a ~ ~ as ~ €. ~ ~ 1 Moo ,0.6 7.178 7.5 165 9877.65 457 27358.114 838.1 2 Tue 0.05. 7.179 7.4 140 8382.2 135 eoa2.84 3.8 ZO.5 3 Wed 0 5.931 8.0 105 5193.78 85 4204.49 9.1 450.1 4 Thu 0 5.552 7.1 403 18660.4 145 6714.03 92 '426 .' 5 Fri ,0 5.43 7.7 120 5434.34 118 5343.77 92 416.6 6 Sat 0 5.249 7.5 147 6435.17 245 10725.3 15.8 691.7 7 SYn 0 5.167 7.7 205 8834.02 175 7541.24 13.5 581.8 8 Moo 0 5.112 7.5 354 15092.5 140 5968.77 8.3 353.9 9 Tue 0 . 5.111 7.6 180 7672.63 97 4134.7 9.9 422 . 10 Wed 0.3 . 6.317 7.6 ..223 11748.5 1005268.3810.8:$69 . 11 Thu. 0.2 5.542 8.1 27Q 12479.5 250 11555.1 121 559.3 c'... 12 Fri 0.1 4.916 7.6 360 14759.8 335 13734.8 124 508.4 13 Sat 0 4.681 7.4 .370 14444.6 '25810072..2 13.6 530.9 14 &In 0.154.8 7.5 135 5404.32 .' 80 3202.56 14.8 5925 ..., 15 Man 0.05 4.891 7.6 200 8158.19,110 4487 15 611:9 16 Tue 0 4.691 7.2 375 14671.1135 5281.6 .14.5 567.3 17 Wed 0.35 5.7S8 7.2 400 19242 120 577261 14 673.5 18 Thu 0 . 5.23 7.6 193 8418.31 '120 5234.18 14 610.7 19 Fri;. 0 . 4.7647.3 3SO 15098.129311641.4'15.9 631.7 : 20 Sat 0 4.461 7.6 150 5580.71165 6138.78 16.9 628.8 21 $unO 4.505 ,7.7j20.. 4508.6 ..75 2817.88 ".....,16.6 623.7 22 Moo OHm . .,...m ,'H ... ..... .. .. 4.428 7.8 . '188 6'942.75 "'100 3692.9517..2 635.2 23 Tue 0 4.373 7.5 450 16411.9 515 187825 12.7 463.2 24 Wed 1.2 8.124 7.6 405 27440.4 170 11518.2.. 15.1 1023 25 Thu 0.85 9.742 7.3 205 16655.9 110 8937.31 10.8 877.5 26 Fri 0 6.295 7~5 168 S820.05 80 4200.02 7 367.5 27 Sat 0 5.384 7.7 145 6510.87 235 10552.1 ..127 570.3 28 Sun 0.4 .6.4 7.6 130 6938..88 200 106752 13 693.9 29 "'on 0 5.274 7.3 130 5718.07 150 6597.77 18.4 809.3 30 Tue 0.25 5.669 7.4 108 5106.18130 6146.33 128 505.2 31 Wed 0 485 7.3 240 97f1J.76 1686795.43 13.2 533.9 '. Mamun." 1211I ,59~:~8.1 : ~=: ~~ ~~~ ,1~~ ~~ ~. .. '. 31"" 0 0 0 <4:~ .....~~ 1: 45003~ ~ 2817.: 0 3~ ZO~ I cedil'y under penalty of law that this cIocument and. aD aItact.meots - prepared. .' /\ d .; ~: --=-J ~ /' /~/ _ / ~ under my cfireCtion QC" supeMsion in ac:cotdance 'IIilh a system designed to assure that uP' v :Yt' 701 h"7 - J &:?//?/ tJG ~:~~=~~~~~ (S~r~~?7,"7 )/jfojrEr !of galhering lt1e infOlluatioh, lt1e ir1fotmaticn sWmit!ed is. to lt1e best of my kncwIedge ( ~ / \ ~ 1/1 / J ~ and belief. true. accutlIte, and complete. I am .-re that there are significant penalties !of sutxniI:ting false inflltTnation. induding the possibility of line andimpcisohrrlGl'lt fof (S~TURE OFPRll'<<iPAL EXECU1WE I I {OoS.'TE} kncIwWlg violations. OFFICER OR AU-nh1ZED AGENT). . . .' i.... 0.,':' >... m-;:: '.'i ....i...C. ''. . ....c.. '; ,'. .c.. ..,/. ,,~~~~~~._,~ b//f/ofJ ~ !y/..' ~:'i?Z~ (SIGNA n.JRi Of' PRINCIPAl... EXEcun-d OFFJC6: OR ' (DATE) " ,. ( lWTHORlZEO AGENT) ~ FiNAl EfFLUENT E!'Ft.iJefT Morit.hly~epori Of Operation 'A~SludgeType wastewater Treatment Plant :r::~ ..J~ . :7~ ,. y- 2(0) Page 2 of 4 State Form 10829 lRfI2-20(5) . .' PRIMARY AERATION EFFLUENT MIXED UQUOR g ~ ~ 'ate ~ i OE .. x a u.. .:5! 1 · ~, I "0 CD -g, 5 ~ C> 11) In :!2 -. ~ :a::E:!2 . 15 ~. 'i l!! . ~ :s .. f1) >" 8. G) "" J; Q. fa' 2- E ~ Q. !~ ~ ~ aF ~ ~ ~ 500 3500 143 4.111 7860 500 3340 150 4.111 8400 550 4180 132 5.045 6520 eoo 4220 142 4.256 7240 630 4240 149 4.469 7220 650 4140 157 4.444T700 500 3700 135 4.478 7320 500 3800 132 4.442 65SO 550 3860 142 4.442 6220 '550 4240 130 5.428 7140 500 3780 132 6.294 5860 450 3900 114 6.253 6140 380 386098 6.133 63SO '. ". 350 3360 104 5.233 5860 300 3&40 78 .' 4.356 5800 300 3740 eo 4.351 5840 350 3640 S6 4.364 6180 260 2840 92 5.082 3640 300 2920 103 4.437 .6780 250 3980 63 4.329 7000 25034eO'-72 4.329 '0760-'-- 200 3560 56 4.493 6100 200 3440 58 4.231 6000 300 3520 85 8.124 5880 200 3540 56 6.848 7000 260 2880 eo 7.235 4400 170 3140 54 4.703 5700 200 3280 61 4.147 . 6520 160 3120 51 4.017 5480 150 3360 45 3.988 6060 160 3040 53 3.986 6740 '. 362 3596 ,98 4.9085 6405 650 4240 157 8.1248400 150 2840 4U343 3_986 3640 o 0 31 31 31 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 0 fct the Montll (map repairs, br9a/u1oWnS, process upsets and their causes. inplant treatment process bypass. etc.): II I , ". ,"': .,' .._ d. . -' , .. --, . :' '".,:.,., r"" RETURN SIJ.JDGE . , , . ~ o ::a o >-. III o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 -20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Zl 281 291 -30 31 AVQ- Max. Mill. Data ~ e 'at E , . '. :!2 15 f1) Q. ., :s f1) . 10 0... o co o , r ' . . , , . . /I"'"' ,: " I .' . . , '>" __ __d_ " ' --. E 8 'at E . 1Il C ;:: .2:Jt! .r:.c 0111 -,r- Ill" ~.1! 4Il C .41 0 0::0 . . C ;:: o ::c o ...... ~ o "8 a E . (II :!2 15 w Q. . :s w I 15 o ui ~ 18 7.7 24 7.7 13 7.6 14 7.5 15 7.9 18 7.9 12 8.1 20 7.9 13 .:.7.8 '. 8 7.8, 13 7.8 .12 7.9 17 7.9 12 7.7 . 18 7.7 13 7.6 10 7.7 20 7.8 28 7.8 17 7.9 ",H88'-1 16 8.0 22 7.9 9 7.8 8 7.4 5 7.7 12 7.5 9 7.7 3 7.6 17 7.8 23 7.5 13 28 .3 31 . 10 o o to o 'ii :s "0_ l~ o::u.. .. . '. , .,' ". .:., " -c ", - ,- '--" . C 4D a >- 5 "0 Cl > la oE 9.1 8.5 8.7 8.9 8.8 8.5 8.7 8.9 8.9 9.0 " 8.8 8.4 .... .....8.8 8.9 .8.7 ' 8.7 8.8 ~; 8.5 , 8.5 8.8' ,"8.8 . .... 8.8 8.7 8.4 8.7 8.5 .' 8.6 8.8 . 8.8 8.6 . 8.8 '. "8.7 9.1 . 8.4 31 ~ I III :s .2 c. tII ~ a.. '. . -- ' 8.1 7.4 31 (J ..,., :." i.. . -- " "',' MOntll1y Report of Operation 'Jl.di~SludgeType . Wastewater Treatment Plant r-of_, J-- ICity d ./eIfe!soIMlIe . IlNOO23302 Page 3 of 4 State Foon 1082S (R/12-2005) II I ' ,..... --" - .r- ~ o ~ o >. 1II o 1 2 3 4 5 6 ...... 7 8 . 9 1C 11 12 13 . 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 . 26 27 28 29 30 31 , lAVa Max Min Data '. Flow .$ III 0:: ~ u:: 1:...... ClO :::Ie> e~ w...... 6.633 6.632 6.474 5.595 5.393 5.247 6.16686 5.255 5.321 5.321 5.787 5.821 .5.251 4.948 5.3SE 5.85 5.194 5.151 6.1-45 5.712 5.164 5.002 5.45971 5.009 5.007 ......... 4.952 7.7 8.422 7.348 6.26 6.38543 6.652 5.702 6.011 5283 5.912 5.&1419 8.422 L38543 4.948 !i386 31 5 'Ill a ~ l! o Cl -> u..< ->- c_ !~ illi~ . For _ 0(: Mav BOO >-Cl "'a ]S -> Ie( 10>> O:i2 OCl fS~ Cl a 13>> <::C11 E ~~) ~ I . ~ l' I It) 10>- U') o 0 :i2 0 .' o OCl 0:" fS fS~ ~ 5 276.76 3.9 215.84 3.5 189.09 4.8 224.11 4.6 2!J7.02 4.9 4.4 214.55 224.79 3.6 157.87 5.3 235.34 5.4 239.78 4.9 236.63 6.6 320.6 1.8 78.875 5.4 4.7143 222.88 213.14 3 146.45 5.5 238.39 3.2 1~.55 6.4 328.19 6.6 314.6 72 310.27 4.6 52143 192.01 238.21 4.2 175.56 ....-7.2 - .... 3al84 ... .. 7 289.27 5.1 ~.71 6.7 470.89 8.1 4S6.es 4.3 6.CW357 224.63 326.51 5.9 ~.51 4.3 204.61 3.9 195.63 42 4.575 185.16 228.23 5.1 247.91 8.1 6.0857 4S6:es 326.51 1.8 4.4 78.875 213.14 31 5 31 S y- ..".6:7.u ..>~ ... 0z' >~ -:-L"./~/y '''7Pl ~~ "'... --~ '6/iq/tZ / (DATE{ Z>>9/~/ 2006 {SIGNATUReOF=~~~OFFlCEROR ( '~(OAtEj~. ANAL EFfLUENT .. .....c Total SUSDl noea SOIkIs Amrt10nia . Other 8 ... ~ o "0 o E g a >- 1II ~ ~ ] ~ E & ~ -& '?i., 'a. & .. ~e ~ ~e E El! ~ :2 "OCl :!2 -aCl I I~ I "0 1S~ "0 15~ '" .~e( · : ~.~ : ~.~ g s~] CD D. Cl D.Cl E E Cl E ~ Ji ~.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6.4 354.26 0.0705'" 3.9023 7.2 398.48 0.0556 3.0771 4 216.1 0.0533 2.8796 5.8 270.8 0.0393 1.8349 52 234.02 0.0532 2.3942 6.2 5.8286 271.47 300.76 0.1)851 0.0021 3.:7262 32473 32 140.33 0.0537 2.3549 42 '. 186.5 0.0326 1.4476 !i6 248.66 '. 0.043 1.9094 5.6 ..... 270.44 '.' '. 0.071 .... .... 3.4288" 5.6 272.03' 0.0498 2.4191. 6.6 289.21 0.0837 3.&577 5.6 52 2',31.14 Z34.04 0.0831 0.0596 3.4299 2.6653 4.2 .' 205.04 0.0705 3.4417 6.4 277.4 ...... 0.0602.. 2.6093 5.8 249.31 0.0683 2.9359 72 36922 0'()631.. 3.2358 9.2 438.53 O.osn" 2.7504 8 344.75.. 0.0547 2.3572 5.6 6.6288 233.75 ~57 0.09560.0672 3.9905 3.0458 5.6 234,re. 0.083 3.4694 8.8 367.69 0.071 2.9666 5.6 231.~2 0.0939 3.8804 5.8 372.69 0.0752 4.8321 13.6 955.83 0.063 4.4277 11 .. 674.51 0.0705 4.323 9.6 8.5714 501.5 476.82 0.0500 0.0725 2.6538 3.7933 82 ." 455.19 0.0069 4.8239 9.2 437.77 0.0866 4.1207 72 361.16 ,... 0.0584 2.9294 6.8 7.85 299.79 388.48 0.0622 0.0785 3.6239 3.8745 .6.7335.26 0.07 32208 13.6 a..:m4955.83 47U2 0.0956 0.0715 4.8321 3..1145 3.2 5.2 140.33 Z34.04 0.0326 0.05e6 1.4476 2.EiS53 31 5 31 5 31 531 5 ~ E >- 1II "OlD - a 1l~ -Cl . :0- ~< C>. ~~ ~~ I Cl It) ~ e o ~ o 'ii o ,to .-: , , I . . '. . , ,. '.0 c MOnttllyRep(>rt()f Operation Activated Sludge Type.. . Wastewater Treabrlent Plant . r- afMlallJ -- For_Of: · laY of Jeffersonville lN0023302 .. May - Page <4 of <4 Stale FOOll10829 (Rtl2-2OO5) SLUDGE TO DIGESTER . ... .... . r- r ~ , = c, o ~ o >- as o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ..Z 23 24 25 26 Zl .. 28 29 30 31 Avi Max. Min. Data .. .. GI -8' cij~ ~..... III X E-= a:~ . . .. . . o ....................i. ..'"'...~ .rL~ a;/, / ~~/bl-" ~NAT1JRE ~ / T:$R)... ............./. .~~ Vea< .~I ~//~#2 . / (Date) . .. ._-~_.: 2006{S!C-NATUREOFA=~~ OFFlCER.&i DIGESTER OPERATION Anaerobic Only CD c E o u .E .E ~~ 0' ~& J!" 0.2 f-:O) " DO ~ .. ~ e 0 0) <) o .E .E ~~ O' ~& S-g ~q; . 23500 .. . o 23500 23500 23500 1 .E <II "'0 ~~ 0, .!!. ",il,gt -:3 0_ >(1) 0:66 0.66 0.65 0;63 0.58 . " i . . : ~ 5 .. ~ .E ~ ~.~ o . . .!!. :co ." -:3 ~a; . DO "'0 :3 a; " S .. . . .9,8 0.... . . . . !D ~ <is .;~ ~..... .Bx . . ~~ 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.139 0.139 0.14 0.14 .0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 .0:13 0.13 0.12 0.1251 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.1 0.1~ 0.15. . 0.1 31 . ~ ~8 ~..... _x c . .!lii ase> E.... 8.~ :Jf O)..c: a E It) o 0- ala cE J!IZ ascJ, E:r: 8.z :J ... (/)0 :r: a. ~8 ~ ~~ ~ eU: 2! J:l. o. 8- = :g... E C> 0 ~ 0:67 0.65 0.64 0.63 1 0.58 0.63 9 .. 94920 93420 47120 . . .. .. . ". .. . 46120 48300 47580 . 93630 40420 45320 . 9l84O 46500 93560 47200 46340 o o o o o Send completed foons by the 28th of the month 10: 92660 44240 4S36O 44620 45900 . . Q 93340 62373 94920 40420 20 o Indiana Department of Environmental Mal ~ Office of Water Quality, Mall Code 65-42 ',-""'., 100 North Sena1e Averue Indianapolis,lndiana 46204-Z251 o "I " "~'I . '">]"~~l "" '~1 - "}1 ~'< PERMITTEE NAME/ADDRESS: : .. . NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) .~~-'!l~~-!~!!~!!.(mY.1~~J~tl!t1i.E!e1!t~!E~~~~. DISCHARGe MONITORINO REPORT M, .~~<!r~!t~~~-?_C!t2~_l!t'JPJ9Jl_~~!S_<l___~..____~. IN0023302 001 A .~_E!ttE!~9_1}Y!~~J~t'19!~n!~11.J~Q..._~_~~~~~..~. PERMIT NUMBER DISCHARGE NUMBER .f..!.r&I!Y~_~_~!f!!!~~~!.!~tl!D!~!l?!'L~!f_..~. .h~P!~.9_'1~_~_~!fC!!!!?r.!Y!~~J.t'!91~'l~_~1.t~Q~. .~!t'1L~:rJ!!l~t'1Y_!:.2!!'..~.9!..<lL_9~rt.!~~~_Qp_~rator . PARAMETER ~ .1'1 (32.37) ';"'1'" 'J - FORM APPROVED . OMS NO.2040.0004 1IIIIIIIIIIIImIIIIIIllIUIUIIIII. * I "0 0 2 3 30 2 . ~ 1 A 0 , 0 6 * *** NO DISCHARGE LI *** NOTE: Read Instructions-before completing thl, form. NO. EX U~itl(62.~ OXYGEN, DISSOl.VED (DO) 00300 1 1 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUe pH I ~ _ptIIlty".........ilIlo..... ""'.1lI .....",..____,....., _I..... ~.i..1o ........'wllh. ~..."""d.. _1Iool""'1ll....' ..._1 ptopttly,...........s- ""Iaf<ftllll.. _II. B_...., ~.,"" _wt>O_.._.._,..._dlro.dy"-u.f.Iot~.... -100..... _I..~d~ ....btolO(..,bowl!'4P....btf~..... .._ ....CGlIlpI.... I...... __ on .lpla...poMI/l...... 0IlII0IIltbia1il" Iof..-J... ...""""....P*"IWIII,I of......._Iotbowlolviololl_. ------................-...~-..,..-......-.-...-..---.....~~.--~ (RefBflince 1111 attachments here) Clark County EPA FORM 3320-1 (REV.OS-95) Previous editions may be u.ed. (REPLACes EPA FORM T-4O WHICH MAY NOT BE USED.) PAGE 1 OF 3 " "' =-~~1 , "W"~, 1 ,,,"""",er, " , ~, "'''1" ' "~""',' '1,' !f"'~1 '--', " , ", " ,',>-- ' " ,:', , ,: " ,< .- , "'- ........ PERMITTEE NAME/ADDRESS: .', NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE El.lMINA TION SYSTEM' (NflDE8) FORM APPROVED :~~~~~~r~~~1~~~:: i~::~~;~NO REPOOTI~~~~~ NUMBERljtl,~I!II(~m"IIII~ln~;ii J_f!~m~:_A~J!~-"!(.m~!!I.!J~tl!t1J~~~.L~J:e___ .~~C2!t~<2!'.:__~!!!!~~t'YJ~.!t_.,J!.!~J~_~!;.~Z~~Q_ .~~!)~_.:n'!!~!~Y..h._~r!yt!Q!~j_9.!!!!.!!.I!~_Qp"&rator PARAMETER (32-37) ... NO DISCHARGE LI". .. NOTE: Read Instructions before completing this fonn. Loading 1{4 Card Only) (3B-45) Minimum NO. EX Unit 1(42-6, Sample Type CHROMIUM, TOTAL RECOVERABLE 01118 1 0 0 eFFLUENT GROSS VALUE COPPER, TOTAL (AS Cu) 01042 GOO RAW SEWAGEnNFLUENT ZINC, TOTAL (AS Zn) 01094 10 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE COPPER, TOTAL RECOVERABLE 01119 1 0 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE FLOW,WA8TEWATERBV. PASSINO TREATMENT 80048100 eFFLUENT GROSS VALUE .' '" FLOW, IN CONDUIT OR THRUSAMPLE TREATMENT PLANT MEASUREMEN ~~~II~uJ':' ~R08S VALUE :i~~~,:,rR1'i'~i!~1Ii~O~;A"G~!!':r!'i!::M~]N~i!:~1 MGD ;, ,,' ",;,;'.. ,', '." .' " f'~rfi;'~'~ii;"9f:IJiI."'d,j;~'.:.JiiliiiMfliiiiii,,""_""_n~ NAMElTITLE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE d1t_.,.....,.,.'...ui.........wlIh. """"doaIpdto_IbtI.,.IIn..s R b W . ,.......,~pIf..ondtWlu...thtlrt_I............."._..ItV""Iry.of o _ alz tho_"""_tht,,"........thoot___Iy.........IbIfI...,.aWit.tht Irt_... tht IoICln111lloa oul>mJuod I.t. 10 tho boll oIltV '"-"<leo ondbolitl.lnI.. _..s ....1... 1 tIl1.....1b1l thtn ...IF!f1.lI1lpnltl. for IIIllm1ltlrwlil.. 101_101\ ImllldUlI-tht pooolWlity ofiilo Of, kI1>rl-1br ........>lollil_ Mayor of Jeffersonville TYPED OR 'PRINTED - COMMENT AND EXPLANATION OF ANY VIOLATIONS DISCHARGE TO -OHIO RIVER SIGNATURE OFPR~CIPAL EXECUTIVE HORIZED AGENT' . AREA CODE NUMB Clark County (Rrif9r8nC6 aI/attachments hefe) EPA FORM ~320.1 (REV.08.g~) Pre\llouudltlons may be used. (REPLACES EPA FORM T -40 WHICH MAY NOT BE USEb.) PAGE20F3 " '.~.1_ ":""'j FORM APPROVED ... OMB No.20010-0004 PARAMETER (32-37) 11_111111111111111111111111111111111 . J H 0 0 2 3 301. 0 0 I A 0 6 06. ~."'"""'J '....-J PERMITTEE NAME/ADDRESS: . NATIONAL POLLUTAt-lTOISCHARGEELIMINATIOtfSYSTEM (NPDeS) ,!'!~_'!!~_~_!!!~!!?_"l1!l~M~~j!;l~L!!.~_. DISC...... MOHlTDRINO..PORT ~1 4"Jj[!!I!q,qjJ,!.l~!!!P.!9,QB.q!'A.~~_.. IlNO~3~01 B J I OO~~e ~~~- ;1 venersonvllle, Indiana ...11.,0 R I UM E I C' 8 'FaclTlly:-Jefle-rsoniiOre-Mliiircrparsi'~-- ~~ ~ ----...........----...----......---....--..--------.......-...-..----.. .h<1~~!i.2.1] ~_.:!~!!~!!l.2.!.lyJ!~I.J!lqt~!l~_1?.1~_<? .~tt_I'!~_:rJ!!'.2.t~y..k9!~)Y!Sl!..qLg!ryl!l.~g_Q~rator ... NO DISCHARGE LI ... NOTE: Read InstructIons b6rore completing thl. form. NO. EX Unit 1(82-6 OHLORINE, TOTAL RESIDUAL 8O~80 1 1 0 EFFLUENT OROSS VALUE e.QoLl . COLISCAN MF 111041 1 0 0 EFFLUENT OROSS VALUE BOD, OARBONACEOUS II- DAY, 20 O. 80082 1 2 0 EFFL.UENT GROSS VALUE BYPASS OF TREATMENT 808S8 1.0 0 EFFLUENT OROSS VALUE FLOW, TOTAL 82220 1 0 0 EFFLUENT GROSS VALUE None None . .~ . ;>;!iill_,.....Jlt_"'-,DI)' _.............I'I..Io..._..Idi. t)'ttfllIdo''''''41o..........qooIlGtd NAMEITITLE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE ....-1_'y......_.........'lIloloforonoofl..._ Jl_4""YloqobyDf .....'___tho._or__ollto<tlJ......holtrpdMri....,. Rob Waiz _......_.._~nfl'...........ot..,_.......db.II~...... ....... """ _~".. I.. _"'"'''''"... .Jpfi....,...,m.. (or ~tld.. 1afwoMo1... ilI<h..... tho .....lbllKy 0{1I.. ... iIap'l_ tilt I1lowlnt viol~_ ~~~.................~ TYPED OR PRINTED COMMENT AND EXPLANATION OF ANY VIOLATIONS DISCHARGE TO OHIO RIVER : ~ .. ~.. . . (R8fef6/lCfJ a/l attachments hef8) " Clark County UV DISINFECTION SYSTEM INSTALLED ON 4120108 EPA FORM 3320-1 (REV. 08-815) Previous editions may be used. . , (REPLACES EPA FORM T-40 WHICH MAY NOT' BE USED.) .. .' .-.....' ""'. '. .......- '.._,,, -.,--.--..,'....-... -..-....- IndianllDepartmentofEllviroJimentalManagement Land Use Section - OSHWM Land Applitation Monthly Report -Biosolids and ID.dustrlal Waste Produ.Cts >>Complete tmd szibmit IhiJ form to IDEM each report 1IWlrt1t<< ~ ~:~ ~.,,-.~ - ~. ,- ~'-~' .-. .~,~,""";;;;""'->$<- Year: L.A. Permit No.. IN LA: -.'-; ,~~. _;. . ..,~.",:, "'.-.~ .'.<.<-' ":;;;,J", ....,'.:.>.;.,.-"'.,.'.....~..~t~\"... ...-,.,,' -.'-""" . ethods of Disposal Utilized: . care by an "X- which disposat methoqs were utilized this month and provide volumes for each method~ OTE: Only include amounts for~. ma~ which you are PERMITTED to land apply. 10S0LIDS: o biosolids 'were disposed, by land application or other methods, this month . iosolids were land applied this month rvatered biosolids were used at the treatment works grounds this month iosolids were landfilled this month . osolids were disposed by the method listed below this month the total volume listed above,.wha.t volume \\'3S transported out. of Indiana? rr 1 US TRIAL WASTE PRODUCTS: o industrial waste products were disposed, by land application or othermethods,tbis mooth . waste products were land applied this month dustrial waste products were landfilled this month dustria1 waste products were. disposed by the method listed below this month ., ;~ .,i Printed Name ~ ~ { Date ~<ii:"'" ,'J.-t;I)ltt\4" ' - -I: - ---'''~-"-, < _' " "",,,,,,,,:,,,,_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"_,_,,,,,,",,,,,=",,y,,_.,,,,,,;~_,.:O'~,'T.''''''"'''',~,_""::O'''':-'';.i',''-':'-';"''CY-'I'..',,~;:.c'C:J_,"-~;;J;!:'."",-,Z ", .. .... .-..-........ - "'_. ...... ',,- ".. -- ..- .... -.. ,.... -- .. '. ..._~ - .--. -...... - ?;.'~:::.=---------~-~-- - -~~~-.~ "~~-~-~ -- ;:-'-~.:':""-'~ ~"- ..._......_.._._..._.,.. ,""._u ' ___ ...n _.'. .. .. NA TIONAL-POL.LlJT ANT DISCHJ\B(;g~L..I-"t'If\J~!12t<1~'I'S,.E~ (NPDi:S): , CSODISCHARGEMONITORING -REPORT(CSODMR)' " , '0""-"-"'_"'-,-,," ..:0'.'_"- ..-..-,.-...-,---..--.....- ~ .. .... ";:""..<;, f ''''~ City of Jeffersonville ,,10f 6 I ,.. ':. " u _ "'U .______n. CitY-.;;r. " ~- ''''''P-~'';_.~-~ .1t~~F:"".~_....~~~,.."..,..., .. -c' r::~~Jeffersonville POTW .......c. ~~~~ 511106 . 5131106 r r C~K .. X_gqC~~:r::.~~Cl!jffiCf.~ii1?1~!1.._-~<,"i~1 .'''~~~~~ I - " , . . ", c'. ,,' " '.. ~~I(Jm.;J~l~P):C, 22.5 MeasuredJMetered 1M) or Estimated(E\ must be specified. (Please attaeh methods usedJ < . I I CSO Outfall No. 003 CSO Outfall No. eso Outfall No. 005 - - .-""\ -:,tt ~~ ,:9! 0 'J€. ;~ MO 0.60 7.18 15.00 . . . '.' r TU 0.05 7.18 18.00 .' . : .' , '- -. ..' . , 1m '. ... 1 WE 0.00 5.93 15.00 ',. ITH 0.00 5.55 14.00 r 0.00 5.43 12.00 . ;.. FR .SA 0.00 5.25 12.00 'C" .. .r- , SU 0.00 5.17 11.00 i MO 0.00 5.11 10.00 . i TU 0.00 5.11 10.00 .. 0 WE 0.30 6.32 15.00 .. TH 0.20 5.54 12.00 '. FR 0.10 4.92 11.00 . ''ffi r SA 0.00 4.68 10.00 -' : SU 0.15 4.80 14.00 r MO 0.05 4.89 14.00 TU 0.00 4.69 12.00 . '. WE 0.35 5.77 11.00 . TH 0.00 5.23 10.00 r-- " 9 FR 0.00 4.76 10.00 " SA 0.00 4.46 10.00 . .'. SU 0.00 4.51 10.00 '=>\ .--. ',;c.. .... .----. - ~J MO 0.00 4.43 11.00 , .~ TU 0.00 4.37 11.00 .iii.. , m WE 1.20 8.13 25.00 r _~i TH 0.85 9.74 25.00 t. .' .If!) FR 0.00 6.30 13.00 fil.J SA 0.00 5.38 12.00 '. , fi!l SU 0040 6.40 25.00 , .@a'] MO 0.00 5.27 12.00 . .. m TU 0.25 5.67 '. . 15.00 t liD WE 0.00 4.85 14.00 . . . '.. '. . f ,,...,..... 4.50 nJa ~ 0.00 _. _01; ,~-- .-..-,..- ~'" -~ '"',. ."",~"",,~.. ':>""~'("'''r''''''~-~' ". '.' ; .... -' 'cc'J1WtfiOriZ r TlmOlhv L Crawford .. . 8121285-$451' 'c. . . I CERnFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND AU ATTACt-lMENTS WEFU:PREP~D U~ceRMYDlRECTlON OR~UPERVlSION IN' ACCORDANCE WITH A SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT QlIAUFIEDPERSONNEl.PROPERl.Y GATHER ANDEVAl.UATE THEINFORMATlONSUBM~D. . r- BASED ON MY INQUIRY OF THE PERSONS WHO MANAGE THE SYSTEM O~)"HOSE PERSONS DlRECTl. Y RESPONSIBLE FOR GATHE.R1NG THEtNFQRMAT1ON;THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWlEDGE AND eaJEF, TRUE; ACCURATE, AND COMPlETE. I AM AWARE THAT THERE AAE SIGNIFICANT PENALnES FOR SYBMrrTlNG FAlSE INFORMATlQN,INCLUDlNG THE PdSSIBIl.lTYOF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING VIOlATIONS.. . . ~~-'Qf~(=~'.-~<<...A~Ment.~~~~~~~..=:;.~. ".. .' .;. ~., ._- .' r ~ ~~'-'1 /'.7 f~- / ~ 6//9. '0 ...... V ..... / , .r. '.' ....<.....i..;..... . .>5. ~,. r--, ,-- NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) CSO DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (eSO DMR) ADDITIONAL OVERFLOWS PAGE ~~--~"t::;;;';;<~~11 , ~IClty of Jeffersonvllle ~~I 2 of 5 I '~.IJeffersonvllle POTW " ~~ IINOO23302 '. ~~~~511J06.5I31106 ,~~~~~~ ... ' "", ",!, M<i3su~jM\C1rEstllilatedlE\nillstbe ~....c...... altacttnietl1odsuSed.l . " cso OUtfall No 006 cso OUtfall No OUT ","'_~",' I'No 008"""",,,,,_ ,~..." INo o:'.,'1!I,' ',.'''', II II ... .. !. .. ~'" .~ :."'.; -~ ~ .;0;; .."'<t. ~ ~ " ' ~ << it, 1! ~ ;"if ~ '~ " .c'~'~ :' ~,' 'p MO TU , WE .. TH ~, FR ,~ I: 18: , TH ,~ FR ""'1.: ", TU II: 'i!1 FR '~J SA ..~. SU --~MO ~) TU ti4"'" ~... WE ,~2 TH ~FR @'J SA ,~SU ~.i MO ~iTU " 'i1" WE "\lJ .II! i , , , '.' , . p, " -. , , .... , n_L~ 0.00 o~~..~.. .~.~. I CERTIFY UNDER PEHAl. TV OF LAW THAT THIS COCUMEHT AND AU. ATTACHMENTS WERE PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION OR SUPERVISION iN ACCORDAHC:E WITH A SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE, THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL. P<<OPER1. Y GATHER AND evALU",TE THE ,IHFORMAttON,SU,BMmm. BASED Ojl MY INQUIRY OF THE, " PERSONS'MIO MANAGE THE SYSTEM OR THOSE PERSONS DlREcn Y RESPONSIBLE FORGATHERING THEINFORMAT1ON; THE.'NFOIUolATlON SUBMITTEtlIS, TO THe BEST OF MY KHOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, TRUE, ACCURATE, AND COMP1..ETE. I AM AWARETAAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT PENAL TlESFOR'SUBMITTlNG FALSE INFORMATION. INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINE AND IMPRISONMENT FOR IOlOWlNG VIOLATIONS. ~~~~~~~.T~~y':,~~trK:*~~~~~~~~_~~~j;~~~~~~~~f~.,,_ ...,- .// --/ "...:::;/ // ~ ~ fL__ ,'"S. I ~/ Pi /IJ I!. , / /' ..' f 1 ,.~ .......... "..., NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) .' . _. _.. .__'_" ".'_, ,,". _....... ._. ,_ ,n.', ..p~n. . eso DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT(CSO DMR) . ADDITIONAL OVERFLOWS PAGE ~-r~~(9.41l~~.~1 ,.-'''' - . ~ """TIt~ City of Jeffersonville Plige:c= 3 of 5 ~L-,~~~ III . acIlity:. .:~ rsonYllle POTW PWiiiIt'Nuii! .,~. IN0023302 .. =~~~T~~~15I1106-5fJ1106 . .... .~~cso~~.~~'IriOnth~ .... ng .. . ........... ~ . . .. .... ...... ...' ..... .. ". . .... MeasureCuMetete<tlMlorEsti~a1edlElmuslbe ~ ....easeattaChmell..'cfsuSecl.l --- cso Outfall No 010 CSO Outfall No 011 CSO Outfall No 012 CSO Outfall No 013 ~ .~ . .i; .' :~ l~; ...!' ,~- 'ClC ~ ".~ ila, .~ '.if E. ''EE: ;~-'''''''''E~~''-''~~e ti ':~E .~ . ' . ~1 ..~ ~ '. . .... .' .~.. ,~IIIGl_... ..... ..- ......, ~ ~l MO it'l TU ffl WE .. "fAl TH . .~~ FR ;w:t ltl SA . JjJ su I: . .... . ~WE t TH ...... ~ '.""'" FR . I~ r : SU MO . .' . TU . im ;" WE Ii TH Ii'! FR t~. SA . . . '. ..... -2l'" < SU ':It<.~~ tm MO .'.- .--....-.-.-- ;~~ TU :24>:; WE \..-'~ ~j TH 12:00am E 4.00 E 0.04 E 12:00am E 4.00 E 0.04 E . ". 12:00am E 4.00 E 0.04 E ~j FR .t! SA ~ SU ~l MO ,'. ,....,........ .' . JAG...; TU ~1;t WE ofliIL~ n1a 4.00 0.04 n1aO.oo 0.00 . n1a 4.00 0.04 "" . ....". _....-.... _,'",--.:,''':-,:''', .._._,','n'" '_,'~.'_'_"'_'.'_'w' ..... ",," ."-' . T_~II~Jm -or .'tIlfitOf ~~-~.~ .... . 812J2BS.&o151 T1rnat1lv L ClawfonI . . ..' . CERTIFY UNDeR PENALTY OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND Al..L ATTACliMENTSWERE F'~EPN!EDUNDER MY DIRECTION OR SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SYSTEM DESIGNED TO AS$URE THAT QUALIFlED PERSONNEL PROPERLY GATHER AND EVALUATE THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED. BASED ON ~~~~L ~r-~~~~ D8te~';. .~,.. '_ i'f~': I"':"o.~ - _, -~_:,' V .. u7_/ / "Hla . ~y", V 7 j/ .~; , ."../ .... r ,-. i . i ~ of Jeffersormlle ~ I . P3ge:~ S . i~IJeffersOrmlle POlW ~~'..' ':... '. ~-~...~... --. .... ._~~~'- ~~~~ Mi.'ii~.~iM~~M~" .. ...... .' . '~;'--, .. ~ 5/1106 -SI31106 ~~~foi:~~' ." . Measu~'IMOi ESliiilated.OOmlJSt'!Se'."'=.....,,, ..,..att.iCh~OdI'l'~1 ,. .' .~7::~-i)1.~__ ~OI' or ..:cw or .. '. .li.~:"i · . .E1!.. ~ ,~ ~E .~ . i~ TU 'fl] we . f!1 TH m FR .~~ SA i: Bwe . , .. tml TH !92' FR 'r.';;.;oi "ISA ....~: , :$is:, TU .~-. WE .@1 TH FR SA , .' ~Jj SU - tzl1 -"~'- ' .. .---- .--.- -- MO . .. . .. --- .. . .., ---- ~-:; TU '~J WE _t~~; TH !2if! FR .....-{.......... !t~ SA ~j SU 129; MO (~;~ TU . ~3 we '. ~.O_oo 0,00 nla 0,00 0,00 nla 0,00 0,00 nla 0,00 0,00 ., " ~ ...._~Jl@l~ .. -- ., "'" .lIllIiM~ Of: ~CliiI&i'cic:' -- , -- T- '.. nmctllv L. Crawfonj !1lI12~1 I CERTlFY UNDeR PEHAI. TV OF LAW THAT nlls OOClJMENT AND AU. ATTACHMENTS WeRE PREPARe) UNDeR MY DIRECTION OR SUPERVISION IN. ACCORDANCE WTTHA SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEl.. PROPERLY GATHER AND .EVAL.UATE THE INFORMATlON SUBMITTED. BASED ON s,=~ir~~.~~~~wci;~;~~~'~.~9*~~~~&C~~~{~~~~~~~~$t~~~~~~~1tf4_~T~~_~~~ _/ ~~ ~ /)J .." Y ,>:~ .' ~//C/h"J& I../'-' ../ / "." I:;i"l "/ . NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) eso DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT(CSO DMR) ADDITIONAL OVERFLOWS PAGE ~~_~~~'\\j~j,;,1 ,-. ,....., r r- r-' '....:... -', . s; ~ NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) CSO DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORT (CSO DMR) ADDITIONAL OVERFLOWS PAGE ~Fri-505i8-(S~1y~-t4~;;3:~i~-IF:;1 ~.I Sof sl Perinlt~" IIN0023302' iI;~ CltyofJeffefsOnvllle ,~ Jeffersonvllle POTW .J:' ',' ~~-:--~'~<~~~~..b~~ ".,:.o!.~~~~~ ','. '~~~MMlticrio~&'1m-$/31106 ~~~~fO\'.1M~~ .' MeasuredJMetered IMl or estimated IE must be --.. 'Please *" methOds used.l ~. i ; .~~- MO . TU WE TH mFR I!- SA SU MO TU WE . . . TH FR SA SU MO TU WE .,4< TH eFR t201SA I~ ...l!. TU ~4WE ~? TH ;2&1 ~~~ FR ~SA ..~" SU #91 1.10 ~TU ~.' nla .4.00. . OJ)8 nla.. .. _~Cft1ciItor T1ma1hv L o-fotd . , ,.. . , . - . ., ,. - . .' . 12:00am M 4.00 1.1 0.08 E 0.00 '_.'~~~:'1>~'.~~ '. 11II12~1 ..... I CER"TIFY UNDER PENAL TV OF LAW THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND.AU. ATTACHMENJS'N!:R.E .PRi:PAREO ~NDER ~D1R~ OR S~PER'J1SION IN ACCORDANCE WITH A SYSTEM oeSIGNEDTO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PROPERLY GATHER AHD EVALUATE THE INFORMAnON sUBMmED.'1lASEO ON '':}''&''''''"f.>.WJ'-iW;;'''>'''_:;;:'<'''''.';'#''''~~''''~~ ~ ...c.l1liII.n'afPtfnCi'"'' .. .' ". >~ ~/- . ~ ~ /~- 7:7 -// /,.';" ~.~~~~~~ h. /,/,/. ./ / 'T ..- ..- Attachment F Locations of Footage Cleaned ,-, , ,.- ~ I r- " '1~~"1 -"".~~] ~.r~] --FLUSH PROGRAM-SUMMARY SHEET.~ STREET FOOTAGE SANITARY/CSO Catch basins Cleaned FULTON 922 130 CSO FULTON 412 200 CSO Catchbasin Tops Cleaned MORRIS 801 200 CSO LOCUST 120 - ALLEY TO WANLUT 260 CSO Total Footage TV'ed BRISCOE & HERBY (CHECK MANHOLE) 285 CSO Hopkins Ln. 288 CSO Total Footage Cleaned MORRIS 1026 300 CSO Middle of Knobloch Ave towards Main St. 325 CSO ELLWANGER & NACHAND 400 CSO 403 Gilmore Ave 405 CSO 10TH & WALL 500 CSO PARK PLACE & CHIPPEWA 700 CSO Main St. down Knobloch Ave. 800 CSO 4793 1 107 Fairview Dr. 35 SANITARY 2505 Marrietta Ct. 150 SANITARY 15TH & DUNCAN 230 SANITARY ALLEY BETWEEN 8TH & BRIGMAN 230 SANITARY 15TH & LOCUST 250 SANITARY FALLOW DRIVE 250 SANITARY BLUEBIRD & HOPKINS MANHOLE 330 SANITARY 843 W. Larkspur Dr. 360 SANITARY 2007 Hambura Pike 400 SANITARY MOCKINGBIRD 609 400 SANITARY ROMA & CARMAN (CHECK MANHOLE) 400 SANITARY 1524 NORTHAVEN TO SPORTSMAN 500 SANITARY 3011 PERIMETER 525 SANITARY PLANK ROAD TO 1043 NACHAND LANE TO CLARVIEW 550 SANITARY 10th St. down to Kehoe Ln. 750 SANITARY 5360 I I 41 I 01 I 8491 I 101531