HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-2000
t
~s
~~
l~
"~ ~
~.......
~
~
C,)
"'C
.. .......
~ .,..,(
~~
~
~
1::2
f} C,)
d:: ~
~
,
.-- r-- ,..-- ....------.. ,....----. r----- r-----. --~ -----
-----,
~ --,
f1
iJ
n
L
n
LJ
G
L;
r
r,
L.
r;
~,-~
r-
.. '"'
[
r
....u~j
[
C
n
L
G
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EMC Annual Report
Letter From the Project Manager.
1
Organization .
2
Wastewater Treatment & Collection .
. . . 5
Facility Safety & Training
.18
Industrial Pretreatment & Laboratory.
. 19
Community Involvement.
20
Goals & Objectives .
.21
n
f1
L.
o
n
L
r:
i
n
r -
t,-,,,
..
t
I
t" ~~.
r
L;
~
~-j
r
L
G
c
EMC Annual Report 1
EMC Annual Report
On behalf of the entire Jeffersonville-EMC Team, I would like to present our May 1999 -
April 2000 Annual Report of the Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facilities.
In the past year, our employees have enjoyed a high level of success and personal devel-
opment. Improving the knowledge base of our workforce is critical to EMC's ability to
stay abreast of the ever changing water quality criteria. This ongoing improvement in our
staff capabilities is essential to meet our goal to provide outstanding customer service.
Wastewater professionals will continuously be challenged to find new and better ways to
improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the wastewater collection system and treat-
ment facility.
Let me assure you that the staff is dedicated and determined to put forth the effort needed
to improve operation in the future. EMC's focus will be to provide a higher level of
customer service.
This Annual Report illustrates the progress we have made to improve the facilities and our
service to the citizens of Jeffersonville. EMC appreciates the support shown by the City.
In return, we are totally committed to:
THE EMC PLEDGE
and Your Guarantee of
PERFORMANCE
QUALITY & COST
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
~:tZ:
Project Manager
n
[
n
G
r
!,
n
f:
LJ
r
l
r
I
n
\ ....,;
fJ
C
[
r
EMC Annual Report 2
ORGANIZATION
EMC Annual Report
The Directorof Operations oversees Contract Compliance within
EMC's Clark County operations and provides support to the
Facility Managers with technical and administrative issues. He is
responsible for insuring EMC's business philosophies are followed in
each of the Clark County Operations.
The Facility Manager and the Assistant Facility Manager are both
responsible for the day-to-day operations of the wastewater treat-
ment facility and collection system, the enforcement of the industrial
pretreatment program, the capital improvement program, cost
control, and client service. The Assistant Facility Manager reports
directly to the Facility Manager and the Facility Manager reports
directly to Mayor Galligan and the Board of Public Works & Safety.
The Laboratory/Pretreatment Supervisor is responsible for the
supervision of the laboratory procedures and quality assurance/
quality control (QA/Qc), industrial pretreatment program, process
control procedures, day-to-day operations of the lab, monitoring and
making necessary adjustments to the treatment processes, and the
monitoring and enforcement of the industrial pretreatment program.
She also insures all federal and state reporting requirements are met
(DMR's, MRO's etc.).
The Administrative Assistant's duties include maintaining the effi-
ciency of the office, payroll, accounts payable, personnel records,
reports, insurance and personnel benefits. She provides administra-
tive support to Management and staff.
Plant operators are responsible for making decisions in process
control, making necessary adjustments, completing preventive and
corrective work assignments, and responding to potential problems
originating from the treatment processes. The operators assist in the
lab, collection system and pretreatment program on an as needed
basis.
:~ ']
~~ :~: I
Organization
homas M. Edwards
irector of
'Perations
Carrie Black
Lab/Pretreatment
Coordinator
Doerators
Sonny
Brannon
Elmer
McKim
1..;'.............:'............11.....
.. " ,~':' .;.:1
David' ......',
Payne
~',."..." r-""""'l f"""""T'" .-.-..,...........
. ,,__.,J t_.~____,.>_) I(__,__~~_,J ~_...__n'~'J (;__~.__._-~j
Ray A.
Wilkey
Facility
Manager
Samuel T.
Lahanis
Assistant Facility
Manager
Danny
Miles
.W;:y~~n
EMC Annual Report 4
EMC Annual Report
Stephanie
Bower
Administrative
Assistant
Maintenance
~~e,"')',,~
r~..... i,; ..... ' ) Mike
' "'1
f.. Arms
fi
U
r,
t '
H
fl
t _
r
f,
r'
1:
~
~
tJ
f:
t :
L
G
l","
WASTEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECTION
EMC Annual Report
Operations
The Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility is a two-cell oxidation ditch extended
aeration activated sludge plant consisting of the following treatment process units.
Secondary
Treatment
Final
Clarification
Disinfection &
Dechlorination
Effluent Discharge to
Ohio River
Solids Thickening &
Aeration
Solids Processing
Solids Disposal to
LandfIll
The facility treated approximately 1.877 billion gallons from May 1, 1999 toApri130, 2000
for an average flow of 5.14 million gallons per day (mgd). The following graph illustrates the
monthly Flow averages from May 1, 1994 through April 30, 2000.
Facility Flow Volume
May 1994 through April 2000
c:::J 1994-95 t::=II9 9 5.96 c=::I1996. 9 7 ---- Design Lim it
12
10
2
o
Feb. M arch April
May
June
July
Aug. Sept.
o cl.
Nov. Dec.
Jan.
=,1991;98. r;;:::J199S.99 =,1999.2000 ____D~..ign Limil
12
EMC Annual Report 5
M 'y
June
July
^ ug
Sept
Oct
N~, \.
D"c
Jan
Fcb
M ilrch
April
G
"J
r
t
r
U
[
r
U
[
[:
[
r
f !
fi
L1
G
i l
r-
k !
t~,:
r
. .
I t.,;
fi
L1
r
WASTEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECTION
EMC Annual Report
With the increased volume of wastewater, an increase in the strength of the wastewater
occurred as well. The higher strength sewage was a result of an increase in discharge
concentration from the industries that discharge to the City's sewer system and the
continued growth and development of residential and commercial properties. The opera-
tors worked diligently to ensure that these challenges had no impact on the quality of the
effluent discharged to the Ohio River.
The average daily effluent Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (CBOD)
concentration was 3.7 milligrams per liter (mg/L) per day. The effluent Total Sus-
pended Solids (TSS) average 14.9 mg/L per day. The annual average removal effi-
ciency was 91 % for TSS and 97% for CBOD and 95% for NH3-N.
The following graph depicts the monthly effluent averages of CBOD and the TSS from
May 1999 through April 2000.
Effiuent CBOD & TSS vs. Permit Limits
May 1999 through April 2000
I:IAverageCBOD CAverageTSS I:IPermitLimitCBOD gPermltLimitTSS
60
50
40
30
20
10
o
May June July Aug Sept Oct Nav Dec Jan Feb March April
EMC Annual Report 6
n
WASTEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECTION
EMC Annual Report
f'
f ;
The following tables depict the design criteria; effluent flow, CBOD, and TSS; and rainfall
since EMC began its contract with the City.
r
L!
Ml11h
D~I;:D~I~D:I~D: I~'I
f1
L
,....,
Vi
L
Mty 1994- 2 15 75 ffi) 5 18 188 781
Jme 1 15 32 ffi) 4 18 128 781
Jdy 2 15 61 ffi) 6 18 184 781
Augu;t 1 15 l) ffi) 6 18 178 781
&[ierrhr '"
1 15 32 ffi) 6 18 191 781)
O:toh:r 1 15 31 ffi) 6 18 1&5 781 ,'Vi
N:Mnfu 1 25 }:l. law 7 l) 239 13)1
D:xmter 2 25 'iD law 6 l) 210 13)1
Jaruuy 1% 2 25 6., law 8 l) 254 13)1
lfuuuy 2 25 49 law 7 l) lID 13)1
Mrch 2 25 48 law 6 l) 144 13)1
,April 2 25 44 law 4 l) 88 13)1
Mty 1 15 ::9 ffi) 4 18 115 781
JlIle 3 15 Al ffi) 2 18 46 781
Jdy 1 15 19 ffi) 5 18 % 781
Augu;t 1 15 Z7 ffi) 5 18 134. 781
&[ierrhr 1 15 19 ffi) 6 18 116 781
O:tohr 1 15 24 ffi) 6 18 144 B)!
N:Mnfu 1 25 22 ,')lcE4 9 :lJ 198 Illl
D:xmter 1 25 Z7 ITltB4 17 :lJ 456 13)1
Jaruuy 1% 4 25 143 law 16 :lJ 572 13)1
lfuuuy 5 25 137 law 12 :lJ 328 E01
Mrch 4 25 182 1~ 10 :lJ 454 1:lJl
,April 5 25 244 law n :lJ 537 ..I:lJl
r
I !
.....
I
.
t .
r
! :
ifl
f J
n
L
EMC Annual Report 7
n
. ,
f
rJ
,
r
I
i
-
I
;
t :
r-
\:-' '
t
LJ
r
L
ri
, f
~
r
t j
r:
~ '
fi
fl
,
j
--,
r:
t:
r:
L
I'
i t
.
r.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECTION
EMC Annual Report
Month CBOD CBOD CBOD CBOD TSS TSS TSS TSS
mg/l Permit Ills. Permit mg/l Permit Ills. Permit
mgll Ills. mg/l Ills.
Mav 5 15 340 650 12 18 818 781
June 3 15 144 650 5 18 239 781
Julv 4 15 145 650 6 18 218 781
Ammst 3 1'\ Qh h'\n '\ 15< lfiO n1
Senterrber 2 15 83 650 7 18 290 781
October 4 15 142 650 20 18 709 781
NovetrlJer 2 25 80 1084 4 30 160 1301
.:1 ?'\ lQ? 1n5<4 1'\ ':\() 722 1'101
Januarv 1997 2 25 93 1084 5 30 233 1301
Februarv ,... "'>~:, 25 146 1084 7 30 341 1301
MarchEi >'19 25 1683 1084 60 30 5314 1301
Anri1 ',' 3 ?'\ 141 ln5<4 '\ 3n 235 1301
Mav ." 4 15 208 650 11 18 575 781
June 3 15 176 650 5 18 294 781
Julv 3 15 108 650 9 18 324 781
AUQ1lst 3 15 111 650 6 18 221 781
. l'i qfi fi'iO h 15< 1q2 7RI
r 3
October 3 15 90 650 6 18 180 781
November 3 25 95 1084 5 30 159 1301
December 6 25 212 1084 19 30 670 1301
J:mmllv 1 QQR 'l. ?'\ 115< 1n5<.:1 ]() 'l.n ''lQ3 1301
Februarv 3 25 133 1084 4 30 177 1301
March 3 25 119 1084 5 30 199 1301
Anril 4 25 187 1084 7 30 328 1301
M",v 4 1'\ 15<h h'\n '\ 15< 232 nl
June 4 15 194 650 5 18 194 781
Julv 3 15 123 650 7 18 286 781
AUQUst 3 15 126 650 5 18 210 781
Senterrber 3 15 101 650 5 18 168 781
Ort{)hP.r ? 1'i m h'iO L1 15< 1?1 7Rl
November 3 25 100 1084 5 30 167 1301
December 3 25 117 1084 6 30 234 1301
Januarv 1999 3 25 166 1084 6 30 332 1301
Fphm~rv '.' 3 ?'i 134 10R4 " 'In 224 13m
March 4 25 200 1084 8 30 400 1301
Anril 3 2'i 143 1n5<4 7 30 333 1301
./
EMC Annual Report 8
r;
t ,
f
fl
tJ
r
t;
r'
I '
t :
\"-
r
i '
t,
r
t
r,
f :
fJ
r
L
r
~
n
i
i
r
t .
f
fl
tl
fi
L;
WASTEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECTION
EMC Annual Report
EMC Annual Report 9
Month CBOD CBOD CBOD CBOD TSS lSS lSS TSS
~ Pemit lb>. Pemit ~ Pemit lb>. ~mit
ngIl lb>. ngIl lb>.
IVI~V I '-Ny ~ 1'1 n4 (;<;{) L1 1~ 17R 7Rl
June 2 ]5 108 650 3 ]8 ]6] 78]
Ju]v 3 ]5 139 650 4 ]8 186 78]
Atwust 4 ]5 ]83 650 3 ]8 137 78]
- 4 1'1 n? f\'iO 4 lR n2 7Rl
Q;to~r 3 15 94 650 4 18 126 781
Noverrber 3 25 95 1084 .; 30 127 1301
4
~cerrber 7 25 262 1084 50 30 ]872 ]301
JanuaJv 2000 3 25 113 1084 24 30 903 1301
4 ?'i ?4?, lORd 'i~ 'l() ~?rn 1~1
,
:tv'Jarch 4 25 182 1084 21 30 955 1301
Antil ~ ?'i n7 lORd 'I ~O 229 B01
Monthly Rainfall vs. Monthly Average Flow
May 1999 through April 2000
DAvg, Monthly Flow iii Total Monthly Rainfall
May 1999 June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dee J:wuary Fcb March April
2000
L''':] C::J c~J ["""J
;-~
N:-:1
Wstewater Treatment & Collection
Mmth
Mly 1994
June
July
Aug
SeJt
Oct
Nlv
Ikc
Jan 1995
Rb
.Mrrd1
Apil
Mly
June
July
Aug
SeJt
Oct
Nlv
Ikc
Jan 1996
Rb
.Mrrd1
Apil
EMC Annual Report 10
Iksign
Flow(MD) Unit
4.5~0 i 5.2
~~-.,.,.,--" ",," ,=-==----
3.84 5.2
-,.~...-
3.
~.--~
3.
-'-,--~
3.
~~--"=
3.
---==
4.
4.
3.
~,-,.=
2.
2.
2.
3.
2.
l
_2.~1 [ 5~~_
3.22 +-5.2
-3jR=3. . ~2
2.87 5.2
~=.= -."""'-
2.64 5.2
-~-"'-'-I---"'-
3.22 . I 5.2
~----
)8 5.2
'-='"'.-
i5 5.2
~7__=
n 5.2
=- ~=-.-,-
11 5.2
-,.~~
'fJ 5.2
"'C~~'.=--
19 5.2
=.~--'-"---'._"~
n 5.2
=~~
)2 5.2
87 5.2
_.~V_____
63 5.2
2"--~_
46 5.2
79 5.2
~'--~~-"~--'
I
4.29 5.2
3.28 5.2
5.45 5.2
5.85 5.2
%
Iksign
87%
74%
71%
68%
73%
71%
79%
81%
73%
56%
55%
51%
67%
'54%
44%
62%
45%
55%
51%
62%
83%
63%
105%
113%
Iksign
1SS Oil>) Unit
6,042 I 10,105
_.._c....' I _.~._-
8,03tH80,105
8.,..3..1.1..10..,105....
_,,__-.""w" ~"~-_=~"~'_'~
7,668 10,105
~'O~'_'_'_"'= __ -~~_==_'_
8'726~1O'105
- 8~493 lo~io5-
~"~_'~~ ;~~c=>V~_~.-_.,-,_
9,483 10,105
-"~"R='" .__.~~~
10,434 10,105
-~"=--'~--' -~,-'.",,,,,-
9,231 10,105
.-.-. "'--'r-"-'."-
6,393 I 10,105
~-"..._~~_._-..~
5,572 I 10,105
4,211 I 10,105
_.__..~.:--t---.__._--~---
3,593 I 10,105
4,824 10,105
-_,_-.-~'-'~.- -"
4,244 10,105
--'--~""-= ~...~~.-
6,338 10,105
5,%2 10,105
_._._~~.~: ~.'.-
6,23~5
7,449 10,105
=====,'-
9,211 10,105
8,229 10,105
8,480 10,105
11,001 10,105
12,148 10,105
CO .:-/
%
IRsign
ff.Yfo
80%
82%
76%
86%
84%
94%
103%
91%
63%
55%
42%
36%
48%
42%
63%
59%
62%
74%
91%
81%
84%
110%
120%
'-'-1
\...."--~-
--:J
'~':J
EMC Annual Report
lRsign
BOD Oil>) Unit
3,4~ [ 10,581
-.-.- ~"'--r-'~~~~o~
3,843 I 10,581
-. ['-~
3,913 .... 1O,?81
- 3~8-i9-1 iO~581
-~7~8-[io~581
t~ E~:_
3,886 10,581
-=--= ~~.~~.",'""~.-
3,864 10,581
=- ~-=~-==
2,710 10,581
""~~~~
2,480 10,581
;
_2,1~~~~?81_..~_
J::~~~ ti~~i;;--
1'8C'fJ~1O'581
~~.,..,.._=-.,. _ ,=.'-,~_'~C'_'~
3,491 10,581
-===-~ -~~,.,.~.",_..-._-
/ 3,022 10,581
--.-.-- ~._~~
~3:_~~4 I ~~~~
2,519 10,581
>= ==~C~~".~~
3,620 10,581
-~=~=---,- ~_...__.--,~~
7,084 10,581
~-~ ~,-~
6,620 10,581
9,045 I 10,581
9,075 I 10:581
%
Iksign
33%
36%
37%
36%
45%
41%
38%
37%
37%
26%
23%
21%
15%
25%
17%
33%
29%
30%
24%
34%
67%
63%
85%
86%
10taI
Rain
I
_2.:~?~
3.70 I
-""'-~
2.25 !
__.o.~
_2.~_!
3.65
-".==.=:~
_23~i
-~~?-!
4.45 !
_.~...~
3.75 I
~'-~"'-j
1.60 i
_.,,,,,,,,,,~,=-,
2.05 I
-- ..~~
-~.~~
10.251
-,._-"",",,-,,--==,
335 i
-_.,~._,.~.--!
2.50 i
i
_.._...~
3.45 I
__..o.~
~~
5.25 I
~o~
2.75 i
5~ I
5.00
2.63
I
~
~
--] ""-":J ''''''':J """"'~j
L:::J r~ [=-1
LLJ .',:':J
Wastewater Treatment & Collection
Iksign %
l\bnth How (lVG)) limit Iksign
J\lhy 1996 8.17 I 52 157%
~-.......---}.--._--.-
June 5.74 5.2 110%
---
July 4.36 5.2 84%
__'.<C< - '
Aug 3.83 5.2 74%
---~=--_.''< =-,-~
SeIt 4.96 5.2 95%
-
Oct 425 52 82%
--- ffi-
NlV 4.80 52 92%
-=' -"'~--".~
5.77 52 111%
Ikc _~_w_
Jan 1997 5.59 52 108%
~b -5~~1;2- 112%
~-"-~_."._'.' i
Mrrch 10.62 52 204%
-~~--
Apil 5.63 5.2 . 108%
. . .~~..
J\lhy 627 5.2 121%
---- - ,
June 7.05 5.2 136%
"----_.~-
July 4.32 5.2 ' 83%
-
Aug 4.43 52 85%
SeIt 3.84 5.2 74%
Oct -'-i~~___s..:~_ 69%
NJv 3.81 5.2 73%
Ikc 4.23 52 81%
Jan 1998 4.71 5.2 91%
~b 5.31 52 102%
Mrrch 4.77 I 52 92%
Apil 5.62 52 108%
EMC Annual Report 11
Iksign
'lSS (Ills) limit
I
14,513 I 10,105
-12~MH-i~10~105-
--~~--_.'~ .~._~-
-~~~~~~~~~~
11,148 10,105
_u._._,. ~_.._
12'86~50'105
___n'.".. "_~".'~==~=-
11,059 10,105
--=-----=~--==. . ~'~-~'----,.,"-
13,771, 10,105
--~_. ---1 - "..~
14,725=t1O,105
-i-9,581 10,105
-' .._.-.-.._<.,.,~~ ~'-~.__._..'~.~
-~~.:~~~~:~~
22,586 I 10,105
_...-._.~,.-.".~ ------.-
17,584 10,105
18,145 10,105
~-~'.="-,--,-- .,--=.-==--
13,347 10,105
~.=~." .-
13,979 10,105
"~,,~_....._.._ ,=c~~
11,925 10,105
-=--~ ~~==.~
9,166 I 10,105
12~539 l 10,105
I
8,516 '.' 10,105
=-
9,208 10,105
10,920 10,105
7,661 10,105
9,309 10,105
.-.-
9,187 10,105
%
Iksign
144%
123%
116%
110%
127%
109%
136%
146%
194%
227%
224%
174%
180%
132%
138%
118%
91%
124%
84%
91%
108%
76%
92%
91%
--- :"J
:7~:J
liMe Annual Report
Iksign
BOD (Ills) limit
10,902 i 10,581
I
-~u-r-~"~--
10, 14H-1O,581
---.--...- -------
9,345 10,581
-'-'~~--~' ,-~<--~_..-".---
10,312 10,581
--==-=--0=='. ,_ ...--.-..
9,928 10,581
_~='"_=,."'_~ =oc=o-.-_~'_"__
8,471 10,581
""~~,--~==--
11,689 10,581
---"-'.83~ .-..-~
11,020 10,581
-..,..."...,'.,..-=........""''",...., =-~-=_C=-_~_
16,597 10,581
-==-=-~=- ...~-~~=-
15,732 10,581
~~~~ ; -..',.,~+~~=~
13,197 I ~~:~~
10,330 I 10,581
?~i~6 [1_0~~~~
8,937 I 10,581
~~~---I---' -----
12.862 I 10.581
- ~"'--~'-~'---
11,817 10,581
-~- ==-
10,160 10,581
10,439 10,581
_.~...._,'M_o_"n_~~_ ~
10,359 10,581
-~~...,,,..,---_.
8,290 10,581
8,838 10,581
8,636 10,581
11,656 10,581
8,812 10,581
%
Iksign
103%
%%
88%
97%
94%
80%
110%
104%
157%
149%
125%
98%
92%
84%
122%
112%
%%
99%
98%
78%
84%
82%
110%
83%
1Ota!
Rain
_7~30-J
3.72 I
--~
3.40 I
-..--I
1.90 I
-,~~--,___,_I
9.02 I
_ 2~ !
4.10 I
4:90-1
----:-1
~~~~
12.25 !
~__,,____, ,.-1
i
6.30 i
-2~311
---- ---1
7.15 I
~051
-6.551
---~
3.95 I
--,-~-==~
--~~7-J
1.47
~~
4.30 I
~
1.65 I
~
~.:..~
;-"l
L_':'~.J
-''''''''"''
l_~_~j
: ~~J
--'"')
J""""l
L.,.'"~,":J
f~"'"
'i,_,~,",~<_J
:::: 1
Wastewater Treatment & Collection
fi>sign %
MJih FI<M'(Ml)) Unit ]);>sign
lVhy 1998 5.57 I 5.2 107%
-_.---'-~~ ..-
June 5.83 5.2 112%
--=C~-_"___- -,~,,-
July '4.90 5.2 94%
-
Aug 5.04 5.2 97%
-..-.c." "--
Sep: 4.03 5.2 78%
-'"~-~~='.'= .,=-=---"
Oct 3.62 5.2 70%
N>v -4.~*~2 77%
~"=~ =,-
~c 4.67 5.2 90%
-6.63 ... 5.2--
Jan 1999 128%
-~~CC~
J<eb 5.36 , 5.2 103%
__.=",_".. -=z."__
lVhrch 6.00 5.2 115%
--~-_.- -
April 5.70 5.2 110%
~-~-- --_.,-,<_..._~
lVhy 5.35 5.2 103%
-~
June 6.45 5.2 124%
-"------
July 5.57 5.2 107%
-- ~">--"~
Aug 5.49 5.2 106%
Sep: 3.96 5.2 76%
Oct -ffi-- 73%
3.77 5.2
-=""""' .. ~.<'-
N>v 3.80 5.2 73%
~c 4.49 5.2 86%
Jan 2000 4.51 5.2 87%
J<eb 7.26 5.2 140%
--- ,-
lVhrch 5.45 5.2 105%
April 5.49 5.2 106%
EMC Annual Report 12
" =:}
:=-~'I
liMe AnnualReport
]);>sign % fi>sign
1SS (lbi) Unit ]);>sign B<D(lbi) Unit
8,640 i 10,105 86% 10,917 I 10,581
",,-~=.'~~=- ="'..--'~,-- "---~ -',==-- _:.---.,~_.."",----
10,016 10,105 99% 10,794 10,581
~~=____= ~ __..=...o=-"'~__
8,418 10,105 83% 6,661 10,581
"--~~,"''',- "-,=.~-,,,..',,-- --=~~,~=,-- ="_.~.'=.:.-~--~.-
8,112 10,105 80% 7,356 10,581
"~ .= -,,--,.=,~- -',~--- _....~_..",._~~
8,302 10,105 82% 8,100 10,581
==-~.=,"- -~...-, "<<.,.-,,;_.....-.~--~
7,216 10,105 71% 6,612 + 10,581
._=.~<.=_ _~.~.~=,._._"_~. _.,~_.__.__~_c~~
7,525 -10,105 74% 7,65tIlO,581
-,-",',""',"'--r"~"',~,",'- -~~'~, '~"",'"c'.'~.'..'_
1O,39t$9 10,105 103% 8,919 10,581
13,38'1 1o~105 132% lo,~-1 10:58"1
----,.,- -- ',~-~- -,,-,..,~ 1.'-"'._-
9,566 . . 10,105 95% 7,868' 10,581
__~_ _..,____ __.,,_, ,_~__L.__" .",_,__
9,508 10,105 94% 7,756 10,581
~'-~'O=" . -,,,--_..,- ,,~. ~
12,360 10,105 122% 10,126 10,581
-lQ9761 iO~lo5 109% --- 9,281 1-()~581
--~,,-" I .-,- ",,,-
11,404 I 10,105 113% 10,759 10,581
~~i~2--n~~~~5 83% ~~523 ~~~,?_8~
7,921 10,105 78% 9,569 10,581
- -~.=,;".- "~-._-'.~" ~~
5,945 10,105 59% 6,200 10,581
-- -=~- ~._--,,_.--,.- ,"",
--..Ji;,~~? 10,105 69% 7,703 HO,58,,~
8,050 10,105 80% 7,796 "1 10,581
9,287 10,105 92% 7,564 10,581
8,839 110,105 87%
10,354 10,105 102%
8,727 10,105 86%
8,608 10,105 85%
~--~'-- --.---
6,883 10,581
9,324 10,581
8,045 10,581
6,227 10,581
%
fi>sign
103%
102%
63%
70%
77%
62%
72%
84%
95%
74%
73%
96%
88%
102%
90%
90%
59%
73%
74%
71%
65%
88%
76%
59%
Tmi
Rin
4.71 I
--,.,~
7.46 I
-'----':--1
7.90 !
_..",..._.~
I
4.22 i
-~---~=~--..!
I
0.05 i
~~ i
I
2.60 I
........-.~.-=--"--~
3.35 i
~~~-""=-j
11.40 !
~=-==~
2.50 I
---~~
3.40 I
---~
_3.:3.~_i
2.10 '
-,--~
6.30 I
O-:7? I
0.95 I
-Q70!
~_.
2.70
2.70
6.17
4.65
6.10
2.75
3.70
c
o
c
o
D
[
r,
U
c
c
o
fl
U
o
1l
u
fl
U
r:I
,L
r;;
U
n
t: '1
~
WASTEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECTION
EMC Annual Report
Collection System
The Jeffersonville collection system continues to expand at a swift pace. We currently have
approximately 125 miles of sanitary sewer line, 25 miles of combined sewer line, 32 lift
stations, and 16 combined sewer overflows (CSO' s). The collection system is a vital part
of the City's infrastructure in providing safe and efficient transportation of wastewater to the
treatment facility. As the community continues to grow, we must always look at implement-
ing new technologies to insure excellent service is provided to the City's residents and
businesses. The majority of our efforts this past year focused on the removal of sump
pumps and roof down spouts from the collection system; compliance with the newly
enacted United States Environmental Protection Agency combined sewer overflow regula-
tions; upgrade of various pump stations; and compilation of records and reports to create
an accurate account of manholes, CSO's and line segments throughout the older sections of
the community. Some of the major accomplishments this past year were:
. We continue to improve and enhance the
preventive maintenance program as related to the col-
lection system. Our goal is to clean an average of
15,000 linear feet per month. This past year we aver-
aged 15,481 linear feet per month or 185,773 linear
feet per year (37.1 miles). The following graph depicts
the linear feet cleaned per month from May 1999
through April 2000, May 1998 through April 1999 ,
May 1997 through April 1998, May 1996 through April
1997 as compared to May 1995 through April 1996 and May 1994 through April 1995.
Sanitary Sewer
C 1994-95 01995-96 C 1996-97 bJ 1997-98 1::11998-99 1::11999-2000 .Month1y Goal
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
o
Jan
Feb March April
May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dee
il
L
EMC Annual Report 13
n
L,
f1
lJ
'W'>"'" ASTEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECTION
EMC Annual Report
r
r
L
f
. We continue to improve the efficiency of the 30 lift stations. Collection system
personnel have performed several upgrades to improve equipment efficiency and
reduce emergency callouts. Evaluations of the older lift stations have been
completed. These evaluations will help the City determine its short and long term
capital improvement needs.
'"
r
, '
I
l .
. Collection system personnel have conducted sump pump inspections in the
Meadows Subdivision to insure no surface runoff or groundwater was being
directly discharged into the sanitary sewer system. Local and state plumbing
codes prohibit connecting roof downspouts, sump pumps or other sources of
surface runoff or groundwater to a building sewer or building drain which in turn is
connected to the sanitary sewer system. Illegal connections were located and
residents were notified ofthe need to comply with the disconnect notice.
n
t
r
t
l ,
r
.
.
l .
[
n
r
L .
r
L;
D
[!
..,.d
r
t 1
EMC Annual Report 14
o
[1
.J
n
n
n
n
o
[
o
o
"'W""'i" ASTEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECTION
EMC Annual Report
Residuals Management
The Jeffersonville facility generated, and disposed of 937 metric tons of residual solids from
May 1998 through April 1999, 1,237 metric tons from May, 1997 through April, 1998,
1,223 metric tons from May 1996 through April 1997 ,
, 1,189 metric tons from May 1995 through April 1996,
and 972 metric tons from May 1994 through April 1995 .
The increase in solids for the 1997 contract year was
due to an increase in industrial organic loadings. The bio-
solids were disposed of at the Outer Loop Recycling &
Disposal Facility located in Louisville, Kentucky.
EMC continues to look at alternative disposal methods
that may be more cost effective and environmentally
beneficial to the community. Some of the alternatives
being considered are land application, composting and!
or pasteurization. The following graph depicts the total
monthly biosolids removed from the facility.
Comparison of Biosolids Removed
ADril1994 throU!!h Mav 2000
I!!I Biosolids 1994-1995
~ Biosolids ]997-1998
!!!I Biosolids 1995-1996
I!!I Biosolids 1998-l999
200
]00
16)
140
120
2
3
4
5
6
7
EMC Annual Report 15
~ Biosolids 1996 - 'J7
III Biosolids 1999-2IXX)
8
9
10
11
12
n
c
r
L
r
[i
.:
C
r
L.
[
r;
l.J
[
r-
t
L~
n
".wP'V: .;.- ASTEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECTION
EMC Annual Report
Maintenance
Since EMC began operating Jeffersonville, we have imple-
mented a proactive preventive
maintenance program to ensure all work orders are com-
pleted in a timely manner. By the use of our computer-
ized MP2 programs, we are able to prioritize work tasks,
track the work to completion and develop a historical
record of the equipment. Preventive maintenance work
orders are generated daily, weekly, montWy quarterly, etc.
and assigned to the appropriate personnel. Corrective
or immediate maintenance work orders are given top
priority. Operators and maintenance personnel have done an excellent job and have been
very effective in completing work orders in a timely manner. There were 228 unscheduled
work orders completed for 1999-2000 as compared to 279 unscheduled work orders in
1998-1999 as compared to 314 unscheduled work orders in 1997-1998. Some of the
more significant work orders are presented below.
1. Repaired #1 pump at Riverport I Lift
Station.
11. Repaired motor and drive shaft at Spring
Street Lift Station.
2. Repaired Penn Valley Sludge Transfer
pump III press room.
12. Electrical repair at Riverport II.
3. Rebuilt #1 Transfer pump.
13. Completed Tenth Street Lift Station
pump replacement project.
Replaced all belts for Belt Filter Press.
14. Televised and cleaned all troublespots
in the City.
5. Dye tested all homes on Riverside Drive
for sewer connection.
15. Televised main line on Chippewa and
Park Place to check for roots.
6. Televised main sewer line on Tenth Street.
7. Repaired motor at Mill Creek Lift
Station.
16. Installed new switch on tarp cover for
sludge truck.
8. Cleaned several Lift Stations and wet
wells.
17. Replaced reset switch on RAS
station.
9. Repaired pump at Riverport II.
18. Cleaned Tenth Street Lift Station
wetwell.
10. Cleaned # 1 Digester at plant.
EMC Annual Report J 6
[
n
L
n
r:
{ ,
[[
"..'op'
(j
[.:
':1
r
r
r-.
t '
~
W' ASTEWATER TREATMENT & COLLECTION
EMC Annual Report
Capital Improvement Expenditures
The Capital Improvement Program is necessary to ensure safe working conditions for all
employees, proper operation of the collection system and treatment facility, maximize
effluent quality, protect the City's assets, and continue to enhance and improve equip-
ment efficiency. The following is a list of projects completed this past year:
· Installed two new Flygt Pumps at Tenth Street Lift Station.
· Constructed another dumping pad for Vactor and Street Cleanings.
· Installed new force main from Wyandot, Inc. to wastewater
treatement plant.
· Bids were accepted and approved for Influent Flume construc-
tion and Clarifier repair.
Plant Clarifier Repair
o
EMC Annual Report 17
r
,
I
[
r
{
r-
t
L:
"
U
C
r
L
[.
; ';,
."
r
L
n
r
.
t
[
FACILITY SAFETY & TRAINING
EMC Annual Report
The safety of our employees is EMC's number one priority. In 1999-
2000 there were eleven reported injuries. All of
the injuries were among the collections system
maintenance personnel. None of the injuries
resulted in lo!'time. The EMC safety program
has been very successful for the year with a
100% safety rating at the wastewater treatment
facility.
EMC provides an annual safety training schedule
to the Indiana Department of Environmental
Managment (IDEM) for approval of continuing education credits
(CEU). We are proud that our facility offers our employees the chance
to receive 41 CEU s each year. During 1999-2000, EM C operators
received training in several safety areas, including confined space entry,
first aid/cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), lockout/tagout proce-
dures, personal protection, hazardous communications and electrical
. safety.
Operations personnel have also received specific technical training in
lab safety procedures, computers, process control and process opera-
tions theory.
All of these training sessions were conducted
on-site by in-house staff with the exception
of chlorine safety, sulfur dioxide safety, and
self contained breathing apparatuses (SCBA)
safety. The First Aid/CPR course was held
at the Clarksville Wastewater Treatment
Facility and was provided by Joseph
Hembree. Chlorine and sulfur dioxide
training was held at the Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility
and was provided by PB&S Chemical. SCBA safety was held at the
Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility and was provided by Mac
Kirschner of the Jeffersonville Fire Department.. Several members of
the staff received additional training through off-site seminars, work-
shops, and short courses which included MP2 maintenance program
training, basic electrical troubleshooting techniques and process control
training. For the contract year of 1999-2000, employees earned a
total of 32 continuing education credits.
The Jeffersonville Wastewater Treatment Facility takes great pride in
our record of no lost-time accidents. In this year the total lost -time
accident free days passed the 2,011 consecutive day mark.
EMC Annual Report 18
r:
t I
.:.;
'TJJUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT & LABORATORY
n
r,
i ;
t ,/
r-o
t ;
t. ~)
n
tJ
n,",i
" \
,c:i
r>
!:
t !
Laboratory
The Jeffersonville Wastewater Laboratory provides
qualitative and quantitative data for the use in effluent
" limitations, monitoring requirements, and to determine '
the extent of compliance of a permitted industry with
discharge standards. In wastewater analyses, the
laboratory data identify the characteristics of the
treatment plant influent and the final load imposed upon
receiving water resources. Decisions on process
changes and plant modifications may be based upon
the results of laboratory analyses.
Industrial Pretreatment
EMC Annual Report
EMC's Industrial Pretreatment Program intent is to recycle and reclaim industrial and
municipal wastewater and sludge. Also, the Pretreatment Program helps prevent the
introduction of pollutants that will interfere or pass through the treatment process. EMC
monitors eleven industries under the Industrial Pretreatment Program, Alumnitec, Brinley-
Hardy, Industrial Water Recycling (IWR), George Pfau's, Voss Clark, Cargo Clean Inc.,
Dallas Group, Wyandot, PQ Corporation, Edward Vogt Valve Company and Galvpro,
with one more under a draft permit. These permitted industries are monitored through
sampling, inspections, and self-monitoring reports.
Enforcement actions that had taken place in 1999 were for minor noncompliance. There
were no Significant Industrial User's (SID) put on compliance schedules.
We continue to work with all of the industries to insure compliance with the Industrial
Pretreatment Program and assist with their commitment towards their own pollution
prevention programs.
EMC Annual Report 19
n
n
r
L:
n
t ~:
r
,
L
D
C
J.
,j
[
[
rJ
r
t
L,.J
r
I ;
t~
Community Involvement
EMC Annual Report
1999-2000 Community Involvement
EMC is committed to be a good corporate citizen and present the wastewater treatment
facility as an asset for the City. During the past year, EMC has contributed money to the
Clark County FOP, American Red Cross, ORC Little League Baseball, YMCA, Lin-
coln Heritage Council Boy Scouts of America, Fund for the Arts, March of Dimes,
Center for Lay Ministries and the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation. EMC is also a member
of the Southern Indiana Chamber of Commerce, as well as the Indiana Chamber of
Commerce.
r
I i
'-....i
EMC Annual Report 20
fl
tJ
r:
l:j
[
fl
[J
o
G OALS & OBJECTIVES
EMC Annual Report
2000-2001 Goals/Objectives
EMC conducts an annual Business Planning Session among its Jeffersonville employees
(August) which allows us to set our team and personnel goals for the upcoming year. EMC
feels that it is important that the staff have meaningful and obtainable goals. By setting these
goals and giving the staff the tools needed to accomplish them, we feel that productivity
increases, employees show pride in their work, and more efficient and professional services
are provided for the residents of Jeffersonville.
City County Building
City of Jeffersonville, Indiana
EMC Annual Report 21